Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 14, 2011 7:47 AM. The previous post in this blog was At least it's a *local* rathole. The next post in this blog is Who's on the Blazers any more?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

Money for nothing

One of the many crazy things about politics in America is that politicians get to accept "campaign contributions," even when they're not running for anything, or even when they're running unopposed. Guys like Earl the Pearl and Gatsby Wyden sit on hundreds of thousands of dollars, and they'll never have a formidable opponent. So what do they do with that money? Give it to other politicians' campaigns and thereby gain power, we suppose.

Here's an example of the looni-tude: The other day Phil Knight made a $10,000 "campaign contribution" to John Kitzhaber. Kitz can't possibly be planning to run for re-election, can he? Surely he'll retire -- again -- and Cylvia can cut up his food for him. And even if he did run, his race wouldn't be for nearly another three years.

The U.S. Supreme Court tells us, rightly or wrongly, that giving money to political campaigns is the equivalent of speech, protected by the Constitution. It would be great if somehow that principle could be limited to people who are actually running for something, and the donations could be restricted to some reasonable time period around their actual election. Otherwise, it just looks like a bribe.

Comments (18)

We know these people are all on the take (both the donaters and donatees) at all times so it is our fault for even pretending the system is legitimate by wasting our time voting. You are much more likely to die in a car (or bike, streetcar, MAX, walking) accident on the way to the polls than voting in an election that is tied or has a one vote difference. Send a real message by refusing to participate in the rigged carnival game.

It doesn't "...just look like a bribe...", it is a bribe.

And when the state pols are allowed to convert the campaign funds to their own personal use under state law when they "retire" and leave politics, the "its a bribe" nature of the transaction is underscored.

It is amazing that most of us know it is a bribe. But we do nothing about it. When will we, the politicians won't?

Maybe it will have to be like the citizens of Clackamas Co. They are doing it because the politicians won't.

That certainly sounds like the right ingredients for a thoroughly corrupt political environment. It sounds as if a politician can be completely in the pocket of some large corporation, legally!

You may have answered how the mayor was able to get his mortgage sorted out.

Earl does use his contributions to gain power by supporting other candidates, just like you have said here.

Remember this? Randy Leonard uses campaign contribution money to pay his parking expenses downtown. And, didn't he give some to Sam for his mayoral election?

There Oughtta Be A Law
It should be illegal for a candidate or PAC to give money from one campaign fund to another.
This is unfair to the donor who contributed money to a political campaign with the intent that the money be used for that campaign. As it is currently, once contributed, money can go to any other campaign committee without the consent of the donor.

It should be illegal for money contributed to a political campaign to be converted to a politician's personal use at the end of the campaign.
This is unfair to the donor who gave money with the intent that it would be expended for the campaign's political needs. Unused funds can go to the state like other unclaimed funds. Is this money even taxed by the IRS?

To convert money from a campaign fund to ANY other purpose than to directly support the campaign to which it is given should be considered fraudulent behavior. In business, this practice would land a person in prison. The problem lies with who writes campaign laws.

If businesses got to write the laws that apply to them, Bernie Madoff wouldn't be in prison.

Nolo -

If you think that the federal courts decisions under the First Amendment flowing from Buckley v. Valejo are bad regarding the money equals speech theory, think a bit about the farcical situation Justice Hans Linde of the Oregon Supreme Court created with his naalysis of Article I, section 8 of the Oregon Constitution.

There "oughta be a law", but until and unlessthe Oregon Constitution is amended, and Buckley is over ruled, there won't be, as any and every entity have a "free speech" right to give money to any pol or committee.

Setting aside where the money comes from for now, it should only be used for the stated purpose of the campaign to which it was given.

Free speech is free speech, but elections and the election process is not free speech.

Therefore, there should be NO election related activity occurring no more than 120 days prior to the actual election. That means no election campaign, no committee, no fund raising, no advertising. Nothing.

Anything that happens prior to 120 days is considered personal activity, so therefore if Phil Knight donated $10,000 he would be giving that money not to John Kitzhaber the candidate, but John Kitzhaber the person - and it would obviously be a bribe of some sort, since he would be obligated to report his income while holding a state office. Likewise, any advertising prior to 120 days would be a personal ad (and thus not subject to all of the rules related to elections in, a TV station could choose NOT to air it.)

How about this:

If you, a close relative or family member donates to a politician, that politician MUST recuse himself from ANY vote affecting you or your relatives or your company or related companies. FOREVER.


And when the state pols are allowed to convert the campaign funds to their own personal use under state law when they "retire" and leave politics, the "its a bribe" nature of the transaction is underscored.

They don't even have to wait until they retire and leave office, do they? I know Oregon legislators can double-dip by using campaign funds for motel rooms, food, gas, etc. while at the same time being reimbursed by taxpayers via their per diem, mileage expenses and the like. Talk about corrupt!

Ah, but the poor dears are so woefully underpaid. Just ask the crew at BlueOregon.

It all got started, basically, with a footnote in this case:


But, the scheme really got some lift after WWII, as explained in this recent article:

The Real History of 'Corporate Personhood': Meet the Man to Blame for Corporations Having More Rights Than You
The real history of today's excessive corporate power starts with a tobacco lawyer appointed to the Supreme Court.

IMO the whole "corporate personhood" argument is irrelevant and a ruse.

A "corporation" is simply a legal entity that exists independent of its members - people. It's a group of people that organize and register a new body. A corporation isn't necessary a business - after all there are "non-profit organizations" which are corporations, "municipal corporations" (government agencies)...

If one person has a freedom of speech, how does a collective of people have that freedom denied? The Constitution grants the right to peacefully assemble (to join together as a group) - is that not what a Corporation essentially is - a group of people that assemble; not necessarily in the physical sense that all of those people are in one physical location at one time, but they assemble their money and voices into a single corporation.

It is not the fault of corporations that America is filled with stupid voters that are so ignorant of the ability to act as individuals - we have MSNBC and Fox News, but there is nobody holding a gun telling you to pick one or the other (or both, or none). Corporations are in and of themselves not evil; corporations can certainly do evil things, just as a single person can. A group of organized people can do evil; just as an unruly mob of loosely organized individuals (see: Occupy Whatever) can. To suggest that the root of evil is in an otherwise unremarkable tax case brought before the Supreme Court...surely the Supreme Court can likewise overrule itself; and we have a Constitution that can override the Supreme Court. In 125 years, neither has happened. But 12 other Amendments have been ratified as part of the Constitution. Clearly, it isn't as big of a problem as though to be.

Sign seen at an OWS rally:

"I'll believe corporations are people when the State of Texas executes one."

With rights come responsibilities. Corporations enjoy the former without being burdened by much of the latter, as we ordinary humans are. Their only missive is to make money.

And yet people can't envision a problem with giving equal rights and virtually unlimited power to completely immoral and self-centered entities. What could possibly go wrong?

Erik H --

To suggest that the Supreme Court has never reversed itself isn't quite accurate. Happens relatively frequently.

The most prominent example is over ruling Plessy v. Ferguson (?1898?) in Brown v. Board of Education (1954.)

"The U.S. Supreme Court tells us ... that giving money to political campaigns is the equivalent of speech."

This is not an accurate statement, though I can hardly fault you, given how very common the mistake is.

The Court merely recognizes that money is an indispensible means for the exercise of political speech (any political speech, that is).

See for a full argument that this conceptual distinction is vital.

The one mistake I won't make is arguing with you.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics