Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 28, 2012 7:45 AM. The previous post in this blog was Obama and Wyden's America. The next post in this blog is Kate Brown screwed up. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Oregon for sale

Do you think Governor Retread will endorse the transaction? In the old days, it would have to go through Goldschmidt. One wonders what the protocol is nowadays.

Comments (44)

Let's face it. If we don't share our water with Californians, they will eventually come after it, and it won't be pretty. Better we should sell it to them in tiny designer bottles ha high prices. But we don't need Nestlé for that.

Did the reporter have to use the word "scotch" when writing about a water issue? The use of the word is appropriate, it's just too clever by half. You don't see stuff like that in papers of record.

It all depends on how much money is tucked into his fancy pansy cowboy boots

This is, IMHO, ridiculous. Nobody gets exercised about soda pop or our State's hallowed beer producers, yet they use the same quantities of water and disposable containers. Yes, you can get tapwater in Boise, but it's not as good as Oregon spring water in much the same way it's not as good as Oregon microbrews.

This promises new jobs in a community that needs them. It will not negatively impact ANYONE/ANYTHING, other than some downtown hypocrit's misguided environmental ethic.

Re: "Better we should sell it to them in tiny designer bottles ha [sic] high prices. But we don't need Nestlé for that."

Allen L.,

Who is "we?" And why haven't "we" done so already?

If I recall correctly, CoPo was bottling and peddling Bull Run water a few years ago....

I'm appalled at the anti-business rants following the Oregonian story about this proposed water bottling plant. I suspect most are from people living in the Portland area that never visit this town and have no clue how difficult it is to find nearby work if you live in the Gorge.

Thanks for pointing out my typing error. But could you try to spell my name right?
"We" is whoever you'd like it to be. To me, it is the people who live here and exercise ownership and control over the natural resources here.
Let me know if you need help with "here" as well.

Deadline for input: March 29th 5:00PM

Governor Kitzhaber
160 State Capitol
900 Court Street
Salem, Oregon 97301-4047

Governor's Citizens' Representative Message Line


(There is an email/message space
available on site above)

Letter from various organizations on letterhead of Food and Water Watch to
Phillip C. Ward, Director of Oregon Water Resources Department.
Re: Water Rights Transfer Application No. T-11249

Re: "'We' is whoever you'd like it to be."

Allan L.,

Water rights in the West are a sensitive matter. In a judicial process, which Nestlé's Cascade Locks gambit became early on, a capricious definition of "we" is not allowed.

Today the Columbia, tomorrow Bull Run.
I bet the Fireman has already cashed a check and designed the labels.

Not the most clearly written article. The article stated that the spring, at it's lowest producing time which is in October, produces about 600 gallons per minute of water. The plant will use 225 GPM of water. Yet the plant will also need about 25 GPM of well water. Why? What did the author miss?

I haven't thought this one out yet, and am having a hard time getting outraged about a company bottling water to sell to suckers willing to pay for it. I'm all for the protection of the enviroment but is the outrage because it is Nestlé or because there is a bottled water industry? Or all of the above? Doesn't the state sell a lot of its natural resorces to industry (fish, timber, minerals etc.) so why is THIS generating such outrage assuming there is fair compensation? I don't use the stuff, but it is legal and the bottles are covered by the bottle bill now...

I agree that the article missed a few important points: Are they paying somebody for taking of this water? Who? How much?

I think another critical point of concern would be what if the spring's production should decrease...would the amount they are allowed to take decrease in kind as a percentage? If they can take up to 225 gals/min based on a low flow of 600 gpm. (37.5%) they I would hope that their max taking would adjust to 37.5% should the spring slow.

By the way, Ketchum, ID (not far from Boise) is home to Trinity Springs, a very pure geothermal water springs. Truly uniquely pure and very delicious water to be found there.

In my opinion,
looks like a spiral out of hell -
leading to globalization and corporate takeover of all aspects of our lives.
The concept of America and our constitution is being sold down the river.....
in favor of others taking the riches of our country while many people are left out to somehow still fit within the system or are just plain left out.

The people that are left out are unfortunately becoming desperate to have to resort to global takeover of resources.

If blame must be cast for lack of jobs and a horrendous situation, the environmentalists and others who resist global takeovers are not the ones to be blamed here for lack of jobs. Look to Congress who allowed manufacturing to leave our country and Wall Street and banks to see why the money has not trickled down to communities.

I don’t see what benefit it is to the fisheries to be trading spring water for well water!
It seems very odd for fish used to spring water, to now be in well water? I would like to know who is responsible for this at the hatchery and state level that would entertain such a plan.

I am not in favor of the taking of water from springs, but if it is done, then for heavens sake, have a local Oregon company do so, so Oregon economy benefits, and so the State is involved in control of the operation and has a long range involvement in all aspects of such an operation. A 50 year contract? We do not know what our water availability will be in future years. Several years of little snow fall could create a shortage. We must not allow others to come in here and capture our water for enormous profit.

The usual kneejerk antibusiness rants.

I don't drink bottled water myself, my well water is probably better than most. But I can't think of a good reason for denying others the right to pay good money for it.

That's what makes the world go around.

My gosh people, have you ever listened to yourselves?

The worlds going around all right, it just happens to be a death spiral.
But business will be business all the way to the bitter end.

John D.,
This is not about denying others the right to pay good money for it.
It is about denying the right to any globalists making enormous money
on what belongs to the people of this state, our public water.

Re: "I haven't thought this one out yet"


Bottled water is mostly a fad, as suggested by the number of bottled waters that are merely packaged tap water. Some bottled water -- Perrier, Evian, Poland Spring, San Pellegrino -- have been successfully branded; Perrier in rare, pale blue, palm-sized bottles is certainly preferable to the mineral-laden, chlorinated, sometimes manganese-tainted tap water originating in the Quabbin Reservoir of western MA and piped in to Cambridge. But consider the last aqueous beverage in that short list, as described last month by Chas Fishman in a NatGeo blog:

"I remember the moment when the silliness of bottled water became vividly clear to me. I was standing in the factory in San Pellegrino, Italy, at the foot of the Italian Alps, where San Pellegrino water is sealed in those shapely green bottles.

Leave aside that the glass bottles weigh more than the water they contain, or the journey those bottles of water have to make, by truck and ship and truck again, to land on a grocery shelf or café table in Manhattan or St. Louis.

The bottles themselves have to be washed before being filled. And as Pellegrino’s wizened factory operations manager explained, they wash the bottles with…Pellegrino water. Before filling them with Pellegrino water.

Of course they do.

But then the silliness took a leap. Where, I asked, do the bubbles in Pellegrino come from? The plant manager’s eyes lit up. Pellegrino water comes out of the ground uncarbonated, in fact. Pellegrino has another spring to the south in central Italy that is naturally carbonated. The company harvests the carbon dioxide from that spring, purifies it, compresses it, trucks it north to Pellegrino, and injects it into the water as part of the bottling process.

No matter how far your Pellegrino water has traveled to get to you, the dancing Italian bubbles that make it so delightful have traveled just a little farther.

San Pellegrino, which is now owned by the conglomerate Nestlé, has a storied history — as a town, as a spring, as a water — but let’s be clear: It’s a product no one needs. It’s refreshing, it’s appealing, but it is a pure indulgence. Whether you live in Milan, just down the road, or Mexico City, where Pellegrino is on the shelves at Wal-Mart. And I say that as someone whose wife and 13-year-old son both love San Pellegrino.

In fact, unless you’re struggling in the aftermath of a natural disaster, unless you live in a developing world nation without safe tap water, all bottled water really falls into that category: luxury, indulgence, convenience."

Nestlé again.

Fishman concludes:

"I love seeing college students leading an imaginative revival of the drinking fountain — and it would be great if the revival spilled beyond campuses into cities. Why do people buy bottled water? Because cities don’t have public water fountains that are easy to use, clean and safe.

The bottled water debates is [sic] a great way of waking people up to the big water issues almost every community faces — scarcity, purity, reuse, sustainability. But the conversation has to move on from bottled water to the water supply itself."

I relish Portland's water and routinely carry it cold in a thermos and other refillable bottles when traveling in the Northwest. If only it were not made so expensive -- along with waste water disposal -- by the unconscionable performances by our elected and appointed officials....

The state of Oregon isn't selling their spring water rights. Don't people actually read the article? The state of Oregon is transferring their water rights to the spring water to the city of Cascade Locks and then the city of Cascade Locks is transferring their well water rights to the state.Cascade Locks will then allow the plant to use the spring water.

I read the article Mike. Are you thinking that the City would just give the rights to bottle the spring water for 50-years WITHOUT being compensated by Nestlé? That exchange by the City to the corporation for compensation is what I was referring to as "selling"...of course the article doesn't reveal what the compensation is.

Or maybe it is just for building the plant??

Transferring vs selling? Now we are into semantics to rationalize the right to water. Well, we can also say that Nestlé isn't "selling" water, they are transferring the rights to drink from their bottle for compensation received. In the meantime, those transferred rights will tie up that spring for 50 years and if that region needs all the water it can get due to severe drought, well, just buy it from whomever has control. Or maybe they will reserve that transference to the 1%, vetting required before taking a sip.

Ever heard of the rule of 3's in survival? the second one says you can live 3 days without water. Only air is more urgent (3 minutes). Hey! a little nano chip in your nose to do an RFID in the number of breaths you take....

It's entirely possible the city is planning to give Nestle the water for free to get them to put a plant there. Look at what Portland gives away to get companies to move here.

In my opinion:

There is something “fishy” going on, I would like to know who at the ODFW is agreeing to trading spring water for well water for the fish and why? Who initiated this plan and why? It seems like the fish are being used somehow to facilitate a precedence here of water transfers allowing corporate privatizing of our public water.

We expect our elected officials to protect our public interests, instead we have mostly been left in the dark until too late, and then people have to plead with officials to be good stewards of our water and resources. Unfortunately, good stewardship is almost like an old fashioned word these days.

Whether it "fits" in the category of actually selling spring water rights or transferring water rights, the state is allowing global interests to come into our state to sell our water.
Many are against corporate privatization of public water. This is happening world wide, and naturally the attempt will be made to take our water as well.

How much of our state’s good water is for the taking through transfer of water rights? 30%, 50%, 65% ? But we haven’t sold water rights to globalists, we have only transferred water rights? What is next, the exchange will be that we get the potentially radiated Columbia River water in “transfer exchange” for our good spring water? Should water shortage occur and it could in the next 50 years, will that transfer of “not well other” water be good enough for the fish, and next good enough for all of us?

Then the 1% in the world can buy what spring water is left. For those who think this is far fetched, do the research as to the water situation in the world.
For starters:

Clinamen: I assume that you understand that spring water and well water both come from the same place - underground aquifers?

I assume that you understand that Intel and Siltronic both use far more water than is proposed in the Cascade Locks scenario, and I assume as well that you understand that these are both "globalist" corporations (who happen to provide a significant number of good jobs in the Portland metro area). Are you in favor of terminating their water contracts and shutting them down, or do you simply believe that Cascade Locks can do without fifty stinkin' jobs?

Did you complain when the City of Portland bottled and marketed Bull Run water a few years ago? Or are you simply caught up in the "hate Nestle" meme - like Sham Adumbs and his silly "hate WalMart" meme?

Finally - a number of years ago, I made a decision to no longer support money-grubbers whose sole justification for existence involves propaganda and litigation. Accordingly, I stopped contributing to Sierra Club, Audubon, and others. PSR, PeTA, HSUS, foodandwaterwatch - none of them are credible; none of them do anything other than solicit donations, protest, and litigate.

HSUS, for example (the "Humane Society of the United States") has a budget of some $32 million, are not affiliated with any animal shelters, do not operate any shelters, and are not involved in humane society operations anywhere.

PeTA has been lambasted because they kill over 95% of animals presented to them for adoption, and in fact got into some legal issues after it was found that animals were killed in the pick-up vans, bagged, and dumped into commercial dumpsters at various business locations.

Audubon and Sierra Club were among those who sued USFWS to prevent the capture of all remaining California condors for placement into an intensively managed captive-breeding program. They eventually lost, and there are now several hundred condors; many have been released into the wild and have successfully propagated there.

Audubon, in a cover story featuring a condor photo several years ago, claimed credit for aiding in the recovery of these majestic birds. That was enough for me, and caused me to examine everyone, no matter how seemingly mainstream, who wants a handout.

Your knee-jerk reaction appears to involve hitting the panic button, but you don't appear to have done much - if any - actual research into the issue. Coming from you, I find that surprising. Usually, you seem well-informed.

Max, your question smacks of the kind of circular questioning illustrated thus:

"Have you stopped beating your wife yet? Answer yes or no."

Can't win for losing. C'mon, you can do better and have.

Hint: Nestle wants total control for 50 years. Intel and Siltronics are users like you and I.

We buy water as we buy gasoline. Nestle wants to own the oil field, metaphorically speaking.

In my opinion of course.

Google: history of water in the West. Marc Reisner's “Cadillac Desert” is a must read.

Interesting. As I read it, it's not an ownership contract, but a lease. Perhaps I missed something, but it looks to me that Nestle purchases the water from the city but does not obtain ownership of the resource. In that case, it's not significantly different from Intel/Siltronic.

I'm not sure what you refer to when you raise the wife-beating issue; CM refers to spring water vs. well water as though there is some substantive difference; there is not. Nestle would be perfectly happy to get away with using well water, but their whole thing is based upon the concept that so many fall for: pure, clean, mountain spring water.

They want the spring water for marketing purposes - and to cover their butts, and with perpetual litigants like Sierra Club hovering around, it's a very reasonable path to take. The fish won't care.

The arguments in opposition resemble the tired "peak oil" stuff: limited resource, blah, blah. And of course, that was based on the idea that oil and natural gas are fossil fuels - when in fact, the only fossil fuels are coal and peat (which we have in abundance). Now it turns out that we're awash in oil and natural gas (which is why nat gas has dropped from $8 to $3 recently).

And, as night follows day, the greens are out there fighting against gas and oil production - admittedly harder to do, as most work is underway on private lands.

If there's one thing Cascade Locks has in great abundance, it's water. If they can get some good jobs from the resource, more power to them.

Don't worry about Starbuck, Max. He has no idea what he's talking about.

All water is owned by the state. The state grants certain use rights to water users in the form of "water rights"(a usufructory right). Sometimes, the state grants itself water rights. All this does is secure the State's right to consume water relative to others (Oregon is a prior approriations state -- first in time, first in right) In this case, the State holds a small water right it intends to lease to Nestle.

If Starbuck is losing this much sleep over this little water right transfer, he must really cry when he reads about the large agricultural water rights the State grants. Talk about selling us down the river! Even worse, those inchoate municipal water permits are gigantic!! And they serve all kinds of foreign owned businesses. The horror!

Oh wait. It's called commerce, and it's a really great thing.

One thing I don't get about this story. If ODFW will exchange water rights at the spring which I believe is above the hatchery and then the spring water just flows to the hatchery for well water rights won't ODFW have to pay to pump that water from the wells to the surface and to their hatchery?

There may be lifting costs, Mike. If there are, I expect the State would require Nestle cover them under the terms of the lease. It's also possible that the groundwater wells are artesian. In any event, I'm confident the State will come out ahead on this one.

You guys are funny!

If you don't even get the wife beating joke and the connection to what Max posted challenging clinamen, then there is no where to go.

Lose sleep? Just where do you get that from my post? Do you bother to ask first?

I didn't think so.

I also don't Curtiss even bothered to look up fossil fuels before making this statement:

"And of course, that was based on the idea that oil and natural gas are fossil fuels - when in fact, the only fossil fuels are coal and peat"

Look it up. I did the homework for you.

You're quoting the wrong guy. I don't care how you guys define fossil fuels. It's not relevant to this conversation.

Right. It was Max. And you are also right. It is irrelevant except that it gets to the issue of who is doing good research.

Right. Wikipedia. Great research there. Ever heard of the Ministry of Truth?

Ministry of Truth! Yea and you are the president! That's how I know you!

Hey! They need some cleanup. Go to it Max. Tell them what's what.

Some background on Portland's bottling Bull Run water 1980's-----Bottled water was just coming into vogue in the early 1980s, primarily sparkling water along the European model. (The ubiquity of bottled still water, which does not have to meet the same water quality standards as municipal supplies, and produces tons of disposable plastic containers, was a later development.) Ivancie directed the Water Bureau to bottle Bull Run water, hoping it would create a niche in the designer water market. Privately, bureau staff groused about the project, as it added cost, diverted staff from other work, and perhaps most importantly did not really provide Bull Run quality water. The water came from Bull Run, true enough, but in bottling it and carbonating it, the chemistry changed, and it just wasn’t as good.

Undeterred, Ivancie used “Bull Run in a bottle” as the centerpiece of a Portland marketing campaign that extended to the 1984 New Orleans World’s Fair. The theme of the fair was “The World of Rivers – Fresh Water as a Source of Life.” Ivancie had Bull Run posters printed, and he commissioned a mobile sculpture that featured flowing water in something of a Rube Goldberg creation to be the drawing point of Portland exhibit at the fair. The Southern Pacific 4449 “Freedom Train” made the trip from Portland to New Orleans, promoting Portland and Bull Run water at every stop. Ivancie sent three employees to staff the World’s Fair booth for three days, but it produced no leads for economic development. In the meantime, Ivancie had been upset in his re-election bid by tavern owner and political newcomer J.E. “Bud” Clark. Ivancie’s defeat, and principal completion of the decade-long changes to the Water Bureau’s physical and financial infrastructure, ushered in a new era.

Don't assume I haven't done any research simply because we don't agree.

I value public ownership of resources and good stewardship for future generations. If I sense dangers to long-range protection, and erosion of public commons, I will raise the alarm, and if that is considered knee-jerk, so be it.

Link and excerpts below:

World Bank partners with Nestlé to “transform water sector”
New venture aims to privatize water country by country

[Washington, DC]: Today, the World Bank launched a new partnership with global corporations including Nestlé, Coca-Cola and Veolia. Housed at the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation (IFC), the new venture aspires to “transform the water sector” by inserting the corporate sector into what has historically been a public service. The new partnership is part of a broader trend of industry collusion to influence global water policy.

The Water Resources Group aims to “develop new normative approaches to water management,” paving the way for an expanded private sector role into best and common practices, worldwide.

The Water Resources Group aims to “develop new normative approaches to water management,” paving the way for an expanded private sector role into best and common practices, worldwide. In order to be eligible for support from this new fund, all projects must “provide for at least one partner from the private sector,” not simply as a charitable funder, but “as part of its operations.” The group’s strategy is to insert the private sector into water management one country at a time, through a combination of industry-funded research and direct partnerships with government agencies. Currently, the Water Resources Group is formally working with the governments of Jordan, Mexico, and the Indian state of Karnataka, and discussions are ongoing with the governments of South Africa, China and several other countries slated for participation in the next phase.

Will Oregon be added to that list?

Anti business rant? In my opinion, I would venture to say that those who are pro public interest are for good business policies, level playing field. When just a few own all, which is where we are heading, we may have a hugely unbalanced situation to the detriment of the majority of the people.


"All water within the state from all sources of water supply belongs to the public." ORS 537.110. That's not changing any time soon. Deep breaths.

Now if you have a problem with the state issuing water rights to private parties (i.e., authorizing use of state-owned water), you're a little late to the dance. Oregon's been issuing water rights since 1909 (and 1955 for ground water). Most surface water bodies are already fully appropriated during the summer months. It's been that way for a long time, and no the World Bank's not colluding with Nestle to take your water away.

Because it's difficult to get new summer water rights (again, already fully appropriated), would-be developers usually have to do deals with the people who already have water rights. That's what's happening here. It just so happens that, in this case, the counterparties holding relatively small water rights are the City and State (i.e., they hold a couple of those use rights I mentioned above). It could just as easily have been Weyerhaeuser or Longview holding those water rights. You know, like Longview Timberlands, that dastardly foreign held corporation employing hundreds in . . . Longview, WA.

Also, the passage you quote above is from a Corporate Accountability International news release. For those who aren't familiar, CAI may actually be left of the Sierra Club. A grain of salt or more is in order.

Star: it appears that the fact that Wikipedia is at best an unreliable source of information, and/or my observation of that fact, is extremely disturbing to your fragile psyche. My apologies for harshing your buzz.

However, I've been working with networks since before the w3 existed, and quite frankly, I stand by my assessment of Wikipedia.

Clinamen: I didn't suggest that you had done no research; I simply noted some rather glaring disparities, such as your insinuation that spring water is somehow superior to well water in hatchery operations. There is no difference, as both come from the same aquifer. For the company, the difference is huge, because their marketing effort depends upon the image of "pure, natural, mountain spring water". That's all it is. The corporation would happily use nothing but well water if they thought they could market it as spring water. But doing so would beg for litigation.

Curtiss appears to have addressed the other points with great clarity.

I add: although not a lawyer, it appears to me that the transaction proposed differs in no significant way from those involving chip-makers and other high-volume water users - except that Nestle is contracting to receive substantially less water than the high-tech users. I see no cause for alarm, and jobs are needed in the area.

Mike: thanks for the refresher course on the Bull Run Water thing. Time flies whether you're having fun or not.

Clinamen: note that in my post I did leave wiggle-room for you, noting that you did not appear to have done much - if any research. This does not preclude your having done some.

Intel and Siltronics are not in the same business as Nestle.

(Where angels fear to tread):

We know, Star - now go back to your mom's basement and your obvious wikipedia dependence. You've demonstrated that you aren't worth the time.

Wiki is a starting point, Max.

I haven't seen anything from you that presents Wiki's assertion that oil and natural gas are fossil fuels as counter factual.

Show me please, with references.

While discussion on this thread has focused on the spring water, commenters to Scott Learn's piece, identifying themselves as Cascade Locks residents, have expressed their dismay at the 24/7 truck traffic anticipated by Nestlé to cart the water from the slender town. It certainly seems that such traffic would profoundly alter life in Cascade Locks, not at all for the better. And this alteration would endure long after those who promote the degradation will have left the scene.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics