There's actually noise coming out of Salem about public employee pension reform these days, but we think it's probably sound and fury signifying nothing. First, the new speaker of the House, who doesn't like us and the feeling is mutual, is already dog-whistling that she's not really on board:
New House Speaker Tina Kotek says PERS reform will "get serious consideration. But the majority of conversations we were having when talking to voters on doorsteps were about schools and jobs. That's what we need to focus on."
Kotek repeats what unions have been saying: Any reforms need to be fair, legal and generate immediate cost savings. But she offers no specifics.
Meanwhile, the Boyfriend-in-Chief sounds like his commitment is pretty conditional as well:
"If this gets ugly, if people try to make this into something about public employee bashing, I'm gone," Kitzhaber said. "I'm not going to do it."
So expect nothing to get done this biennium, with everyone in the Democratic Party blaming someone else for it.
Meanwhile, here's a wonky paper from some pension actuaries who dig into the question of how quickly pensions will eat up the budget for essential government services. And here's a table they prepared, showing Oregon as second worst in the nation in terms of what it's going to take per household for retired government bureaucrats. It's a grim scene.
Comments (13)
Good find, Jack.
Now maybe some actuary can do that chart again and use interest rates from 1978-1981 like we had at the end of the Carter administration.
Just imagine if the cost for borrowing went back to say, 15-18% or so... as I expect it to do in the not too distant future.
"New House Speaker Tina Kotek says PERS reform will "get serious consideration. But the majority of conversations we were having when talking to voters on doorsteps were about schools and jobs."
Madame Speaker does not think there is a connection between PERS and schools??
So, for PERS to be fully funded thirty years from now, Oregon would have to increase its contribution by $3.1 billion a year, or another 36.1% of government payrolls.
An earlier version of this paper was noted in an Oregonian article on June 18th :
"A 2011 study by economists at the University of Rochester and Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management compared pension funding needs under very conservative investment assumptions. It concluded Oregon needed to triple its current contributions, from $1.3 billion to $4.4 billion per year, to dig out of its actuarial hole. Measured as a percentage of state tax revenue, that would give it the highest pension burden among the 50 states in the study."
It's amazing how bad things look, once you eliminate the 8% magical rate of return.
Tripling the current PERS contribution - imagine what that will do to the State...
When I criticize the policies of The Hon Speaker Tina, am I a homophobe or a lesbianphobe? And re the latter, is there such a thing? And finally because she is a she, I'd be a sexist also, yes?
An eye-opener, among many, from "The Revenue Demands of Public Employee Pension Promises" paper:
Oregon has the lowest "actual contributions" by employees, by an order of magnitude, at 0.1%. I am not going to take the time to calculate a mean percentage of employee contribution, but I am seeing a lot of 7-point-somethings there nationwide, with contributions as high as 11% in Massachussetts.
And as simple as that, we have found one path to public employee pension reform in Whoregon.
Harry - It's all just sexism if you are discriminating based on behavior that does no conform to traditional gender roles.
So a man/gay/lesbian/woman that is not doing what you think a 'normal' of that gender should be doing, and you make judgments based on that, then that's sexist.
Took me forever to figure that out...hope it helped. :-)
Snards - Idaho. It's nice. Nevada is okay but not Vegas.
Snards: The weather is better here in Nevada, and we;re getting a bunch of new businesses now leaving California. Oh - and you'll save a bunch on both property and income taxes as well.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (13)
Good find, Jack.
Now maybe some actuary can do that chart again and use interest rates from 1978-1981 like we had at the end of the Carter administration.
Just imagine if the cost for borrowing went back to say, 15-18% or so... as I expect it to do in the not too distant future.
Posted by ltjd | November 18, 2012 5:15 PM
"New House Speaker Tina Kotek says PERS reform will "get serious consideration. But the majority of conversations we were having when talking to voters on doorsteps were about schools and jobs."
Madame Speaker does not think there is a connection between PERS and schools??
Posted by pdxjim | November 18, 2012 5:17 PM
Thanks, Jack - that's a wonderful paper.
So, for PERS to be fully funded thirty years from now, Oregon would have to increase its contribution by $3.1 billion a year, or another 36.1% of government payrolls.
An earlier version of this paper was noted in an Oregonian article on June 18th :
"A 2011 study by economists at the University of Rochester and Northwestern's Kellogg School of Management compared pension funding needs under very conservative investment assumptions. It concluded Oregon needed to triple its current contributions, from $1.3 billion to $4.4 billion per year, to dig out of its actuarial hole. Measured as a percentage of state tax revenue, that would give it the highest pension burden among the 50 states in the study."
It's amazing how bad things look, once you eliminate the 8% magical rate of return.
Tripling the current PERS contribution - imagine what that will do to the State...
Posted by Random | November 18, 2012 5:28 PM
So when Kotek says it has to be "fair", I assume that she doesn't care about anyone or anything except for the union members?
Dems are just whores for the unions. Kotek and the rest would rather have the State go bankrupt than do anything to upset their union bosses.
Posted by Andy | November 18, 2012 5:33 PM
Before we get ahead of ourselves, help me out.
When I criticize the policies of The Hon Speaker Tina, am I a homophobe or a lesbianphobe? And re the latter, is there such a thing? And finally because she is a she, I'd be a sexist also, yes?
Posted by Harry | November 18, 2012 5:41 PM
So what's a better escape hatch? Idaho or Nevada?
Posted by Snards | November 18, 2012 5:44 PM
An eye-opener, among many, from "The Revenue Demands of Public Employee Pension Promises" paper:
Oregon has the lowest "actual contributions" by employees, by an order of magnitude, at 0.1%. I am not going to take the time to calculate a mean percentage of employee contribution, but I am seeing a lot of 7-point-somethings there nationwide, with contributions as high as 11% in Massachussetts.
And as simple as that, we have found one path to public employee pension reform in Whoregon.
Posted by gen. Ambrose Burnside, Ret. | November 18, 2012 5:54 PM
" Kotek and the rest would rather have the State go bankrupt than do anything to upset their union bosses."
The new term for that is to Twinkie it.
Posted by sally | November 18, 2012 7:56 PM
Both? Nevada, or certain areas of it, had a little bit more of a bubble.
Posted by Andrew | November 18, 2012 8:27 PM
The Unions paid for their legislators and they intend to use them...
Posted by tankfixer | November 18, 2012 9:02 PM
Harry - It's all just sexism if you are discriminating based on behavior that does no conform to traditional gender roles.
So a man/gay/lesbian/woman that is not doing what you think a 'normal' of that gender should be doing, and you make judgments based on that, then that's sexist.
Took me forever to figure that out...hope it helped. :-)
Snards - Idaho. It's nice. Nevada is okay but not Vegas.
Sally - I prefer the term SnoBall it. :)
Posted by JO | November 19, 2012 3:58 AM
Snards: The weather is better here in Nevada, and we;re getting a bunch of new businesses now leaving California. Oh - and you'll save a bunch on both property and income taxes as well.
Posted by Dave A. | November 19, 2012 6:38 AM
Why not declare PERS bankrupt?
Posted by Mike (one of infinity) | November 19, 2012 8:49 AM