The newspaper of record is currently touting a Rhode Island case as "a first major test of whether, and how, financially strained states and cities can cut the benefits of their workers and retirees." And they're hooting about the judge's conflict of interest, since her own pension is affected by the case.
Here in Oregon, we've been through all of this many years ago. Out here, no, you can't cut the benefits and no, the conflicts of interest don't stop the judges from ruling on their own case. Interestingly, the Orehashed that very tale just the other day.
Comments (7)
Oh yeah judge's in Oregon are sure to uphold PERS changes. Jack, on down the road is bankruptcy for the state the only option if any and all attempts at "reform" of PERS fail to win court approval?
If the judges cannot or will not recuse themselves for pro tem judges who are not beneficiaries, then the legislature should create a legislative fix (since they created the problem legislatively). This IS a conflict of interest. It does not matter who the judge is or how honorable he is or disinterested he acts, it is prima facie a conflict of interest.
True hack huh Sally? Seems like you're the hack. From New Jersey law site " At a superficial level, it may seem strange that judges could rule on an issue that affects them personally. But the “rule of necessity” has long held that a judge is required to hear such cases, since “if every judge is disqualified from hearing a case, the litigant will be denied the right to have his case adjudicated.” Judge Feinberg expressly addressed this issue near the outset of her opinion, and concluded, relying extensively on United States v. Will, 440 U.S. 200 (1980), that she not only could but was required to decide the case. She also cited a number of appellate decisions from other states that held, under the rule of necessity, that judges were to rule on cases involving judicial salaries or retirement benefits." The defense is not debatable.
I was referring to the Oregonian piece. Every judge is not disqualified by virtue of being party to PERS. Or, the legislature could create a separate pension plan for judges. They added them in. They could subtract them out.
The Court in Oregon was sharply divided. The issue is debatable. It needs to be debated. The stakes are too high.
Public employee unions did not used to own this state.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (7)
Oh yeah judge's in Oregon are sure to uphold PERS changes. Jack, on down the road is bankruptcy for the state the only option if any and all attempts at "reform" of PERS fail to win court approval?
Posted by paul | December 5, 2012 10:52 AM
If the judges cannot or will not recuse themselves for pro tem judges who are not beneficiaries, then the legislature should create a legislative fix (since they created the problem legislatively). This IS a conflict of interest. It does not matter who the judge is or how honorable he is or disinterested he acts, it is prima facie a conflict of interest.
Posted by sally | December 5, 2012 2:05 PM
Rule of necessity applies
Posted by mike | December 5, 2012 6:07 PM
"Rule of necessity applies"
Spoken like a true hack. If you read the article, this defense is debatable and debated.
The bigger "necessity" might seem to be saving the State's marginal financial viability. You know, one of those "don't kill the goose" things.
There are also two other outs, as previously stated.
Posted by sally | December 5, 2012 6:40 PM
True hack huh Sally? Seems like you're the hack. From New Jersey law site " At a superficial level, it may seem strange that judges could rule on an issue that affects them personally. But the “rule of necessity” has long held that a judge is required to hear such cases, since “if every judge is disqualified from hearing a case, the litigant will be denied the right to have his case adjudicated.” Judge Feinberg expressly addressed this issue near the outset of her opinion, and concluded, relying extensively on United States v. Will, 440 U.S. 200 (1980), that she not only could but was required to decide the case. She also cited a number of appellate decisions from other states that held, under the rule of necessity, that judges were to rule on cases involving judicial salaries or retirement benefits." The defense is not debatable.
Posted by Mike | December 6, 2012 9:42 AM
I was referring to the Oregonian piece. Every judge is not disqualified by virtue of being party to PERS. Or, the legislature could create a separate pension plan for judges. They added them in. They could subtract them out.
The Court in Oregon was sharply divided. The issue is debatable. It needs to be debated. The stakes are too high.
Public employee unions did not used to own this state.
Posted by sally | December 6, 2012 1:47 PM
The court was divided on the case before them but they were not divided on whether they should hear the case.
Posted by Mike | December 6, 2012 2:00 PM