This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 11, 2006 8:11 AM.
The previous post in this blog was The 3-Variable Funny Test.
The next post in this blog is You bet your life.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
Guess who's got his greasy little fingerprints on that plan to sell off part of Mount Tabor Park.
None other than The Scone himself.
It's why the people of this city love him so much.
Comments (14)
I'm sure this is part of a wider conspiracy to build Condo's in the park, or maybe even install parking meters? I'm going to Jim Karlock's blog to check it out.
The same man who was director when Fox studios "leased" for 50 years part of one of Sydney's signature parks, is now handling the negotiations at Portland Parks.
The water bureau does indeed have an interest in the property being discussed at Mt. Tabor.
While I certainly want to give the other side an opportunity to make their case, from what I have read of this idea so far, I am not favorably inclined to sell, lease or otherwise turn over to any entity any of our Mt. Tabor property.
It does seem a little strange that while Randy's scratching around making parkland out of the nothing under the water towers, Big Pipe's getting ready to give away prime land in one of the city's historic park areas.
Maybe the Historical Society pals that he listens to should send him an IM on this one.
If the maintenance yard is currently a liability, if the neighborhood is cool with getting a sports facility they can use, and if Parks gets some revenue they can use elsewhere...where's the foul and the harm? The maintenance yard is not currently a nieghborhood asset.
That's a lot of ifs...but I think the better question, to get to the heart of this, is less about what happens to Mt Tabor, but what is Parks doing with its maintenance facility plans? Does this make sense, decentralizing? Is this a cost savings, or a goofy part of an on-going reorganization I still don't quite get?
If it's going to cost more money to maintain Parks with the Mt tabor maintenance facility gone, then this is a bad idea on that basis alone.
Frank, come on, wake up and smell the condos. This is just like the Fire Station move. It supposedly had some rationale having to do with administration of core city services, but the real agenda was a condo tower. There's no reason to think that there's anything but real estate development motivating this latest insult to the Tabor neighborhood by Big Pipe. They'll farm out maintenance and turn the yard over to a Joe Weston type, and the deal will be sealed before the neighbors knew what was coming.
According to the news article they are looking at 10 acres, lost. On the other side of Warner Pacific there are some very old duplexes, that are past their design life, that would seem more prudent to develop into an extended campus, and not take away park land. If the land belongs to the neighborhood, if the fields are going to be used by the public, why can the public own them and Warner Pacific pay parks to use them and contribute to maintenance. I heard an old plan called for a conservatory on the site, I think there is a green house there now, where I got a wreath one year. I think the lady that sold it to me said they raised specialty plants for the Chinese and Japanese Garden there.
If the land belongs to the neighborhood, if the fields are going to be used by the public, why can't the public own them and Warner Pacific pay parks to use them and contribute to maintenance.
John, that sounds like a sound plan to me.
The argument you'll get back is that Warner Pacific couldn't successfully do fundraising under this scenario. Well, maybe they need to re-think that. If they want to play in the park, they should be paying for that privilige, and see that it works out for everyone.
I think the lady that sold it to me said they raised specialty plants for the Chinese and Japanese Garden there.
The neighbors used to tell me that lower (west) Tabor serves as a nursery for parks throughout the system. Heaven forbid we should leave it alone when Saltzman's developer buddies are paying for his police pension Band-Aid campaign and whispering sweet density in his ear.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 32
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
I'm sure this is part of a wider conspiracy to build Condo's in the park, or maybe even install parking meters? I'm going to Jim Karlock's blog to check it out.
Posted by CondoBob | October 11, 2006 9:02 AM
Don't laugh about the condos. When they sell the maintenance yard, I'm sure that's what will go there.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 11, 2006 9:36 AM
I actually took the time to read this.
http://www.clovermoore.com/idx.htm?http://www.clovermoore.com/issues/environment/open-space/cpmpt/990719.htm
The rest of the people should.
The same man who was director when Fox studios "leased" for 50 years part of one of Sydney's signature parks, is now handling the negotiations at Portland Parks.
Posted by John Capardoe | October 11, 2006 10:20 AM
And don't forget:
http://www.clovermoore.com/idx.htm?http://www.clovermoore.com/issues/environment/open%2Dspace/cpmpt/mcdonalds/background.htm
Posted by Jack Bog | October 11, 2006 10:29 AM
I understand that the water bureau might own some of that land, so maybe, hopefully Fireman Randy will help save the day.
Posted by John Capardoe | October 11, 2006 11:34 AM
Where's Homer?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | October 11, 2006 12:04 PM
The water bureau does indeed have an interest in the property being discussed at Mt. Tabor.
While I certainly want to give the other side an opportunity to make their case, from what I have read of this idea so far, I am not favorably inclined to sell, lease or otherwise turn over to any entity any of our Mt. Tabor property.
Posted by Randy Leonard | October 11, 2006 5:14 PM
It does seem a little strange that while Randy's scratching around making parkland out of the nothing under the water towers, Big Pipe's getting ready to give away prime land in one of the city's historic park areas.
Maybe the Historical Society pals that he listens to should send him an IM on this one.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 11, 2006 5:36 PM
If the maintenance yard is currently a liability, if the neighborhood is cool with getting a sports facility they can use, and if Parks gets some revenue they can use elsewhere...where's the foul and the harm? The maintenance yard is not currently a nieghborhood asset.
That's a lot of ifs...but I think the better question, to get to the heart of this, is less about what happens to Mt Tabor, but what is Parks doing with its maintenance facility plans? Does this make sense, decentralizing? Is this a cost savings, or a goofy part of an on-going reorganization I still don't quite get?
If it's going to cost more money to maintain Parks with the Mt tabor maintenance facility gone, then this is a bad idea on that basis alone.
Posted by Frank Dufay | October 11, 2006 9:38 PM
Frank, come on, wake up and smell the condos. This is just like the Fire Station move. It supposedly had some rationale having to do with administration of core city services, but the real agenda was a condo tower. There's no reason to think that there's anything but real estate development motivating this latest insult to the Tabor neighborhood by Big Pipe. They'll farm out maintenance and turn the yard over to a Joe Weston type, and the deal will be sealed before the neighbors knew what was coming.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 11, 2006 9:48 PM
They'll farm out maintenance and turn the yard over to a Joe Weston type, and the deal will be sealed before the neighbors knew what was coming.
Jack, if that happens I'll be out there with the rest of you, with my pitchfork and torch.
Posted by Frank Dufay | October 11, 2006 11:14 PM
Frank,
According to the news article they are looking at 10 acres, lost. On the other side of Warner Pacific there are some very old duplexes, that are past their design life, that would seem more prudent to develop into an extended campus, and not take away park land. If the land belongs to the neighborhood, if the fields are going to be used by the public, why can the public own them and Warner Pacific pay parks to use them and contribute to maintenance. I heard an old plan called for a conservatory on the site, I think there is a green house there now, where I got a wreath one year. I think the lady that sold it to me said they raised specialty plants for the Chinese and Japanese Garden there.
Posted by John Capradoe | October 11, 2006 11:48 PM
If the land belongs to the neighborhood, if the fields are going to be used by the public, why can't the public own them and Warner Pacific pay parks to use them and contribute to maintenance.
John, that sounds like a sound plan to me.
The argument you'll get back is that Warner Pacific couldn't successfully do fundraising under this scenario. Well, maybe they need to re-think that. If they want to play in the park, they should be paying for that privilige, and see that it works out for everyone.
Posted by Frank Dufay | October 12, 2006 12:07 AM
I think the lady that sold it to me said they raised specialty plants for the Chinese and Japanese Garden there.
The neighbors used to tell me that lower (west) Tabor serves as a nursery for parks throughout the system. Heaven forbid we should leave it alone when Saltzman's developer buddies are paying for his police pension Band-Aid campaign and whispering sweet density in his ear.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 12, 2006 1:11 AM