Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 26, 2012 8:46 AM. The previous post in this blog was Portland cop critic throws spotlight on shrink. The next post in this blog is If it matters to Oregonians, it's butchered in the Oregonian. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, September 26, 2012

The liberal case against the Portland school bond issue

You don't have to feel guilty if you vote no on the upcoming Portland school tax bond issue. It doesn't mean you don't care about the public schools or the students in them. Quite the contrary. The reasons to just say no are laid out pretty eloquently here:

We do not believe rebuilding/building schools is the critical next step to improving education outcomes.

Instead, research consistently highlights these three critical steps necessary for successful academic results:

1. More teachers who receive the training and support they need, so as to be held accountable for student outcome (PPS has a graduation rate of only 62%),

2. More instructional classroom days. In 2012-2013 students will be in classroom instruction less than ½ of the year, per The Oregonian 8/8/12; national norm is 180 days.

3. More parent involvement (parents who have high expectations and hold children and their schools accountable)....

Rosa Parks, the newest school, built in 2006, ranks in the BOTTOM 5% of Title 1 schools (Portland Tribune 8/2/12). Having a nice, modern building doesn't guarantee an education.

"Throwing money at education is purely symbolic; both CARING and FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY demand specificity and results." From "Only Connect" by Dr. Rudolph Crew, Oregon’s education chief.

Between these arguments and the fact that they're planning to borrow the same amount they tried for unsuccessfully last time, we're voting no. Again. Maybe if they asked us for money for programmatic improvements, our answer would be different.

Comments (24)

I would make one more point to this list of very good points:

Stop enabling the drunk. Our tax system is crap if we can't fund public education. There is way too much stealing of public resources for stupid stuff - like urban renewal.

By continuing to bail out inadequate public education funding with "special measures" just keeps the game going.

Vote NO on ANY tax measure until the political class gets the message. You have plenty of money - use it wisely.

Unfortunately, PPS can count on those who do not actually own a home, and those who have no idea where the money will come from to pass this measure. Note that all of the promotional material last year, and this year, says nothing about the source of the revenue (i.e., property taxes). Ask any ten random 20-somethings where the money will come from, six out of ten won't know. They are the ones who will pass this bill.

We have a superintendent who didn't know we had a HS graduation problem until the Oregonian told her. If that isn't a firing offense, then there is no firing offense. It means that for all those dollars in the budget, none of them have the vaguest idea what we're getting or not getting for that money. Every last one of them above the level of principal should be fired. Either they didn't know, either, or they knew and kept it from higher management. In either case, they should all be GONE.

Then there was the astro-turf for football they asked for and were refused by the public. But, they created some kind of ruse of having the old turf "condemned" as an excuse to replace it anyway. Who "condemns" astro-turf? You couldn't make this stuff up. Nobody would believe it.

Point number one reads like the typical liberal double talk where two separate points trip over each other. It's nothing but happy talk.

Public schools fail all over the nation because they've become vehicles for teacher satisfaction and support instead of student achievement. If you want real change start out by firing most of the superintendents and their assistants; find new hires who spend 100 percent of their time assessing, planning and implementing achievement centric policies and hiring principals and teachers who focus on one and only one thing, what works for each individual student.

Maybe you need to look at the site itself and not rely solely on the small excerpt that Jack cited.

Unfortunately, I moved out of the district a month ago. I would have voted no, and recommend voting no on every - and any measure until Super Carol, her henchmen, Poe and the rest of the detritus are gone. Let’s find someone local and competent that can run the district.

I have kids in the schools, so I'm voting yes. Simple as that. I'd rather that they have better, rather than worse, facilities.

"I have kids in the schools, so I'm voting yes. Simple as that. I'd rather that they have better, rather than worse, facilities."

Gee. Brilliant analysis. Has it occurred to you that the facilities would be fine, had they not chosen to "defer maintenance" so they could take the cash and cram it into staff benefits?

Sorry to hear Dave.
But a lot of us do not.
And cannot afford a gun to our heads to fork over more to the union pensions.

So when us property owners all move out of here it will be exponentially worse than if this doesn't pass.

I was never under the impression that the bond measure was to improve academic performance; I was under the impression it was to improve facilities. I think it's going to do that.

Another reason I'm voting yes is that Measure 5 limited the ability of Portlanders to tax themselves to pay for the education system they want, and that pisses me off. If a majority want to pay more property taxes so that our kids have a better education system, we should be able to do that. Since property taxes have been artificially capped for 20 years, and the growth of those taxes capped by M47/50 for 15 years, the only way to get more is through operating levies (which we have) and GO bonds (which this is). So far, I've voted for every one.

By the way, the argument that there is "enough" money in the system is a cop out. If you think you know where to find the waste that would create $400 million to renovate the schools, you need to run for school board, request to be a citizen advisor, or at least testify and enlighten the rest of us.

And in the meantime, vote no.

I was never under the impression that the bond measure was to improve academic performance

Case closed. Vote no.

Miles: How does throwing an excessive amount of money into a broken tax/educational system bring about change? The amount of money PPS is proposing for the school rebuilds is pretty much double what any other district in the state has spent and that includes sites that opened this fall. $95 Million for Grant, $85 Million for Franklin, $70 Million for Roosevelt--these are astronomical costs. Did you read the page on restore education before buildings.com's site "How Much will the PPS bond cost Me?"
I do not not drive a Lamborghini nor would I feel comfortable doing so even if I could afford it. Nor do I want to drive a beater. This bond is so far out of touch with reality it is frightening. What do the people on our school board do for a living that they are clueless as to what is a reasonable budget? I have a really nice house I can sell you for $850,000 make that an even $1 million.

But WAIT! The advocates for the measure in their posts, brochures, media outreaches state that repairing, seismic upgrading and building a few schools is "to improve academic performance". Which is it?

Miles says he is voting yes because Portland's property taxes are too low.

Why doesn't he just send in more?

"By the way, the argument that there is "enough" money in the system is a cop out. If you think you know where to find the waste that would create $400 million to renovate the schools, you need to run for school board, request to be a citizen advisor, or at least testify and enlighten the rest of us."

Many people have already done just that. Saxton in advocating for PERS reform; Kulo in winning a modest PERS reform (both 10 yrs ago). Much more needs to be done to reform PERS. $1Billion more this 2 yr legislative session, just for more PERS (mostly to those no longer teaching our kids), and next 2yr session.

PERS, reform the PERS and you would have more money for both facilities (capital expense for the current bond) and operating costs.

Miles: How does throwing an excessive amount of money into a broken tax/educational system bring about change?

I don't think it's excessive, and I don't think it's broken (yet). I do think that when I went to PPS 30 years ago, before Sizemore's tax measures, people paid higher property taxes (connected to the actual value of their property), the schools were in better shape, and we had a top-notch public system. In fact, PPS turned out better students than many of the NY/NJ/PA private prep schools did (at least if the kids I went to college with were an indication of the quality of those schools).

If you're looking for a reason to vote against the bond, it's easy to find fault with PPS. But if you actually want to positively impact the education of 40,000 future taxpaying residents, you can't just say no and wash your hands of it. You don't change a system by destroying it. You change it by getting involved. They just appointed a citizen oversight body for the bond. Why not send a letter to each of them outlining your concerns about the high cost of the buildings? I suspect they might actually forward your question to those who will have to defend it.

Miles says he is voting yes because Portland's property taxes are too low. Why doesn't he just send in more?

Because we're all in this together. If the majority thinks we should pay more, we all pay more. If it thinks we should pay less, we all pay less.

PERS, reform the PERS and you would have more money for both facilities (capital expense for the current bond) and operating costs.

PERS reform is great. I pushed for it back then, and I will gladly push for more. But the bulk of what legally can be done, has been done. Implement every reform the City Club put in their report, and you don't solve the problem. We cannot go back in time and undo what the Democrats (and Republicans!) in the legislature did to us in the 70s and 80s. I don't think it makes sense to pass something that feels good, but just gets thrown out by the courst two years later.(Interestingly, one PERS reform being proposed is to require employees to pay the 6% pick-up. It's not really a reform, just a pay cut. And PPS teachers already do it.)

Really? Ya don't say. Ya don't say.

Coulda sworn the liberal policy for fixing things was throwing money at them. Past performance and all that.

Miles, "Since property taxes have been artificially capped for 20 years.."

3% annual increases are a cap?

I lived in Portland during 15 of those 20 years, and my property taxes went up AT LEAST 3% each and every year beginning in 1997. Some years, the property tax was higher due to local option levies.

It recently sold for $24k less than the "assessed value" and $150k less Multnomah County's estimated market value.
The poor SOB who bought it is paying $6,696 for a $280,000 house. That's $558/month just in property tax.

Only in Government can a guaranteed 3% annual increase be considered a cap.

No doubt he'll be paying $10,000/year at some point in the future: we just don't know when. Is his income going to rise 3% a year? Does his ability to shoulder that tax burden rise with the "assessed value" or with his income?

I'll give you a hint: most owner occupied housing isn't income producing. Most salaries aren't increasing 3% annually.

When you have the ability to tax a person's home, you have the right to take their home. This is especially true for the working poor and those living on fixed incomes.

Portland's middle class will flee to the surburbs and enrollments will decline while commute times increase.

"If a majority want to pay more property taxes so that our kids have a better education system, we should be able to do that."

It's pretty easy to vote for something you don't have to pay for. A good chunk of Portlanders are underwater on their mortgages, under or unemployed, and struggling to get by. You think they had seismic upgrades done to their houses? In addition, the disparity in terms of how houses are taxed is a joke. I have a 3-2 house in Concordia and pay about 4k in taxes. My neighbor has a 4-3 house on a double lot worth almost twice as much as mine and pays 1,200 a year in taxes. Tell me about how fair the tax system is in Multnomah County.

" I'd rather that they have better, rather than worse, facilities."

PPS and some bond supporters seem to asking resident property owners to finance modernizing three high schools (with plans to request future bonds for additional construction at remaining schools). What is the explanation for closing the three most recently built high schools (Jackson High School, Adams High School, Marshall High School)? While financial resources are limited due to poor economy, why not focus on student retention, achievement, and results oriented teaching improvements?
Restore Education Before Buildings

"More teachers who receive the training and support they need, so as to be held accountable for student outcome."

Oh yes, the accountability fairy appears again. It's a great word, accountability. It sounds so innocuous when what the writer means is "bust the union and make it easy to fire teachers."

I have no problem with helping out schools if this bond weren't paid out of property taxes. So many voters who support this bond are not home owners and will not directly be responsible for paying the bill on this hand-out to contractors via an incompetant school district.

Additionally, I am of the mind that since the pro-bond people can use the argument "my kids are in school, so I'm voting yes", I can reasonably use the argument: "pay for your own kids out of your own wallet- I have no kids, so I'm voting against it." We all need to vote for our own interests, right? Why don't you breeders take the deduction you get on your income taxes and pay for your kids? Oh yeah, you'd prefer everyone else support/subsidize your decision to procreate...


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 119
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics