The dudes running the City of Portland's water supply (and the pet project pork barrel that goes with it) really, really don't want to talk about how much of ratepayers' money is going for non-water-related projects. You know, like the "green" construction demonstration house, "clean money" campaign money handouts to amateur politicians, and setting up a new headquarters for the Rose Festival, among many others. In the pending lawsuit challenging the legality of these and other spending sprees, the city is asking the judge to deny the outraged plaintiffs any answers to the factual questions they've raised about these projects.
It describes many, if not most, of the requests for information as a "fishing expedition" that would take an unreasonable amount of time and expense to accommodate.
This is Portland City Hall's view of accountability to the public -- it's all just an unreasonable "fishing expedition" that should be dismissed.
But hey, at least there's some comedy included in the package:
The [city's] motion also includes a footnote that dismisses a previous letter of advice issued by the city attorney's office. It said the city charter requires that water and sewer funds should only be spent on programs directly related to water and sewer services.
The letter had been cited by attorneys for the plaintiffs suing the city as support for their cause. But in the footnote, the city now writes: "[t]he advice of the city's attorneys ... is entitled to no weight or deference from the court in interpreting the charter."
Or from anybody else, apparently.
Comments (14)
Hopefully, the judge is a Portland ratepayer who's interested in finding out for himself just what's been going on.
My bad...I didn't read the article first.
The Judge is Stephen K Bushong, originally from Michigan.
Jack, what do you know of this guy that isn't in his bio on Google?
OK, so Bushong is a U Mich grad who had a job a Miller Nash and worked for Hardy Meyers, before he was elected to be a judge. He could be on "the payroll"...
I give the plaintiffs a 50/50 chance.
It seems pretty clear what the charter says. Even the city attorney agrees, although apparently we aren't supposed to listen to them.
The city is going through a lot of time, money and expense fighting something that seems like a sure loser. I guess they're mostly interested in mitigating what the fine will be.
One would think a plain, ordinary ratepayer would be entitled to that kind of information, without having to file a lawsuit much less talk to a judge. I mean, really, how costly is it for the city to explain how it spends our money? If we can't afford to account for the funds, what does that say about the wisdom of spending them on all these goofball projects.
I almost feel bad for the city attorneys, who are required by law to defend the pretezel logic of the political hacks that have come and gone over the years. But then, not so much.
A most secretive bureau and matters of which we must be informed:
Their huge Debt and why they needed another $75 million bond.
Who runs the Plans and Bureau!
Regional Water Plan.
Our water bureau's role in the LT2 Rule.
Their "flow chart" of dismantling our system.
Why the Council supports Leonard and the PWB.
Why they don't want a Waiver and won't ask for one.
The Construction up at Bull Run that could introduce invasive species.
The "works in progress" at the well-fields for a multi-national corporation.
Who gets discounts while we citizens pay more.
Why the great silence about our water from elected officials.
Using politics rather than science to achieve outcomes.
Why the subject of radon is swept under the rug.
Maneuvers to keep citizens at bay.
How much money goes to administration and costs.
How much deferred maintenance of our valuable system and why.
The path to privatization.
Biggest Secret of all:
The Grand Plan of the future of our water!
In my opinion, this is a bureau run amok.
A moratorium and immediate stop to all plans is needed until transparency for the public.
There is too much at stake here for our community to be kept in the dark regarding
our precious resource and our pocket books!
How much will the public have to pay just to get information/transparency and for justice to prevail about this very basic need, our water?
Wow, there is so much low hangin' fruit on this tree of ineptitude it is tough to pick just one, but: "[t]he advice of the city's attorneys ... is entitled to no weight or deference from the court in interpreting the charter."
Aside from the obvious He who represents himself has a fool for a client I wonder if they made one of the attorneys write that drivel or just approve it?
At this point, I don't know if I feel more distressed and sad for the people who know far too little about this until too late or distressed and sad for the people who know too much and cannot reach the public adequately about it until too late.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
Hopefully, the judge is a Portland ratepayer who's interested in finding out for himself just what's been going on.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | June 14, 2012 9:03 AM
Who is the judge? Then we will be able to make odds on the outcome.
Posted by portland native | June 14, 2012 9:14 AM
My bad...I didn't read the article first.
The Judge is Stephen K Bushong, originally from Michigan.
Jack, what do you know of this guy that isn't in his bio on Google?
Posted by portland native | June 14, 2012 9:19 AM
Nada.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 14, 2012 9:19 AM
OK, so Bushong is a U Mich grad who had a job a Miller Nash and worked for Hardy Meyers, before he was elected to be a judge. He could be on "the payroll"...
I give the plaintiffs a 50/50 chance.
Posted by portland native | June 14, 2012 9:30 AM
It seems pretty clear what the charter says. Even the city attorney agrees, although apparently we aren't supposed to listen to them.
The city is going through a lot of time, money and expense fighting something that seems like a sure loser. I guess they're mostly interested in mitigating what the fine will be.
Posted by Snards | June 14, 2012 10:09 AM
IMHO any fine should be paid by the induhviduals who made the decisions..
I.e. Sam and Randy and company....
Posted by tankfixer | June 14, 2012 10:37 AM
How dare the public inquire into City Hall's private slush fund!
What has happened to this city?
Posted by Tim | June 14, 2012 10:56 AM
One would think a plain, ordinary ratepayer would be entitled to that kind of information, without having to file a lawsuit much less talk to a judge. I mean, really, how costly is it for the city to explain how it spends our money? If we can't afford to account for the funds, what does that say about the wisdom of spending them on all these goofball projects.
I almost feel bad for the city attorneys, who are required by law to defend the pretezel logic of the political hacks that have come and gone over the years. But then, not so much.
Posted by Mike H | June 14, 2012 1:05 PM
Portland water bureau wants to keep its secrets
A most secretive bureau and matters of which we must be informed:
Their huge Debt and why they needed another $75 million bond.
Who runs the Plans and Bureau!
Regional Water Plan.
Our water bureau's role in the LT2 Rule.
Their "flow chart" of dismantling our system.
Why the Council supports Leonard and the PWB.
Why they don't want a Waiver and won't ask for one.
The Construction up at Bull Run that could introduce invasive species.
The "works in progress" at the well-fields for a multi-national corporation.
Who gets discounts while we citizens pay more.
Why the great silence about our water from elected officials.
Using politics rather than science to achieve outcomes.
Why the subject of radon is swept under the rug.
Maneuvers to keep citizens at bay.
How much money goes to administration and costs.
How much deferred maintenance of our valuable system and why.
The path to privatization.
Biggest Secret of all:
The Grand Plan of the future of our water!
In my opinion, this is a bureau run amok.
A moratorium and immediate stop to all plans is needed until transparency for the public.
There is too much at stake here for our community to be kept in the dark regarding
our precious resource and our pocket books!
How much will the public have to pay just to get information/transparency and for justice to prevail about this very basic need, our water?
Posted by clinamen | June 14, 2012 1:44 PM
Wow, there is so much low hangin' fruit on this tree of ineptitude it is tough to pick just one, but:
"[t]he advice of the city's attorneys ... is entitled to no weight or deference from the court in interpreting the charter."
Aside from the obvious He who represents himself has a fool for a client I wonder if they made one of the attorneys write that drivel or just approve it?
Posted by Old Zeb | June 14, 2012 2:05 PM
Monopoly utilities have been turned into another way for governments to pick your pocket.
Also why are we paying for the attorneys to undercut the public (taxpayer) interests?
Posted by Britt Storkson | June 15, 2012 6:26 AM
Judge Bushong can rule on the merits or stay in good graces with The Machine: the plaintiffs are so screwed.
Posted by Mister Tee | June 16, 2012 10:37 AM
So are all those who aren't part of The Machine!
At this point, I don't know if I feel more distressed and sad for the people who know far too little about this until too late or distressed and sad for the people who know too much and cannot reach the public adequately about it until too late.
Posted by clinamen | June 16, 2012 8:35 PM