Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 2, 2013 8:45 AM. The previous post in this blog was Gray Bees top Friars for Garden State bragging rights. The next post in this blog is Where's David Peel?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Cr-apartment Sacrilege of the Week

The hideous bunkers just keep on coming all over Portland, but this one is really, really bad karma. Apparently the developer is a Lake Oswego guy who does business as "Exceptional Homes by André." Heaven help us.

Comments (22)

I tried the link and all I got was a blank, black page...
On other sites those homes all look extremely UNexceptional to me: just
"Poo-wood" boxes on small lots; more stack-a-shacks".

Unexceptional doesn't begin to cover it. They remind me of the early 70's when I took my day trip behind the Iron Curtain to East Berlin.

This is really disappointing news. Especially since there are still empty grass lots in the Eliot neighborhood that you could build on instead. While I'm more sanguine about having more rentals in inner Portland I wish they weren't all so uniformly ugly. Seems like other cities get much better looking buildings.

In my opinion:
This historic house must be saved. This is crazy making to destroy the character of neighborhoods. Who in the planning bureau has such hatred/disdain for our neighborhoods and our livability? We need to insist they be fired or start working for our neighborhoods. Or more to the point, who in Council has directed the planning bureau to go down the path of wide swaths left open for “almost anything goes now.” If the good codes were dismantled, they need to be brought back. Can we count on Hales to change his stripes? He was one who contributed to this downward spiral years ago. What did our community do? Let him back in our city chambers again!!
6B. and 6C.
This cannot continue without a huge show of people throughout the city from all these neighborhoods getting together pushing back to say "Enough is enough." Going to court involves huge costs draining people further and delays while meanwhile the “bloodthirstiness” continues. One can't just have a case and say we don't want this. It used to be anyway that one would have to find assignments of error in council procedure and you can be sure that in many instances, the city has that taken care of that so as to make it ever more difficult.
So unfortunate this is, I find it difficult to witness.

I really do find the destruction of this historic home heart breaking! How can anyone put a bulldozer to it? It is such a lovely crafted historic home. I don't know if it is in as good a condition as that photograph, if not, it certainly is worthy of restoration.

Thank goodness Andre's webmaster likes 'ambiance' The soothing music was positively soporific.

Jack, clever and amusing, but what I really wish someone would do is put together a serious website documenting the before-and-after effects of Portland's formerly prized classic and craftsman homes being demolished for these apartment and condo monstrosities, a site that hosts a growing collection of photos clearly documenting how Portland's famous "livibility" is being crapped on by the planner-banker-builder cabal in the name of "sustainability".

Andre's web photo provided some amusmement. There he was with his shoulder length bleached blonde shaggy hair wearing a gauzey/linen shirt.. sort of a Fabio wanna be look. This might sell some overpriced apartment buildings to a certain segment of investors....

No problem. Looks like there is plenty of street parking by the buildings.

Portland Native:

Be sure to download Flash Player so you can listen to the wonderful piano of the website.

UG! Please no more torture!
And to Bill...yes the former 'Soviet eastern block look' does come to my mind too!
Is that the lastest hipster thing?

Well, I guess taste is subjective. The apartment buildings in Jack's photo all look reasonably good to me, much better than what you usually see in the suburbs. (And much better than what I could afford when I was living in apartments.)

A large new apartment building is under construction in my neighborhood, and it will be a huge improvement over the semi-derelict houses and a liquor store that used to fill the block. Probably the context of the development matters.

I do have a concern with apartments that lack on-site parking, though there are trade-offs. Underground parking is preferable but drives up construction costs and rental rates. Surface parking looks bad (who wants to live next to a parking lot?) and isn't an efficient use of land. Maybe the policy choices aren't simple.

While attractive older houses are nice, I'm hesitant about telling property owners they can't replace a structure if they want to. I'm less hesitant about making property owners go through design review, preferably with design review guidelines that require architectural interest in the new structure.

Thank you, Matt. Give my love to Mom and Dad the next time you call for money.

"It is clear our old close-in neighborhoods are under attack from wealthy developers from the suburbs. We face architectural pillage by them because the city is promoting high density and has deaf ears for historic preservation." Roy Roos

I don't think it is just developers from the suburbs that are the problem, it is a fact of life with developers from everywhere. LO still has Williams Dame and White nipping at our heels lusting after Foothills wanting to out 9-10 story buildings there to urbanize our small town. So we have the same thing in reverse. References to LO are not needed.

The bunkers are going in as a result of the City's and Metro's buy-in to the whole New Urbanism, Smart Growth, TOD form of city planning. What looks ideal(istic) on paper rarely works out in real life where real lives and property are disturbed forever. You could say the PSU Urban Studies Dept. has a lot of blame for this state of affairs. Their ivory tower approach to planning that permeates CoP is all-encompassing and reaches into every aspect of the city's life.

The good news is that you get to elect the people who can change all of this. You have a new mayor. How can you influence him and the council to see what you see? What solutions do you have to their problems? If it were me, I'd invite them over for a friendly lunch to start. And then start thinking about the next open council seat.

Did Andre take his website offline? All I get is a black screen.

Sorry, Jack, I'm older than you. My mom is still hanging in there and sends a small box of sweets at Christmas but dad has been dead for 35 years. (And no, I've never received any inheritance or trust fund money.) I just happen to disagree with some of your aesthetic judgments. I looked at several of the apartment buildings listed on your picture using Google Maps. A few of them were kind of bland, especially those in bleak surroundings. I thought some of the buildings looked great, such as the new apartment building at SW 18th and Jefferson. Your mileage might differ, which is fine, but I'm not at all clear on what you'd consider an attractive apartment building.

Instead of taking potshots, it would be better to talk about how to design housing for those who need or want to live in apartments. For the reasons I mentioned before, I don't think the question of parking is all that simple.

So many cogent comments! Pls. attend the meetings re: comprehensive plan updates & speak. I will be too angry to speak but I will be there to sabotage BPS efforts to create various false impressions.

Matt makes some good points, but my question
to him is this: it's too late for design- the city is built out for the near future.

The question today is how to respond to the coming apartment bust. We need to put rules in place now to make sure those big flat-topped eyesores don't go to seed when the renters willing/able to pay high rents
fail to materialize.

Aesthetic judgments are one factor.
There are others and the complaint from many is that these developments are out of character of the neighborhood. Those that have invested in their homes now have a complex overshadowing adjacent homes, losing privacy, solar access, sun/garden space, etc. The street now has congestion and property values decrease. This is not what people invested in and for the city to later allow these is taking down the character of the area.

It used to be that in our Title 33 code, the approval criteria was that the projects had to fit in with the character of the neighborhood. Apparently those codes have been morphed to allow these bunkers. The planners have been busy throughout the years morphing those codes to accommodate the "redo look" of our city and neighborhoods as dictated by Metro, City and others who most likely have been behind the scenes.

Nolo, you have a new Mayor. In Portland, we have Charlie Hales back in, this time in the Mayoral seat, and as Planning Commissioner he orchestrated the changes towards “smart growth” and “redo” in the first place, so what can we expect other than a continuation of that agenda? Or will he have matured, willing to recognize problems of his earlier vision and change codes back to positive? Or once for "smart growth" always for continued "smart growth" no matter what negative results?

I shudder to think of what is in that elaborate comprehensive plan some have been so "busy" on and what next might be in store for our community.

Instead of taking potshots, it would be better to talk about how to design housing for those who need or want to live in apartments. For the reasons I mentioned before, I don't think the question of parking is all that simple.

The reason Portland is being destroyed is that this sort of comment passes as insightful. It's the kind of thing Opie Sten used to say, as he was setting the wheels of destruction into motion.

The population of the City of Portland is growing by only a couple thousand per year. High-rises are ugly and not necessary. You could house everybody in two stories, or three maximum. But that's not what the developers want to build, and that's not what the know-nothing planner types are taught at Portland State. And so on with the destruction we go.

Tear down houses from the 1890s -- it's okay, there's always somebody like "Matt" there to defend it.

Mamacita and clinamen raise lots of good questions and I don't pretend to have answers for all of them. Here are a few comments that I hope are helpful:

I think there is still a valuable role for design review, which is a useful tool as long as the design review guidelines are good. Part of the reason new development will occur is that there are still reasonable sized vacant lots, at least outside of downtown. My understanding is that cities within the boundaries of Metro are required to have a buildable lands inventory that can accommodate projected growth at various densities. I did a Google search using these terms and found lots of information on that topic: Metro housing inventory "buildable land"

There will also be redevelopment. The big apartment building under construction in my neighborhood involved demolishing an entire block of ramshackle houses and a liquor store. (I mean no disrespect to the people who lived there, but the houses really were a shambles.) Another upcoming development in my neighborhood will take out a run-down motel. Opportunities for redevelopment will vary by neighborhood, but they are out there.

What will happen if too many apartments are built and the market goes bust? I'm no economist, but one possibility is that developers and their investors will go bankrupt. Purchasers of the property out of bankruptcy will have a lower investment to cover and will be able to rent at lower prices. The city can use its nuisance abatement authority to require upkeep of apartments (and houses), though I suspect pressure from neighborhood associations is necessary to make this effective.

Regarding the impact of changed zoning (not to mention risks such as street widening), I have an unsolicited suggestion that will be cold comfort to existing home owners: really do your homework before buying a house. There are many books (at least there used to be) that discuss factors to consider when choosing a house. Zoning is a big one, as well as proximity to major streets and commercial development. Even keeping your distance from major streets and commercial development doesn't guarantee freedom from unwelcome surprises, but it improves your odds. I've discovered that some subdivisions, even old ones, have private deed covenants that restrict development to one residence per lot. It's a lot to keep in mind, but buying a house is a huge investment.

Moving past the cold comfort suggestion, I don't have anything to say other than I feel your pain. I lost my views to residential construction across the street (the real estate agent assured me those lots couldn't be developed) and lost my privacy to an "accessory dwelling" built behind my house. I didn't enjoy it, and my property lost some value, but I've moved on. I've learned, in several painful ways, that things don't always go the way you planned.

It seems inevitable that a city like Portland will see some growth, which I suspect is better than the alternative. The challenge is to promote good development rather than bad development. This is where it gets tricky since distinguishing good from bad can become pretty subjective. Remember when the city put the kabosh on snout houses? (Snout houses are houses where you can't see much of anything from the sidewalk or street except for garage doors.) There was controversy about that, but I have to agree with the city's call on that question. That's just one design issue out of probably hundreds, but it illustrates the importance of handling development the right way. I hope that Mayor Hales will focus on what constitutes good development and will promote that.

Sorry for the rambling post. There was a lot to cover, and I'm sure I still missed some of the points that were raised.

I am not sure I have the fortitude for these comprehensive plan meetings after what I witnessed for years.
I do not agree with the extreme density agenda for many reasons and I don't think the ubiquitous compromise or mitigation avenue has really helped our livability as much as it has helped the planners to move the smart growth agenda forward.
Planners like to “sell” plans by using illustrations or words on paper - not the same as stark reality once built.

I am all for good design, but in my view design is a word that I believe has been overused as a key/response to people that somehow the infill and congestion will get better and design will take care of the myriad of other problems associated.

There is more to the issue and no matter how good the design, it does not solve the problems of infill and congestion, such as if the building is really out of scale to the area, if no parking, if privacy in adjacent yards is lost, if the community cannot handle the infill, lack of parks, public safety issues, etc.

Randy Rapaport should be in jail by now. He is a liar and a massive diabolical thief who will stop at nothing for profit off the backs of others. Someday there will be a new "Portland Confidential" book out and I can promise you Randy Rapaport will be in the book. Would love to tell more but Portland is a small club with a very nasty hierarchy. If I could compare Randy Rapaport to a politician he would be George Bush during Katrina. Love the graphic.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics