Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 5, 2012 11:29 AM. The previous post in this blog was But it's a dry heat. The next post in this blog is Afternoon with Bruce. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, August 5, 2012

Government a la carte

The ballot measure to create a permanent taxing district for the Multnomah County library seems likely to pass. Most of the arguments against it aren't new, and they haven't stopped library tax measures from passing before. Multnomah's library is expensive – yes, but it puts out a great product that many people enjoy and the majority of voters supports. Taxes are already too high, government is already too big, let the private sector handle it – let’s face it, this is Portland, and those arguments, whatever their merits may be, are all nonstarters.

About the only new argument we're seeing this time around is that through the craziness of Oregon property tax "compression," a library district would take money away from other government bureaus. Opponents wheel out the Portland "children’s levy" as a victim, about to lose $1 million a year, but millions more would be drained from City Hall pet projects and the "urban renewal" scam machinery.

Is the "compression" effect going to be a winning argument against the district? We don't think so. If the children's levy comes up short, why couldn't school supporters just ask for a bigger levy next time? If the public really wants the current level of service maintained, it can vote itself a tax increase. And of all people to be crying the blues over raids on its treasury – the City of Portland is ruthless as it creates, expands, and extends its "urban renewal" developer handout programs at the expense of schools and other public services throughout the area.

We didn't like the way the library taxing district concept was presented to the voters two years ago, when the groundwork was laid for this fall's final vote. And we share some folks' suspicions that there is fat in the library budget that ought to be identified and cut. But we're not persuaded that creating the district is a bad idea. In fact, we think it has a certain appeal.

We like the idea of the public getting more directly involved in designating the programs on which its hard-earned tax dollars are being spent. We wouldn't mind if the police bureau got its own taxing district and the fire bureau its own. We'd like to see a street paving district, a street sweeping district, and a mental health treatment district, too. Let’s have all the property tax dollars spent on the services that the public wants, and stop frittering them away on streetcars and bike share programs and other tomfoolery. Anything that "compresses" the fantasies of the city's bloated planning army is aces in our book.

Comments (17)

If our elected officials had been doing their jobs right, or had left in place the need for a public vote on URA funding, rather than "compressing" basic services by giving unlimited $$ for undefined plans to the development mafia, then spinning off libraries and parks into their own districts wouldn't be necessary. Those who are advising against this are the same ones that made it necessary.

BTW, nominating Charles Jordan for CEO of the new Parks and Recreation District.

I like libraries myself and use them but I do have one concern with passing this bill. I believe libraries, as we know them, are on their way out. Internet has killed traditional print media and will likely kill off all other forms of print as well. They can be replaced with a server and a couple employees maintaining the database.

"Let’s have all the property tax dollars spent on the services that the public wants, and stop frittering them away on streetcars and bike share programs and other tomfoolery."

Sometimes direct democracy trumps a representative republic, especially when those representatives are so brain-dead. The public deserves what the public wants, even if a server and two database employees are more efficient.

Look around ... I don't know a single kid who who has gotten anything from the Children's Levy. Not a single kid, not a single program. And not saying this because I'm locked up in some Old Folks' Home.

Now, the library ...

I know folks who borrow books and movies. Folks who download music. I know kids who show up once a week to be read stories. I know other kids who read to seeing-eye dogs.

The library is for everyone, the Childrens' Levy is for Dan Saltzman.

Actually, IIRC, Dan Saltzman's lady friend is a beneficiary of spending by the "Children's Fund" board. Maybe the "Children's Fund" spending is for her, not "The Legend">

And because they are not married, none of Oregon's already-too-loose conflicts-of interest rules apply.

Sort of like Cylvia and John.

Ain't Oregon grand?

This is exactly the reason people say government does not work. Presumably, the folks elected from a like minded voter's base, would be spending monies on the same priorities most desired by the people who elected them. There would be no need for a "special taxing district". Somehow though, once in office our elected succumb to either the loudest minority or wealthiest special interest to guide their path. It's too bad we couldn't just vote on our priorities, and have them use existing tax monies to get it all done. After all, if we all agree it's a priority, then it isn't special.

Jack: We wouldn't mind if the police bureau got its own taxing district and the fire bureau its own. We'd like to see a street paving district, a street sweeping district, and a mental health treatment district, too.
JK: Next step: elect the head of each bureau.
Final steps: Do the same to a very few other important bureaus, then kill funding for the rest of them AND city council. Make city hall into a museum to government waste.

If people really want bike paths and speed bumps, let then elect Blue manure as head of roads.
If people really want 50 story condo farms next door they can elect Sam Adams to head PDC. Wait - where did this PDC come from? Oh, drat, it got left off of the list surviving of agencies.


Speaking of City of Portland being ruthless as it creates, expands, and extends developer handout programs at the expense of schools and other public services; don’t forget the 10 year tax abatement handouts the City of Portland hands out to developers for building the shoddy high density tenement slums of the future, many of them without parking, in locations where they don’t belong. It is obvious Portland has a Chief Idiot (or two) running things, and a gang of idiot cronies as backup.

If new taxes or fees are assessed, they need to come from the people who can afford to pay them, but scam or freeload off the current bias applied system. Examples include bicyclist paid user fees to pay for bicycle infrastructure instead of siphoning off motorist paid roadway dollars, and fares for the transit and streetcar passengers that truly reflect the fiscal costs of providing the service – both operational and locally paid infrastructure costs.

Subsidies for cyclists and transit do not need to be brought into the "urban renewal" debate. One talking point at a time, please.

I may be wrong, but it seems that I recall Portland's first URD going in around 50 years ago, tearing up established SE neighborhoods and installing 3 large apartment towers, among other amenities. 50 years later, it's a URD again, and Tri-Met cut down most of the trees that were planted in the area to make way for more loot rail.

Am I missing something, or is URD in Portland just a never-ending merry-go-round?

It seems to have been a never-ending merry-go-around, but once those paying for it have been picked fairly clean, it may turn into those lonely unused and stopped carousels one sees at carnivals.


I've been hearing predictions about the demise of the book for at least 20 years. It has not happened yet, nor have I seen any decrease in the interest in books. I think you'll find that interest in books is just as great as it has always been. What has changed is that library patrons now add in other media and formats. Books are as popular as ever. The library now attracts people who aren't necessarily interested in books, but who are interested in DVDs, CDs, or books on CD.

We have a ways to go before digital formats supplant print, and I doubt that they ever will. People simply have more choices in what format in which to read (or listen) to books.

Digital formats are not going to save any money. Databases can be expensive... usually in the thousands of dollars. Adding more "seats" adds to the subscription price - and that subscription has to be renewed every year (an expensive print Reference set might be purchased every 5 years to stretch the budget). One of the downsides of databases is that once you cancel the subscription, you lose access: not true for a book you by.

All the programming (book groups, children's programs, adult programming, etc...), reference help, and various patron services have not diminished. If anything, new technologies require libraries to constantly retrain their staff to help patrons adapt. The library is more than book storage. The library is frequently the communitie's family room: internet access, photocopier, word processing, etc... While you may be computer savvy, and have your own computer and internet connection, you would be surprised to see how many people don't.

Libraries will look different (and the change will most likely be gradual), but they will still be important and desired. The proof? They are busier today than they have ever been in the past.

The front page story and editorial in the August NW Examiner address a conflict of interest involving PDC chair Scott Andrews, the aborted Centennial Mills project and the proposed Portland Public Market.


Like I said, I like libraries and books myself. To me there's nothing better than holding a book in my hands and read it. But I think that's a generational thing, kids today are used to reading off their laptop, kindle, ipad, audio books, etc. Even now, if signed up to the library you can download digital books right from home to read. IE, we are already going down the road of only needing a server.

Yes, I do know they've added movies, cd's, provide printers/internet and such. All those services are also provided in other places already. That begs the question, why the mission creep by libraries. Maybe because patronage was going down so they've added extras to get people in. It will work for a while but will trail off over time.

I'm not saying libraries as we know them will die out next week. I do think in the next generation, maybe two what we have today will no longer be around.


Libraries have provided music for at least the last 50 years, if not longer. I remember working at Multnomah County Library (Central) when they checked out 8mm films (that would be over 30 years ago). There is no creep, libraries are simply providing the same content in different formats. What changed, at least for films and movies, is that whereas not everyone had an 8mm projector, a significant portion of the public did have VHS, and then DVD, players.

I think libraries will change. The change will be gradual and evolutionary as the population demographics and the way our patrons access and use information changes. However, I suspect that libraries will be just as loved and need in the foreseeable future. If the time comes that libraries are obsolete and not used, then adjustments will happen. However, libraries today are vibrant and the public has made clear that they want them.

Patronage has continued to climb because libraries have adapted to the demands and requests of their patrons. When the patronage decreases and people stop going, then libraries will be unnecessary.

FYI - eReaders are actually probably more popular with slightly older patrons (the screens on smart phones are simply too small for, ummmm, older eyes). Same with audiobooks - those tend to be more popular with older audiences than with new. And as for laptops - most sane people don't do extended reading on those unless they can't avoid it. ;)

What you see as "mission creep" I simply see as libraries providing the same basic services in new ways, and libraries responding to their patrons. The alternative would be for them to ignore the population - that is a good way to become obsolete and useless fast.

Questions about the library district proposal:

Does it establish citizen panels to oversee budget and tax proposals as well as ongoing operations?
Does it provide an analytical process for future tax rates?
Does it set a tax ceiling for future years?
Does it require an independent auditor function?
Does it put on the record that library management must be responsive to both citizen and auditor recommendations?
Does it call for "desk audits" of all positions in order to justify keeping them, retaining current salaries, reducing salary structures, or--gasp!--eliminating positions?

Ridiculous as such questions are for Portland's sheeplike voters, citizens in Josephine County will be voting to set up a special library district that is much more tough-minded, and that will be closer in touch with the community than our bureaucracy. One aspect that would be unthinkable here: Its employees will not be participants in PERS. Our district will surely grandfather everyone, rather than look for constructive solutions to the rising cost of personnel.

Multnomah County's commissioners will be the ex officio Library District Board. How much time do you really believe they'll devote to that obligation, compared to many other functions that normally have higher priorities, like social services, mental health, etc.? One can assume that the library district's director and various managers will have cozy berths, even farther removed from accountability than at present.

Proposal for Josephine County's special library district:


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics