Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 14, 2013 2:23 PM. The previous post in this blog was Stenchy bringing people together. The next post in this blog is Another Portland wrecker heads down under. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Quotation of the Year (so far)

"Oversized buildings are destroying the fabric of our city," she says.

"Our"? Sorry, no. Unless you're Homer Williams or Mark Edlen.

Comments (15)

Let's not forget that a city which cannot add land still must try to get more property tax revenue by raising the value of every square foot of property within the city. Isn't that really what infill, limited lot sizes, apartments w/o parking, and all the other schemes are really about? The city doesn't care about livability, it's all about increasing the tax money to spend.

"This isn't about killing the development; it was never about that," said Helen Gundlach, board president. "Developers could've had a great building. They just wouldn't give on any of our concerns."

To each their own as to how they wish to project their issues. My point is that we have been too much Portland Polite.

How about a neighborhood finally saying we simply have had enough, we don't want the development where the city has given the keys to whatever the developers have wanted until our codes for good livability have been chipped away. Our property values are being eroded as is the character of our neighborhood. I guess Portland Polite wouldn't dare say they wouldn't want development, funny how in Boulder, CO they had a building moratorium. (Don't know current status)

That developers wouldn't give on any of their concerns tells me it has been a losing game in our city, where the neighbors are ALWAYS put in the position of compromise.

Of course it costs so much money ($30,000 in this case) to appeal a land use decision that mere mortals cannot afford to object! That is the plan! That's how the city and the developers get what they want and to hell with what the people who actually live or work in the neighborhood think!
Sorry Goose loose! And your taxes will go up, the services and livability will decline. There will be NO parking any more. Oh, and the city will probably rename the area too. Goose plebeian!
I am getting SO disgusted with this town.

So, the residents of the 27-unit, four-story condo building built 14 years ago don't want a similar (but taller? perhaps) building going in across the street and blocking their views, removing some green space, harming the historic nature of the neighborhood and impacting traffic and parking.

Wonder what the neighbors thought when the Arbor Vista was built. . . .

Not that they're wrong. It's just a bit ironic. (And it seems they got a tax exemption for the first five years, to boot.)

It's called "vertical urban sprawl".

"Planning" was supposed to be about avoiding strip malls. These cr-apartment bunkers are just strip malls tipped up on their sides. They're not "green," they're just "greed."

Yes, the pattern and the formula is down alright. How about a survey we citizens initiate with such questions what is your level of disgust with this town?

Like I have said before, they get an inch, a foot and then go miles riding roughshod over our codes and livability! Ironically, we have one who did a lot of damage before he left and now is back in, the fox in the hen-house!

City Hall: "We value the opinions of our neighborhoods"...until out-of-state developer money talks.

Out-of-state, in-state -- a turd is a turd is a turd.

Sarah Ames, do you have any proof that Arbor Vista got any 5 year tax exemption? Is it something to do with being a TOD? And will/would the new proposal across the street get a tax exemption?

Anyone have a number of how many "units" get tax abatements?
Maybe the Office of Equity ought to look into this one?
We have seniors who can hardly hold onto their homes with property tax increases and then we have those living in luxury condos who pay little to nothing if at all?

I live in Arbor Vista, it was built in 1999. It was developed as a mixed income building (40% market rate and 60% subsidized), with incentives for first time home buyers that qualified as low income owners--including a 10 year tax abatement.

I would like to add information on one of the homeowners main concerns which was not addressed in the article. Our 4-block neighborhood has only one way in and out of the neighborhood - the light at SW 20th & Jefferson. All the streets dead-end and one is exceptionally steep, making circulation a challenge.

The proposed building of 134 units (and 122 for-rent parking spaces) will increase vehicle trips and parking 4-times current usage, (by our calculations 200+ cars will be moving in). It is our concern that the 50 on-street public parking spaces cannot handle the increased demand, and the street grid will be congested with vehicles looking for parking. Not to mention weekly moving vans, delivery trucks, etc.

It is not 100% about views, it is also about preserving quality of life. Below are the defined goals of design review from our case packet.

“Design review ensures that development conserves and enhances the recognized special design values of a site or area. Design review is used to ensure the conservation, enhancement, and continued vitality of the identified scenic, architectural, and cultural values of each design district or area. Design review ensures that certain types of infill development will be compatible with the neighborhood and enhance the area. Design review is also used in certain cases to review public and private projects to ensure that they are of a high design quality.”

AV Homeowner, thank you for the info. As you know there is much more verbiage is the Title 33 Design Review requirements. But even taking the simplified Purpose of Design Review that you quote, and in the context of being in a historical district, such words as "scenic, architectural, and cultural" provides fodder to challenge.

The site being in a steep terrain area of our city with scenic and territorial views, should be addressed. Goose Hollow with it's historical buildings, scale of homes, churches and business has to be respected. And its long time cultural history to the city has to be recognized. These being all subjective, meaning interpretations can go many way, it's still appealable. It can go the neighborhoods way just as well as the developers/CoP's Planners way.

There also the scale of the proposed project being almost twice the height of your condos and density/number of units being 5 times greater. This dichotomy falls under the "architectural" category as well as the "compatibility with the neighborhood".

Nimbyism will be called out. And maybe the proposal isn't all bad. But gross infill throughout our city must be addressed.

Unless the area is in a recognized historic district, good luck with fighting anything but the strict zoning guidelines (for which developers can request a variance, and which they usually win). When we fought an oversized condo in our neighborhood, we had a lot of very valid reasons to reject their variance request. The property-owning neighbors and the neighborhood association were almost completely united again the project. And the land use people just kept telling us that those things didn't matter because they weren't legal impediments and didn't need to be considered in the decision process. The fact that businesses on Vaughn would lose parking places for customers, that the views of those in the residential area would be ruined, and that we'd have a monolith coming right up to the sidewalk didn't matter. Quality of life, in general, doesn't figure into the land use appeal process.

NW Portlander, your point should be considered. What our neighborhood, and I know of others, is to consider the long haul of the appeal processes.

There's first the appeal to Planning Commission, then City Council (this all varies on particular projects), then Land Use Board of Appeal, then State Appellant Court, then Oregon Supreme Court, and finally the US Supreme Court.

All along there's the variables of remanding back to lower jurisdictions, again. Several times just the appealing to Planning Commission, then City Council,even without prevailing, the time and cost it takes for the Developer/Planner cabal creates concessions that helps a neighborhood.

Going to LUBA really slows down the process and greatly increases the cost for the other party and creates results, even eventually with losing.

This is sadly the story here in Portland when the Planning Cabal is not like it was in past decades when they at least listened. I've been on both sides and find the pendulum has swung too far one way.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics