Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 1, 2013 3:19 AM. The previous post in this blog was 2012 -- it goes in the green bin. The next post in this blog is Windmill dudes catch a break in "fiscal cliff" deal. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

"Fiscal cliff" deal includes huge middle-class tax increase

In the Legend of Nazaré, the Blessed Virgin made sure Dom Fuas stopped before he went over the edge.
All the mainstream media are merrily reporting how the Senate-passed tax bill that will miraculously turn us around in mid-air after our drop off the "fiscal cliff" is going to increase taxes on the wealthy. That statement is true, as far as it goes. But what they're hardly mentioning, if at all, is that it is also going to raise taxes on every single working American. The 2% payroll tax cut that's been in effect the last couple of years has expired, and unlike all sorts of other tax goodies, including for the rich, it isn't going to be extended. And that's 2% of gross wages:
Payroll tax extension: payroll taxes will increase by 2 percent for all wage earners. This was passed and extended by Congress to give taxpayers additional relief during the slow economic recovery.

Translation: You workers' take-home pay is going to be smaller in January than it was in December, unless you got a raise. If you make $5,000 a month gross, it will be $100 less.

Guys like Obama and Wyden are not the working-class heroes they make themselves out to be. In Obama's case, either he's getting his clock cleaned or his heart isn't in exactly the right place. Wyden, of course, is just a big phony Republican from New York City.

Now, don't get us wrong -- we thought the payroll tax cut was bad policy to begin with, and we're not sorry to see it go. But what we don't like is watching the toupees of Washington, D.C. slip it to the public without the mainstream media calling them out on it.

They'll probably tell you that the payroll tax cut was temporary all along, and so letting it expire isn't really a tax increase. But all of the so-called Bush tax cuts expired at midnight last night -- none of them are in effect today -- and lots of the ones that the super-rich enjoy are going to be reinstated, in full or in large part. The big money here is in the payroll tax increase -- it's more than $100 billion a year -- and make no mistake, moms and pops and Joe the Plumber are going to pay it.

Comments (35)

In fact, because it is super-regressive, it's 2% of your first $110k of gross pay, and 0% (as in zero) after that. So if you have a two-income family with $220,000 of gross pay, the hit is $4,400. One household earner, the same gross $220k? Half as much. Etc.

When in debt we should stop spending and start paying the money back. That means everyone has to take a hit to be fair. For the MS media it should be the highlighted part of the story, not a glossed over detail.

I always believed that with enough New Year’s Eve inebriation our congress could accomplish almost anything. But will they regret anything the morning after?

Actually, everyone doesn't have to take a hit. But assuming for the sake of argument that that's true, the hit to the middle class may turn out to be a larger percentage of their income than, say, somebody making $200K-300K. And if you're Dick Cheney living off municipal bonds, you just laugh your head off at all this.

Obama has been true to the wimp form he first
exhibited righ after he was eleced.

The administration's "accomplishment" las night was just another exercise in kicking the can down the road.

In his desperation o appear like a leader, he gave away the tax package he and we needed, an illusory tax increase leaving h e rich basically untouched, and left spending cuts hostage to yet another repgnican mugging three months down the road.

Here's a clue: Taxes have to go up. Everybody's taxes. Substantially. Spending has to come down. All spending. Substantially.

Neither the repugnican base nor the demonrat base like that set of twin truths.

So instead of any actual change, we have the ongoing charade.

But the pols on both sides get to announce a "deal" as if a "deal"is the actual goal. A "deal" wasn't what was needed, what was needed was rational fiscal policy without either side's ideological idiocy driving the policy.

And as usual, big money, on he left and right, talked and every special interest group got a continuation of their olwn preference payments out of the Treasury, and the can was kicked down the road again.

Beer there should have been no deal, and the tax increases and spending cuts actually went into effect for a couple of years.

I've got a suggestion for a New Year's resolution for you: Use a different keyboard.

With the rapidly declining labor force participation rates under Obama and growing Federal Government employment rolls, and the base of state and local employees outside of the system, we're getting close to the point where most aren't affected by reinstatement of the payroll. So maybe this is a populist, redistributive move after all.

Beer there should have been no deal, and the tax increases and spending cuts actually went into effect for a couple of years.

I'll drink to that.

I am with you Jack, the original tax "holiday" was a sick joke taking money away from programs that are already insolvent in the long term.

The coverage of this has been horrible and I wonder how many people are going to notice that first check in January is a little lighter?

I don't mind paying my fair share, as long as we start working on the problems, not give away tax money to countries and companies where our ROI is horrible (I am looking at you GM and Pakistan).

how many people are going to notice that first check in January is a little lighter?

It's not "a little." If you make $3000 a month gross, you're going to notice $60 less net.

Pretty sad. Remember how everyone was ga ga in 2007-08 for this guy? He has 5 years to basically figure things out, and the policy churned out is 1) Congressional pay raises and 2) a 2% increase in payroll taxes. Yeah, that will turn the economy around.

Meanwhile, President Obama gives legislators a pay raise. I am so disgusted with the whole lot that they will have to pry taxes from my cold, dead hands.

A few of you touch on it, but I feel the media from all sides has more to do with this latest camouflage fiscal disaster bill. Media should carefully refute all the hyperbole coming out of the President and members of Congress. That includes all the months Obama kept claiming we wanted to protect the middle class.

$3,000 gross? HAH!

That 2 percent means a lot to me. I'm not even in the middle-income bracket.

So the very few extras I've allowed myself (I'm talking a gym membership, which I need for my health as I'm on the shady side of 50, plus Amazon and Netflix on demand) will have to go.

Already, I never go to restaurants, unless somebody else is footing the bill; I rarely buy clothes and shoes (I do buy DSL Internet), I don't have cable or a smartphone. I don't have credit cards. My "extra" budget (which has covered food treats, some organic foods and the aforementioned gym membership, Amazon and netflix) is slim.

And after this "deal," gone. Hopefully, I can hang on to the DSL.

Rick Newton:

Meanwhile, President Obama gives legislators a pay raise.


I wonder if all of those long-time suporters of higher pay for congress-critters still believe that higher pay leads to higher quality legislators.

Bob Tiernan
NE Portland

YO! Is anyone surprised? Y'ought not be. This was the plan from the get-go.

If anyone knows a tax law professor, please ask them if tax and spending bills are still supposed to originate in the House of Representatives.

Many years ago, I was taught money issues went from House, to Senate, to the President. Now, it seems exactly reversed.

What the heck are the little people supposed to think about all of this?

Perhaps running off the fiscal cliff is the only way to dislodge and unravel the Executive Branch-Congress' fiscal suicide pact they like to refer to as the federal budget.

They all seem to acknowledge that fiscal calamity is inevitable and yet all they seem capable of doing is no better than arguing about the means to keep their own names off the country's tombstone?

I heard Mitch McConnell refer to the Senate bill as "imperfect".

Wow, the seasoned senior Senator makes an observation any halfwit in America could make. Now that's confidence building.

Are remedy and success are right around the corner of a few more congressional raises?

Should we view it as essentially the whole country being run by a Sam/Rand-like band of thoroughly incapable and conflicted phonies pretending to be taming a massive beast they lost control of many years ago.

And when they later raise the debt ceiling it too will be "imperfect".

As we listen to more tired floor speeches and stale presidential pronouncements
are we supposed to be encouraged because things could always be worse?

Sure, why not?

In the absence of hope we reside in despair.

President Obama gives legislators a pay raise.

An interesting quirk in the bill passed by the Senate is that it calls off the federal pay thaw -- including congressional pay rates -- that Obama instituted late last week. So for senators and congressmen, voting for the bill involves rescinding a pay hike for themselves.

When in debt we should stop spending and start paying the money back.

It might have meant more to hear this from you back in, say, 2003.

Doesn't matter. The House is in full pouting mode, and will not pass this bill, but send back some kind of grotesque mess to the Senate, whereupon rinse and repeat.

"But what we don't like is watching the toupees of Washington, D.C. slip it to the public without the mainstream media calling them out on it."

So which of the two must be prosecuted for fraud first - Wash.D.C. or massmedia?

"It might have meant more to hear this from you back in, say, 2003."

I do recall some serious horror at starting a couple of big expensive wars and cutting taxes at the same time. What nincompoops we are that 10 or 12 years seems like ancient history.

I could care less about the congressional pay raises one way or the other. That's the least of the damage they and the system do.

I am currently horrified at the raising of the medical tax deduction eligibility limit from the current 7.5% to 10% of adjusted gross income. I don't know how many people this hits but it is expected to raise $400 million in 2013 and 15billion by 2019. These are people with large unreimbursed medical expenses. Seems kind of a wicked way to raise money for Obamacare. When you have these kind of expenses in a year you are already hurting.

Dear Sally, if a tax at your marginal federal rate on another 2.5% of your adjusted gross income is horrifying to you, you have my sincere respect. That AGI number must be a big one in your case.

Someone with a better calculator than mine can tell us how much a high-income couple can save by divorcing, with the makimum rate now kicking in at $400,000 for individuals and $450,000 for (heterosexual) married couples..

Dear Allan, we're not talking about large AGI numbers; we're talking about large medical expenses. Every penny of mortgage interest is deductible, but only medical expenses in excess of 7.5% of AGI currently and 10% starting next year. Picture an adjusted gross income of $50,000 and unreimbursed medical expenses of $12,000 and maybe you will see what I am talking about. This is not a tax on rich people; this is a tax on people who for whatever reasons (and they're never fun, are they) have large medical expenses -- still also the single largest cause of personal bankruptcy.

I think this was a sneaky and mean way to raise some of the money paying for Obamacare, which I still believe will raise, not lower, the ridiculously high percentage of GDP that goes there in this country.

Sally, I understand that unreimbursed medical expenses can be crushing. I was looking more narrowly at the tax change proposed by the Senate bill, which would reduce the deduction on your facts from $8,250 to $7,000, producing a tax at the marginal rate (15% or 25%, most likely, depending on filing status) on $1,250 of roughly $200 to $300.

To me the real issue here is the level of unreimbursed medical expenses. Our medical costs are way too high, and our access to effective insurance is way too limited.


I do recall some serious horror at starting a couple of big expensive wars and cutting taxes at the same time.


Like most others, you keep confusing cutting taxes with cutting tax rates. If you look at the amount of tax revenues taken in by the IRS all that time you'll see that it went up every year. Spending, of course, always outpaces this.

As for the wars, it's hard to argue against doing something about Afghanistan since that one was started already and nearly everyone agreed that something had to be done about the camps therer and those who allowed them to be there. Iraq was the optional one, and even then paying for it was hardly the same thing as creating a new $100 Billion per-year program in late 2002, giving it a 10% budget increase each year, and never getting rid of it. War spending winds down dramatically, but the four or five major spending programs we have have been ballooning like crazy since they were created.

Get rid of the $800 Billion war spending since 2001 and we still have a huge structural mess on automatic, with far too many cowards in Washington.

By the way, have you noticed the huge mess in most EU countries, most of which do not have large military budgets to blame this one. California, too. Gee, how'd that happen?

Bob Tiernan
NE Portland

So there are still some around that believe in the Laffer curve? That's a good one.

Many years ago, I was taught money issues went from House, to Senate, to the President. Now, it seems exactly reversed.

The bill that the Senate passed is technically a House bill, which has been "gutted and stuffed." The rule that tax measures must originate in the House is contained in the Constitution. Like many constitutional provisions, it is a bit of a joke.

"By the way, have you noticed the huge mess in most EU countries, most of which do not have large military budgets to blame this one. California, too. Gee, how'd that happen?"

I have noticed. I did happen to listen to a woman from the estimable Hoover institution a month or so ago proclaim that the United States' military spending -- more than half of the total global military spending -- in so many words is indefensibly absurd.

It needs to be on the table, but I speculate that owing to structural political economics and cultural never-ending cumulative guilt over Vietnam it won't be.

I agree that is not the whole picture. But as far as the war in Afghanistan, the Russians must be laughing, yes? How long until we leave?

"Our medical costs are way too high, and our access to effective insurance is way too limited."

"Medical insurance" as currently defined makes no sense to me whatsoever; neither do our obscenely high medical costs -- nationally and sometimes personally. In this obscene system I have long thought it would make more sense -- except, apparently, for revenue-raising -- to make every penny of unreimbursed medical expenses deductible. Every penny of mortgage interest but not unreimbursed medical? That is only because mortgage spending is at some point discretionary. And the real estate industry is powerful; the medical industry not subject to the same machinations.

Your boy in the White House made it even worse.

I do not understand how anyone can pass a budget without serious spending cuts and say "...wooohooo! What a difference we just made..!!...". You can raise taxes on everyone to the point of full confiscation and if spending doesn't come under control, we'll be trying to explain this one to our grandkids....


from the Speaker's website: “The House has already passed bills addressing the fiscal cliff. We passed a bill replacing the President’s sequester with responsible spending cuts and did it last May. We passed a bill to stop all the tax hikes on the American people scheduled to take effect January 1, and we did that on August 1. And we’ve proposed plans over and over again that Democrats used to support, but now they won’t."

"Boy" in the White House? Good one, Sally.


So there are still some around that believe in the Laffer curve? That's a good one.


The principle is valid. There is indeed a point or extremely narrow range (if multiple rates are used) which will maximize revenues. The size of the economy from which the tax revenues will be extracted will of course always be influenced by other factors.

At the same time, I don't agree that revenues must be maximized.

So, are you one of those people who still believes that the wealthiest once paid taxes at a 92% rate? That's a good one.

Bob Tiernan
NE Portland

The principle is valid.

Bob, you are out of date. While the Bush tax cuts are viewed by Your People as paying for themselves, it appears that when the same tax rates are extended by action of the Democrats, they suddenly are very expensive.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 382
At this date last year: 241
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics