Some days we can't make sense of it all. See if you can help us figure this one out. The Oregon tax department is auctioning off tax credits on the internet. Each credit is worth $1,000 off your Oregon income tax, and bidding starts at $950. Bids will be open for nine days.
The money that the auction takes in will be spent by the state on "green" stuff. It's reported that there will be $1.1 million of tax credits auctioned off, and so apparently there will be 1,100 credit certificates sold.
Assuming that the bidding will move up from $950, it's hard to see why it would be worth most people's time and effort to get involved in bidding. And what's in it for the state? If the top bid is, say, $990, the state loses $11,000 in revenue, plus whatever administrative costs it's incurring running the auction and sending out credit certificates. Then there's the added cost of processing the certificates when they show up with tax returns next year.
Wouldn't it have been a whole lot simpler just to hand out grants to worthy "green" projects out of general tax revenues, and skip all the auction folderol? Maybe we should ask the people who dreamed the whole thing up. Probably some responsible adults like Jefferson Smith.
Wouldn't it have been a whole lot simpler just to hand out grants to worthy "green" projects out of general tax revenues, and skip all the auction folderol?
a) Them "worthy" projects might be a little hard for state workers to recognize. They're conditioned to dole pork to the chosen (rarely worthy) few.
2) When has "simple" ever motivated gubmint types?
One of the documents on their site says up to 1,094 credit certificates will be issued.
Seems like such a small discount for the necessary work/risk for a normal person. Maybe a large business that owed a bunch of tax could save enough to make it worth the effort and expense.
Oregon probably saw that SolarWorld sold about $10M worth of Oregon Energy tax credits to WalMart for $7M and thought they should get in on the game.
I'd be really curious how many people fall for this "paying your future taxes now" game. I mean why would you pay $1000 in 2011 money for a $1000 2015 tax credit?
Then again they are the only entity in the state that actually believes the Oregon Lottery is used for investment purposes.
The other issue is using this as a way to get around funding limits (I think). I mean if you pay $1000 that goes into "clean" energy projects from the state, this means Oregon collects $1000 less for general revenues later.
Which means they take it out of schools and roads (I can guarantee this won't affect employee benefits).
Something doesn't smell right about it. Of course, that smell is swamped by the general miasma from the Capitol anyways.
I mean why would you pay $1000 in 2011 money for a $1000 2015 tax credit?
Especially since by 2015 it may be worth $300 in today's money - or less. Break out the wheelbarrow, Maw - I'm heading to the store for a loaf of bread!
Why doesn't Oregon State start selling assets and just do business as usual? I know most state agencies would have a negative retail value, but sell them now while we can get a discount on foreign exchange rates.
Didn't the star try this earlier and it failed so now they are in "do over" mode.
Oregon needs to lure the state treasurer from Rhode Island. That lady has done the impossible there.
They should sell the naming rights to the highways, maybe even the rivers, even the naming rights to Mt. Hood. Why is it even named after an English bone head to begin with?
Portland could lead the nation by selling the naming rights to various streets. They ever get any money for Washington Street? Of course not. Maybe it should be the Sam Adams Street?
Cap and trade training and PR game. Press release to follow saying that demand for green credits outstripped supply, quoting supplicants gushing on how good it felt to give the government money and save the environment -- almost as much fun as going by streetcar.
Where are you guys coming up with using the credits in 2015?
It doesn't really matter, I was being extreme. The point is why pay taxes now (by buying credits) you can pay later (2012-2015 when 2011-2014 taxes are due)?
I still don't see any sense behind it besides a money for some more subsidies to green energy schemes.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (17)
Brain damage eclipse.
Posted by Mojo | November 30, 2011 3:34 PM
Wouldn't it have been a whole lot simpler just to hand out grants to worthy "green" projects out of general tax revenues, and skip all the auction folderol?
a) Them "worthy" projects might be a little hard for state workers to recognize. They're conditioned to dole pork to the chosen (rarely worthy) few.
2) When has "simple" ever motivated gubmint types?
Posted by cc | November 30, 2011 3:46 PM
Creative financing. Cash now instead of later.
Posted by Joe | November 30, 2011 3:47 PM
Cash in December -- three or four months early -- is worth all the administrative expense, plus the discount?
Posted by Jack Bog | November 30, 2011 3:52 PM
WTF?
One of the documents on their site says up to 1,094 credit certificates will be issued.
Seems like such a small discount for the necessary work/risk for a normal person. Maybe a large business that owed a bunch of tax could save enough to make it worth the effort and expense.
Posted by Michael | November 30, 2011 4:07 PM
Oregon probably saw that SolarWorld sold about $10M worth of Oregon Energy tax credits to WalMart for $7M and thought they should get in on the game.
I'd be really curious how many people fall for this "paying your future taxes now" game. I mean why would you pay $1000 in 2011 money for a $1000 2015 tax credit?
Then again they are the only entity in the state that actually believes the Oregon Lottery is used for investment purposes.
Posted by Steve | November 30, 2011 4:51 PM
The other issue is using this as a way to get around funding limits (I think). I mean if you pay $1000 that goes into "clean" energy projects from the state, this means Oregon collects $1000 less for general revenues later.
Which means they take it out of schools and roads (I can guarantee this won't affect employee benefits).
Something doesn't smell right about it. Of course, that smell is swamped by the general miasma from the Capitol anyways.
Posted by Steve | November 30, 2011 4:56 PM
I mean why would you pay $1000 in 2011 money for a $1000 2015 tax credit?
Especially since by 2015 it may be worth $300 in today's money - or less. Break out the wheelbarrow, Maw - I'm heading to the store for a loaf of bread!
Posted by Max | November 30, 2011 5:40 PM
Why doesn't Oregon State start selling assets and just do business as usual? I know most state agencies would have a negative retail value, but sell them now while we can get a discount on foreign exchange rates.
Posted by dhughes609 | November 30, 2011 5:51 PM
Didn't the star try this earlier and it failed so now they are in "do over" mode.
Oregon needs to lure the state treasurer from Rhode Island. That lady has done the impossible there.
Posted by Portland Native | November 30, 2011 6:22 PM
They should sell the naming rights to the highways, maybe even the rivers, even the naming rights to Mt. Hood. Why is it even named after an English bone head to begin with?
Portland could lead the nation by selling the naming rights to various streets. They ever get any money for Washington Street? Of course not. Maybe it should be the Sam Adams Street?
Posted by Evergreen Libertarian | November 30, 2011 7:01 PM
We are lucky that Salem doesn't have the right to print money, only borrow it. We would quickly become Zimbabwe of the West.
How many state employees are required to "manage" this scam?
Posted by Mister Tee | November 30, 2011 7:18 PM
Where are you guys coming up with using the credits in 2015? From what I can tell they are good for 2011-2014 taxes.
Posted by Michael | November 30, 2011 8:52 PM
Cap and trade training and PR game. Press release to follow saying that demand for green credits outstripped supply, quoting supplicants gushing on how good it felt to give the government money and save the environment -- almost as much fun as going by streetcar.
Posted by Newleaf | November 30, 2011 11:31 PM
Where are you guys coming up with using the credits in 2015?
It doesn't really matter, I was being extreme. The point is why pay taxes now (by buying credits) you can pay later (2012-2015 when 2011-2014 taxes are due)?
I still don't see any sense behind it besides a money for some more subsidies to green energy schemes.
Posted by Steve | December 1, 2011 6:31 AM
Ha ha. It's like Groupon for the green energy set.
Posted by MJ | December 1, 2011 2:18 PM
From the Acution Form: "Cash and personal checks are not acceptable forms
of payment."
I do not believe a public agency can refuse Cash. Isn't that full faith and credit violation?
Posted by Skamaniac | December 2, 2011 3:29 PM