Union stance on testing costs Portland schools big bucks
Rightly or wrongly, the Portland public schools, who are currently asking voters to pay for for the biggest borrowing in state history, are passing up on eight figures of federal grants because they won't evaluate teachers in any way based on student test scores. According to the news reports, the public school teachers' union won't allow it. We're voting no on the school bond, and we feel more confident every day that that's the right vote for this school district at this time.
Comments (15)
Teachers unions say "no" to everything. Literally every single idea anybody ever has for schools, the union opposes.
Their union may take this hardline stance but how do individual teachers feel about passing up on this amazing potential opportunity to help their students?
The union today seems to want it card blanc (from taxpayers) with no oversight. By not agreeing to teacher evaluations to receive some federal dollars may be a back to the future lesson for teachers with class sizes of 35 to 40 students, as they were in the 1950s and 60s. There should be no rewards that update buildings to today’s standards. A NO is in order for the bond measure.
I like that fact that Oregon law kicks in next year that will require them to use test scores in the teacher evaluations, so they are giving up $40 million so they can delay for one year.
So I agree a no vote is called for. (I can't vote no because I am just outside the PPS district, which is a good thing...)
"Their union may take this hardline stance but how do individual teachers feel about passing up on this amazing potential opportunity to help their students?"
Great question... I feel that the "union" is really just the collective entity representing the "individual teachers". Not every teacher of course, but all the teachers and yes, the "average teacher".
So when individual teachers claim that their bad union doesn't represent them, I know they must be in the minority of teachers.
Until the individual teachers start changing their unions from within, they will continue to be slimed by their association with said unions, and rightly so.
The insanity that is PPS never ends.
-David Wynde has already stated that the PERS increases for next year will mean cuts equivalent to NINE school days. Why do we need an asssistant/deputy CFO anyway?
-PPS was "saved' from cutting 111 teachers this fall by the city coughing up $5 million. What happens this January when they are looking to balance the budget?
-Do the rank and file really believe the actions of their union will sit well with the rest of us?
Ted: of course, I know that teachers do receive some sort of evaluation today. Apparently, not very useful.
Don't get me wrong, I work very closely with teachers at middle and high school levels. I see some that are very, very good; others not so good. Apparently, though, they are all exceptional or "above average".
Seniority seems to be the only criteria that has any bearing.
I know teachers cannot solve society's issues.
Who shall we hold accountable for low graduation rates? for mediocre college prep?
One fact: lack of parental involvement affects student success. Some parents either won't or can't provide the guidance and support at home to back up the teachers efforts in the classroom. Too bad measuring parental involvement on a case by case basis will never be part of the assessment. It should count.
I still think it's lame of the union to derail the opportunity for going after this grant though.
I saw a recent news story that stated the Oregon Teachers Union was number 2 behind Hawaii in union funding. And people wonder why teachers in Oregon are so well paid.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (15)
Teachers unions say "no" to everything. Literally every single idea anybody ever has for schools, the union opposes.
Posted by Mike in NE | November 2, 2012 1:15 PM
Their union may take this hardline stance but how do individual teachers feel about passing up on this amazing potential opportunity to help their students?
Posted by SKA | November 2, 2012 1:18 PM
Well, the union supports the bond, and that's an idea. Unless you're using "literally" in the Joe Biden sense of the word, meaning "figuratively."
Posted by Dave J. | November 2, 2012 1:18 PM
The union today seems to want it card blanc (from taxpayers) with no oversight. By not agreeing to teacher evaluations to receive some federal dollars may be a back to the future lesson for teachers with class sizes of 35 to 40 students, as they were in the 1950s and 60s. There should be no rewards that update buildings to today’s standards. A NO is in order for the bond measure.
Posted by TR | November 2, 2012 1:51 PM
I like that fact that Oregon law kicks in next year that will require them to use test scores in the teacher evaluations, so they are giving up $40 million so they can delay for one year.
So I agree a no vote is called for. (I can't vote no because I am just outside the PPS district, which is a good thing...)
Posted by Michael | November 2, 2012 2:19 PM
"Their union may take this hardline stance but how do individual teachers feel about passing up on this amazing potential opportunity to help their students?"
Great question... I feel that the "union" is really just the collective entity representing the "individual teachers". Not every teacher of course, but all the teachers and yes, the "average teacher".
So when individual teachers claim that their bad union doesn't represent them, I know they must be in the minority of teachers.
Similar to Portland Native's comment in a similar thread here: http://bojack.org/2012/11/portland_public_schools_going.html#comments
Until the individual teachers start changing their unions from within, they will continue to be slimed by their association with said unions, and rightly so.
Posted by Harry | November 2, 2012 2:22 PM
The insanity that is PPS never ends.
-David Wynde has already stated that the PERS increases for next year will mean cuts equivalent to NINE school days. Why do we need an asssistant/deputy CFO anyway?
-PPS was "saved' from cutting 111 teachers this fall by the city coughing up $5 million. What happens this January when they are looking to balance the budget?
-Do the rank and file really believe the actions of their union will sit well with the rest of us?
Posted by teresa | November 2, 2012 3:31 PM
Weird isn' working.
The cop union runs the Poorland Police Bureau.
The teachers union runs the Porland school district.
And nobody needs "Windy Dave" including US Bank, which is why he is retired on he job, and on he public ea, as permanent staff a PPS.
Posted by Nonny Mouse | November 2, 2012 4:11 PM
Have any teachers or the union ever offered a proposal as to how teacher effectiveness could be measured?
It's one thing to be against standardized tests, but what would they like to use instead?
Anyway, what's $40M anyway?
Posted by Mike (one of the many) | November 2, 2012 4:28 PM
Mike: Are you under the impression that teachers are not currently, and have never been, evaluated?
Are you evaluated by your clients' test scores? If not, do you think you are not evaluated at all?
Posted by Ted | November 2, 2012 4:52 PM
Some people think that fogging a mirror for another year means that you have been successfully evaluated.
Got seniority? Nothing else matters.
Posted by Harry | November 2, 2012 5:04 PM
Ted: of course, I know that teachers do receive some sort of evaluation today. Apparently, not very useful.
Don't get me wrong, I work very closely with teachers at middle and high school levels. I see some that are very, very good; others not so good. Apparently, though, they are all exceptional or "above average".
Seniority seems to be the only criteria that has any bearing.
I know teachers cannot solve society's issues.
Who shall we hold accountable for low graduation rates? for mediocre college prep?
Posted by Mike (one of the many) | November 2, 2012 5:32 PM
One fact: lack of parental involvement affects student success. Some parents either won't or can't provide the guidance and support at home to back up the teachers efforts in the classroom. Too bad measuring parental involvement on a case by case basis will never be part of the assessment. It should count.
I still think it's lame of the union to derail the opportunity for going after this grant though.
Posted by SKA | November 2, 2012 7:11 PM
I saw a recent news story that stated the Oregon Teachers Union was number 2 behind Hawaii in union funding. And people wonder why teachers in Oregon are so well paid.
Posted by Dave A. | November 2, 2012 8:05 PM
PPS is not about the educating of children, it is about the employing of adults.
Posted by fancypants | November 3, 2012 5:56 AM