County sells out to Portland "urban renewal" money grab
The Multnomah County commission has foolishly voted to go along with the latest "urban renewal" scam in Portland, involving the Portland State Patronage Center and Lincoln High School (motto: "We're underutilized"). The vote was 3 to 2. Voting against were the two commissioners who are currently up for re-election -- funny thing.
"We have other really pressing priorities," Kafoury said.
Urban renewal zones, generally speaking, take money from other local governments to create funding for large capital projects inside designated areas. Adams' new zone at PSU would drain about $50 million from the county's coffers over the zone's 30-year life. It would also divert about $60 million from Portland Public Schools.
To soften the blow, Multnomah County Chairman Jeff Cogen negotiated a multi-million dollar deal with city officials. If the Portland City Council approves the zone, the Portland Development Commission will carve out $19 million so the county can build new Department of County Human Services headquarters at PSU.
"You end up trading service dollars for new buildings," Kafoury said. "And, at least in my opinion, they're not equal."
Voting in favor were the county chair, "Little Big Pipe" Cogen; Loretta Smith from Wydenville; and Diane McKeel of East County, who really ought to know better. All three have lost our confidence, which wasn't great to begin with, from here on out. It was a better board, much better, when Ted Wheeler was running it.
Shouldn't the TSCC be stepping in to say that this can not include Lincoln HS in the URA? The schools should not be linked to this sort of funding. At least it would take away some of the support for a poorly conceived and timed project.
Can I get in on this deal too? If Mult. Co. will give me $50 million, I would be more than willing to give them $20 million back. (I'd give them a better deal.)
"You end up trading service dollars for new buildings," Kafoury said. "And, at least in my opinion, they're not equal."
Hasn't that been the name of the game here for years, trading much needed service dollars for new buildings?
Jeff Cogen (from Saltzman's office)
Loretta Smith
Diane McKeel
Three who should not be elected again.
Three who telegraphed they favor more development over our needed services.
I really wish the PPS teachers' union would get upset about this. The diversion of millions of dollars from an already desperately stretched school budget seems nearly criminal at this point.
Is there anyone who is pro-UR who can explain why these things should continue to exist? All I ever hear from the politicians is stuff that sounds like fluff. They never seem to either understand the negative side effects, or they just ignore them. There must be someone in town who is an expert on UR and who can explain why it is still a good thing even though it has all of these negative side effects. Maybe Jack can find someone at PSU to give us an explanation.
Or is it as simple as graft? The politicans vote for it becuase it funnels money to developers who then funnel the money back to the politicians?
Why else would they keep doing it when the schools don't have enough money and the roads can't get fixed and the parks are being closed???
I really wish the PPS teachers' union would get upset about this.
Also the PTAs and Site Councils and all the rest of the parental-involvement groups. The city's dubious redevelopment schemes are effectively stealing money from their schools, yet we hear nary a peep from them.
Andy,
All of the pro-UR experts (bureaucrats and consultants) are making income off of it.
That's why they are pro-UR and why they only use all the fluff politicians want to hear.
Cogan, like nearly every local politician, is thoroughly inept when it comes to UR. Most falsely & willingly believe UR generates revenue.
Cogan is either lying or doesn't understand that his so-called softening of the blow is actually making the blow to Mult. Co services worse.
The $19 million he thinks comes form the tooth fairy is really just more borrowed UR money requiring even more of a raid on schools and city/county services to pay it off.
The Portland Development Commission calls it "carving out" $19 million.
Close. But it's more like a gutting.
Urban Renewal should be restricted to voter approved levy funding just like school bond measures.
The "Tax Increrment Financing" scheme is a cold blooded instrument of public deceit.
Portland is one of the worse offenders in the county.
There is a reason California abolished UR agencies.
"California property taxes going to TIF
grew from $1.5 billion in 1995 to $5.7
billion in 2009, representing a 10 percent annual growth rate.
In the short run, eliminating TIF will help states close critical budget gaps. In the long run, eliminating TIF will prevent cities from taking ever-increasing amounts of money from schools and other programs that are supported by property taxes.
Instead of reforming TIF, state legislatures should simply repeal the laws that give cities and counties the authority to use it and similar tools to subsidize economic development."
Unfortunately because of the Portland Creep the legislature is terminally infected with what Cogan and Admas have.
So the only remedy is extensive surgery to remove the politicians.
Well it would be quite funny if they took away Lincoln HS in this deal , and then could not pull off funding
for a new super-fancy school for all those precious lil rich west hills kids. Gads , they might have to go to our other HS's with regular PDX kids.
Eric:Also the PTAs and Site Councils and all the rest of the parental-involvement groups. The city's dubious redevelopment schemes are effectively stealing money from their schools, yet we hear nary a peep from them.
Cogan is either lying or doesn't understand that his so-called softening of the blow is actually making the blow to Mult. Co services worse.
If Cogen doesn't understand he shouldn't be in such a decision making position and has no business being the Chair of Multnomah County!
If it is going along with a lie, another reason to stop revolving doors of career politicians.
Seems too many are lock step with each other and their plans.
TRANSLATION: A panel of enablers that does three things: 1) Takes property tax money from the entire county and redistributes it to a few connected insiders. 2) Finds various schemes to allow connected insiders to not pay their fair share of property taxes. 3) Takes whatever is leftover and argues about who is going to get it, based on pet projects and campaign contributions.
Probably they're too busy busting their a**es trying to raise funds to keep the music and PE teachers that they don't pause to think about how larger forces are working against them. Reminds me of the river babies parable.
I can believe that some of the politicians don't understand the implications of UR. Some of these folks are fairly dim. Just good looking glad handers reading from cue cards. But there are usually at least a few smart folks on staff who can explain in short words where danger is.
The fact that even a clueless moron like Gov Moonbeam in CA saw fit to get rid of UR should be telling. He has fallen for almost every money giveaway invented in the past 40 years.
I really can't figure out why groups like the PTA aren't protesting this stuff. Most of those folks aren't getting any graft or kickbacks from the developer crowd. They are usually just people trying to stay involved with their kids.
I did read a story the other day about a politican in Stockton (they are going bankrupt) who said that she voted for the pension plans because they were told that the increased benefits wouldn't cost anything. Evidently she was so stupid that she actually believed that increased benefits wouldn't cost anything. I guess we could have the same level of dullness from our elected officials here in Portland?
Elected officials?
In my view, the time has come to stop voting for those who can be run in campaigns, and then when in office, are not capable of good decisions and then get to the point where every turn they take depends on another election to stay in??
We cannot continue in this vein.
Look what is happening to our country and to our city!
Why can't teachers, PTA's, parents, citizens do the math? Why can't Cogan, Smith and McKeel?
For the county we get $19 Million while losing $50 Million which equals a loss of $31 Million. And that loss is even higher if you read the fine print of the Agreement. That $19 Million includes space for PSU reducing the benefit for Multnomah Co. even more. Even worse is that Multnomah Co is a non paying property tax entity that will not be helping to pay down the UR debt. That puts more burden on the few of us still staying around. It's funny they call it the Education URA when we have public officials that can't add and subtract.
Cogan is not dumb, he's been bought off. His political future is dim because citizens are catching on like in the surrounding counties.
Someone should sit the folks in City Hall down and carefully explain the difference between the words, "Steward" and "Enabler" and why one falls within their job description and the other does not.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (23)
http://tsccmultco.com/
Shouldn't the TSCC be stepping in to say that this can not include Lincoln HS in the URA? The schools should not be linked to this sort of funding. At least it would take away some of the support for a poorly conceived and timed project.
Posted by teresa | May 1, 2012 1:58 PM
Can I get in on this deal too? If Mult. Co. will give me $50 million, I would be more than willing to give them $20 million back. (I'd give them a better deal.)
Posted by Michael | May 1, 2012 2:00 PM
"You end up trading service dollars for new buildings," Kafoury said. "And, at least in my opinion, they're not equal."
Hasn't that been the name of the game here for years, trading much needed service dollars for new buildings?
Jeff Cogen (from Saltzman's office)
Loretta Smith
Diane McKeel
Three who should not be elected again.
Three who telegraphed they favor more development over our needed services.
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 2:24 PM
I really wish the PPS teachers' union would get upset about this. The diversion of millions of dollars from an already desperately stretched school budget seems nearly criminal at this point.
Posted by nobody | May 1, 2012 2:36 PM
At least the school kids were out protesting today.
Maybe the young will break out the pitchforks?
Posted by portland native | May 1, 2012 2:51 PM
Is there anyone who is pro-UR who can explain why these things should continue to exist? All I ever hear from the politicians is stuff that sounds like fluff. They never seem to either understand the negative side effects, or they just ignore them. There must be someone in town who is an expert on UR and who can explain why it is still a good thing even though it has all of these negative side effects. Maybe Jack can find someone at PSU to give us an explanation.
Or is it as simple as graft? The politicans vote for it becuase it funnels money to developers who then funnel the money back to the politicians?
Why else would they keep doing it when the schools don't have enough money and the roads can't get fixed and the parks are being closed???
Posted by Andy | May 1, 2012 3:06 PM
Give'em hell, Jack!
Posted by Mister Tee | May 1, 2012 3:06 PM
I really wish the PPS teachers' union would get upset about this.
Also the PTAs and Site Councils and all the rest of the parental-involvement groups. The city's dubious redevelopment schemes are effectively stealing money from their schools, yet we hear nary a peep from them.
Posted by Eric | May 1, 2012 3:10 PM
Is there any word on how they would pay to build a new Lincoln High? They can't even do basic maintenance right now.
Posted by Snards | May 1, 2012 3:38 PM
Andy,
All of the pro-UR experts (bureaucrats and consultants) are making income off of it.
That's why they are pro-UR and why they only use all the fluff politicians want to hear.
Cogan, like nearly every local politician, is thoroughly inept when it comes to UR. Most falsely & willingly believe UR generates revenue.
Cogan is either lying or doesn't understand that his so-called softening of the blow is actually making the blow to Mult. Co services worse.
The $19 million he thinks comes form the tooth fairy is really just more borrowed UR money requiring even more of a raid on schools and city/county services to pay it off.
The Portland Development Commission calls it "carving out" $19 million.
Close. But it's more like a gutting.
Urban Renewal should be restricted to voter approved levy funding just like school bond measures.
The "Tax Increrment Financing" scheme is a cold blooded instrument of public deceit.
Portland is one of the worse offenders in the county.
There is a reason California abolished UR agencies.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/PA676.pdf
"California property taxes going to TIF
grew from $1.5 billion in 1995 to $5.7
billion in 2009, representing a 10 percent annual growth rate.
In the short run, eliminating TIF will help states close critical budget gaps. In the long run, eliminating TIF will prevent cities from taking ever-increasing amounts of money from schools and other programs that are supported by property taxes.
Instead of reforming TIF, state legislatures should simply repeal the laws that give cities and counties the authority to use it and similar tools to subsidize economic development."
Unfortunately because of the Portland Creep the legislature is terminally infected with what Cogan and Admas have.
So the only remedy is extensive surgery to remove the politicians.
Posted by URexpert | May 1, 2012 3:43 PM
Well it would be quite funny if they took away Lincoln HS in this deal , and then could not pull off funding
for a new super-fancy school for all those precious lil rich west hills kids. Gads , they might have to go to our other HS's with regular PDX kids.
The Horror...
Posted by billb | May 1, 2012 4:02 PM
Eric:Also the PTAs and Site Councils and all the rest of the parental-involvement groups. The city's dubious redevelopment schemes are effectively stealing money from their schools, yet we hear nary a peep from them.
Why do you suppose that is?
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 4:32 PM
Cogan is either lying or doesn't understand that his so-called softening of the blow is actually making the blow to Mult. Co services worse.
If Cogen doesn't understand he shouldn't be in such a decision making position and has no business being the Chair of Multnomah County!
If it is going along with a lie, another reason to stop revolving doors of career politicians.
Seems too many are lock step with each other and their plans.
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 4:36 PM
I don't get this, the schools and Mult COunty lose future tax revenue with these URDs. Somehow, they can't roll over fast enough to vote for them.
Posted by Steve | May 1, 2012 4:38 PM
Multnomah County Commission
TRANSLATION: A panel of enablers that does three things: 1) Takes property tax money from the entire county and redistributes it to a few connected insiders. 2) Finds various schemes to allow connected insiders to not pay their fair share of property taxes. 3) Takes whatever is leftover and argues about who is going to get it, based on pet projects and campaign contributions.
Posted by Tim | May 1, 2012 4:42 PM
Why do you suppose that is?
Probably they're too busy busting their a**es trying to raise funds to keep the music and PE teachers that they don't pause to think about how larger forces are working against them. Reminds me of the river babies parable.
Posted by Eric | May 1, 2012 4:48 PM
I can believe that some of the politicians don't understand the implications of UR. Some of these folks are fairly dim. Just good looking glad handers reading from cue cards. But there are usually at least a few smart folks on staff who can explain in short words where danger is.
The fact that even a clueless moron like Gov Moonbeam in CA saw fit to get rid of UR should be telling. He has fallen for almost every money giveaway invented in the past 40 years.
I really can't figure out why groups like the PTA aren't protesting this stuff. Most of those folks aren't getting any graft or kickbacks from the developer crowd. They are usually just people trying to stay involved with their kids.
I did read a story the other day about a politican in Stockton (they are going bankrupt) who said that she voted for the pension plans because they were told that the increased benefits wouldn't cost anything. Evidently she was so stupid that she actually believed that increased benefits wouldn't cost anything. I guess we could have the same level of dullness from our elected officials here in Portland?
Posted by Andy | May 1, 2012 4:57 PM
Eric,
It may be that the parents are way too busy with fundraising just for books and some basics.
It will be a great day when our schools have all the money they need, and our air force has to have a bake-sale to buy a bomber.
Robert Fulghum quote
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 6:15 PM
Elected officials?
In my view, the time has come to stop voting for those who can be run in campaigns, and then when in office, are not capable of good decisions and then get to the point where every turn they take depends on another election to stay in??
We cannot continue in this vein.
Look what is happening to our country and to our city!
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 6:20 PM
Fulghum quote... when our schools have all the money they need...
So clinamen, the problem is a lack of money?
Well then the solution is easy! More money... for the children.
Posted by Harry | May 1, 2012 6:35 PM
Why can't teachers, PTA's, parents, citizens do the math? Why can't Cogan, Smith and McKeel?
For the county we get $19 Million while losing $50 Million which equals a loss of $31 Million. And that loss is even higher if you read the fine print of the Agreement. That $19 Million includes space for PSU reducing the benefit for Multnomah Co. even more. Even worse is that Multnomah Co is a non paying property tax entity that will not be helping to pay down the UR debt. That puts more burden on the few of us still staying around. It's funny they call it the Education URA when we have public officials that can't add and subtract.
Cogan is not dumb, he's been bought off. His political future is dim because citizens are catching on like in the surrounding counties.
Posted by Lee | May 1, 2012 10:22 PM
I hope there are many more whose political future will be dim...
Whatever happened to Statesmen?
Stewardship of our country, our constitution...
our city....?
I can't go on now,
the list is too long.
Posted by clinamen | May 1, 2012 10:46 PM
Someone should sit the folks in City Hall down and carefully explain the difference between the words, "Steward" and "Enabler" and why one falls within their job description and the other does not.
Posted by NW Portlander | May 2, 2012 9:07 AM