This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 3, 2012 1:36 PM.
The previous post in this blog was Excellent birds.
The next post in this blog is The party's over.
Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.
The decision by the Multnomah County commissioners not to submit a new library taxing district to the county's voters in May got quite a negative reaction from library supporters. And so now the new plan is to ask voters in May to pass a new three-year levy, with an election on the new taxing district promised in November if the levy passes:
If Multnomah County voters approve the three-year local option levy, which will provide the Library with temporary financial stability, the Board will refer a district measure to the ballot in November 2012.
Cogue and the New Sisters of Hawthorne will be voting on the new package on Thursday. They'll have an audience no doubt. Why they put themselves in an adversarial position with the library -- the most popular institution in the county -- remains a mystery. It's got a strong smell of condo developer around it, though.
Comments (12)
So then we pay the levy AND for a new library district?
Levys are temporary fixes and not all that great as a funding mechanism. They allow for a program to continue, but not to grow. They prohibit any real long term planning by an organization, and keep a sense of “not knowing what’s next” at the forefront. Great employees are not particularly attracted to organizations needing a life line every 3 years to survive, and where continued employment might suddenly end at the conclusion of a funding cycle.
A renewal of the current levy in May seems more like insurance, just in case there is not enough momentum for the taxing district campaign in November. The levy will likely pass, probably because it asks only to keep current taxes pretty much at status quo. Seems a smart move if you are a friend of the library.
I'm completely in favor of funding libraries that are free and open for everyone. However, Multnomah County Public Library already has a budget, at $62 million dollars, that is far larger than any system in the country serving a similar sized population. Were it to be reduced by 10%, it would still be the largest. The Seattle Public Library has a budget that is 20% smaller, yet has more branches, a larger collection, and is open longer hours. Not to mention a central library that puts ours to shame. MPL instead chooses to spend its money on "social media initiatives' and lobbying. MPL will point to its circulation figures, but these numbers are so pumped up by their DVD collection check outs that it's hardly worth comparing to other libraries that concentrate on their original mission- books. It would be more cost effective to reduce MPL's budget and buy every family in Multnomah County a Netflix subscription. At a time when everyone is tightening their belts, MPL wants to grow. That it seeks to do this when many families are losing their homes in tax sales because they can't afford to pay ever increasing property taxes is unconscionable.
Put a great big glass bowl by the front door at all the branches so that patrons can contribute whatever they think it is worth. I'll bet it will fill up real fast.
What kind of a community do we live in, with street cars and pet projects taking over library, schools and public safety needs?
It feels so like a choke-hold on our community for insider's benefits.
These decision makers have no conscience and the people in our community will have to be engaged and proactive instead of just hoping things will get better.
Mike says a 10% cut still makes MPL one of the biggest system per capita. The Trib reports:
"Even if voters approve the levy in May, it still will leave the library system with a 10 percent cut in operating funds for one year, even after the county plugs in $10 million in emergency funds, Cogen said. That’s likely to result in shorter hours at library branches, and changes in staffing levels."
So by this logic, no increase amounts to a cut in funding.
I suspect Jeff Cogen has figured out that the library actually isn't as popular as many intellectuals think it is. Quite a few lower-income county residents never set foot in the library and are unlikely to be interested in a new taxing district. Cogen knows how to count votes.
Library cheerleaders have long resisted any efforts to reform their basic business model (yes, it's a business); but those days are coming to an end.
I know for a fact that a "child reading specialist" makes over $60k, plus bennies. Should librarians earn more than cops or school teachers?
Whatever fat is currently in the budget, you can be sure the patronage jobs become more numerous and well compensated when the trough is permanently expanded.
What kind of a community do we live in, with street cars and pet projects taking over library, schools and public safety needs?
Clinamen, we live in a communtity where there is little respect for democratic principles, where the arrogant few deeply believe they know what's best for the rest of us who they see as stupid and inferior in need of shepherding.
I think that about sums it up and frankly, also quite a few of the issues Jack shines a light on in this blog.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
So then we pay the levy AND for a new library district?
Posted by Snards | January 3, 2012 2:30 PM
I still think the rational is to avoid having the voters choose between books and street cars.
Posted by David E Gilmore | January 3, 2012 2:49 PM
Levys are temporary fixes and not all that great as a funding mechanism. They allow for a program to continue, but not to grow. They prohibit any real long term planning by an organization, and keep a sense of “not knowing what’s next” at the forefront. Great employees are not particularly attracted to organizations needing a life line every 3 years to survive, and where continued employment might suddenly end at the conclusion of a funding cycle.
A renewal of the current levy in May seems more like insurance, just in case there is not enough momentum for the taxing district campaign in November. The levy will likely pass, probably because it asks only to keep current taxes pretty much at status quo. Seems a smart move if you are a friend of the library.
Posted by gibby | January 3, 2012 4:22 PM
I'm completely in favor of funding libraries that are free and open for everyone. However, Multnomah County Public Library already has a budget, at $62 million dollars, that is far larger than any system in the country serving a similar sized population. Were it to be reduced by 10%, it would still be the largest. The Seattle Public Library has a budget that is 20% smaller, yet has more branches, a larger collection, and is open longer hours. Not to mention a central library that puts ours to shame. MPL instead chooses to spend its money on "social media initiatives' and lobbying. MPL will point to its circulation figures, but these numbers are so pumped up by their DVD collection check outs that it's hardly worth comparing to other libraries that concentrate on their original mission- books. It would be more cost effective to reduce MPL's budget and buy every family in Multnomah County a Netflix subscription. At a time when everyone is tightening their belts, MPL wants to grow. That it seeks to do this when many families are losing their homes in tax sales because they can't afford to pay ever increasing property taxes is unconscionable.
Posted by Mike | January 3, 2012 6:56 PM
Put a great big glass bowl by the front door at all the branches so that patrons can contribute whatever they think it is worth. I'll bet it will fill up real fast.
Posted by Evergreen Libertarian | January 3, 2012 7:12 PM
Maybe the MPL budget is getting "skimmed" for non-library purposes like everything else around here.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | January 3, 2012 8:09 PM
What kind of a community do we live in, with street cars and pet projects taking over library, schools and public safety needs?
It feels so like a choke-hold on our community for insider's benefits.
These decision makers have no conscience and the people in our community will have to be engaged and proactive instead of just hoping things will get better.
Posted by clinamen | January 3, 2012 9:25 PM
Mike says a 10% cut still makes MPL one of the biggest system per capita. The Trib reports:
"Even if voters approve the levy in May, it still will leave the library system with a 10 percent cut in operating funds for one year, even after the county plugs in $10 million in emergency funds, Cogen said. That’s likely to result in shorter hours at library branches, and changes in staffing levels."
So by this logic, no increase amounts to a cut in funding.
Posted by Fred Stovel | January 3, 2012 9:32 PM
The library already did cut hours several years ago. What next? No evenings, 1/2 days, closed on Sundays?
I would think a library is in many ways more "sustainable" for a healthy vital community than the proposed "Sustainable Center!"
Posted by clinamen | January 3, 2012 10:03 PM
I suspect Jeff Cogen has figured out that the library actually isn't as popular as many intellectuals think it is. Quite a few lower-income county residents never set foot in the library and are unlikely to be interested in a new taxing district. Cogen knows how to count votes.
Library cheerleaders have long resisted any efforts to reform their basic business model (yes, it's a business); but those days are coming to an end.
Posted by John Charles | January 3, 2012 11:36 PM
I know for a fact that a "child reading specialist" makes over $60k, plus bennies. Should librarians earn more than cops or school teachers?
Whatever fat is currently in the budget, you can be sure the patronage jobs become more numerous and well compensated when the trough is permanently expanded.
Posted by Mister Tee | January 4, 2012 6:42 AM
What kind of a community do we live in, with street cars and pet projects taking over library, schools and public safety needs?
Clinamen, we live in a communtity where there is little respect for democratic principles, where the arrogant few deeply believe they know what's best for the rest of us who they see as stupid and inferior in need of shepherding.
I think that about sums it up and frankly, also quite a few of the issues Jack shines a light on in this blog.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | January 4, 2012 11:41 AM