Here's a howler from Homer Williams, the real estate developer whose South Waterfront District in Portland is one of the most spectacular failures in the city's history, both for private investors and for taxpayers. Nowadays old Homer's selling his shinola in the pristine suburb of Lake Oswego, and his schtick hasn't changed a bit:
This month, a city-commissioned financial feasibility study performed by ECONorthwest provided news that could be good for both the streetcar and Foothills projects. With the use of a new recommended urban renewal area, the city would have tax-increment financing and system development charges totaling $56.2 million that could be spent on public infrastructure improvements, including the streetcar.
Also, the study upheld the framework plan’s estimates that development of the district would generate up to $1.6 billion of new real market value in the district, resulting in assessed value as great as $881.1 million. That new value would be the tax base to generate money for a new urban renewal area.
The Foothills development is uniquely suited for TIF and SDC funding mechanisms, Williams said, because of what exists in the area now.
"The current value of the properties down there is so low and potential for higher-value development so great, that through tax-increment financing and SDCs we could obtain, it would essentially fund itself," Williams said.
When this guy starts talking "it will pay for itself," well, you know what they say: Do not leave valuables unattended.
Comments (24)
Yes, google, bing, etc exist, but thought I'd ask others to do the work... er, if it's already been done to share the knowledge.
Is there a web page or three that describes the finances of South Waterfront, what the 'vision' was, who paid what, current state of play, etc?
Paul Wolfowitz talking about Iraq: ""There's a lot of money to pay for this. It doesn't have to be U.S. taxpayer money. We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon." ---Congressional Testimony, March 27, 2003
Trying to think through the need for the streetcar for this project in a dispassionate way, I just don't see the logic. Is it so Foothills residents would be able to head into Portland to partake of its shopping and cultural attractions? Well, LO has shopping, boutiques, a library, not to mention a walkable downtown and grocery stores. If there's something that only Portland can offer, however, are folks willing to make an hour-and-a-half round-trip on the streetcar, which even then will limit their options to the West Side and the inner East Side? Add more time for a bus transfer if they want to go to Mississippi, Alberta, or Hawthorne. At that point, might as well drive.
Going the other direction, are Portlanders going to find anything in LO they aren't going to find in Portland, other than a private lake they can look at but not touch?
The only people I can see really benefiting from the streetcar would be retirees who want Clackamas County tax rates and safe, convenient access to OHSU in case their driving skills are fading. Maybe some families would choose to live in the Foothills for the LO schools, but condo life is not for everyone and it's very hard for families to not have a car (sure, some make it work, but would there be enough of these hardy folks to fill up the Foothills and justify the streetcar?)
As most Portland-area transit-oriented developments go, this one is really more about developer-oriented transit. The money would be better spent on converting the streetcar ROW to a bike path that terminates in LO at a nice new public beach park on the Willamette, as well as improved bus service (including expresses) between LO and Portland.
Eric, that is good analysis. I think for the developers, streetcar is a good "value add" as long as they aren't paying for it. But they really want the direct subsidies to their projects from urban renewal and transit-oriented programs.
For the "smart planning" braintrust, rail is no longer questioned and therefore doesn't need to be justified. "Rail is good because rail is good."
Or, more accurately, "rail is good because cars are bad."
"The Conjurer," painted by Hieronymus Bosch. The painting accurately displays a performer doing the cups and balls routine, which has been practiced since Egyptian times. The shell game does have some origins in this old trick. The real trick of this painting is the pickpocket who is working for the conjurer. The pickpocket is robbing the spectator who is bent over. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_game
Lake Oswego learn from Portland mistakes!
Don't let them in.
I would venture to guess that some newcomers into LO are pushing for this, along with others who have been strategically placed there in decision making capacities.
I commented before, if you don't like LO the way is and want more glitzy, move to those vacant ones in SoWhat!
I believe Abe Farkas at Econw was development manager at PDC when the South Waterfront was negotiated. They are also providing support for The Don in Beaverton.
Why doesn't this group just move on to greener pastures? Our "green" is running out and has been fairly well picked...in pdx anyway. One would think they would do better in another state where people might be more enamored. Maybe they aren't that well received in other areas, and why Hales wants back in here.
Am really surprised why Beaverton would fall for this URA!
Maybe Hales should have gone to Beaverton instead!
Homer's already tried L.A. -- as I understand it, that did not go well. There's also action by Portland weasels currently under way in San Diego.
They've picked the City of Portland clean, but there's still plenty of property tax to be looted in Clackamas and Washington Counties. These birds won't quit until they've gotten it all.
Vultures! Or perhaps the Kia Parrots of New Zealand.
These parrots are protected and there are signs everywhere saying so.
They are very smart birds and they know they are safe. They go after everything including the rubber around car doors, and wind shield wipers, dismantling and destroying everything they can get their beaks on.
In another era developers like Gerding-Edlen or Williams would have to hire private security full time or suffer a blownout knee and a warning that the next visit wouldn't go so well...
Homer, Dike, and now Christie are dealing drugs. Every small town politician got a whiff of the Pearl and is chasing that original high and ignoring the sickness and dependence that follows. Even if you don't need it, WDW is selling it.
Now, now people. These are our esteemed associates hand picked for us by our elected officials to help save the planet. You know, the famous "public-private partnership" thing.
In another era developers like Gerding-Edlen or Williams would have to hire private security full time or suffer a blownout knee and a warning that the next visit wouldn't go so well...
Eric, didn't you know? LO is a "food desert", that is why they need UR.
Jack, besides Homer and Edlen's failures in LA, Homer is still having troubles in Tucson.
The Rio Nuevo $290 Million URA in Tucson has been a total failure with criminal investigations, corruption flying every which way. It's success, if ever, is tied in with a new trolley line out to UofA. Our local one-car trolley manufacturer in Clackamas has its hands in that promotion. And that includes our favorite son Charlie Hales and his company trying to sell trolleys to Tucson.
The recent mayor's race had Rio Nuevo as a major topic determining the race. Maybe Portland should be considered as a leader in Corruption and Influence. They even have conferences/seminars paying Portland's local Green/Trolley/Lightrail Mafia to speak.
I believe Abe Farkas at Econw was development manager at PDC when the South Waterfront was negotiated. They are also providing support for The Don in Beaverton.
I'm starting to think the PDC has more revolving doors than PDX airport.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (24)
Yes, google, bing, etc exist, but thought I'd ask others to do the work... er, if it's already been done to share the knowledge.
Is there a web page or three that describes the finances of South Waterfront, what the 'vision' was, who paid what, current state of play, etc?
I lack background on Mr. Williams' wild ride(s).
Posted by EB | November 15, 2011 9:16 AM
Homer Williams or Brant Williams?
Posted by Nolo | November 15, 2011 9:34 AM
Black magic or neo-con magic?
Paul Wolfowitz talking about Iraq: ""There's a lot of money to pay for this. It doesn't have to be U.S. taxpayer money. We are dealing with a country that can really finance its own reconstruction, and relatively soon." ---Congressional Testimony, March 27, 2003
Posted by Bill McDonald | November 15, 2011 9:42 AM
Homer Williams or Brant Williams?
Homer I guess. Who's Brant? An evil twin?
Posted by EB | November 15, 2011 9:52 AM
Trying to think through the need for the streetcar for this project in a dispassionate way, I just don't see the logic. Is it so Foothills residents would be able to head into Portland to partake of its shopping and cultural attractions? Well, LO has shopping, boutiques, a library, not to mention a walkable downtown and grocery stores. If there's something that only Portland can offer, however, are folks willing to make an hour-and-a-half round-trip on the streetcar, which even then will limit their options to the West Side and the inner East Side? Add more time for a bus transfer if they want to go to Mississippi, Alberta, or Hawthorne. At that point, might as well drive.
Going the other direction, are Portlanders going to find anything in LO they aren't going to find in Portland, other than a private lake they can look at but not touch?
The only people I can see really benefiting from the streetcar would be retirees who want Clackamas County tax rates and safe, convenient access to OHSU in case their driving skills are fading. Maybe some families would choose to live in the Foothills for the LO schools, but condo life is not for everyone and it's very hard for families to not have a car (sure, some make it work, but would there be enough of these hardy folks to fill up the Foothills and justify the streetcar?)
As most Portland-area transit-oriented developments go, this one is really more about developer-oriented transit. The money would be better spent on converting the streetcar ROW to a bike path that terminates in LO at a nice new public beach park on the Willamette, as well as improved bus service (including expresses) between LO and Portland.
Posted by Eric | November 15, 2011 9:53 AM
I imagine Homer Williams as Dr. Evil and ECONorthwest as his band of Mini-Mes screaming ONE B-I-L-L-I-O-N DOLLARS!
Posted by Garage Wine | November 15, 2011 9:54 AM
"The current value of the properties down there is so low and potential for higher-value development so great"
Then just build it, Homer. Why do you need tens of millions in public money?
Posted by Snards | November 15, 2011 9:54 AM
Does Homer own a home in Portland? I wonder how many tents his yard might accomodate? 2 birds/1 stone.
Posted by Mister Tee | November 15, 2011 10:19 AM
Eric, that is good analysis. I think for the developers, streetcar is a good "value add" as long as they aren't paying for it. But they really want the direct subsidies to their projects from urban renewal and transit-oriented programs.
For the "smart planning" braintrust, rail is no longer questioned and therefore doesn't need to be justified. "Rail is good because rail is good."
Or, more accurately, "rail is good because cars are bad."
Posted by Snards | November 15, 2011 10:28 AM
It's not black magic. More like a modern version of thimbelrig.
Illustration --
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Conjurer_Bosch.jpg
"The Conjurer," painted by Hieronymus Bosch. The painting accurately displays a performer doing the cups and balls routine, which has been practiced since Egyptian times. The shell game does have some origins in this old trick. The real trick of this painting is the pickpocket who is working for the conjurer. The pickpocket is robbing the spectator who is bent over.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shell_game
All aboard!
Posted by Mojo | November 15, 2011 10:31 AM
Mojo: to look at it another way, "it will pay for itself" is DeveloperSpeak for "Yew shore got a purty mouth."
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | November 15, 2011 10:46 AM
Rail is good for the developers!
Lake Oswego learn from Portland mistakes!
Don't let them in.
I would venture to guess that some newcomers into LO are pushing for this, along with others who have been strategically placed there in decision making capacities.
I commented before, if you don't like LO the way is and want more glitzy, move to those vacant ones in SoWhat!
Posted by clinamen | November 15, 2011 11:00 AM
I believe Abe Farkas at Econw was development manager at PDC when the South Waterfront was negotiated. They are also providing support for The Don in Beaverton.
Posted by Justsayin | November 15, 2011 11:43 AM
Why doesn't this group just move on to greener pastures? Our "green" is running out and has been fairly well picked...in pdx anyway. One would think they would do better in another state where people might be more enamored. Maybe they aren't that well received in other areas, and why Hales wants back in here.
Am really surprised why Beaverton would fall for this URA!
Maybe Hales should have gone to Beaverton instead!
Posted by clinamen | November 15, 2011 11:54 AM
Homer's already tried L.A. -- as I understand it, that did not go well. There's also action by Portland weasels currently under way in San Diego.
They've picked the City of Portland clean, but there's still plenty of property tax to be looted in Clackamas and Washington Counties. These birds won't quit until they've gotten it all.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 15, 2011 11:58 AM
Vultures! Or perhaps the Kia Parrots of New Zealand.
These parrots are protected and there are signs everywhere saying so.
They are very smart birds and they know they are safe. They go after everything including the rubber around car doors, and wind shield wipers, dismantling and destroying everything they can get their beaks on.
Posted by Portland Native | November 15, 2011 12:25 PM
In another era developers like Gerding-Edlen or Williams would have to hire private security full time or suffer a blownout knee and a warning that the next visit wouldn't go so well...
Posted by Dave A. | November 15, 2011 12:37 PM
Homer, Dike, and now Christie are dealing drugs. Every small town politician got a whiff of the Pearl and is chasing that original high and ignoring the sickness and dependence that follows. Even if you don't need it, WDW is selling it.
http://www.featurepics.com/FI/Thumb300/20100815/Drug-Dealer-1634775.jpg
Posted by Nolo | November 15, 2011 12:58 PM
Now, now people. These are our esteemed associates hand picked for us by our elected officials to help save the planet. You know, the famous "public-private partnership" thing.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | November 15, 2011 1:24 PM
Katz liked to use that term "public-private partnership" with enthusiasm!
Posted by clinamen | November 15, 2011 1:31 PM
In another era developers like Gerding-Edlen or Williams would have to hire private security full time or suffer a blownout knee and a warning that the next visit wouldn't go so well...
Posted by Dave A. | November 15, 2011 12:37 PM
Now GED is doing the kneecapping
Posted by Portland Native | November 15, 2011 1:53 PM
Eric, didn't you know? LO is a "food desert", that is why they need UR.
Jack, besides Homer and Edlen's failures in LA, Homer is still having troubles in Tucson.
The Rio Nuevo $290 Million URA in Tucson has been a total failure with criminal investigations, corruption flying every which way. It's success, if ever, is tied in with a new trolley line out to UofA. Our local one-car trolley manufacturer in Clackamas has its hands in that promotion. And that includes our favorite son Charlie Hales and his company trying to sell trolleys to Tucson.
The recent mayor's race had Rio Nuevo as a major topic determining the race. Maybe Portland should be considered as a leader in Corruption and Influence. They even have conferences/seminars paying Portland's local Green/Trolley/Lightrail Mafia to speak.
Posted by Lee | November 15, 2011 2:55 PM
I believe Abe Farkas at Econw was development manager at PDC when the South Waterfront was negotiated. They are also providing support for The Don in Beaverton.
I'm starting to think the PDC has more revolving doors than PDX airport.
Posted by Ryan | November 15, 2011 6:51 PM
Another PDC alum is Kenny Asher, Community Development Director at Milwaukie, and pusher of the City's Urban Renewal scheme.
Posted by pete | November 15, 2011 10:32 PM