Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 6, 2012 8:45 AM. The previous post in this blog was Tim Boyle didn't want Kroger at Reed. The next post in this blog is Is this guy somebody's nephew?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, June 6, 2012

Apartment weasel to Fremont neighbors: Read my lips

“We’re not gonna have parking. The people who choose to rent here, if parking’s a problem, they won’t rent here,” said Remmers.

What a prince.

Comments (32)

Sigh. As usual, it's great, GREAT, that he wants to encourage people who don't have cars to park to rent his apartments. Right now, anyway. So...what's going to happen the moment Zach, Hummus, and Melvert decide to have their first party to celebrate their new digs and 95 percent of the attendees have to drive to get there?

Need to immediately repeal that relatively recent goofy city ordinance exemption that allows these development goons to overwhelm existing residential neighborhoods with newly fobbed-off parking problems. Must make this a campaign problem for the clowns running for city council & mayor.

One of the city's objectives is to use every means possible to persecute you for owning or using a motor vehicle and they've already stated some while back that you don't have a right to park on "their" streets.

In light of this attitude, permitting, encouraging, and even subsidizing projects like this helps to further that goal.

"what's going to happen the moment . . . and 95 percent of the attendees have to drive to get there"

Easy - They'll park on the street and give the neighborhood some semblance of popularity whilst pissing off the local merchants.

When you think about it that a pretty impressive accomplishment, even for a place as screwed up as Portland.

As the banks begin working through the backlog of foreclosed properties and putting them on the market, we'll see that there really isn't a shortage of residential rental space in PDX. Few people will want to rent parking-free units, and they'll be mostly vacant. My prediction is that eventually they'll be turned into Section 8 housing.

This guy's a card . . .

"We're going to overbuild and overpopulate this residential neighborhood. Parking is a hassle when you choose to live in the big city!

"Wait, what? You mean those families who chose to live in a nice quiet non-Pearl District neighborhood object? Didn't they know that NE Portland is just like any other European metro area?"

Most projects are made to look at least presentable in their initial renderings. Not this one. I can only imagine how much uglier it will be when it's actually built.

Perhaps this is the future envisioned for new Portland housing:

The Fremont bus doesn't run on weekends and ends early on weekdays, so next they'll do a bike lane on the already cramped street.

All in the plan, all in the plan...

So when is this AAA-hole blow-hole going to give up his car?

Mike - it's not the envisioned future, it is the now.

Someone recently asked the developer of the proposed conversion of the old Nature's building (SE 30th & Division) at a Richmond Neighborhood Ass'n public meeting:

if you're claiming to appeal to non-car owners and only providing 11 parking spaces for 80 tenants, and the people living all around here in the neighborhood are very concerned and distressed about crushing already tight parking, and you claim to be marketing to non-car owners, why not require in your leases a provision about cars like a common "no pets" prohibition?

The developer's answer: That's "not viable" -- can't make it work. He then proceeded to ridicule an elderly neighborhood resident who followed-up with a good question. The Richmond NA Chairman then swiftly brought the Q&A session to a close and thanked the developer for his Show & Tell (Fib).

The bottom line: The developers are flim-flammers.

Hit the road, jacka$$es!

And the neighborhood bends over and says there is nothing they can do.

I say each and every neighborhood association in the city should be demanding an all-out moratorium on multi-family housing until such time that the degradation forced upon the neighborhoods by such building can be ameliorated through development charges to offset the degradation.

Once again we need to review the zoning for that property.
It is CSh, Commercial storefront with an aircraft landing overlay.

If this guy thinks he can legally build there I would suggest the fix is in and the payoff checks have already been cashed downtown.

I, too, wish this short-sighted rule that allows no - or insufficient - parking spaces for the tenants of new or converted buildings could be eliminated. At first developers provided spaces and now that they've realized they don't need to and can use the available space to increase the number of apartments/condos, of course they're going to take it. Parking spaces do not generate as much money and a garage is "wasted space." Who cares about the neighbors or neighboring businesses? The City sez it's OK.

Developers could never get away with blowing off disabled parking or accessibility issues but it's OK to take your neighbors' street parking - right in front of their business or home, if necessary.

Another concern is that a building's use doesn't necessarily remain static. What is student housing today may be retirement or singles condo living in the future. Maybe students can get by on bike or the "ten toe express" while more affluent singles or older folks will come to the building with a car or two and nowhere to put them.

I can't believe our City is so stupid.

It's all outlined in the Portland Climate Action Plan, aka, Developers's Dream Come True.

The neighbors should retaliate by insisting that the city charge for on-street parking near the building. All it will take is one good party hosted by one of the residents of the building, and the backlash will begin.

I am on lunch, so here are some quick thoughts on this issue as a neighbor and taxpayer.

I am a neighbor near this and several other limited parking projects in the Williams and Vancouver corridor. My wife and I testified to our neighborhood association on a separate massive project South of the 4400 Williams address, as well as on the New Seasons project. I have been a neighbor here for 15 plus years and moved here specifically for intelligent high density and a neighborhood that had the diversity that reminded me of Newark NJ . The lack of logic to have almost no parking in the Williams/ Vancouver corridor and the hulking masses slammed up against existing homes makes one sad that we really are not learning from bigger cities. The hubris is classic Portland planner thinking and doublespeak. It really only benefits the developers and has no long lasting balancing value for the existing community.

In our case, we were basically told to keep our mouths shut or we might scare off the developers doing these projects. One smarmy trust-funder activist kid made sure we knew he was a "New Urbanist" and that we must be anti-bike to not simply let these developers move forward. He has been in the neighborhood for a few years, mommy and daddy apparently brought him his home. And sadly he should avoid judgement as I was commuting on a bike to work back in Essex County New Jersey when he was in diapers. Interestingly, the neighbors near the massive projects are getting a very limited voice and the active neighbors off the dense street alignments are calling the shots. That is my experience South of the 4400 project. I hope folks North of us fare better.

The project almost completed just North of Fremont on Williams was the first big example of bad planning along the Fremont/ Williams Corridor. It was build so out of proportion that each time I have a visitor from bigger cities visit , they laugh at it's hulking mass compared to the single story and two story homes now hidden in its shadows. Sadly, one of our most effective neighbors and a successful local business woman became so frustrated by the loss of sun, privacy, and livability that she moved out. Other neighbors are following her direction.

I believe we can do better and will continue to be involved in the dialog along the corridor. It won't help me to just complain, since it is actually my own backyard.


I asked him these questions:
1) What is the average apartment size?
2) What is the size of the largest apartment?
3) What is your projected number of cars owned per apartment?
4) What is the average income our your target renter?
5) Are you targeting any of these units for low income subsidies?

And he answered:
I understand where you are coming from, but it sounds like the neighborhood thinks we are further along on this project than we really are at this point. We haven't closed on the property and we are meeting with the neighborhood to get ideas and feedback on what they would like to see developed here. So, we really don't have the answers to your questions at this point. I am sure all of these questions will come up Thursday evening and I encourage you to stop by and partake in the discussion.



It will take a while to watch the videos but this pretty much sums up the issue.

To grow, the choice is "centers" vs. "corridors". Portland has chosen to develop density mostly in "corridors" like Fremont, Belmont, Mississippi, Hawthorne, etc. vs. "centers" like Lloyd or SOWA, etc.

The high cost of on-site parking keeps corridors from developing when parking is required. Most of those "corridor" developments are relatively small and don't have room or budget for parking so they can use parking that is already there, on street. This is how the city can get those buildings built. These smaller buildings are better for the transportation systems, are more affordable, etc.

Unfortunately, "corridors" tend to be where the interesting neighborhood business districts are which give a neighborhood the character that made people want to move there in the first place.

Sadly, like Portland's miles and miles of charming vintage homes, these corridors too are doomed to the early morning backhoe, courtesy of our locked-step, tight-lipped "urbanist" city council.

That's why I maintain that the PCAP is a developer's wet dream come true.

Great post, Paul. Developers don't care. They are like the medicine show shysters who hit a town, sell their dubious product to the gullible town and then split in the middle of the night with their loot. They don't care about the shortcomings or drawbacks of what they left behind; they don't have to live either in the building or near the neighbors they have inconvenienced, marginalized and offended.


It's centers & corridors. Has been for years and will continue for years to come.

All of which may be viewed by some as uglifying neighborhoods throughout the region. However, the infill option is necessary to prevent sprawl and the destruction of the planet.

Livability is subjective and most planners view the infill approach as more desirable. At least their literature says so.

A hundred Portland residents against one out-of-town developer. Is there any question which side the City will choose?

Land of neo-Stalist apartment blocks and faux_Stasi snitch laws...

I can't believe our City is so stupid.

Corrupt, or inept, either way, we are in for it. That ordinance needs to be changed before the entire city is taken over with these type of housing units.

O’Toole says that Metro, the Portland area’s regional government, is aiming to reduce single-family home ownership from 65 percent down to 41 percent; which is nothing short of a war on homeownership.

A large apartment complex without parking in this location reduces the quality of life for everybody else living in the surrounding neighborhoods. If parking isn't part of the project, IT SHOULDN'T BE BUILT! This greedy socialist slum lord builder needs to be run out of Beaumont on a rail, then sent over to Kenton where he can propose something in king Sammyboy’s backyard.

When did this begin, that these apartments could be built
without providing needed parking spaces?

When did the good planning of Portland we were noted for
years ago morph into allowing this?


Are you arguing that there are people making a choice of where to live by deciding between a 400 sq ft apartment in inner Portland and living somewhere beyond the urban growth boundry- thereby contributing to sprawl?

People attracted to living in these complexes would never consider living in outer suburbs or rural areas.

However, I would tend to think that people who have their lives disrupted by the construction of one or many of these monstrosities would likely flee to the exurbs and rural areas to avoid having this happen to them again- when they most certainly would not have otherwise.

The Portland Neighborhood associations are NIMBYS.

If they supported each other they would flip the pyramid of power upside down.

Richmond and Brooklyn didn't back HAND opposing the annexation of Powell Park by Fred Meyer.

Who supports Lents anyway?

Who cares?

Most association members are not activist types, they are community volunteers just looking for some neighborly interactions and maybe having a hand in an information table with some t-shirts and cookies on it. Truly.

Then there's a few sociopaths involved who can easily take over a board, but I digress.

Go, Skeezicks! Right!

JG - a 50+ unit building is not small potatoes in this corridor, or whatever you want to call it. And, as others have noted, bus service is limited to non-existent.

Plus, this Remmers guy is a sheer aXXhole - saw an interview with him on the news. Let's hope the building's current owners have yet to sign the sales paperwork, and have second thoughts in selling to him.

I'm not defending developers, but most of the rightful wrath here is projected at developers. The wrath should also, and properly more so, be extended to CoP, Planners and City Council. Clinamen above alludes to this.

Developers are doing what Planning has allowed. Just the issue of deficient parking has been before Planners (word used as all-encompassing) for almost two decades when reduction of required parking was implemented.

Parking reduction was first implemented in the Central City Plan for downtown, to help meet DEQ/EPA requirements. Then the social/car hating aspect was interjected and it spread to all the different parts of Title 33, the zoning code.

There was little public outreach of these incremental increases of "no parking". It mostly occurred in the several "neighborhood plans", transit street plans, spot rezoning planning efforts, and finally throughout Title 33. And usually only a few neighborhood associations even knew of them, and maybe a subcommittee of 3 or 5 members might have participated. Now we are experiencing the negative outcome.

It is time for the umbrella neighborhood associations like SE Uplift and SWNI to better represent citizens. But since they are part of what got us in this mess, is it appropriate for them to get us out of it? But they are what CoP has dealt us to get through this hierarchy mess. Maybe there are some other means like respected groups of citizens going directly to each Commissioner's office. And then wait for 5 years at that.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics