When asked about job creation, Portland mayoral candidate Eileen Brady talked about Portland State and OHSU as a good place to throw money. Ick.
Meanwhile, her opponent, Charlie Hales of Camas, Washington, would relax environmental protection rules north and west of the Fremont Bridge. Also ick.
And the capper: "All express support for spending urban renewal money on economic development." Ipecac ick.
In a way we feel sorry for Hales and Brady. One of them is going to inherit a Portland that's as screwed up as the country was when Dick Cheney gave up control of the White House. It appears that the Sam Rand twins are going to skate away, but the city's free-range financial chickens are coming home to roost soon. The next mayoral term is likely to be one of relative austerity. Big plans won't be worth the full-color brochures they're printed on.
The latest from Hales and Brady is discouraging. And we'd never vote for the phony Jeffer-Sam Smith for anything. So which kid named Max do we vote for for mayor -- Brumm or Bauske?
Comments (12)
And I find the candidates for the 1st congressional district an equally depressing lot!
If there's a high profile elected official in Oregon worth bragging about, please bring me up to speed. I've listened to most of them and I'm not impressed.
That's twisted that anyone would look to "urban renewal" for anything, other than shoveling out taxpayer money for "not market-ready" real estate boondoggles. At least Brady has a different idea that sounds like it involves something other than using "urban renewal" to build a monument of herself. I don't get Hales's idea to "loosen environmental restrictions" right in the heart of Portland. Is he channeling Dick Cheney?
Wheeler is good, but there's only one. Still, the further we are from Sam and his lineage, the better. There is some reason for hope, I think.
"All express support for spending urban renewal money on economic development. And all three would like to see an independent panel oversee water and sewer rates."
All 3 want to keep the game going- talking the talk, but not having a single braincell understanding about the new reality- urban renewal is a SCAM that has destroyed our local tax base.
And to their eyes the independent panel to oversee water and sewer rates is just a way to take the heat off of them for rising rates- "don't blame us, blame the independent panel"
They probably don't dare say one disparaging word about the Metro-PDC-CoP gravy train that's been milking residents in the name of saving the planet and lining the pockets of a few select corporations for some years now. And remember, you're talking about a populace a large percentage of whom you could probably convince to buy dog turds in a brown paper bag to if you simply told them it was the green thing to do.
If you asked Brady, Smith and Hales how urban renewal affects budgets of police, fire, parks, schools, and the city's general budget, I bet they would hardly know any of UR's consequences. Hales should, since he's been involved before.
I hope citizens and the media ask the hard questions and not let them skate. What does "spending UR money for economic development" mean? Why does the media let them get off with such a pat answer of meaninglessness? Does it mean helping Linnton to Lents build a sidewalk, or Homer to Edlen to build condos?
Does it mean using UR money to pay for economic studies of where to build grocery stores, decide it should be near PSU, then give UR money to exclusive stores like Market of Choice or New Seasons to build the stores? That is what is happening in the South Waterfront URA. Welcome to the New Economics of Portland.
If PSU can afford to pay Condosleeza Rice to come flap her lips at attendees, then they don't need any additional funding. They obviously have too much as it is.
OHSU still has to pay off the damn tram before we extend them any additional funds. Even then, I have problems advancing funds to dubious borrowers.
It looks like every elected official we have around here wants to keep the game going.
What reason would they not come out with a statement or be with the public and tell us that they will do everything they can to save our water?
This is so serious, with the PWB debt and continuous shoveling money and they not only favor corporations but act like one instead of a municipality.
Our community could lose our water rights by the time all is done.
OK then, if there is even ONE, one official who will stand up now, correct me if they have been engaged to do everything possible about this matter.
Instead we have:
1. Silence.
2. The Run Around. The matter was put into state primacy? Even there, some confusion about a rule change without a public hearing. Meanwhile, last summer, a very hopeful sign when NY Senator Schumer asked and got a good response from EPA that they would reconsider the LT2, having to cap a NY reservoir and that science would prevail.
What was the response to that here? More silence.
Eventually heard Senator Merkley (on radio) say he would fight along with NY Senator Schumer if the city would be willing. City Commissioner Fritz said it was now up to the Senators. However, there has been no action on her part,as she has been asked to come forth with an ordinance to ask Senator Merkley to ask EPA for a Waiver from the LT2 rule. There were some letters from the city, but in my opinion weak letters and unless there is that ask for the Waiver, it looks like the "Run Around Game."
This is just one example, but it It looks like we have this "Run Around Game" with light rail, the CRC, urban renewal, etc.
In my opinion, it is because winning an election and staying in elected positions is what is more important to them than doing what is best for the community. Do we really need these types making critical decisions for the rest of us and/or being silent and giving us the run around?
Many liberal Portland voters believe the way to fix everything is by endorsing a sort of benevalent autocracy who'll have the resources to understand the issues and what needs to be done, and the power to force people to do the right thing even if it means breaking the rules. In other words, they've abdicated themselves to the role of sheep in need of a good shepherd.
However, as history has demonstrated time and time again, the shepherd turns out to be only human and has been making deals with the wolf.
All serious comments about UR's prospects under either Hales or Brady, but my top question (that won't be asked or certainly not brought up by candidates)is: What do you intend to do about the massive unfunded liability of public safety pensions?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (12)
And I find the candidates for the 1st congressional district an equally depressing lot!
Posted by Portland Native | October 18, 2011 8:10 AM
If there's a high profile elected official in Oregon worth bragging about, please bring me up to speed. I've listened to most of them and I'm not impressed.
Posted by David E Gilmore | October 18, 2011 8:37 AM
I think Wheeler's the best we've got at the moment.
Posted by Jack Bog | October 18, 2011 8:39 AM
"All express support for spending urban renewal money on economic development."
That sound you hear is Gerding-Edlen lighting Homer Williams' cigar with a City of Portland promissory note.
Posted by Garage Wine | October 18, 2011 9:06 AM
That's twisted that anyone would look to "urban renewal" for anything, other than shoveling out taxpayer money for "not market-ready" real estate boondoggles. At least Brady has a different idea that sounds like it involves something other than using "urban renewal" to build a monument of herself. I don't get Hales's idea to "loosen environmental restrictions" right in the heart of Portland. Is he channeling Dick Cheney?
Wheeler is good, but there's only one. Still, the further we are from Sam and his lineage, the better. There is some reason for hope, I think.
Posted by observer | October 18, 2011 9:35 AM
"All express support for spending urban renewal money on economic development. And all three would like to see an independent panel oversee water and sewer rates."
All 3 want to keep the game going- talking the talk, but not having a single braincell understanding about the new reality- urban renewal is a SCAM that has destroyed our local tax base.
And to their eyes the independent panel to oversee water and sewer rates is just a way to take the heat off of them for rising rates- "don't blame us, blame the independent panel"
Posted by Ralph Woods | October 18, 2011 9:43 AM
They probably don't dare say one disparaging word about the Metro-PDC-CoP gravy train that's been milking residents in the name of saving the planet and lining the pockets of a few select corporations for some years now. And remember, you're talking about a populace a large percentage of whom you could probably convince to buy dog turds in a brown paper bag to if you simply told them it was the green thing to do.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | October 18, 2011 10:00 AM
If you asked Brady, Smith and Hales how urban renewal affects budgets of police, fire, parks, schools, and the city's general budget, I bet they would hardly know any of UR's consequences. Hales should, since he's been involved before.
I hope citizens and the media ask the hard questions and not let them skate. What does "spending UR money for economic development" mean? Why does the media let them get off with such a pat answer of meaninglessness? Does it mean helping Linnton to Lents build a sidewalk, or Homer to Edlen to build condos?
Does it mean using UR money to pay for economic studies of where to build grocery stores, decide it should be near PSU, then give UR money to exclusive stores like Market of Choice or New Seasons to build the stores? That is what is happening in the South Waterfront URA. Welcome to the New Economics of Portland.
Posted by Lee | October 18, 2011 10:35 AM
If PSU can afford to pay Condosleeza Rice to come flap her lips at attendees, then they don't need any additional funding. They obviously have too much as it is.
OHSU still has to pay off the damn tram before we extend them any additional funds. Even then, I have problems advancing funds to dubious borrowers.
Posted by godfry | October 18, 2011 1:15 PM
...All 3 want to keep the game going-...
It looks like every elected official we have around here wants to keep the game going.
What reason would they not come out with a statement or be with the public and tell us that they will do everything they can to save our water?
This is so serious, with the PWB debt and continuous shoveling money and they not only favor corporations but act like one instead of a municipality.
Our community could lose our water rights by the time all is done.
OK then, if there is even ONE, one official who will stand up now, correct me if they have been engaged to do everything possible about this matter.
Instead we have:
1. Silence.
2. The Run Around. The matter was put into state primacy? Even there, some confusion about a rule change without a public hearing. Meanwhile, last summer, a very hopeful sign when NY Senator Schumer asked and got a good response from EPA that they would reconsider the LT2, having to cap a NY reservoir and that science would prevail.
What was the response to that here? More silence.
Eventually heard Senator Merkley (on radio) say he would fight along with NY Senator Schumer if the city would be willing. City Commissioner Fritz said it was now up to the Senators. However, there has been no action on her part,as she has been asked to come forth with an ordinance to ask Senator Merkley to ask EPA for a Waiver from the LT2 rule. There were some letters from the city, but in my opinion weak letters and unless there is that ask for the Waiver, it looks like the "Run Around Game."
This is just one example, but it It looks like we have this "Run Around Game" with light rail, the CRC, urban renewal, etc.
In my opinion, it is because winning an election and staying in elected positions is what is more important to them than doing what is best for the community. Do we really need these types making critical decisions for the rest of us and/or being silent and giving us the run around?
Posted by clinamen | October 18, 2011 1:36 PM
Many liberal Portland voters believe the way to fix everything is by endorsing a sort of benevalent autocracy who'll have the resources to understand the issues and what needs to be done, and the power to force people to do the right thing even if it means breaking the rules. In other words, they've abdicated themselves to the role of sheep in need of a good shepherd.
However, as history has demonstrated time and time again, the shepherd turns out to be only human and has been making deals with the wolf.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | October 18, 2011 1:56 PM
All serious comments about UR's prospects under either Hales or Brady, but my top question (that won't be asked or certainly not brought up by candidates)is: What do you intend to do about the massive unfunded liability of public safety pensions?
Posted by Don Lief | October 19, 2011 10:46 PM