Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 7, 2013 11:48 AM. The previous post in this blog was She's got a point. The next post in this blog is Push comes to shove between Tri-Met and Clackistanis. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, March 7, 2013

Blah blah blah vibrancy blah blah blah

Now the O is going to tell you that after six or seven years, the epically failed SoWhat District is almost starting to feel like a neighborhood:

Ethan Seltzer, professor of urban studies and planning at Portland State University, points out neighborhoods and our perceptions of them are in constant flux.

"Many would be quick to write off South Waterfront," he says, but think of the Alberta neighborhood. The hordes willing to line up for brunch outside the Tin Shed these days probably don't realize that it sits in a spot that was the epicenter of the crack trade in the 1990s.

How a neighborhood evolves, he says, is only partly a function of its physical layout and arrangement. What makes one neighborhood downright hostile, another innocuous and unremarkable, and another rich with street life and cultural vibrancy, is he says, what the "people who live there commit to do with each other. What are the intentions of the people who inhabit the place?"

Almost. It's coming. Any day now. The hard-to-get-to condo tower jungle is going to be a real destination. The next Alberta. Yeah, that's the ticket.

Comments (36)

A homeless shelter is has diversity, culture, and community. Another attempt to redefine reality to push an agenda.

Hurray for the Hipsters! Thanks for moving into Alberta and getting rid of all those ill intentioned crack fiends.

The reality is the long time residents along Alberta are who chased the crack heads away.
It took lots of hard work on the part of people living there and the PPD.
Some of us remember it as a street lined with bustling small businesses. Long before the hipsters were born.

. . .what the "people who live there commit to do with each other. What are the intentions of the people who inhabit the place?"

I found this comment insulting. What if the intentions of the neighborhood are to retain the character of their neighborhood, difficult to do when the city has "set" it up to ruin it?

South Waterfront will probably be a successful neighborhood in another ten years. Which will then be held up by various planning panjandroms as what we should do. Between the streetcar, tram, the light rail, and rebuilding moody we'll have spent...2 Billion or so on this folly. Of course it will be succesful-it's on the river and had a ton of money dumped into it.

Or compare Interstate versus Williams and Alberta. Millions dumped into max for little gain vs six inches of white paint on bike lanes on Vancouver/Williams and a few thousand on bike corrals on Alberta. Portland has good bones-we just need to force the planners to step aside and let people choose where they want to live.

Quite frankly, I think we have had enough of planning to last for at least a decade if not longer. Too many forced changes have created an intolerable instability in my book and way too much for the population to absorb.

The Oregonian can't get out of its own way. Here they're getting all misty about what the people have decided to do with their neighborhood but read the caption under the picture:

Larissa Butler plants peas in a raised bed at the South Waterfront Community Garden. The garden will move later this year when the land it is located on is prepared for construction.

Sorry, Larissa. Your garden's standing in the way of our plans. Pull your peas up and get out.

She may be fortunate in this respect. Has the soil been tested there to be free of toxins for a garden? Used to be lots of industry down there, most likely has had to be "cleaned" by public dollars, but question is by what standards?

Psychobabble....speech that is heavy in post-structuralist jargon that is heavily based on experience and emotion instead of well-known science.

"Some of us remember it as a street lined with bustling small businesses."

So do I. It was called "earlier today."

the South Waterfront is a food desert

My problem with the whole 20-minute neighborhood thing is that it defines neighborhoods based on commerce. Success is judged on how many places you have to spend money.

But there are only so many "brunch" dollars to go around. You can't have a bustling commercial street every quarter mile. People also need places to just live, in homes big enough to house a family. Nothing hip or sexy, no bike boulevards out front, just living.

I saw this interesting quote from an article on gentrification in Cleveland: "The problem with most city revitalization these days relates to its playbook: there are the investors who have capital, and then the political power from which finance flows.... The main interest of investors is to make money, so people are seen as consumers as opposed to citizens. Consumers that fill up real estate space."

""Many would be quick to write off South Waterfront," he says, but think of the Alberta neighborhood."

OK, Ethan I'll bite. I'm thinking of Alberta, NW 23rd and SE Hawthorne. I'm thinking of the popularity and attractiveness of those neighborhoods and the "vibrancy".

I'm also thinking of how much PDC/City Money went into those neighborhoods. ZERO (or close) handouts.

When do these dumb-a$$es realize you don't design a successful neighborhood in a classroom or govt office? Maybe if they invested in well-run schools we wouldn't be in this state and maybe Portland wouldn't be looking at Hillsboro's rear bumper leaving them behind.

Well put, Steve. Those are some of Portland's historic neighborhood commercial streets. They predate Urban Renewal and the PDC by a hundred years. "Portland Planning" didn't create those places.

"They predate Urban Renewal and the PDC by a hundred years."

A hundred years? NE ALberta, N Mississippi and N Williams can't be 10 years old. Hawthorne's been around a long while and NW 23rd was biker bars 30 years back when Richard Singer took his own money and started developing it.

Portland's a lost cause living in their own bubble.

Keep in mind that Ethan Seltzer's career experience is limited to formulating and selling planning theology. I don't believe he's ever held a job that wasn't supported by the public teet, and probably believes the nonsense he spews. He is perfect for the Patronage center, dutifully preparing the planning priesthood to educate us on how we should live. He, on the other hand, celebrates his compact urban lifestyle in a fou bedroom-three bath home near Jack's.

Alberta was a streetcar suburb. It is basically almost exactly 100 years old, a bit older. The oldest remaining commercial buildings date from 1910 or so.

I believe Mississippi and Williams are similar.

So yes, "100 years before PDC" was an exaggeration. Maybe 50 years.

I saw an advertisement for a brand new version of "Sim City". A crop of future planners can now go into training.

It may not be worth the money spent by the city, but South Waterfront is certainly a better neighborhood than it was 15 years ago.

Alberta Street in the 90's? What a load. I lived around there -- if anything, it's more dangerous now than it was then. Oh, and if you want to be precise, Tin Shed was already in existence and (packing them in) before the turn of the Millennium.

IMHO South Waterfront is a hideous, overpriced, traffic-snarled joke. If you see it as a "vibrant community", then great -- please feel free to buy some land and develop the buildings yourself, and they will come. Leave the rest of us out of it!

It may not be worth the money spent by the city, but South Waterfront is certainly a better neighborhood than it was 15 years ago.

That is debatable. Since we are this city of "visionaries" many envisioned better.
I remember a city leader relating to me the plans they had worked on regarding river-fronts. Why if they had to built there didn't they at least adhere to the height restrictions early planners had in place with the step down concept to the river?
As I recall, wasn't it designated as a greenway? I remember some advocating for just that, for a public park greenway, heaven knows with the density push in the rest of the city that could have been a welcome place and use of open space for events, and landscapes, etc. It would have cost much much less and been a positive addition to our city and neighborhoods. It would not have obliterated the views of Mt. Hood and the river of the residents that had lived in the neighborhoods for years. It could have been a wonderful designed space for the people of our community and tourism. Examples: Sydney Opera House.
Ashland Outdoor Theater.

There is big difference between the streetcar communities of yesterday and today. Decades ago when the automobile was in its infancy, the for profit streetcar systems radiating out from the central city were subsidized by land speculators and developers until build out occurred in the neighborhoods that were served. The streetcar operators even had to pay a fee to the city to place their tracks in the public right-of-ways. Once streetcars became money loosers, the lines were discontinued or replaced by a more flexible for-profit bus system. Although property owners within blocks today’s Portland Streetcar contribute to the system, the majority of funding for streetcar construction and operations comes from taxpayers. Fares play a pittance role in the over all costs for the system. Also, unlike the decades old streetcar communities that were built by the private sector, the social engineered streetcar communities of today receive huge public new development subsidies, funding and incentives that often times equate to a negative impact as it relates to providing basic services for other parts of the city.

"It may not be worth the money spent by the city, but South Waterfront is certainly a better neighborhood than it was 15 years ago. "

Sorry Justin but 15 years ago there were still some good well paying jobs down there. Not politically correct jobs as they were the EVIL industrial types.

I have had the to opportunity to attend a couple functions in SoWhat and the one thing I noticed is the Noise! Try to hold a normal conversation out on the street down there, the freeway noise is deafening.

I'd sure as hell take a condo in the sowhat district over the pearl anytime of day or night, take that as you will...

SoWhat is more like a high-risk organ transplant than a vibrant, organic neighborhood. Only anti-rejection drugs, in the form of continuing cash infusions from the city, keeps it from a blistering case of gangrene. If 51% of our City budget goes to pension plans for police and firefighters, maybe there should be a retirement condo located there for them.

Justin Morton, you must be new or don't know anything about zoning. SoWhat was always zoned industrial. You could call it an industrial neighborhood that existed for almost 150 years. Not until the late 1990s was the zoning changed to allow for your kind of "neighborhood"-that is what the North Macadam Urban Renewal Area Plan expedited.

Andrew S., you aren't far off when you state $"2 billion or so" of public money for SoWhat. Back around 1999 PSU's Milner and others came up with about $1.2 Billion. That didn't include all the additional federal, state, etc. money that has since poured into SoWhat.

What's sad is that very few of the transportation projects identified for SoWhat aren't even off the drawing boards, and certainly not funded. Transportation remedies are a requirement by State Planning Goals to be fulfilled before zone changes, Plans like SoWhat are able to proceed.

How is SoWa a 20-minute neighborhood? It isn't unless you count going to the gym or a restaurant as being able to walk to get all your daily needs met within 1/2 mile. For this, the planners get an F-. Groceries? Now why didn't someone think of that? Oh yeah, there isn't enough population base to support a full-fledged grocery store on the segregated "island". Then how about parking for visitors and shoppers? The people who live in the isolated district do so for a reason, and it isn't vibrancy or accessibility to friends and outsiders, and the shop owners are there as an amenity for the condo buyers, not to make real money.

I had to laugh at Bill's comment about the pea farmer. I know someone who moved to SoWa and counted the community garden as one of its main attractions. This is what being an urban pioneer is all about - urban agriculture! Even that term is a joke... but the only people who are laughing are the ones who can't believe it's a real planning concept. SoWa is where concepts come to die.

As I understand it, the portion underneath the rising higher education buildings, next to the westside lightrail bridge approaches, sits on a brownfield gifted by the Schnitzers to OHSU to escape having to remediate the toxicity. That was left to the public, which evidently assumed that if they isolated the toxic waste on the site by installing a membrane and adding another layer of soil, that people could habitate the toxic brownfield. I suspect that OHSU is assuring all that there will be no adverse health situation arise from this decision.

I'm left wondering where the watertable is under SoWhat, how that interacts with all of the toxic materials accumulated there, and how the next flooding of the Willamette will all affect this new development. Aren't all the mechanical and electronic building controls of all the buildings in SoWhat below river level? I also wonder how a flood would affect the 'remediation' measures taken by the developers of structures on the toxic brownfield.

the South Waterfront is a food desert

LOL. SoWhat is a people desert.

Justin Morton, you must be new.

Not new. Born and raised in Portland. I grew up on 18th and Alberta during the 80's when it was sketchy as hell.

You can argue that the city could have better spent the money it invested in the South Waterfront. I won't disagree. And I certainly don't want to live in SoWhat. It's not my type of neighborhood. But some people love it. (I have friends who just bought a condo down there and they couldn't be happier.) So, I stand by my assertion that the high-rises and medical facilities are an improvement.

But, of course, folks can certainly disagree on this.

Justin, your "it's better than what it was" argument is false. Because those weren't the only two options available.

As I recall, PRIVATE DEVELOPERS were chomping at the bit to build out SoWhat, but then-mayor Katz said no... because what they wanted to build didn't fit her "Portland vision". So instead of having a market-based, privately-funded, tax-paying development, we now have a tax-sucking, publicly-subsidied mess.

I would like to compare North Interstate with M.L.K.

Sure, M.L.K. is a little more "gritty" but I see far more life on M.L.K., more businesses, more neighborhood, more community. Interstate is barren, dry - I am more "uncomfortable" around the people at the MAX stations than I am on any street corner on M.L.K. I see more places to walk to and from on M.L.K. than on Interstate - I see many vacant lots, closed buildings...Kaiser Permanente seems to be a walled fortress with virtually no life outside of their building.

Which one has the light rail? Which one doesn't?

Today I noticed that the Oregonian inserted a copy of a magazine about the Pearl District in the paper. It featured an article about people who live in Pearl penthouses and their fabulous views. None of these people seem to have been born in Portland. One couple moved to The Pearl from Salem to retire but they were both originally from New York and confided that they consider Portland "Little New York."

But the most precious thing about the issue was a two-page map of The Pearl that identified, among other things 16 Dog Stations of one kind or another. I don't know exactly what they are - places where poop bags are located? - but there are 16 of them and not one human public restroom identified on the map.


One couple moved to The Pearl from Salem to retire but they were both originally from New York and confided that they consider Portland "Little New York."

Katz's dream!
By the way, how many of those Pearl penthouses/condos are tax abated?

Today I rode the Macadam bus through SoWhat and found it appalling. First we passed some blocky apartment buildings, then Zidell - heavy industrial - cozied up to the Tram, then lot after lot of cyclone fenced construction equipment and what appeared to be empty or half-constructed buildings. Many of these were located under I-5 with its associated noise and exhaust. It got a little better as we headed south, but it reminded me of the new Gresham near the MAX line and that's not a compliment. Highly artificial and filled with large, blocky, light-and-view-sucking buildings. Many of the business buildings near the south end and on Macadam, apparently built on spec, had For Lease signs on them and almost no tenants (unless they hadn't yet got their names up in front). The fact that there are still small businesses on Macadam means that the SoWhat developers have not succeeded in driving the price of property up to the point of sending them packing. That's a promising development (or lack of any).

I really have to question exactly who would choose to live in SoWhat when there are more attractive alternatives. Even Orenco Station or The Round look more attractive.

Are there tax abated condos in SoWhat?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 119
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics