The degree to which "student athletes" are exploited by their slavemasters universities seems to have no limits. Here's the latest financial abuse from Bluegene, the new capital of jock excess and hypocrisy. Maybe it's time for a juicy class action, with the players as plaintiffs. [Via UO Matters.]
Comments (13)
Exploited? If they're good enough for auction they were likely scholarship, some of these guys were handed a college education worth $168K. And now they are complaining? As a taxpayer and someone paying tuition, I say get all you can from these guys. Good for UO.
these guys were handed a college education worth $168K
Even if that's an accurate valuation (the average student doesn't pay full freight, and if they play the game right can get in-state tuition), these guys provide services that are worth far, far more than that. To sell items that have value simply because they were worn by a particular athlete, and have that athlete get nothing out of it, is additional exploitation.
I think I might have posted something similar to Mark’s comment at one time. I have to say I have altered my views over the years regarding what players should be entitled to. They chew these kids up and spit them out without regard for the student or their long term well being. Sure, they are handed a degree, but few get an education. The emphasis is on selling sports and not on classroom achievements. The world can be a dark difficult place with lifelong injuries and nothing much to show for it, save for a worthless degree hanging on the wall. This is exploitation and profit mongering, and the kids are the victims.
Mark Asper, one of the main interviewees for this article and a rather big guy might not appreciate being called a jail duck. Costa is a pretty good person too from what I have read.
If the NCAA rules state that you can only give so much to the players, what else should you do with it? Throw it away? Would that be a good use of funds? I doubt it will amount to a hill of beans though in their budget. I'd be fine with the proceeds going to charity or scholarships for non athletes.
The phrase “jail duck” is a term that has taken hold as a direct result if the University’s failure to hold students accountable. Every year a significant number of college players are arrested, some for very serious crimes. The lack of sanctions or punishment for players who violate the law is almost always in direct proportion to their star power. Oregon and the other top universities continually put their financial interests way ahead of kids who are breaking the law. It then sets a standard for other players that anything goes, and once again exploits them in favor of the almighty buck. Of all the college football players out there, only 2% or so will ever have a chance at the NFL. The rest are left to fend for themselves, some with long term injuries, and others with serious character flaws having been developed in an environment of no holds barred.
Take it up with the NCAA. Usually this stuff gets sold on campus at a yearly sale, after which the people who bought it sell it on EBay.
So give the money to memorabilia wholesalers, or keep it for yourself. Seems like a real easy decision. I'd rather the money go to the players, but the NCAA ain't letting that happen, which is why what the Ducks are doing is common practice througthout the NCAA. This is about as cutting edge as a butter knife.
Btw, the stack of gear UO players leave with is borderline obscene. One pair of the custom retro Jordan 4s the team was given this year would go for $750 easy.
I don't feel that following the NCAA rules makes the student athelete "exploited." They agreed to take the scholarship and housing and food for several years in exchange for the chance to play at that level. Knowing they can'g get paid. Of course some of them, after showing their skills get huge pro sports contracts afterward. They don't seem the think they owe the school anything for developing that potential. I reject their self centered view of the world. No one earned it by themselves.
With all due respect Roger there is no argument that the physical property belongs to the school. It is about the name and/or brand that is being used for profit without compensation to the actual owner.
And yes Gene, they agreed to the terms going in. They did so as teens with stars in their eyes after promises and complicated contracts were offered forward from business savvy professionals. No exploitation?
Adrian Peterson said the NFL is modern day slavery, 'Sheed said 12 years ago the NBA was run like a plantation system with the owners acting like masters. I can only imagine what those guys think of college players and the system in place.
It's a joke to refer to these guys as "student athletes". Some are, but most are not. Just pay them and don't have them pretend they're college students, turn it into a farm system where it's out in the open. Much of the SEC has essentially been that way for years, why should anyone hide it any more? Especially with the NCAA being as arbitrary as it is with "rules" enforcement and sanctions, colleges should just leave the NCAA and have football clubs. They'd probably make just as much money, if not more by cutting out the middleman organization of the NCAA.
UO could generate some much needed positive PR, and maybe get a legal recruiting edge, by donating sets of one of each game worn uniforms to each high school in Oregon, with the proviso that the recipient school auction the uniforms off, on E Bay or elsewhere, as a fund raiser for that high school's athletic program.
It would be really cool if OSU, PSU, SOSC, OIT, Linnfield, etc and other schools with surplus uniform sets do the same.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (13)
Exploited? If they're good enough for auction they were likely scholarship, some of these guys were handed a college education worth $168K. And now they are complaining? As a taxpayer and someone paying tuition, I say get all you can from these guys. Good for UO.
Posted by Mark Mason | April 25, 2012 7:22 PM
these guys were handed a college education worth $168K
Even if that's an accurate valuation (the average student doesn't pay full freight, and if they play the game right can get in-state tuition), these guys provide services that are worth far, far more than that. To sell items that have value simply because they were worn by a particular athlete, and have that athlete get nothing out of it, is additional exploitation.
Posted by Jack Bog | April 25, 2012 8:38 PM
I think I might have posted something similar to Mark’s comment at one time. I have to say I have altered my views over the years regarding what players should be entitled to. They chew these kids up and spit them out without regard for the student or their long term well being. Sure, they are handed a degree, but few get an education. The emphasis is on selling sports and not on classroom achievements. The world can be a dark difficult place with lifelong injuries and nothing much to show for it, save for a worthless degree hanging on the wall. This is exploitation and profit mongering, and the kids are the victims.
Posted by gibby | April 25, 2012 8:43 PM
Mark Asper, one of the main interviewees for this article and a rather big guy might not appreciate being called a jail duck. Costa is a pretty good person too from what I have read.
If the NCAA rules state that you can only give so much to the players, what else should you do with it? Throw it away? Would that be a good use of funds? I doubt it will amount to a hill of beans though in their budget. I'd be fine with the proceeds going to charity or scholarships for non athletes.
Posted by Brian | April 26, 2012 6:13 AM
The phrase “jail duck” is a term that has taken hold as a direct result if the University’s failure to hold students accountable. Every year a significant number of college players are arrested, some for very serious crimes. The lack of sanctions or punishment for players who violate the law is almost always in direct proportion to their star power. Oregon and the other top universities continually put their financial interests way ahead of kids who are breaking the law. It then sets a standard for other players that anything goes, and once again exploits them in favor of the almighty buck. Of all the college football players out there, only 2% or so will ever have a chance at the NFL. The rest are left to fend for themselves, some with long term injuries, and others with serious character flaws having been developed in an environment of no holds barred.
Posted by gibby | April 26, 2012 7:50 AM
Take it up with the NCAA. Usually this stuff gets sold on campus at a yearly sale, after which the people who bought it sell it on EBay.
So give the money to memorabilia wholesalers, or keep it for yourself. Seems like a real easy decision. I'd rather the money go to the players, but the NCAA ain't letting that happen, which is why what the Ducks are doing is common practice througthout the NCAA. This is about as cutting edge as a butter knife.
Btw, the stack of gear UO players leave with is borderline obscene. One pair of the custom retro Jordan 4s the team was given this year would go for $750 easy.
Posted by Chuck | April 26, 2012 7:53 AM
"Every year a significant number of college players are arrested, some for very serious crimes."
I'm in no mood to defend UO on their lack of institutional control, but that sentence above goes for ALL students on ALL college campuses.
Posted by Chuck | April 26, 2012 7:56 AM
I don't feel that following the NCAA rules makes the student athelete "exploited." They agreed to take the scholarship and housing and food for several years in exchange for the chance to play at that level. Knowing they can'g get paid. Of course some of them, after showing their skills get huge pro sports contracts afterward. They don't seem the think they owe the school anything for developing that potential. I reject their self centered view of the world. No one earned it by themselves.
Posted by gene b | April 26, 2012 8:30 AM
None of the players actually paid for their uniforms, save for guys like Costa who presumably got them from the school after he was done playing.
Therefore, it's the school selling school property. Or rather, the athletic department selling athletic department/Nike property.
Posted by Roger | April 26, 2012 9:04 AM
With all due respect Roger there is no argument that the physical property belongs to the school. It is about the name and/or brand that is being used for profit without compensation to the actual owner.
And yes Gene, they agreed to the terms going in. They did so as teens with stars in their eyes after promises and complicated contracts were offered forward from business savvy professionals. No exploitation?
Posted by Gibby | April 26, 2012 9:41 AM
Last I heard (it was some time ago), NCAA sports eligible athletes weren't even allowed to get a part-time job, and earn honest money.
So how could they buy their jerseys back, even if they wanted to? Seems like they are locked in a gilded cage, so long as they want eligibility.
Posted by Downtown Denizen | April 26, 2012 2:49 PM
Adrian Peterson said the NFL is modern day slavery, 'Sheed said 12 years ago the NBA was run like a plantation system with the owners acting like masters. I can only imagine what those guys think of college players and the system in place.
It's a joke to refer to these guys as "student athletes". Some are, but most are not. Just pay them and don't have them pretend they're college students, turn it into a farm system where it's out in the open. Much of the SEC has essentially been that way for years, why should anyone hide it any more? Especially with the NCAA being as arbitrary as it is with "rules" enforcement and sanctions, colleges should just leave the NCAA and have football clubs. They'd probably make just as much money, if not more by cutting out the middleman organization of the NCAA.
Posted by Eric L | April 26, 2012 4:52 PM
UO could generate some much needed positive PR, and maybe get a legal recruiting edge, by donating sets of one of each game worn uniforms to each high school in Oregon, with the proviso that the recipient school auction the uniforms off, on E Bay or elsewhere, as a fund raiser for that high school's athletic program.
It would be really cool if OSU, PSU, SOSC, OIT, Linnfield, etc and other schools with surplus uniform sets do the same.
Jus' thinkin' out loud.
full uniform sets for one player each year to
Posted by Nonny Mouse | April 26, 2012 8:05 PM