Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on October 23, 2012 8:44 AM. The previous post in this blog was The worst part about the Lance Armstrong scandal. The next post in this blog is Rust never sleeps (neither does Johansen). Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

How we're voting, cont'd

Our post of yesterday laid out almost all of our votes in the current election. But as readers pointed out, we left out a couple of important positions -- Portland City Council and Oregon attorney general. Maybe it was because we've already discussed those two races on this blog all year long. Maybe it was because we lack enthusiasm about either of them. Maybe it was a subconscious urge of some kind. Who knows?

Well, here they are for the sake of completeness. DE signifies our degree of enthusiasm, with 0 the lowest and 10 the highest; DC is our degree of confidence that our candidate will prevail:

- State attorney general: Rosenblum - DE 2, DC 10. This one was over months ago.
- City Council: Fritz - DE 2, DC 5. By far the lesser of two evils.

We probably won't mark our ballot until close to the last minute, and so we're still open to suggestions. We're stubborn, but we do change our mind occasionally. The last time, we recall, was in 1993.

Comments (13)

Yup. With you on nearly everyone of the recommendations.

Firstly, I know Tim Volpert, and he's a great guy. I cannot recommend him highly enough, and your association argument is easily trumped by his integrity.

I'll vote for 79, whether it clutters the ballot or not, the people have to vote in the Oregon system to change the language in the constitution, and removing gender specific language is perfectly reasonable (even admirable), if only symbolically.

I'll also vote for 80. I think the comments on your other post already cited a lot of the good reasons. But I'd add 1) that the current black market system of sales makes it easier for younger people to get a hold of the substance; 2) fighting the federal government on an issue of fiscal and moral responsibility is more than appropriate; and 3) Pot is great for a lot of people, and the system of prohibition makes that seem like an inappropriate thing to say, even though it's true.

All of these pot measures seem so disingenuous to me, wrapped up in arguments about sick people, and prison costs, and civil rights and so on. Proponents are by-and-large pot smokers who want it to be legal so that they can buy it and smoke it more conveniently. Just be honest about the motivations and we can have an honest vote on it.

The idea that it will be harder for young people to get it is ludicrous. If they can't find a way to get at the "legal" supply, then other people will just keep growing it at home to meet that demand.

I'm totally a pot smoker, and have no shame about that. However, your argument is bunk: as Jack pointed out in his first post, I have no problem getting weed right now. It is also currently untaxed. It's unclear whether the price would go up or down post measure 80 (I can tell you prices have already been falling over the last 10 years here in Portland, and rather dramatically in the last 3). Which isn't to say my educated guess isn't that they'd fall further, at least eventually. Further, convenience would not necessarily increase: currently, there are about 4 "retail outlets" within 3 blocks of my residence, and delivery is free. That will not likely be the case post measure 80. Do I want my habit to be legal? Yes, of course. Why would I want people who don't understand a substance that does great things for me to have legal leverage over me? But do I want measure 80 to pass because it would be more "convenient"? No. I have no evidence that that would really be the case. Weed is currently considerably easier for me to procure than liquor.

The argument regarding youth is obviously impossible to demonstrate, because it relies on a counter-factual. However, it also relies on perfectly sound logic and shouldn't be dismissed so easily. Demand is not static, it is partially manufactured. The current system has created a network of retailers that, largely because they are already outside the law, do not have many scruples about selling to minors. Indeed, many minors belong to that network. It is a common (and in my experience correct) statement that it is easier for high schoolers to acquire weed than to acquire alcohol. Would they still get their hands on it through a (slightly less) black market post measure 80? Sure. But by disincentivising the larger black market retailers, who rely on high school middlemen, it is very likely that there would be less supply, and then less manufactured demand, among Oregon's youth.

Right, you want pot to be legal because you smoke pot. That is the conversation that proponents need to have with voters. It is the honest conversation.

I don't agree with your second argument. I don't think this measure would reduce availability to minors. But it probably wouldn't make it more available either.

Pot is getting more affordable because California's current law, and to a lesser extent our current law has created a gray area for growing and trafficking. If legal, pot would become a lot cheaper (before tax) because it is just a crop that can be grown as a commodity.

Sportsmen and women care more about hunting regulation. Gay people care more about gay marriage. Pot smokers care more about pot. Duh.

That's not at all the point though, or "the honest conversation." I know plenty of non smokers who want this law to pass, and indeed, I know plenty of smokers who will vote against it. In particular, dealers, who risk being out of a job.

The honest conversation is one that investigates the effects of current policy and the possible effects of alternative policies.

Regardless, note my original third reason: "Pot is great for a lot of people, and the system of prohibition makes that seem like an inappropriate thing to say, even though it's true." Do you think I don't realize that more or less outs me? I was attempting to be couth, not to hide my habit.

I wasn't trying to out you. I don't care whether you smoke or not.

My point was about how the pot measures have been presented in Oregon for a long time now. I think they obfuscate that fact that they are about Oregon's pot users wanting to legalize pot. Even the medical pot bill was really about that. They are all trojan horse measures.

Admittedly Measure 80 is more up front about it then some in the past. But if you look at their materials its all about regulations and protecting kids and raising tax revenue.

I just wish that the actual motivations were presented openly to Oregon: "We, Oregon's pot smokers, would like pot to be legal so that we can use it more openly. Do you agree with that or not?"

Anyway, if it works out in Washington and/or Colorado, we'll see what the effects are and can reconsider in the future.

- Measure 26-146 (head tax): No - DE 10, DC 8. Classic Sam Rand. Send those fops a farewell message.

The following from city website:

Measure 26-146 will generate the revenue to support the Arts Education and Access fund through an income tax of $35 per adult, income-earning resident of Portland. Residents living in households at or below the federal poverty limit will be exempt: they will not pay this tax.

Details need to be forthcoming. What happens if one doesn't send in the $35. in a timely matter? A huge fine on top of it? Who will be managing this program and what are the costs of that if passed.

Is anyone else concerned or am I misunderstanding something here, as this seems to allow the city to be digging into the financial business of the residents. Since when is it the city’s business of resident’s income level? In my view, I don’t want them to know my financial business. Can we just pay the $35. dollars to avoid “being
looked" at or do we need to file our IRS statements now to the city?

What about an 18 year old who hasn't found a job, they have to report to the city? Clearly an invasion of personal privacy! Some are already stressed with student loans and buying books.

It would be interesting to know what artists who many are struggling to even buy supplies during this economic downturn would have to say about this.
A household of two artists can buy $70. worth of supplies, and I suspect other essentials actually for that $70.
Believe me I am supportive of the arts, but this head tax will hurt many, while the wealthy can attend concerts, etc. subsidized. It is all for the children again.

What is the reason that arts have been taken from the schools and schools hurting financially? That is the bigger question.

If Adams were so concerned about children and arts, he would have stopped the pet projects years ago that have drained our city. Taxes going up and water rates going up are taking discretionary money from many who might have used that money to attend a concert or buy a work of art, or buy art supplies for their own children.

Yes, I care about children and the importance of art and expression, but I would prefer to spend my $35. to buy art supplies and take it to my local school, that way I know where the money will go.
Why don't those who support this measure do the same?

People might vote for this because it sounds good, who can be against the children and arts, but what will they think when the details are disclosed and collections begin.
This measure could lead to a negative attitude towards the arts, as people don't want to be forced on this.

I just wish that the actual motivations were presented openly to Oregon: "We, Oregon's pot smokers, would like pot to be legal so that we can use it more openly. Do you agree with that or not?"

Snards: You are no more than half-right. I've favored legalization for years and it isn't a drug I use. But there are a whole lot of people who see it like Tom Tacredo, R-Colorado, a state entertaining a similar measure:

"I am endorsing Amendment 64 not despite my conservative beliefs, but because of them. Throughout my career in public policy and in public office, I have fought to reform or eliminate wasteful and ineffective government programs. There is no government program or policy I can think of that has failed in such a unique way as marijuana prohibition.

Our nation is spending tens of billions of dollars annually in an attempt to prohibit adults from using a substance objectively less harmful than alcohol."

George Schultz and Pat Robertson have called for legalization, for crying out loud. I don't care what people pay for marijuana. They're paying the least of it. We are all paying billions and billions so they can't have it legally.

There are ways to remedy enforcement costs short of legalization. We would regret the impact of legalizing pot on our city and culture. Just as some places in the Netherlands are regreting it currently. You think we have a lot of 20-year-old burnouts sitting around on our sidewalks now? Just wait.

I used to smoke plenty, and get all fired up about prohibition and industrial hemp and it's not fair, and so on. Then I grew up and realized that society can't really be a free for all. There do have to be rules and by definition they are going to limit freedom for some. That's what rules are.

Right now we have a system where anyone who wants to can get low cost pot, use it discreetly and even if they're caught, get off very easily as long they aren't carrying an ounce or something. It is a good system that employs a wink-wink. I don't need every park and public event in Portland filled up with losers getting stoned in front of my kids.

Being less than honest about why something should be allowed or outlawed is hardly unique to pro pot legalization measures. Hell, its all but the standard these days, the ill-fated "Grange" casino measure and the estate tax measure being perfect examples from this current cycle.

clinaman -

The biggest part of the Arts Tax scam is that half of the net will be turned over as welfare for extremely elitist private arts groups - Portland Symphony; Opera; Portland Art Museum,etc.

Maddeningly, the "explanatory statement" in the Voter's Pamphlet, written by our hero Sam The Scammer Adams, at page M-53 (the pages with the reddish border)never mentions the half that bypasses schools and goes to private organizations. Sammy, liar to the end.

There has been some mass media print stories about the City needing to hire 4 - 5 folks to administer the assessment / collection. Unfortunately, I didn't keeep the reference.

Given the lawn signs on the around town on the Eastside, including in front of his house, it appears Scott Fernandez is waging a write in campaign for Mayor.

If anyone has any doubts, look at the Willamette Week full page ad,
Write-in Scott Fernandez for Mayor and title:
"What will Portland Look Like in Four years with Scott Fernandez as Mayor?"
with his position statements on -
Drinking water
Public Safety
Economic responsibility.
Fernandez gives in depth look at the issues, which is more than we can get from the other two, the press seems focused on campaign financing and personality problems.
Heavens forbid, should someone talk seriously about issues.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2012
Decoy, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Marqués de Murrieta, Reserva Rioja 2010
Kendall-Jackson, Grand Reserve Cabernet 2009
Seven Hills, Merlot 2013
Los Vascos, Grande Reserve Cabernet 2011
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Forlorn Hope, St. Laurent, Ost-Intrigen 2013
Upper Five, Tempranillo 2010 and 2012
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Topsail, Syrah 2013
Jim Barry, The Lodge Hill Shiraz 2013
Robert Mondavi, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2012
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2014
Boomtown, Cabernet 2013
Boulay, Sauvignon Blanc 2014
Domaine de Durban Muscat 2011
Patricia Green, Estate Pinot Noir 2012
Crios, Cabernet, Mendoza 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Dehesa la Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #15
Selvapiana, Chianti Ruffina 2012
Joseph Carr, Cabernet 2012
Prendo, Pinot Grigio, Vigneti Delle Dolomiti 2014
Joel Gott, Oregon Pinot Gris 2014
Otazu, Red 2010
Chehalem, Pinot Gris, Three Vineyards 2013
Wente, Merlot, Sandstone 2011
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2012
Monmousseau, Vouvray 2014
Duriguttti, Malbec 2013
Ruby, Pinot Noir 2012
Castellare, Chianti 2013
Lugana, San Benedetto 2013
Canoe Ridge, Cabernet, Horse Heaven Hills 2011
Arcangelo, Negroamaro Rosato
Vale do Bomfim, Douro 2012
Portuga, Branco 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Late Bottled Vintage Porto 2009
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Kristina's Reserve 2010
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 28, 2012
Coppola, Sofia, Rose 2014
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Napa Meritage 2011
Kramer, Chardonnay Estate 2012
Forlorn Hope, Que Saudade 2013
Ramos, Premium Tinto, Alentejano 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Rutherford Cabernet 2012
Bottego Vinaia, Pinot Grigio Trentino 2013
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2011
Pete's Mountain, Elijah's Reserve Cabernet, 2007
Beaulieu, George Latour Cabernet 1998
Januik, Merlot 2011
Torricino, Campania Falanghina 2013
Edmunds St. John, Heart of Gold 2012
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2010
Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013

The Occasional Book

Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 144
At this date last year: 203
Total run in 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics