Besides being of questionable legality, Portland's proposed $35-per-person annual tax to funds "arts education" would be retroactive to the first of 2012, even though it wouldn't be voted into law until the November election. A vague summary of the whole thing is here. If you don't like the ballot title, you have until next Tuesday to go to court to have it reviewed:
CAPTION:
Restore School Arts, Music Education; Fund Arts through Limited Tax
QUESTION:
Shall Portland restore arts, music for schools and fund arts through income tax capped at 35 dollars per year?
Now they're saying that the "income tax" will be "capped" at $35 a year, whereas previously the mayor said it was going to be a flat $35. It's hard to see how it's an "income tax" if it's a fixed dollar amount for everyone who pays it. And if it's any more complicated than that, it's going to be an even bigger mess to enforce than what's already been acknowledged. It's so dopey that you think it couldn't possibly pass -- but then you look at the two finalists for mayor and you realize, anything's possible.
Comments (19)
That caption is amazingly misleading.
How about:
"Enacts new retroactive tax to fundarts programs in local school districts in Portland, and provide funds for non school arts projects."
Is the filing deadline July 3 (next Tuesday) or July 10 (week from Tuesday)?
How much is the filing fee?
One filing fee, 50 petitioners?
The tax is a flat $35 per income-earning resident? Hmmm. Is "income" defined as actual earnings, or checks sent from home? I'm asking because I want to see if Portland's ever-expanding hipster population will be hit up for this, or if they're purely recipients instead of contributors.
My guess is that this will function along the same lines as the MultCo tax that went for 3 (?) years a few years back. I'll bet that tax-paying residents pay according to a chart based on taxable income in order to call it a "tax," but that the categories will be really broad so as to ensure that pretty much everyone pays $35, eg. AGI = 10K-29,999K = no tax, 30K-39,999K = $30, 40K and higher = $35.
I wonder if the school board was consulted prior to Sam pitching this tax. Voter frustration with this one could bleed over and take votes away from their more costly bond measure.
Tankfixer, don't forget all of the government employees and attorneys who will gain employment from this measure, as well. Wonder what the net amount collected after expenses will really be!
Typical of our "progressive" mayor. Completely tone death to the fact that people in this town don't want and can't afford more taxes/fees, and structured in such a fashion that it will likely cost hundreds of thousands in legal fees (because this doesn't pass the smell test) and alienate people toward an otherwise worthy cause. It would be a different story if the city could be trusted to use funds in an appropriate manner, but under Sam the Scam, that hasn't been the case. Wonder if some of the grafted bike funds could have been used for arts education?
Currently the city or Portland has no authority to tax. That's why the business income tax is called a "fee", even though it is based on gross revenue and is, for all practical intents and purposes, a tax.
No matter how attractive it may seem to folks to help fund the arts in schools, they must not vote for this tax. This would, for the first time, give the city the authority to tax. The camel's nose will be in the tent and we will never see the end of it.
If you want to help the schools, write them a thirty five dollar check.
Since Portland has no authority to tax, then I'm sure when this goes to the US Supreme Court, Roberts will rule against CoP for imposing a tax that has been disguised as a fee. Oh wait, they even called it a "limited tax" on the ballot title.
Oh wait, they even called it a "limited tax" on the ballot title. What gives???
CoP is probably simply seizing the authority to impose a tax.
Until somebody says "no you can't" and has the power and will to back it up, so far this mayor and his council have been willing to try just about anything they please just to see if they can get away with it.
Much like very naughty children, except in this case the kids have taken your wallet, all your keys, and have locked you out of the house.
Where is the language about the part of the swindle that has tax dollars going to the non-profits? It is obvious Sammyboy’s rhetorical propaganda about promoting transparency is just another one of his lies.
"In our defense, if the mayoral election was choices were Hales, Smith or No, No would win in a landslide."
Given that the choices were Hales, Smith and several others in the primary and Hales and Smith are the only ones left standing, I would say this statement is not true. At least not in Portland.....sorry...had to point out that that combination was already offered and rejected.....
Why can't they instead fire or lay off (or to use a doublespeak term, de-hire) some of the useless skool bureaucrats, from alleged vice-principals to teachers' aides? By going along with this tax, it prevents forcing those in power to make decisions that they really need to sooner or later.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
That caption is amazingly misleading.
How about:
"Enacts new retroactive tax to fundarts programs in local school districts in Portland, and provide funds for non school arts projects."
Is the filing deadline July 3 (next Tuesday) or July 10 (week from Tuesday)?
How much is the filing fee?
One filing fee, 50 petitioners?
Posted by Nonny Mouse | July 2, 2012 10:04 AM
The Financial Impact and Public Involvement Statement prepared by the city clearly states:
"The tax is a flat $35 per income-earning resident.
Posted by Not the Tax Man | July 2, 2012 10:08 AM
If you think of Portland as a bizarre form of entertainment, it's just another cover charge.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 2, 2012 10:15 AM
Weird really isn't working.
Posted by K.W. | July 2, 2012 10:39 AM
If someone here files a petition against and needs signatures - PLEASE let us know so we can sign!
Posted by links | July 2, 2012 10:54 AM
The tax is a flat $35 per income-earning resident? Hmmm. Is "income" defined as actual earnings, or checks sent from home? I'm asking because I want to see if Portland's ever-expanding hipster population will be hit up for this, or if they're purely recipients instead of contributors.
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | July 2, 2012 11:05 AM
Think of it as the:
"Slacker Artists Full Employment Act"
Posted by tankfixer | July 2, 2012 11:11 AM
My guess is that this will function along the same lines as the MultCo tax that went for 3 (?) years a few years back. I'll bet that tax-paying residents pay according to a chart based on taxable income in order to call it a "tax," but that the categories will be really broad so as to ensure that pretty much everyone pays $35, eg. AGI = 10K-29,999K = no tax, 30K-39,999K = $30, 40K and higher = $35.
I wonder if the school board was consulted prior to Sam pitching this tax. Voter frustration with this one could bleed over and take votes away from their more costly bond measure.
Posted by Dave J. | July 2, 2012 11:38 AM
Tankfixer, don't forget all of the government employees and attorneys who will gain employment from this measure, as well. Wonder what the net amount collected after expenses will really be!
Posted by umpire | July 2, 2012 11:42 AM
Typical of our "progressive" mayor. Completely tone death to the fact that people in this town don't want and can't afford more taxes/fees, and structured in such a fashion that it will likely cost hundreds of thousands in legal fees (because this doesn't pass the smell test) and alienate people toward an otherwise worthy cause. It would be a different story if the city could be trusted to use funds in an appropriate manner, but under Sam the Scam, that hasn't been the case. Wonder if some of the grafted bike funds could have been used for arts education?
Posted by NEPuy | July 2, 2012 12:29 PM
Currently the city or Portland has no authority to tax. That's why the business income tax is called a "fee", even though it is based on gross revenue and is, for all practical intents and purposes, a tax.
No matter how attractive it may seem to folks to help fund the arts in schools, they must not vote for this tax. This would, for the first time, give the city the authority to tax. The camel's nose will be in the tent and we will never see the end of it.
If you want to help the schools, write them a thirty five dollar check.
Posted by Dave Lister | July 2, 2012 1:11 PM
If you want to help the schools, write them a thirty five dollar check.
The best part of that idea is you'll know CoP can't use it as another mystery slush fund for its photo-op projects.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 2, 2012 1:29 PM
Since Portland has no authority to tax, then I'm sure when this goes to the US Supreme Court, Roberts will rule against CoP for imposing a tax that has been disguised as a fee. Oh wait, they even called it a "limited tax" on the ballot title.
What gives???
Posted by lw | July 2, 2012 1:33 PM
Oh wait, they even called it a "limited tax" on the ballot title. What gives???
CoP is probably simply seizing the authority to impose a tax.
Until somebody says "no you can't" and has the power and will to back it up, so far this mayor and his council have been willing to try just about anything they please just to see if they can get away with it.
Much like very naughty children, except in this case the kids have taken your wallet, all your keys, and have locked you out of the house.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 2, 2012 1:47 PM
Where is the language about the part of the swindle that has tax dollars going to the non-profits? It is obvious Sammyboy’s rhetorical propaganda about promoting transparency is just another one of his lies.
Posted by TR | July 2, 2012 1:55 PM
"It's so dopey that you think it couldn't possibly pass -- but then you look at the two finalists for mayor and you realize, anything's possible."
In our defense, if the mayoral election was choices were Hales, Smith or No, No would win in a landslide.
Posted by Chuck | July 2, 2012 1:59 PM
"In our defense, if the mayoral election was choices were Hales, Smith or No, No would win in a landslide."
Given that the choices were Hales, Smith and several others in the primary and Hales and Smith are the only ones left standing, I would say this statement is not true. At least not in Portland.....sorry...had to point out that that combination was already offered and rejected.....
Posted by thaddeus | July 2, 2012 5:39 PM
I'm prepared to pay their silly "tax"
In pennies....
Canadian, pennies...
Posted by tankfixer | July 2, 2012 6:25 PM
Why can't they instead fire or lay off (or to use a doublespeak term, de-hire) some of the useless skool bureaucrats, from alleged vice-principals to teachers' aides? By going along with this tax, it prevents forcing those in power to make decisions that they really need to sooner or later.
Bob Tiernan
NE Portland
Posted by Bob Tiernan | July 3, 2012 2:53 PM