The O's Maxine Bernstein has the latest on the death of James Chasse in Portland police custody Sunday night.
And the news is not good.
When a story dribbles out like this, it's a bad sign. Mayor Potter, perhaps your "vision" of Portland needs to include something better than this.
Comments (30)
Very sad to read the name and see the picture first on your blog Jack. I knew Jim Jim for 25+ years off and on. He was a gentle soul at all times, a man who was kind and calm and loved music - especially anything from the Velvet Underground. Back the about 1977 or 1978 Jim even fronted a band - I think it was called the Psychedelic Combo. Played at The Long Goodbye on 10th and NW Everett. I remember long talks in front of the Central Library - often drifting away in the breeze.
This is a sad day for Jim Jim, for his family, for all the people who helped him over the years, and for the police officers who evidentially have been instructed from the wrong book.
Is it possible that Jim was resisting arrest, thereby escalating the level of force deployed by the officers?
Yes, it is possible, and it sounds like that's what was going on. However, just as in the shooting in Tigard recently, it sounds as though the cops in question used excessively poor judgement as to the appropriate "level of force." And, in this case, they also apparently erred in bringing him back to the station in a squad car rather than letting him go with the medics.
""They were yelling at him to get on his stomach."
I think Miss Manners should assist in writing the new book on Police Procedures. They should have said 'Please Mofo down on your stomach.' Just a suggestion.
This is a pretty sad story to read. I work downtown in a facility that serves the homeless mentally ill and, in my five years in that job, I have been present dozens and dozens of times when cops have come to engage our clients (whether we called the cops ourselves or the cops became involved in some other way) and I suppose we've been lucky because the cops I've watched have almost always been pretty great. Once upon a time some of those cops used to recieve something called "crisis intervention training" which was meant to teach them how to engage (specifically) mentally ill people in non-lethal ways. I think that training has long since gone away, but the spirit of it has persisted among many downtown cops. Although, this is certainly a departure. Resisting arrest is definitely troubling, but I'd like to see the policy book that suggests repeatedly kicking a subject in the stomach to help control him.
My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100.
Of course, he never boarded our new tram on a cold, rainy, windy winter's night, did he?
The Crisis Intervention Training program still exists but few cops take it. It means taking extra calls, extra paperwork, often involves leaving your district so others cover for you and offers no monetary reward for the additional hassle. This leads me to believe Portland Police Bureau management isn't serious about CIT.
When a suspect fights it means a potentially life-threatening situation for an officer. From the article, this guy did more than resist--he fought and attacked. The "official" hand-to-hand fighting methods taught by Portland are as useful as any martial art's "moves". In other words, hardly at all. Unlike movies, real fights don't have scripts and cops don't have Vulcan pinches. Kicks to the stomach can be appropriate if it matches the authorized level of force.
It was claimed cops erred "in bringing him back to the station in a squad car rather than letting him go with the medics"? Portland cops never stop medics from providing medical care. According to the article medics arrived on scene. Indeed, it must've been at the officers' request. If the suspect went with police then the medics either cleared the guy or the guy refused further medical care.
RE: the Tigard shooting being "excessively poor judgement" [sic]. A guy with a knife threatens to kill people, says "Someone's gonna die tonight", behaves consistent with such proclamations, refuses to disarm and then starts heading out of view and into close proximity with innocents. Would you let him go inside and potentially kill people?
Armchair quarterbacks like to think "I'd have handled that differently", and by "differently" they think "perfectly". Well, there almost never is a perfect way to handle something. Policing isn't calculus or physics. People--and believe it or not cops are people--can take different yet reasonable approaches. The issue isn't whether a cop does something you like or not, it's whether it was legal and reasonable.
Armchair quarterbacks like to think "I'd have handled that differently", and by "differently" they think "perfectly".
It's not so much that I am thinking "I'd have handled that differently," rather "I wish our police department was adequately trained to handle that differently." I hate to rehash the Tigard thing, but go listen to the 911 call: the cops show up and start screaming at the kid, telling him they're going to shoot. Witnesses say their guns were drawn immediately, and they immediately went into a very aggressive mode...and this is with a kid who they KNEW was drunk and suicidal.
Also, re. this case: the cops didn't send him with the medics, and then when they finally got around to deciding that he needed medical care (after his SECOND bout of breathing difficulties at the jail), they took him to the hospital in a squad car. A squad car. Not being a cop, I don't know this for sure, but I'm guessing that there wasn't a trained medical professional in the back seat with him.
Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. And, frankly, I'd rather be an armchair quarterback than an armchair apologist.
"My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100."
I must say Ricky's right, in a way, because as poet William S. Burroughs once said:
"You have to be a deviant in America or you will die of boredom."
But seriously, I wonder if the dead guy, Jimmy C, would have chosen to listen to the cops had he known his absolute refusal would be the last in a life-long series of mistakes he has made on Earth.
Assume that this guy was on crack. Assume that he didn't want to turn over on his stomach for the cops. Assume that he tried to run away and didn't want to go to jail on a drug charge. "Resisting arrest" is not carte blanche for the cops to execute people in a free society. There is no evidence to suggest that he was armed or dangerous or otherwise presented an imminent threat of serious bodily harm to anyone. He was uncooperative. Two eyewitnesses who have filed formal complaints against the officers involved in the incident felt that the level of force used to neutralize this guy was excessive. More troubling, is that after he went into what sounds like temporary respiratory failure for several minutes, he wasn't take by ambulance to an emergency room for appropriate medical treatment. Witnesses reportedly heard him beg the paramedics not to leave the scene. The cops subsequently loaded him into their squad car like a dead deer with his hands and feet bound, and he died in transit. Sounds like the cops screwed up on this one as well as the paramedics who prematurely abandoned a patient in need of treatment.
After rereading the article and comments regarding the Chasse death, it appears Dave and I are speaking about different situations.
The article said the locations occurred in this order: scene, jail, 33/Sandy on the way to Adventist. Dave originally said the cops were taking the guy to the "station", which I thought meant jail. By his second comment, I guess he meant Adventist. The two situations are quite different. I was speaking about the first.
The odds of having a medic in the backseat on the way to Adventist approach zero.
"Hog-tying" is reserved for the most combative suspects and is rarely done.
There are so many questions left. It's wayyy too soon to make an informed analysis. Blame, if any, cannot be properly allocated yet.
The officers requested medical attention for Chase because he appeared to be having trouble breathing. After being medically evaluated, Chase was taken to the Multnomah County Detention Center to be booked on charges of resisting arrest, assaulting a police officer and interfering with a police officer. Police say he continued to battle with corrections officers.
While at the booking facility, Chase again had breathing problems. Because of his difficulty breathing, Chase was taken by patrol car to a local hospital and at some point, appeared to lose consciousness. The transporting officers tried to resuscitate Chase, and medical personnel eventually took over. Chase was pronounced dead at a local hospital.
Well, being one of the few witness's, who actually took pictures of the aftermath, I can safely say, this was handled VERY POORLY! What all the reports are failing to say, was that James, the victim, was repeatedly kicked in the back of the head, also. So, picture this, being tased, being punched in the face, and being kicked in the back of the head. Is that deescaltion tactics 101? Or is that the allowed torture that seems to rampant in our government now? I dont know what anyone did to deserve to be brutally beaten by cops, RIGHT IN THE FRICKEN PEARL!!! The supposed posh posh sheik part of Portland. I have given my statements to several sources, and I hope the justice is served. Even if it means the cops have to serve 10k hours of community service for Sisters of the Road!
And to the gentleman who knew the victim, can you tell me a little bit more about him? Is there going to be a memorial service for him?
Interesting background on an eyewitness to the alleged excessive use of force...The Rev. Randall Stewart (quoted by KGW tonight) was ordained in the "Alliance of Divine Love, Inc." Church. I didn't know that churces could incorporate?
"My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100."
As someone said elsewhere:
Does that include when they ask to see your tattoo?
"Then you file a complaint, and/or sue.
That way, you live."
Yes, of course, because we know the cops never hurt or kill people by mistake, unnecessarily or without just cause, right? That must be why they're investigating this as a homicide.
But then again, you also wrote: "But can we also agree that if you werent doing something that required their attendance, it would not be an issue?"
No, Jon, I cannot agree with that.
First of all, I guess you've never heard of DWB - Driving While Black, huh?
Secondly, that mentality smacks of the same that says it's OK for the NSA to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens, because if you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.
Finally, as far as this case goes, according to the latest, this transient's "odd behavior" led officers to him.
So now "odd behavior" requires "the attendance" of cops now, does it?
Now, the story is that they thought he might have been urinating in the street. But they told witnesses he was being arrested for possession of crack cocaine.
Blunt force trauma is what killed a man in Portland Police custody, according to the state medical examiner.
Officials say James Chasse died from a broad blow to the chest, and have ruled the death accidental. A toxicology report also came back negative.
Police took Chasse into custody Sunday night after a confrontation in Northwest Portland. Officers said he was acting odd or may have been intoxicated.
Blunt force. I.e., getting punched or kicked in the chest. He was NOT on drugs. Guess acting strange now is all the cops need to kill you.
In looking at the range of comments above, I
am appalled at how many of you are so quick
to believe the "official" version as if it is the truth.
Where have you people been all these years?
Don't you know how bad and often
the cops here tell self-serving lies?
I think it demonstrates you level of IQ if
you're so quick to believe them...very low
and in same range as theirs!
This is so very, very sad. So sad that the police so violently took (yet another) life. So sad that so many people are so brainwahsed by the system that they would strain all credibility to blame the man who was killed rather than the police. It hurts to think about this poor man being kicked in the head and beaten and attacked with tasers, the way witnesses describe. It hurts that people are actually trying to say he "had it coming."
Are we all so willing to believe that the police never do wrong? Is it so easy to live in such a simple world, where the police are the white hats, that we can really look the other way and pretend this man really deserved this?
In my mind, it is sinful to blame the victim of this crime. The fact that the men who did this wore badges only makes it more unforgiveable, not less. I think the people trying to play apologist for them must either be police officers themselves, or they must be unfathomably deluded by the years they've spent soaking up commercials from the corporate media.
As a fitting MEMORIAL for James, why don't
we as a community arrange for a Memorial
showing of the highly acclaimed movie....
V FOR VENDETTI
It would be very much in keeping with the tragic
nature of his death, and might give the community
a few ideas as how best to combat this growing abuse
of force and police brutality by our local brutes 'n' thugs
that the PoPo have become.
PS: I wonder if any of the cops involved
are members of BROTHERHOOD OF THE STRONG?
I see the Indymedia contingent has arrived. So much for polite and intelligent discussion. Prepare for the revolution! Rise up against the murderous pigs! I'll just go hit my head against a wall.
James was not transient, he lived in a halfway house for the mentally ill 5 blocks from the scene of his arrest.
James was not on ANYthing, he has suffered from phsycotic illness since his late teens, and was cared for and loved by family and friends.
If somebody had just tackled you to the ground, breaking several ribs, you wouldn't want to lay on your stomach either. James ran in the first place because he was scared, and fought back for the same reason.
Jamiem: now that you're able to channel the Ghost of James into your keyboard, ask him if he was prescribed any anti-phsycotic medications that he should have been taking.
Also: was he receiving any kind of therapy at the halfway house or elsewhere? If everybody knew he was severely mentally ill, it would be a systemic failure if nobody was treating him.
I knew JimJim in the late 70s, early 80s. I was in a band with him for a short time. a gentle soul.
he may have been problematic with the cops and they got rough. But the autopsy shows a lot more than rough. resisting arrrest does not warrant beatings. miss you JJ.
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Uh oh:
» Beaten to death from Jack Bog's Blog
It's late Friday afternoon -- time for all the news that the government doesn't want you to see. Here's the latest from the powers that be on the poor sap who was killed by the Portland police last Sunday: He died of blunt force trauma to the chest. Th... [Read More]
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (30)
Very sad to read the name and see the picture first on your blog Jack. I knew Jim Jim for 25+ years off and on. He was a gentle soul at all times, a man who was kind and calm and loved music - especially anything from the Velvet Underground. Back the about 1977 or 1978 Jim even fronted a band - I think it was called the Psychedelic Combo. Played at The Long Goodbye on 10th and NW Everett. I remember long talks in front of the Central Library - often drifting away in the breeze.
This is a sad day for Jim Jim, for his family, for all the people who helped him over the years, and for the police officers who evidentially have been instructed from the wrong book.
Posted by C | September 21, 2006 5:41 AM
What role did Jim play in the choices that led him to be confronted by the Police?
Is it possible that Jim was resisting arrest, thereby escalating the level of force deployed by the officers?
Is personal responsibility limited to the officers and deep pockets?
Posted by Mister Tee | September 21, 2006 6:15 AM
Perhaps Paul Harvey will bring us "The Rest of the Story" as there are some Big holes to fill in this news.
Posted by Abe | September 21, 2006 7:09 AM
The man was yelling, "I won't, I won't. I won't get on my stomach," and kept struggling with the officers, the witnesses said.
Sounds like resisting to me...
Posted by Jon | September 21, 2006 7:42 AM
Is it possible that Jim was resisting arrest, thereby escalating the level of force deployed by the officers?
Yes, it is possible, and it sounds like that's what was going on. However, just as in the shooting in Tigard recently, it sounds as though the cops in question used excessively poor judgement as to the appropriate "level of force." And, in this case, they also apparently erred in bringing him back to the station in a squad car rather than letting him go with the medics.
Posted by Dave J. | September 21, 2006 8:45 AM
""They were yelling at him to get on his stomach."
I think Miss Manners should assist in writing the new book on Police Procedures. They should have said 'Please Mofo down on your stomach.' Just a suggestion.
Posted by tom | September 21, 2006 8:52 AM
This is a pretty sad story to read. I work downtown in a facility that serves the homeless mentally ill and, in my five years in that job, I have been present dozens and dozens of times when cops have come to engage our clients (whether we called the cops ourselves or the cops became involved in some other way) and I suppose we've been lucky because the cops I've watched have almost always been pretty great. Once upon a time some of those cops used to recieve something called "crisis intervention training" which was meant to teach them how to engage (specifically) mentally ill people in non-lethal ways. I think that training has long since gone away, but the spirit of it has persisted among many downtown cops. Although, this is certainly a departure. Resisting arrest is definitely troubling, but I'd like to see the policy book that suggests repeatedly kicking a subject in the stomach to help control him.
Posted by dawn | September 21, 2006 9:11 AM
My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100.
Of course, he never boarded our new tram on a cold, rainy, windy winter's night, did he?
Posted by Daphne | September 21, 2006 11:13 AM
A few points:
The Crisis Intervention Training program still exists but few cops take it. It means taking extra calls, extra paperwork, often involves leaving your district so others cover for you and offers no monetary reward for the additional hassle. This leads me to believe Portland Police Bureau management isn't serious about CIT.
When a suspect fights it means a potentially life-threatening situation for an officer. From the article, this guy did more than resist--he fought and attacked. The "official" hand-to-hand fighting methods taught by Portland are as useful as any martial art's "moves". In other words, hardly at all. Unlike movies, real fights don't have scripts and cops don't have Vulcan pinches. Kicks to the stomach can be appropriate if it matches the authorized level of force.
It was claimed cops erred "in bringing him back to the station in a squad car rather than letting him go with the medics"? Portland cops never stop medics from providing medical care. According to the article medics arrived on scene. Indeed, it must've been at the officers' request. If the suspect went with police then the medics either cleared the guy or the guy refused further medical care.
RE: the Tigard shooting being "excessively poor judgement" [sic]. A guy with a knife threatens to kill people, says "Someone's gonna die tonight", behaves consistent with such proclamations, refuses to disarm and then starts heading out of view and into close proximity with innocents. Would you let him go inside and potentially kill people?
Armchair quarterbacks like to think "I'd have handled that differently", and by "differently" they think "perfectly". Well, there almost never is a perfect way to handle something. Policing isn't calculus or physics. People--and believe it or not cops are people--can take different yet reasonable approaches. The issue isn't whether a cop does something you like or not, it's whether it was legal and reasonable.
Posted by anahit | September 21, 2006 11:33 AM
Armchair quarterbacks like to think "I'd have handled that differently", and by "differently" they think "perfectly".
It's not so much that I am thinking "I'd have handled that differently," rather "I wish our police department was adequately trained to handle that differently." I hate to rehash the Tigard thing, but go listen to the 911 call: the cops show up and start screaming at the kid, telling him they're going to shoot. Witnesses say their guns were drawn immediately, and they immediately went into a very aggressive mode...and this is with a kid who they KNEW was drunk and suicidal.
Also, re. this case: the cops didn't send him with the medics, and then when they finally got around to deciding that he needed medical care (after his SECOND bout of breathing difficulties at the jail), they took him to the hospital in a squad car. A squad car. Not being a cop, I don't know this for sure, but I'm guessing that there wasn't a trained medical professional in the back seat with him.
Sloppy, sloppy, sloppy. And, frankly, I'd rather be an armchair quarterback than an armchair apologist.
Posted by Dave J. | September 21, 2006 11:53 AM
"My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100."
If you don't die of boredom at 50.
Posted by rickyragg | September 21, 2006 11:57 AM
I must say Ricky's right, in a way, because as poet William S. Burroughs once said:
"You have to be a deviant in America or you will die of boredom."
But seriously, I wonder if the dead guy, Jimmy C, would have chosen to listen to the cops had he known his absolute refusal would be the last in a life-long series of mistakes he has made on Earth.
Wonder....
Posted by Daphne | September 21, 2006 12:37 PM
Actually, to more accurately convey the point of the quote:
"In the U.S. you have to be a deviant or exist in extreme boredom... Make no mistake, all intellectuals are deviants in the U.S."
Posted by rickyragg | September 21, 2006 12:45 PM
Assume that this guy was on crack. Assume that he didn't want to turn over on his stomach for the cops. Assume that he tried to run away and didn't want to go to jail on a drug charge. "Resisting arrest" is not carte blanche for the cops to execute people in a free society. There is no evidence to suggest that he was armed or dangerous or otherwise presented an imminent threat of serious bodily harm to anyone. He was uncooperative. Two eyewitnesses who have filed formal complaints against the officers involved in the incident felt that the level of force used to neutralize this guy was excessive. More troubling, is that after he went into what sounds like temporary respiratory failure for several minutes, he wasn't take by ambulance to an emergency room for appropriate medical treatment. Witnesses reportedly heard him beg the paramedics not to leave the scene. The cops subsequently loaded him into their squad car like a dead deer with his hands and feet bound, and he died in transit. Sounds like the cops screwed up on this one as well as the paramedics who prematurely abandoned a patient in need of treatment.
Posted by Kevin | September 21, 2006 2:46 PM
After rereading the article and comments regarding the Chasse death, it appears Dave and I are speaking about different situations.
The article said the locations occurred in this order: scene, jail, 33/Sandy on the way to Adventist. Dave originally said the cops were taking the guy to the "station", which I thought meant jail. By his second comment, I guess he meant Adventist. The two situations are quite different. I was speaking about the first.
The odds of having a medic in the backseat on the way to Adventist approach zero.
"Hog-tying" is reserved for the most combative suspects and is rarely done.
There are so many questions left. It's wayyy too soon to make an informed analysis. Blame, if any, cannot be properly allocated yet.
Posted by anahit | September 21, 2006 3:04 PM
Anahit--here's what I was referring to:
The officers requested medical attention for Chase because he appeared to be having trouble breathing. After being medically evaluated, Chase was taken to the Multnomah County Detention Center to be booked on charges of resisting arrest, assaulting a police officer and interfering with a police officer. Police say he continued to battle with corrections officers.
While at the booking facility, Chase again had breathing problems. Because of his difficulty breathing, Chase was taken by patrol car to a local hospital and at some point, appeared to lose consciousness. The transporting officers tried to resuscitate Chase, and medical personnel eventually took over. Chase was pronounced dead at a local hospital.
Posted by Dave J. | September 21, 2006 3:16 PM
Well, being one of the few witness's, who actually took pictures of the aftermath, I can safely say, this was handled VERY POORLY! What all the reports are failing to say, was that James, the victim, was repeatedly kicked in the back of the head, also. So, picture this, being tased, being punched in the face, and being kicked in the back of the head. Is that deescaltion tactics 101? Or is that the allowed torture that seems to rampant in our government now? I dont know what anyone did to deserve to be brutally beaten by cops, RIGHT IN THE FRICKEN PEARL!!! The supposed posh posh sheik part of Portland. I have given my statements to several sources, and I hope the justice is served. Even if it means the cops have to serve 10k hours of community service for Sisters of the Road!
And to the gentleman who knew the victim, can you tell me a little bit more about him? Is there going to be a memorial service for him?
Posted by jamie | September 21, 2006 4:49 PM
Interesting background on an eyewitness to the alleged excessive use of force...The Rev. Randall Stewart (quoted by KGW tonight) was ordained in the "Alliance of Divine Love, Inc." Church. I didn't know that churces could incorporate?
http://www.allianceofdivinelove.org/
Posted by Mister Tee | September 21, 2006 6:19 PM
"My father always said if you live right, eat right, say no to the deadliest drugs on Earth (beer and alcohol) and do what the cops command, you'll live to be 100."
As someone said elsewhere:
Does that include when they ask to see your tattoo?
Posted by Madam Hatter | September 21, 2006 7:20 PM
As someone said elsewhere:
Does that include when they ask to see your tattoo?
Yes, it does.
Then you file a complaint, and/or sue.
That way, you live.
Posted by Jon | September 22, 2006 10:32 AM
"Then you file a complaint, and/or sue.
That way, you live."
Yes, of course, because we know the cops never hurt or kill people by mistake, unnecessarily or without just cause, right? That must be why they're investigating this as a homicide.
But then again, you also wrote:
"But can we also agree that if you werent doing something that required their attendance, it would not be an issue?"
No, Jon, I cannot agree with that.
First of all, I guess you've never heard of DWB - Driving While Black, huh?
Secondly, that mentality smacks of the same that says it's OK for the NSA to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens, because if you're not doing anything wrong, you have nothing to worry about.
Finally, as far as this case goes, according to the latest, this transient's "odd behavior" led officers to him.
So now "odd behavior" requires "the attendance" of cops now, does it?
Now, the story is that they thought he might have been urinating in the street. But they told witnesses he was being arrested for possession of crack cocaine.
How many civil remedies does a corpse have, Jon?
Posted by Madam Hatter | September 22, 2006 2:47 PM
The latest:
Blunt force trauma is what killed a man in Portland Police custody, according to the state medical examiner.
Officials say James Chasse died from a broad blow to the chest, and have ruled the death accidental. A toxicology report also came back negative.
Police took Chasse into custody Sunday night after a confrontation in Northwest Portland. Officers said he was acting odd or may have been intoxicated.
Blunt force. I.e., getting punched or kicked in the chest. He was NOT on drugs. Guess acting strange now is all the cops need to kill you.
Posted by Dave J. | September 22, 2006 4:34 PM
In looking at the range of comments above, I
am appalled at how many of you are so quick
to believe the "official" version as if it is the truth.
Where have you people been all these years?
Don't you know how bad and often
the cops here tell self-serving lies?
I think it demonstrates you level of IQ if
you're so quick to believe them...very low
and in same range as theirs!
Posted by Pete J. | September 22, 2006 9:20 PM
This is so very, very sad. So sad that the police so violently took (yet another) life. So sad that so many people are so brainwahsed by the system that they would strain all credibility to blame the man who was killed rather than the police. It hurts to think about this poor man being kicked in the head and beaten and attacked with tasers, the way witnesses describe. It hurts that people are actually trying to say he "had it coming."
Are we all so willing to believe that the police never do wrong? Is it so easy to live in such a simple world, where the police are the white hats, that we can really look the other way and pretend this man really deserved this?
In my mind, it is sinful to blame the victim of this crime. The fact that the men who did this wore badges only makes it more unforgiveable, not less. I think the people trying to play apologist for them must either be police officers themselves, or they must be unfathomably deluded by the years they've spent soaking up commercials from the corporate media.
Posted by catherine | September 23, 2006 9:40 AM
As a fitting MEMORIAL for James, why don't
we as a community arrange for a Memorial
showing of the highly acclaimed movie....
V FOR VENDETTI
It would be very much in keeping with the tragic
nature of his death, and might give the community
a few ideas as how best to combat this growing abuse
of force and police brutality by our local brutes 'n' thugs
that the PoPo have become.
PS: I wonder if any of the cops involved
are members of BROTHERHOOD OF THE STRONG?
Posted by Little Lou Lou | September 23, 2006 1:27 PM
I see the Indymedia contingent has arrived. So much for polite and intelligent discussion. Prepare for the revolution! Rise up against the murderous pigs! I'll just go hit my head against a wall.
Posted by JP | September 23, 2006 3:47 PM
A few clarifications...
James was not transient, he lived in a halfway house for the mentally ill 5 blocks from the scene of his arrest.
James was not on ANYthing, he has suffered from phsycotic illness since his late teens, and was cared for and loved by family and friends.
If somebody had just tackled you to the ground, breaking several ribs, you wouldn't want to lay on your stomach either. James ran in the first place because he was scared, and fought back for the same reason.
Posted by jamiem | September 26, 2006 7:33 PM
Jamiem: now that you're able to channel the Ghost of James into your keyboard, ask him if he was prescribed any anti-phsycotic medications that he should have been taking.
Also: was he receiving any kind of therapy at the halfway house or elsewhere? If everybody knew he was severely mentally ill, it would be a systemic failure if nobody was treating him.
Posted by Mister Tee | September 26, 2006 10:22 PM
For images and information on WHO Jim Jim (AKA James Chasse) was, check out my short memoire:
www.lovelake.org/diary1.htm
He was an artist and a writer, already a the age of 14. He had a franzine which had some great artists contributing to it, like Mike King.
And far from any kind of hopeless throw away!
Posted by eva lake | September 27, 2006 10:03 PM
I knew JimJim in the late 70s, early 80s. I was in a band with him for a short time. a gentle soul.
he may have been problematic with the cops and they got rough. But the autopsy shows a lot more than rough. resisting arrrest does not warrant beatings. miss you JJ.
Posted by Mr MIke | October 7, 2006 7:10 PM