Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 8, 2012 2:47 PM. The previous post in this blog was Dirty job up for grabs. The next post in this blog is Two takers for a Thursday home 'dog. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Portland cr-apartment "study" confirms the obvious

According to the O, "A city of Portland study released Wednesday plays down the effect of no-parking apartment buildings on nearby residential neighborhoods," but the report also says this:

- Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute.

- Residents of no-parking apartment buildings aren't less likely to own a car.

And their cars get stored in front of nearby businesses and homes that used to have adequate parking. This decreases the value of those other properties. It's just a transfer of wealth from the existing taxpayers of Portland to developer weasels from places like Lake O. As long as everyone's okay with that, Portland "planners" are doing a bang-up job.

Comments (26)

- Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute.

And I would venture to guess that the residents who did NOT respond to the survey are more likely than not to own cars (perhaps they did not fill out the survey because they feared being outed as an evil car owner), and thus the impact on neighborhoods is even worse than the study says.

The other fault with the study is that it is studying the effect of something on a finite quantity of neighborhood parking spaces, yet not examining the future impact of more parking-free apartment buildings. It's like saying "hey, the water quality in this stream did not deteriorate when we dumped 100 gallons of chlorine into it, thus we can probably dump 1,000 gallons into it." Parking in places like RIchmond and Sunnyside may not have deteriorated yet because there are few of these things around now. However, there are TONS in development--THAT is what neighbors are concerned about.

"Residents of no-parking apartment buildings aren't less likely to own a car."

What a shocker!

It's amazing that a council which has been trying to solve the parking problem in NW for years (a problem caused in no small part be the many historical apartment buildings which have no parking), is intentionally recreating that problem all over the inner east side.

Just remember Eastsiders, the city doesn't work for you. It works for The Million. Just think, your neighborhood is being ruined now, so that some child just being born today somewhere in the Midwest will be able to take his god-given place in inner Portland 20 years from now. Beautiful isn't it? Your job is to shut up and pay taxes until he gets here.

In related news:

Water is wet. Turkeys are stupid. Developers lie.

Fewer built parking spaces = higher profit.

And Portland's Bureau of Planning & Sustainability doesn't mind if hipsters park in front of your house every day.

I am sad sometimes to see what is happening in Beaumont and Hollywood, my stomping grounds. The low-quality, 45ft tall, no parking apartments are taking off like wild mushrooms.

Wally Remmers, according to an attorney that has worked against him in the past, has a strong dislike of Portland. The city is the opposite of everything the he stands for and has built in his rolling house farms in WA county. It is so ironic that the king of the Mc Mansions finds an abettor in chief planner Joe Zehnder to come in and rob the inner east-side Portland neighborhoods of their value.

Wally's greed is understandable and one of the excesses of the American Way. Joe Zehnder and Susan Anderson are the enemy of east Portland. The people who, along with Saltzman as BDS Comm., could have stopped this from happening and chose to do nothing, or even worse, chose to do a study.

"Heritage Tree Committee – Michael McCloskey
Michael reported that the Committee is planning a meeting sometime in the fall to finish discussion on delisting trees.

There may also be an optional field tour sometime in the fall."

http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/index.cfm?c=41487&a=407170

http://www.portlandonline.com/parks/index.cfm?c=41487

Not the only shame on The Commissioners.

"Heritage Tree Committee – Michael McCloskey
Michael reported that the Committee is planning a meeting sometime in the fall to finish discussion on delisting trees"

Rule # 1 these people are lying to you. Rule # 2 Trees don't mean anything to these people. We have listened to the TRI Met drivel monthly from Claudia Steinberg MLR spokesperson about how we are going to trim this tree and MAYBE take down another here. B>>>Shirt come take a look at what they have done to the century + year old trees along McLoughlin
just out of Millywakay. Total destruction and they have a huge muddy mess going on.

Tri Met and their contractors are so screwed up that they are still negotiating on additional homes and buildings that they have discovered that they need and did not plan for.

BINGO!

We don't need no stinking trees! Just soviet style bunkers for the part time employed barista class. Inner city infill at its finest!

"It's just a transfer of wealth from the existing taxpayers of Portland to developer weasels from places like Lake O."
===

I think Obama would call it 'spreading the wealth around'. But Obama spread it from the wealthy to the not-so-wealthy.

Doesn't Progressive Portland have it kinda backwards? Transfers to LO from Portland's middle-class-taxpayers is robbing from the poor to give to the rich, no?

"As long as everyone's okay with that..." As a former LO-regonian who may return someday, fine by me.

Rule # 1 these people are lying to you. Rule # 2 Trees don't mean anything to these people.

Hey now, that is ABSOLUTELY incorrect! If you are a citizen who has a scrawny, ugly, invasive tree planted in your parking strip and you'd like to replace it with something more suitable, you have to go through acres of red tape to so much as prune it, much less remove it.

I feel sorry for those folks in the area of the proposed bunkers on Division. Years ago I lived around 51st & Hawthorne when I worked nights. My front yard was only about 20 feet deep. Every time a car door slammed I'd wake up. The blocks north of Division and west of 39th are very similar. People will be coming and going at all hours, and it will have a terrible impact on the livibility of the neighborhoods (in addition to the lack of parking.)

Is neighborhood livability a tangible asset that directly effects property value? Is there a class action suit here?
OR . . .
Is this unstoppable ?

Harry - not sure what LO developers you are referring to. Can you name them?

I must be on several email lists because over the past week I received several near duplicate emails with a link to a different survey that apparently went to a number of neighborhood groups. Several of the questions appeared to be politically motivated by the car hater crowd, but many others were not. I believe results of this additional survey will be presented to the planning commission this coming Tuesday along with the City's survey. It will be interesting to see how the planning commission will react - especially the well known Sammyboy crony and anti-car commissioner that has his own blog.

"Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute."

Hmmm...Okay, 2/3 of the 72% of the residents (presumably the child residents don't own cars) who own cars park their cars on the street. Yeah, right. So, the remaining 1/3 of car owners in these units, who do not have off-street parking...where are they storing their cars? In the building lobby? They would certainly take up way too much room in the bike rack.

So, I'd bet that nearly 100% of adults living in these new crapartment units own cars and they ALL park their cars on the street.

Those kind of neighborhoods work best if you walk or take the bus. I lived in two of them a few years back, Goose Hollow and the Lloyd District. I did have a car parked on the street that I rarely used. Great walking areas. The newer buildings that I recollect around West Burnside to the south were built with below-ground parking.

My car got covered with sap-ridden leaves in one place and broken into, stolen and totaled in the other (a crime for which I had to pay substantially in towing and storage fees).

When I was a single person I loved the downtown or close-in life relying on walking and bus, but then I've never liked to drive. Parking was terrible in those areas. I also rarely drove because it was just too hard to find a parking place again.

Crazy to shoehorn a bunch of new no-parking complexes in other areas. It WILL ruin your neighborhoods.

Well, it doesn't really even take a apartment complex to mess up the parking situation. In the North Portland neighborhood I used to live in--which was already lacking parking for many of the older homes--everyone who was already parking on the street was forced to compete with the customers of a neighboring newly opened restaurant with no onsite parking. We just got used to driving down a block or two away to park at peak times. And that was just one restaurant on the edge of a residental neighborhood of single family homes.

But we were so close to a MAX line said the local planners...

It WILL ruin your neighborhoods.

Planners must know this. Question is who rules the planners? Who benefits from property values/livability taken down notches?

I am wondering whether that is not the long range game plan, to take down the neighborhoods, as neighborhoods as we knew are an old fashioned concept, and the new trail to be blazed is now the mixed-used density concept!
Neighborhoods don't matter much as they don't fit in with those "new plans" anymore?

I wonder what the neighborhood associations think of this, or are they still somehow aligned with city plans, accepting concepts that reduce their neighborhood livability all in the name of the UGB?

In my view, that UGB concept was very heavily put into the minds of the population, who could be against saving farmland and forests?

Were we also told that in order to do this, that our neighborhoods and the livability of where we actually live would become a sacrifice zone?

Were we also aware that some people would then benefit greatly financially from this "land" UGB concept at the expense of our quality of life/livability here?

Some neighborhood associations are split on this (Richmond), some are against it (Beaumont and Alameda). They are largely powerless unless the developer has development plans that will require a variance to the zoning code. They then have a seat at the table during review of plans.

Almost all of the two dozen buildings going up now are in zone CS which has no parking requirement and has a height restriction of 45 feet. If they stay within those guidelines the NA has no voice.

Richmond has an added layer of code known as an overlay that was specifically crafted for the area. It is my understanding that they are or plan to appeal to LUBA regarding development conflicts with the overlay. In an area like Beaumont where there is not an overlay, it is just the developer and what he can get away with in zone CS.

For those interested here is a link to a short summary of the commercial zones - http://www.portlandoregon.gov/bps/article/64432

If you have the time scroll down and read about Zone CS. It makes a lot of sense, sounds reasonable, and is largely a cut and paste of the underlying codes preamble.

If you go further and read the code, you will find that no part of it lives up to the spirit outlined in the preamble. Nothing is required of the developer. Doesn't have to preserve character, no parking is fine, no storefront is fine(!), as many units as can fit in 45 feet is fine, towering over single family residential is fine. No bike parking is not fine, but that goes without saying.

Clinamen has nailed it dead center.

Smart-growth sounds like a great idea to a lot of guilt-ridden people who unfortunately can't grasp that it also creates an irresistible and enormous opportunity for politicians and developers working in partnership to scam the 'religion' for personal gain. You'd think they'd get a clue when their own elected officials are documented liars.

It's like one of those televangelist shows where the minister has one hand in the giving bowl, the other up his secretary's skirt, and a secret savings account in the Grand Caymans. The congregation is so desperate to believe and be saved they refuse to look behind the curtain.

Honestly folks , you sound like people arguing over who gets to keep the fine silver as the titanic goes down.
Global Warming is happening, and fast. You seem to think that it is someone else's problem, and that your precious cute 1920's hood should remain untouched til the end of time, [which is coming faster all the time]. We need to do some fairly significant things to avert GW , and densifying our cities is job number one. You don't own the city or the street in front of your home, we all do, along with the new people who will inhabit your neighborhood in ten years, when many of us will be in nursing homes. Sharing is what we teach tots in kindergarten. Share with your new neighbors, and the future neighbors of our city.

Wow! Someone who actually advocates for the bulldozing of Portland.

The congregation speaks.

Even if it were the right thing to do, which collection of fellow human beings do you trust to mastermind and execute this without saying to themselves, "Well, since I don't really believe what tiny Portland does to itself is actually going to have much impact on GW on a global scale, and since there's no way any single government would be able to pull this off without starting WWIII which would surely hasten the end, and since the big climate sh*t's going to hit the fan anyways, I think I'll just help myself to the cookie pot so that my family and I will have more resources to purchase influence and comfort when things go south".

So far, all we've seen at the helm are accomplished liars and frauds.

"...which collection of fellow human beings do you trust to mastermind and execute this..."

Isn't that the 30-trillion-dollar question. Me: none. But by various vote-counts and attendant rhetoric I think I'm in the minority. This is exactly where the future of the USA is going to divide or be decided, I think.

Clinamen somewhat nailed it. But adding to it, from my experiences from spot zoning to whole neighborhood plans-with some cynicism, is that Planning has become a major industry. Why? Politicians with their egotism, hopeful political rise use Planning as a change-agent, that they can list in their achievement list. But what supports this notion? Who are one of the biggest contributors to the politicians?-the Developers. Change equals profit from upzoning, rezoning, all the subsidies, tax incentives, etc.

That doesn't necessarily make Developers evil. They are merely using the system that we have allowed them to use, and get away with Change in our neighborhoods.

State Planning Goals/Metro/CoP/Planners were successful in convincing some that Smart Growth/Density was necessary to save the planet. But they didn't realize the consequences for neighborhoods. And how can an ordinary layperson know the affects of centralized planning that in Portland's case induces Change.

Citizens need to re-examine how our Planning has and will affect their own neighborhoods. We have several examples that we can examine to demonstrate to citizens how they are affected. One is using mass transit from streetcars to lightrail and analysis its affect on Interstate, or Central Eastside. We can examine the massive rezoning/upzoning of SoWhat. The list goes on.

tda, there are numerous studies that disproves that densifying our towns and cities uses less energy and helps global warming.

All you need to do to see the future of the inner Portland neighborhoods is follow the MAX line out to Rockwood and Gresham. I grew up in that area and it's now so ticky-tacky and generic that I don't recognize it.

Of course developers are happy about not having to provide anything but bike parking. Parking doesn't generate income; apartments do. Parking is wasted space - or worse - space that needs to be developed in addition to the income-generating human occupation cubes which are growing increasingly smaller.

One wonders about that trend as well. It's one thing to say that there's a need for bedsitter convenience apartments among young working people (retired folks can't afford them and probably want parking) but has anyone given any thought to the future and who might be occupying them if and when the surge of young single workers debarks for larger family abodes? Remember the surge of elementary schools in the 60s to accommodate the baby boom generation? Many of them (including some high schools) are now only memories or empty buildings owned and managed by PPS but often empty).

In the last month or so, I've seen several articles about this apartment building frenzy, particularly in NW Portland, but strangely enough nobody is talking about what the anticipated rents will be. My guess? "Market Rate" which means that I and most of my neighbors will be priced out of them.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 328
At this date last year: 183
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics