Portland cop brutality reform: "This time we really mean it"
They waited until Friday afternoon to get up and announce the new agreement between the Portland police and federal authorities on police brutality, and that makes us awfully leery of it. That's the time of the week when they break the news they don't want you to pay any attention to. Maybe the PoPo is hoping that nobody will read the contract, so that nobody will be able to hold them to the promises they're making.
On the surface, the deal sounds mildly intriguing, but we've heard the reform line so many times before -- only to be followed by more senseless police killing without consequences -- that it's hard to be optimistic. Anyway, Willy Week gives a first summary here. Some items that catch our eye right away:
Officers must also only use one Taser at a time, and must attempt to handcuff suspects after each 5-second discharge of the weapon...
The Portland Police Bureau will also create a Crisis Intervention Team of specially trained officers who will respond to all calls suspected to involve mental illness. The agreement will also expand the police Mobile Crisis Unit — a vehicle pairing one officer and a private social worker—to a 24 hour program.
A 15-member Community Oversight Advisory Board will also be created. The city auditor’s office will also hire three new investigators, including at least one with a background in mental health, City Auditor LaVonne Griffin-Valade says.
The cost is expected to be $5.8 million in the first year, and includes 26 new staff members in the PPB and six new staff members elsewhere in the city.
We'll see, but we doubt that throwing money and bodies at the problem is going to help it much. Even when the current brass is in the mood to fire an officer for unjustified killing, he eventually gets reinstated with lengthy back pay. And unless it's recorded by a robot,many Portland police officers seem perfectly willing to lie about what they actually do with a Taser.
New investigators in the city auditor's office seem darned interesting, but you can bet the union will be filing a grievance on that one before long. This town needs to be a lot tougher at the bargaining table, but given the stranglehold the government employee unions have on the place, that's not going to happen in our lifetimes.
God rest the soul of James Chasse, who died more than six years ago now. His killer is still at large.
Comments (9)
When you live in a police state you get out of control police.
Our masters like it that way, but they will always been attempting to fool the public into thinking that 'they' care about our 'safety'.
“There are only two choices: A police state in which all dissent is suppressed or rigidly controlled; or a society where law is responsive to human needs. If society is to be responsive to human needs, a vast restructuring of our laws is essential.”
"so that nobody will be able to hold them to the promises they're making." What? The agreement is legally binding once the city signs it. It's not a promise. If the city doesn't do what's in the agreement the feds will take them to court and make them do it.
Instead of falsifying a covering up of the issues with a scapegoat and blaming a single cop that due to an on-sight communication failure, a training failure and a management failure pulled the trigger, any personnel firing needs to be from the top (Sammyboy the police commissioner) down.
The first step towards a solution is to get rid of all the tactical armor, redundant weapons, 20 extra mags, MOLLE plate carriers/vests, helmets, and etc. A lot of the attitude comes from the gear (dress for success, right?). I'm willing to bet that most police go their entire career without ever needing to draw their weapon.
Our police are NOT military and they should bear little resemblance in attitude or appearance.
Would a rational person actually confront a policeman and threaten him/her? No and No.
The problem you have is irrational people whether they are high on drugs or not able to think rationally confronting the police and the police have 2 choices--back off or use the force necessary to subdue the person.
I would rather have the police subdue the person and if that takes a little more force than the fine folks of the SoWhat district like, so be it. At least we are all safer.
That Chris Humphries guy deleted my post on his Facebook page where I called him a murderer and linked to the news reports of his crime. It stayed up for a good 24 hours though.
Abandoning the mentally ill in flophouses, then expect the police and jails,
trained for criminals, to be their baby sitters is just plain wrong, and puts everyone at risk.
Managing and treating mental illness is an entirely different discipline and training. All that has happened was inevitable.
Vote to cut the taxes for the wealthy again though.
Ha Ha Ha! This is going nowhere. Sure - the intellectually/truthinest challenged Mayor and Randy's lapdog (and fellow band member) Police Chief may have said anything they need to say to deter the Feds from indicting them, but the new procedures will not make it through the terms of the labor contract the City has given away to the Police Union. Consider the following:
Clause 3.1 guarantees, "Standards of employment related to wages, hours and working conditions which are mandatory for collective bargaining except those standards modified through collective bargaining shall be maintained at not less than the level in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement. Any disagreement between the Association and the City with respect to this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure."
In other words, any change of procedure from the status quo has to be bargained. And, we have all seen how well the City does at "bargaining" with the Police Union.
Clause 15.1 states, "15.1 The Police Bureau and the Bureau of Human Resources will furnish the Association with copies of all policies and procedures, special, disciplinary and personnel orders when they are issued. Such materials shall include, but not be limited to, position announcements, job announcements, and training bulletins. When the Police Bureau is contemplating changing its policies and procedures, it shall provide the Association with all drafts of the to-be-amended policies and procedures and provide the Association with an opportunity to comment on the drafts. When the Bureau of Human Resources is contemplating changing its policies and procedures, it shall provide the Association with at least fifteen (15) days’ advance notice of the proposed changes."
Thus, before the City can implement anything (which then has to be bargained - see above), it has to provide a copy of what it (the City) wants to implement. This means before anything begins, the City has to make up its mind what it wants. With a credibility defunct Mayor holding court with four other royals having their own fiefdoms and futures to worry about, this is not possible.
Finally, the biggest hurtle to cop oversight is the 48 hour advance notice the City must give before it can interview a potentially bad cop (see Clause 61). This gives the cop and all his/her cop buddies plenty of time to meet with the Police Union attorney, at the Police Union headquarters, check their notes and "discuss" the events. ;-)
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (9)
When you live in a police state you get out of control police.
Our masters like it that way, but they will always been attempting to fool the public into thinking that 'they' care about our 'safety'.
“There are only two choices: A police state in which all dissent is suppressed or rigidly controlled; or a society where law is responsive to human needs. If society is to be responsive to human needs, a vast restructuring of our laws is essential.”
(William Orville Douglas)
Posted by al m | October 29, 2012 9:09 AM
"so that nobody will be able to hold them to the promises they're making." What? The agreement is legally binding once the city signs it. It's not a promise. If the city doesn't do what's in the agreement the feds will take them to court and make them do it.
Posted by Mike | October 29, 2012 9:23 AM
Instead of falsifying a covering up of the issues with a scapegoat and blaming a single cop that due to an on-sight communication failure, a training failure and a management failure pulled the trigger, any personnel firing needs to be from the top (Sammyboy the police commissioner) down.
Posted by TR | October 29, 2012 9:44 AM
The first step towards a solution is to get rid of all the tactical armor, redundant weapons, 20 extra mags, MOLLE plate carriers/vests, helmets, and etc. A lot of the attitude comes from the gear (dress for success, right?). I'm willing to bet that most police go their entire career without ever needing to draw their weapon.
Our police are NOT military and they should bear little resemblance in attitude or appearance.
Posted by Anthony | October 29, 2012 11:47 AM
Would a rational person actually confront a policeman and threaten him/her? No and No.
The problem you have is irrational people whether they are high on drugs or not able to think rationally confronting the police and the police have 2 choices--back off or use the force necessary to subdue the person.
I would rather have the police subdue the person and if that takes a little more force than the fine folks of the SoWhat district like, so be it. At least we are all safer.
Posted by Dick Smith | October 29, 2012 1:54 PM
Jack,
Thanks for continuing to remind the public about our police problem. Chasse--and all the others--should never have died.
Posted by Shadrach | October 29, 2012 4:29 PM
Smith - Who's "we".
That Chris Humphries guy deleted my post on his Facebook page where I called him a murderer and linked to the news reports of his crime. It stayed up for a good 24 hours though.
Posted by Jo | October 29, 2012 6:18 PM
Abandoning the mentally ill in flophouses, then expect the police and jails,
trained for criminals, to be their baby sitters is just plain wrong, and puts everyone at risk.
Managing and treating mental illness is an entirely different discipline and training. All that has happened was inevitable.
Vote to cut the taxes for the wealthy again though.
Posted by From Where I Sit | October 29, 2012 10:13 PM
Ha Ha Ha! This is going nowhere. Sure - the intellectually/truthinest challenged Mayor and Randy's lapdog (and fellow band member) Police Chief may have said anything they need to say to deter the Feds from indicting them, but the new procedures will not make it through the terms of the labor contract the City has given away to the Police Union. Consider the following:
Clause 3.1 guarantees, "Standards of employment related to wages, hours and working conditions which are mandatory for collective bargaining except those standards modified through collective bargaining shall be maintained at not less than the level in effect at the time of the signing of this Agreement. Any disagreement between the Association and the City with respect to this section shall be subject to the grievance procedure."
In other words, any change of procedure from the status quo has to be bargained. And, we have all seen how well the City does at "bargaining" with the Police Union.
Clause 15.1 states, "15.1 The Police Bureau and the Bureau of Human Resources will furnish the Association with copies of all policies and procedures, special, disciplinary and personnel orders when they are issued. Such materials shall include, but not be limited to, position announcements, job announcements, and training bulletins. When the Police Bureau is contemplating changing its policies and procedures, it shall provide the Association with all drafts of the to-be-amended policies and procedures and provide the Association with an opportunity to comment on the drafts. When the Bureau of Human Resources is contemplating changing its policies and procedures, it shall provide the Association with at least fifteen (15) days’ advance notice of the proposed changes."
Thus, before the City can implement anything (which then has to be bargained - see above), it has to provide a copy of what it (the City) wants to implement. This means before anything begins, the City has to make up its mind what it wants. With a credibility defunct Mayor holding court with four other royals having their own fiefdoms and futures to worry about, this is not possible.
Finally, the biggest hurtle to cop oversight is the 48 hour advance notice the City must give before it can interview a potentially bad cop (see Clause 61). This gives the cop and all his/her cop buddies plenty of time to meet with the Police Union attorney, at the Police Union headquarters, check their notes and "discuss" the events. ;-)
Posted by x-portlander | October 30, 2012 8:48 AM