Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 8, 2012 2:47 PM. The previous post in this blog was Dirty job up for grabs. The next post in this blog is Two takers for a Thursday home 'dog. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, November 8, 2012

Portland cr-apartment "study" confirms the obvious

According to the O, "A city of Portland study released Wednesday plays down the effect of no-parking apartment buildings on nearby residential neighborhoods," but the report also says this:

- Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute.

- Residents of no-parking apartment buildings aren't less likely to own a car.

And their cars get stored in front of nearby businesses and homes that used to have adequate parking. This decreases the value of those other properties. It's just a transfer of wealth from the existing taxpayers of Portland to developer weasels from places like Lake O. As long as everyone's okay with that, Portland "planners" are doing a bang-up job.

Comments (26)

- Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute.

And I would venture to guess that the residents who did NOT respond to the survey are more likely than not to own cars (perhaps they did not fill out the survey because they feared being outed as an evil car owner), and thus the impact on neighborhoods is even worse than the study says.

The other fault with the study is that it is studying the effect of something on a finite quantity of neighborhood parking spaces, yet not examining the future impact of more parking-free apartment buildings. It's like saying "hey, the water quality in this stream did not deteriorate when we dumped 100 gallons of chlorine into it, thus we can probably dump 1,000 gallons into it." Parking in places like RIchmond and Sunnyside may not have deteriorated yet because there are few of these things around now. However, there are TONS in development--THAT is what neighbors are concerned about.

"Residents of no-parking apartment buildings aren't less likely to own a car."

What a shocker!

It's amazing that a council which has been trying to solve the parking problem in NW for years (a problem caused in no small part be the many historical apartment buildings which have no parking), is intentionally recreating that problem all over the inner east side.

Just remember Eastsiders, the city doesn't work for you. It works for The Million. Just think, your neighborhood is being ruined now, so that some child just being born today somewhere in the Midwest will be able to take his god-given place in inner Portland 20 years from now. Beautiful isn't it? Your job is to shut up and pay taxes until he gets here.

In related news:

Water is wet. Turkeys are stupid. Developers lie.

Fewer built parking spaces = higher profit.

And Portland's Bureau of Planning & Sustainability doesn't mind if hipsters park in front of your house every day.

I am sad sometimes to see what is happening in Beaumont and Hollywood, my stomping grounds. The low-quality, 45ft tall, no parking apartments are taking off like wild mushrooms.

Wally Remmers, according to an attorney that has worked against him in the past, has a strong dislike of Portland. The city is the opposite of everything the he stands for and has built in his rolling house farms in WA county. It is so ironic that the king of the Mc Mansions finds an abettor in chief planner Joe Zehnder to come in and rob the inner east-side Portland neighborhoods of their value.

Wally's greed is understandable and one of the excesses of the American Way. Joe Zehnder and Susan Anderson are the enemy of east Portland. The people who, along with Saltzman as BDS Comm., could have stopped this from happening and chose to do nothing, or even worse, chose to do a study.

"Heritage Tree Committee – Michael McCloskey
Michael reported that the Committee is planning a meeting sometime in the fall to finish discussion on delisting trees.

There may also be an optional field tour sometime in the fall."

Not the only shame on The Commissioners.

"Heritage Tree Committee – Michael McCloskey
Michael reported that the Committee is planning a meeting sometime in the fall to finish discussion on delisting trees"

Rule # 1 these people are lying to you. Rule # 2 Trees don't mean anything to these people. We have listened to the TRI Met drivel monthly from Claudia Steinberg MLR spokesperson about how we are going to trim this tree and MAYBE take down another here. B>>>Shirt come take a look at what they have done to the century + year old trees along McLoughlin
just out of Millywakay. Total destruction and they have a huge muddy mess going on.

Tri Met and their contractors are so screwed up that they are still negotiating on additional homes and buildings that they have discovered that they need and did not plan for.


We don't need no stinking trees! Just soviet style bunkers for the part time employed barista class. Inner city infill at its finest!

"It's just a transfer of wealth from the existing taxpayers of Portland to developer weasels from places like Lake O."

I think Obama would call it 'spreading the wealth around'. But Obama spread it from the wealthy to the not-so-wealthy.

Doesn't Progressive Portland have it kinda backwards? Transfers to LO from Portland's middle-class-taxpayers is robbing from the poor to give to the rich, no?

"As long as everyone's okay with that..." As a former LO-regonian who may return someday, fine by me.

Rule # 1 these people are lying to you. Rule # 2 Trees don't mean anything to these people.

Hey now, that is ABSOLUTELY incorrect! If you are a citizen who has a scrawny, ugly, invasive tree planted in your parking strip and you'd like to replace it with something more suitable, you have to go through acres of red tape to so much as prune it, much less remove it.

I feel sorry for those folks in the area of the proposed bunkers on Division. Years ago I lived around 51st & Hawthorne when I worked nights. My front yard was only about 20 feet deep. Every time a car door slammed I'd wake up. The blocks north of Division and west of 39th are very similar. People will be coming and going at all hours, and it will have a terrible impact on the livibility of the neighborhoods (in addition to the lack of parking.)

Is neighborhood livability a tangible asset that directly effects property value? Is there a class action suit here?
OR . . .
Is this unstoppable ?

Harry - not sure what LO developers you are referring to. Can you name them?

I must be on several email lists because over the past week I received several near duplicate emails with a link to a different survey that apparently went to a number of neighborhood groups. Several of the questions appeared to be politically motivated by the car hater crowd, but many others were not. I believe results of this additional survey will be presented to the planning commission this coming Tuesday along with the City's survey. It will be interesting to see how the planning commission will react - especially the well known Sammyboy crony and anti-car commissioner that has his own blog.

"Among residents of those buildings who responded to a survey, 72 percent owned cars, and two-thirds of car owners park on the street. But only 36 percent use a car for a daily commute."

Hmmm...Okay, 2/3 of the 72% of the residents (presumably the child residents don't own cars) who own cars park their cars on the street. Yeah, right. So, the remaining 1/3 of car owners in these units, who do not have off-street parking...where are they storing their cars? In the building lobby? They would certainly take up way too much room in the bike rack.

So, I'd bet that nearly 100% of adults living in these new crapartment units own cars and they ALL park their cars on the street.

Those kind of neighborhoods work best if you walk or take the bus. I lived in two of them a few years back, Goose Hollow and the Lloyd District. I did have a car parked on the street that I rarely used. Great walking areas. The newer buildings that I recollect around West Burnside to the south were built with below-ground parking.

My car got covered with sap-ridden leaves in one place and broken into, stolen and totaled in the other (a crime for which I had to pay substantially in towing and storage fees).

When I was a single person I loved the downtown or close-in life relying on walking and bus, but then I've never liked to drive. Parking was terrible in those areas. I also rarely drove because it was just too hard to find a parking place again.

Crazy to shoehorn a bunch of new no-parking complexes in other areas. It WILL ruin your neighborhoods.

Well, it doesn't really even take a apartment complex to mess up the parking situation. In the North Portland neighborhood I used to live in--which was already lacking parking for many of the older homes--everyone who was already parking on the street was forced to compete with the customers of a neighboring newly opened restaurant with no onsite parking. We just got used to driving down a block or two away to park at peak times. And that was just one restaurant on the edge of a residental neighborhood of single family homes.

But we were so close to a MAX line said the local planners...

It WILL ruin your neighborhoods.

Planners must know this. Question is who rules the planners? Who benefits from property values/livability taken down notches?

I am wondering whether that is not the long range game plan, to take down the neighborhoods, as neighborhoods as we knew are an old fashioned concept, and the new trail to be blazed is now the mixed-used density concept!
Neighborhoods don't matter much as they don't fit in with those "new plans" anymore?

I wonder what the neighborhood associations think of this, or are they still somehow aligned with city plans, accepting concepts that reduce their neighborhood livability all in the name of the UGB?

In my view, that UGB concept was very heavily put into the minds of the population, who could be against saving farmland and forests?

Were we also told that in order to do this, that our neighborhoods and the livability of where we actually live would become a sacrifice zone?

Were we also aware that some people would then benefit greatly financially from this "land" UGB concept at the expense of our quality of life/livability here?

Some neighborhood associations are split on this (Richmond), some are against it (Beaumont and Alameda). They are largely powerless unless the developer has development plans that will require a variance to the zoning code. They then have a seat at the table during review of plans.

Almost all of the two dozen buildings going up now are in zone CS which has no parking requirement and has a height restriction of 45 feet. If they stay within those guidelines the NA has no voice.

Richmond has an added layer of code known as an overlay that was specifically crafted for the area. It is my understanding that they are or plan to appeal to LUBA regarding development conflicts with the overlay. In an area like Beaumont where there is not an overlay, it is just the developer and what he can get away with in zone CS.

For those interested here is a link to a short summary of the commercial zones -

If you have the time scroll down and read about Zone CS. It makes a lot of sense, sounds reasonable, and is largely a cut and paste of the underlying codes preamble.

If you go further and read the code, you will find that no part of it lives up to the spirit outlined in the preamble. Nothing is required of the developer. Doesn't have to preserve character, no parking is fine, no storefront is fine(!), as many units as can fit in 45 feet is fine, towering over single family residential is fine. No bike parking is not fine, but that goes without saying.

Clinamen has nailed it dead center.

Smart-growth sounds like a great idea to a lot of guilt-ridden people who unfortunately can't grasp that it also creates an irresistible and enormous opportunity for politicians and developers working in partnership to scam the 'religion' for personal gain. You'd think they'd get a clue when their own elected officials are documented liars.

It's like one of those televangelist shows where the minister has one hand in the giving bowl, the other up his secretary's skirt, and a secret savings account in the Grand Caymans. The congregation is so desperate to believe and be saved they refuse to look behind the curtain.

Honestly folks , you sound like people arguing over who gets to keep the fine silver as the titanic goes down.
Global Warming is happening, and fast. You seem to think that it is someone else's problem, and that your precious cute 1920's hood should remain untouched til the end of time, [which is coming faster all the time]. We need to do some fairly significant things to avert GW , and densifying our cities is job number one. You don't own the city or the street in front of your home, we all do, along with the new people who will inhabit your neighborhood in ten years, when many of us will be in nursing homes. Sharing is what we teach tots in kindergarten. Share with your new neighbors, and the future neighbors of our city.

Wow! Someone who actually advocates for the bulldozing of Portland.

The congregation speaks.

Even if it were the right thing to do, which collection of fellow human beings do you trust to mastermind and execute this without saying to themselves, "Well, since I don't really believe what tiny Portland does to itself is actually going to have much impact on GW on a global scale, and since there's no way any single government would be able to pull this off without starting WWIII which would surely hasten the end, and since the big climate sh*t's going to hit the fan anyways, I think I'll just help myself to the cookie pot so that my family and I will have more resources to purchase influence and comfort when things go south".

So far, all we've seen at the helm are accomplished liars and frauds.

"...which collection of fellow human beings do you trust to mastermind and execute this..."

Isn't that the 30-trillion-dollar question. Me: none. But by various vote-counts and attendant rhetoric I think I'm in the minority. This is exactly where the future of the USA is going to divide or be decided, I think.

Clinamen somewhat nailed it. But adding to it, from my experiences from spot zoning to whole neighborhood plans-with some cynicism, is that Planning has become a major industry. Why? Politicians with their egotism, hopeful political rise use Planning as a change-agent, that they can list in their achievement list. But what supports this notion? Who are one of the biggest contributors to the politicians?-the Developers. Change equals profit from upzoning, rezoning, all the subsidies, tax incentives, etc.

That doesn't necessarily make Developers evil. They are merely using the system that we have allowed them to use, and get away with Change in our neighborhoods.

State Planning Goals/Metro/CoP/Planners were successful in convincing some that Smart Growth/Density was necessary to save the planet. But they didn't realize the consequences for neighborhoods. And how can an ordinary layperson know the affects of centralized planning that in Portland's case induces Change.

Citizens need to re-examine how our Planning has and will affect their own neighborhoods. We have several examples that we can examine to demonstrate to citizens how they are affected. One is using mass transit from streetcars to lightrail and analysis its affect on Interstate, or Central Eastside. We can examine the massive rezoning/upzoning of SoWhat. The list goes on.

tda, there are numerous studies that disproves that densifying our towns and cities uses less energy and helps global warming.

All you need to do to see the future of the inner Portland neighborhoods is follow the MAX line out to Rockwood and Gresham. I grew up in that area and it's now so ticky-tacky and generic that I don't recognize it.

Of course developers are happy about not having to provide anything but bike parking. Parking doesn't generate income; apartments do. Parking is wasted space - or worse - space that needs to be developed in addition to the income-generating human occupation cubes which are growing increasingly smaller.

One wonders about that trend as well. It's one thing to say that there's a need for bedsitter convenience apartments among young working people (retired folks can't afford them and probably want parking) but has anyone given any thought to the future and who might be occupying them if and when the surge of young single workers debarks for larger family abodes? Remember the surge of elementary schools in the 60s to accommodate the baby boom generation? Many of them (including some high schools) are now only memories or empty buildings owned and managed by PPS but often empty).

In the last month or so, I've seen several articles about this apartment building frenzy, particularly in NW Portland, but strangely enough nobody is talking about what the anticipated rents will be. My guess? "Market Rate" which means that I and most of my neighbors will be priced out of them.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics