This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on
November 23, 2011 4:48 AM.
The previous post in this blog was
U of O president canned!.
The next post in this blog is
Holiday 'dogs.
Many more can be found on the
main index page or by looking through
the archives.
Comments (11)
I run Astersik on a box to filter my calls, good from bad and unknown, and optionally play the following message:
Current legislation, state and federal, is just too watered down, and caps recovery.
Would the following wording make it more difficult for me to try to collect on my verbal agreement(s)?
Replacement text for 47 U.S.C. 227(f)(1):
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:H.R.3035:That does not appear to be limited to mobile phone (robo)calls.
Call me, often. Robocallers are the best. If I successfully collect on the agreement(s) in court . . .
Posted by pdxnag | November 23, 2011 6:22 AM
"What politician in his right mind would support this?"
Answer: Considering our current corporatocracy, most of them.
Posted by langston | November 23, 2011 7:19 AM
Schumer is a clown show and has been for years
Posted by paul | November 23, 2011 7:25 AM
What Langston said
Posted by Portland Native | November 23, 2011 7:49 AM
Schumer is a clown show
Maybe, but did you take the trouble to read the first few words of the linked article, which indicate that Schumer is warning against the proposed bill? Are you saying you're in favor of unsolicited marketing robocalls to my cell phone?
Posted by Allan L. | November 23, 2011 7:57 AM
Per the linked article: Do we really want to stop FedEx or UPS using modern technology to deliver your holiday gifts on time? Of course not, but that is what we heard at the hearing is one consequence of this 20-year old law.
No it isn't. If I want FedEx or UPS or anyone else to call me upon delivery, I can give them the phone number when I place the order. They don't know if it's a cell or landline phone; they just call whatever number I give them. And they're expected to use it only for that, per our current law. Which is the way things should stay.
What we really need is a comprehensive Federal policy like this, so that we aren't always playing catch-up as technology changes.
Posted by John Rettig | November 23, 2011 9:45 AM
Do we have politicians with a "right mind"?
Posted by George | November 23, 2011 10:40 AM
At what point does this marketing strategy backfire?
If Joe's Market is robo-calling my cell phone, potentially costing me money for each call he sends me, I'm going to get mad and refuse to shop there. Ditto for Vote For Mike or anybody else.
Posted by Michelle | November 23, 2011 11:07 AM
Apparently, the creeps who keep calling my cell phone from FL regarding my back pain -which I do not have, BTW- didn't get the memo.
Posted by Ex-bartender | November 23, 2011 6:05 PM
Why would anyone need to support it? I've been getting calls for years.
Posted by Jo | November 24, 2011 3:54 PM
Perhaps we will get some right (or left) minded politicians in the next auction cycle. Could happen.
Posted by Jo | November 25, 2011 12:51 AM