Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on September 16, 2011 9:48 AM. The previous post in this blog was Speaking of paving paradise.... The next post in this blog is Have a great weekend. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, September 16, 2011

Portland car hater agenda: Sunday Parkways every day

We have no beef with Sunday Parkways -- the summer event in which the city closes down streets for bicycling on a half dozen Sundays in various parts of town. We took the kids walking on the parkways a couple of times, and it was o.k. But we soon realized that while it's advertised as being for walkers, too, Sunday Parkways is really for the cyclists. It's not particularly friendly to pedestrians at all.

Be that as it may, we can't see any harm. For those of us who don't feel like riding our bikes in dense packs of mostly inexperienced cyclists, all we need to do is note and avoid the affected areas on the few Sundays on which the events take place. Fine.

But Portland's pushiest bicycle freaks will stop at nothing to make known their claim to superiority, and for some reason this shrill minority has complete control of the Beautiful People currently running Portland government. And so now they're bragging about certain streets in town that they're gradually taking over on a permanent basis:

First of all, the message here is pretty misleading. It's only "Sunday Parkways Everyday" on Going Street until you get hit by a UPS truck on a Tuesday afternoon. But more importantly, it's stunning to us that this is the mindset of Portland city government these days. "Sunday Parkways Everyday." Just wow.

This latest in the endless stream of glossy propaganda brochures mailed to our home explains a lot. Yes, it's "Sunday Parkways Everyday" in Portlandia. Hardly anybody goes to work on Sunday.

Comments (37)

You may not have a problem with the summertime Sunday Parkways but we live just inside the boundary of the North Portland parkway and dread them every year. We can look forward to SUVs and vans clogging our street (one block long), taking up available parking and unloading bicycles. Buses are re-routed and good luck trying to figure out where Tri Met has sent them. And just try to walk anywhere. It may be a nice Sunday afternoon outing for people who drive to the neighborhood to ride their bikes. But it is nothing but a headache for the neighborhood. So I have nothing but sympathy for those who live along the "Sunday Parkways Everyday" routes.

Jack, Jack, Jack - you just keep refusing to see the big picture ...

You know who else demanded that cars only drive 25 mph on residential side streets? Hitler.

All your street are belong to us.

Uh, how is the glossy misleading? It says that there are certain streets where peds and bikes are given priority all the time, and that Sunday Parkways tries to include the greenways when possible.

Hard to see anything misleading here.

I think the point is that Sunday Parkway streets are closed to motor vehicles, whereas Sunday Parkway Everyday streets are not. Except for Sunday Parkway.

"We can look forward to SUVs and vans clogging our street (one block long), taking up available parking and unloading bicycles.

Driving to a biking event. Sigh....

I've never been to one of these things. I ride my bike to get places. Riding it around in circles on a street packed with other cyclists for the point of... what exactly? Makes no sense to me.

It would perfect sense if the goal were simply to clog up the streets, now wouldn't it? Don't the bike activists call that "corking"?...

...which, by the way, I'd assume would eventually attract the attention of Homeland Security.

Not surprised, not surprised at all!
Just wow is right.
Feel sorry for those neighborhoods overtaken by the band of cyclists. Am sure some of the people living there would like a little peace and quiet in their homes and streets, from their hectic week.
What is wrong with Springwater trail and Gateway Greenway, etc? Why go through residential areas? Seems like an army here taking over territory.
It is one thing to have an occasional "sunday parkway" but give an inch and take a mile by making streets permanent is the message here!

Just want to add, am not against people who bicycle and see the value of the exercise, etc. but am against being propagandized and pushed by certain groups here.

Enough is enough, too much in the faces of the rest of the people here visually and then the finances towards this when the economy needs prudence on projects.

What is next, how far does the lobbyist bike group intend to take this?

I'm a daily rider on Going from around NE 35th. And a couple of times a week, I'm a pedestrian walking the dog there. There really isn't much motor traffic at all during the commute times and it is pleasant. I see many more residents out and about in their yards or with their kids than I see on high speed Prescott just a block over. I'm pretty sure the vast, vast majority of residents would prefer the bike vehicle traffic noise on Going as opposed to the motor traffic noise on Prescott.

That said, I agree that producing and sending out propaganda like this should not be part of the City's agenda.

Now that I think more about it, maybe disguising it as a "community event" is actually diabolically brilliant.

And so what if local residents feel harrassed? Doesn't it only further the goal? If they don't want to live in the settlement being forced on them, they're free to move and someone who wants to be there can move in and take their place, increasing the headcount and political clout of the desired thinkers.

And if those harrassed do something unpleasant, sure, there may be collateral damage, but they wind up in the penal system, a problem gets removed from the colony, and again the goal is furthered along.

If I can think of it, so can people who sit around scheming up clever, manipulative, and dishonest ways to achieve an agenda.

However, when one buys property on a busier street to live on, they already know what comes with it....
different than one who buys property on a quiet street because that is what they bought it for.
Having bicyclists going through neighborhood streets is not so much the issue here as having streets designated as such permanently.
Propaganda is one thing, how about finances and fairness? There are some streets where the white lines for vehicles are nearly vanished, why for lack of money for labor and paint?
The focus in on freshly painted streets for the bikes.

Mr. Grumpy:...If I can think of it, so can people who sit around scheming up clever, manipulative, and dishonest ways to achieve an agenda.

And they do!!

I wonder how much of the agenda would be accomplished
if those who desire it were paying for it?

I don't get the need for Sunday Parkways. Many of Portland's roads are very casual on Sundays even without Sunday Parkways. I've never had any problem getting around on bike or walking on Sundays anyways. All Sunday Parkways does is obstruct other forms of commuting such as Sunday automobile trips; and gives the police extra over time pay. What A Waste!

Sunday Parkways is fun... there are lots of mindsets government could have that would seem worse to me...

Now I can see there are some advantages to living in outer SW PDX where the city doesn't care about us or our streets or whatever. They keep their agendas out of here for the most part. Except recently I was visting a friend in a very hilly area and noticed those damned bike chevrons on the lines of one street. I've never seen a bike on that street ever. What a waste of dough.

What a waste of dough.

Maybe, but it looks great in a brochure.

I wonder how much of the agenda would be accomplished
if those who desire it were paying for it?
Posted by clinamen | September 16, 2011 12:39 PM

I ride on Going frequently, and I love it. I also pay gas taxes every time I fill up my tank, I sometimes pay to park downtown, and I recently paid almost $150 to register my car. Explain to me how I'm not paying.

Looks great in a brochure and perhaps on resumes for Adams and others.

Sigma, yes you paid in a few use your car, but you haven't paid for the costly bike boxes, whole lanes for bikes with all their strips and signage, now even bike lights, nor bike parking areas, bike PR programs, city gov. bike staff and every commissioner having 2 to 5 bike staffers, etc.

Over $89 Million dollars were taken out of Oregon STIP gas tax money in just the 2009 tax year for the propagation of bikes. Then add all the fed, state, and other grants and otherwise diverted to bikes. We need a true auditing then we'd totally be blown away.

"Over $89 Million dollars were taken out of Oregon STIP gas tax money in just the 2009 tax year for the propagation of bikes."

I know. I pay gas taxes. So explain how I'm not paying for "costly bike boxes."

Are your gas taxes paying for the cost of the many brochures we get, staff time, design, printing costs to promote the bike agenda, if the bike groups had to pay for them, we most likely wouldn’t be getting these costly brochures or certainly not as many.

I talked about fairness, explain to me why the paint is nearly vanished on auto lanes but crisply painted all over town for bikes and the signage for bikes, it is in our faces, and if you can't see that, then you are not interested in the fairness issue. It is obvious the proportion of attention is heavily on one side here, the side of bikes.

Sigma, it's simple fact and logic. Gas taxes by law are suppose to go to roads. Drivers of vehicles pays for all roads according to the Federal Highway Commission and other Federal over-site commissions, including the Federal Budget Office.

Having bike users pay for their (I'm an avid bike rider) infrastructure improvements is fair and logical. And like other are saying here, then maybe some common sense will creep in, in regards to the type/costs of these improvements.

Emphasizing specific roadways as bicycle-oriented is the right idea, and it's surprising that Portland has lagged behind a bunch of other cities on this. Separate facilities, to the extent that they can be achieved affordably (meaning something like this, where low-traffic roadways are shared and drivers know to expect through bicycle traffic, instead of building all new facilities, which just isn't feasible in the near-term), are better for cyclists, walkers, and drivers alike. Predictability is a major key to a safe, shared transportation network.

A big problem, of course, is that cyclists seem slow to adopt the routes designated for them. Indeed, many continue to use whatever street they feel like even where the greenway would be more convenient for them and where such utilization would improve the function of the arterial or connector they clog instead. This is precisely why publicizing this with "glossy propaganda" is important. Do cyclists on Alberta know Going is theirs? I really don't know, and the city should be measuring awareness of the greenway network. FWIW, I do agree that the message is a little misleading here. Greenways and Sunday Parkways are not the same thing. I also think the name change from "bicycle boulevard" to "greenway" was a mistake. But I support the effort and can see why they'd try to raise awareness of the greenways using the popular Sunday Parkways events.

Greenways constitute an obvious, low-cost improvement to a transportation network that is multi-modal whether we promote or snicker at that term. Status quo means more bike/car conflict where we really need to keep cars moving, greater inclination for bloated projects, and unnecessary congestion in every commercial district in town. Transportation infrastructure is astronomically expensive; printing and distributing brochures that will engender a higher perception of safety in the right places for bikes and cars is comparatively cheap.

From the point of view of this blog (host and commenters alike), every aspect of transportation planning in Portland belongs to a single phenomenon, one that incorporates all aspects of land-use planning and development, too. I think that view is counter-productive. You cannot possibly think EVERYTHING the city or regional government does emanates from a bizarrely united Weird, Green, Beautiful People, Homer Williams, Trade Union, Panhandler, Fireman, Streetcar agenda. That's too easy an answer for the very real political problems that plague our area right now. Please do keep calling for responsibility, Jack, but ask whether something as small as this could have its place in a responsible government, and whether you should keep after the big fish instead of jabbing at something that, if effective, would benefit everybody.

Somebody's bound to pick up on my infrequent pattern of defending Portland planning here sooner or later, so I'll preempt guesses by saying that I am not a planner and I don't work for the City of Portland, TriMet, Metro, Multnomah County, etc. I am just one who believes we lose the plot by lumping good ideas with bad under one banner.

Can you boil that down for me? Is it the well-worn Portlandia argument, "We waste so much money on other garbage, this isn't worth arguing about"?

I'm not lumping all that crap together -- only you are. Pronouncing it all crap doesn't mean it's all related.

"Urban renewal" boondoggle and "40% cycling share" malarkey have little in common, other than both occupying large sections of the brains of people like Earl Blumenauer and Sam Adams. And both being ripoffs.

But hey, you want weird linkages? Try the selling of bike streets as "green streets" -- throw in a couple of bio-ditches, so that the city can steal sewer money for toys for the Spandex minority.

Are your gas taxes paying for the cost of the many brochures we get, staff time, design, printing costs to promote the bike agenda,

It's PDOT money, so parking, gas tax, and registration fees pay for it. I pay all those. I am simply refuting the tired argument that people who ride bicycles "don't pay." The vast majority of us do.

explain to me why the paint is nearly vanished on auto lanes but crisply painted all over town for bikes

The recovery act (stimulus) paid for the vast majority of all the new bike stencils you see around town.

Perhaps the best part about living in far southwest is that many of the streets have no shoulders and thus, no chevrons, bike boxes, and other stuff.

In the '80s, the City of Portland had ONE committee - a Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee. Now it has two - a Pedestrian Advisory Committee and a Bicycle Advisory Committee. They meet monthly. Who knows if any conversation exists between the two or if they even plan together. Even in the '80s, most of the work the committee undertook had nothing to do with pedestrians and everything to do with siting bicycle paths and parking.

LUrid wrote: "Emphasizing specific roadways as bicycle-oriented is the right idea, and it's surprising that Portland has lagged behind a bunch of other cities on this."

The City has recognized certain streets as optimal and desirable as routes for biking; these have appeared on the City's BIKE THERE maps for at least 30 years. It has never been official, signed, etc. however and unless riders got hold of a map they wouldn't necessarily have known about them.

My take on the "close the streets and set the bicycles loose" plan is that it's supposed to encourage people who might not other ride a bike in the street to give it a try. The problem with that is that, unless it's accompanied by a strong attempt at education (safety, route-finding, bike mechanics) it is not helpful except as a sort of one-day carnival.

Well then, guess Sigma does not want to factor in the fairness issue.
It is obvious the bike agenda is getting the royal creme de la creme, at the expense of other needs.
Maybe the bike lobbyists could relinquish some of their agenda so that road lines could be painted as well, especially in time for our rainy dark evenings coming on!
This would be beneficial for all.

I'd like pot holes fixed properly (and not by neighborhood volunteer wannabe types) and arterials resurfaced every so often in my part of SW. But well that's not ever going to happen again.

Hey Lucs! CoPo actually re-striped SW Taylors Ferry this week! Unfortunately, that appears to have depleted the pothole repair budget.

I thnk those dam bikerists aut to git off the rodes. Jes like Palind said, people like Jack wanna drive beg trucks an luk like macho men. Those weeny people lukin all fisicle an stuf in there tyte cloase shud not run thengs.

I goota stop now so an I can driv to the 7-11 to git more cigs.

Where does this "40% bike share" claim come from? When I googled the amount that came up according to short-timer Mayor Adams was 17%, and that was of "uncommitted" city road revenues. Meanwhile, another google search shows that ODOT commits 1% of state gas moneys to bike improvements on state highways.

Max, I don't care about the stripes. Just the potholes. Where I grew up not all the roads had asphalt on them and they don't put stripes on dirt roads and in the winter in that part of the world, stripes don't show up on rural asphalt either. But potholes damage cars, etc.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics