Adams and Fritz: We created 1,900 jobs in Portland
Here's the claim. And here's the glossy 15-page brochure (heaven knows how much it cost to produce). If you can figure out what in heck they're talking about, please let us know.
Comments (22)
"Completed construction of Directors Park, opened in October 2009,
to enhance downtown retail and office development."
One would think the hole next door would be under construction with the completion of the park. Evidently, there is more involved in office development than creating a park downtown.
The glossy illustrates the collusion between the "City of the Future and Current Awesomeness" and their preferred types of businesses they have rubber stamped as part of the aforementioned awesomeness and the green legacy projects. They even included the Iron Work company that is going to delay the toy train on the seedy side of the polluted river. I think Vera's lapdog needs to immediately hire an army of wordsmiths to catch these errors. Apparently, the text/twitter staff are preoccupied with condensing communications into a limited format.
I started to dig into their methodology but why bother. Basically, they're taking credit for everything that moves, so that any job growth since the depth of the recession is a result of their "economic development."
I would be most interested to understand how they define "retaining" jobs and what the city has to do with that.
Anyway, their employment data for Mult. Co. is cherry picked, comparing July 2009 to May 2011 to find a +5,500 job difference. If you compare May 2009 to May 2011, you find a 2,500 job LOSS.
From the peak in 2007, the county is down 34,000 jobs.
Great job, Mr. Mayor! So the 26,463 full-time private sector jobs lost since you have been working in city hall between 1997 and 2009 might be gone forever, making Multnomah County "one of the poorest performing counties in the West," but you have added 1900 Tweeters on the public dime. You are seriously touting the success of your downtown retail development when there is a 40% vacancy rate downtown?
Go back to Newport, Mayor Creepy. Or a community college.
(Commissioner Nick Fish spoke about the decision two-and-a-half years ago to create a Bureau of Housing separate from the PDC, and “unleash the power of two separate organizations—to have PDC focus relentlessly on jobs, and job creation, and the local economy.”)
Great- let's create another layer of government. And letting PDC not have to deal with unimportant stuff like affordable housing, allows them to focus relentlessly on getting publicly-funded no-bid jobs for their construction mafia buddies.
Ha Ha. Good one, Jack. This brochure is funnier than reading the comics. I wonder how many of the "new" jobs went to creative class types to dream up new ways to spin the same old BS? The claims of actual job creation would be laughable if the reality wasn't so depressing.
TriMet,"Light rail and streetcar investment has been matched with more than $8 billion in adjacent new development".
"Development and Transit
Light rail does not by itself promise redevelopment and prosperity – but it does provide access and access is a valuable commodity. That value translates into more density, less parking and new mixes of commercial and residential development. With access that is clean, quiet and less auto dependent, the character of the surrounding development can be more pedestrian oriented. The prosperity of the Central City and Pearl District is the product of a regional land use and transportation policy that makes reinvestment attractive. There is a synergy between urban renewal investments, streetcar construction and new development and redevelopment. Parking revenue and self-imposed local improvement taxes helped to support the streetcar program. Studies for the Portland Development Commission show that Portland’s livability has attracted a creative generation of workers. New talent and an environment that supports emerging business and industry contributes to the local and international economy, provides cultural benefits to the community and brings national and international visibility. These advantages allow Portland compete with regions like San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles and New York. Regardless of profession or life-style preferences, everyone benefits from a well-developed and integrated transit system."
Perhaps with all of that transit development the COP is counting all of the gang-bangers, drug dealers, pimps and prostitutes in their employment count. Those are creative, aren't they?
Of course they're touting jobs created, nothing about net job gain (because that, like unicorns, doesn't exist). On the upside, they didn't bang too loudly on the ever mysterious "jobs saved" drum.
According to NBER's dating Committee the recession ended June, 2009 based on an assessment of "the payroll and household measures of total employment, and aggregate hours of work in the total economy" among other economic measures. Good to know it was smart mayors and smart bureaucrats responsible for the job growth -- I hadn't know they brough us back from the brink. Stupid me, I've been looking at consumption expenditures and private investment as the principal job growth (tepid as it might be) drivers. I'll learn someday.
"We previously had 13 target industries—which was not focused—and now we have the focused four, which has become five,” added Commissioner Amanda Fritz."
The focused four, which has become five. Probably that went up to six, but was revised down to three between the point that statement was taken and transferred to the web.
UPDATE: since I started typing this, it was been retroactively revised up to 8.
A more useful and informative statistic would be to know the number of jobs lost as result of stupid local policy compared to the number of jobs created by stupid local policy. Of course, that number is probably impossible for "experts" to be able to enumerate.
It's hard to determine how they're calculating these job figures as the report seems to count the reduction in the number of unemployment claimants as "increased jobs" (translation: people ran out of benefits and gave up looking for work). On page 4 they then mention the business license "activity" as indicative of the number of new businesses that opened up shop but don't appear to parse out renewed licenses from new ones.
Many of the jobs "created" appear to be attributable to Vestas, SoloPower and ReVolt, all which have received millions of dollars of tax breaks and subsidies to site facilities in Portland. A big chunk is also temporary construction work for the streetcars and MAX money pits.
Page 8 is pretty funny, Portland has a strong athletic industry because it's home to powerhouses like Nike and Columbia Sportswear. Except Columbia packed up and moved out to Washington County 10 years ago when the city wouldn't let it build any evil car parking for it's planned new headquarters location in inner NE. And Nike is in unincorporated Washington County.
Unbelievable that transit oriented development has created so many jobs when Interstate Lightrail proves the opposite.
The few coffee shops along the route layed off baristas, but the prostitutes increased so I can see the net gain. Or maybe Sam has a way of counting the drug dealers as employed. That certainly has increased. And if not that, maybe he is now including the drive-by shooters as employed.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (22)
"Completed construction of Directors Park, opened in October 2009,
to enhance downtown retail and office development."
One would think the hole next door would be under construction with the completion of the park. Evidently, there is more involved in office development than creating a park downtown.
Posted by pdxjim | July 21, 2011 10:12 AM
According to Der Fuher Transit Dictator Macfarlane, payroll receipts are up 4% over last years receipts.
So that must mean there are more people working right?
Posted by AL M | July 21, 2011 10:37 AM
The glossy illustrates the collusion between the "City of the Future and Current Awesomeness" and their preferred types of businesses they have rubber stamped as part of the aforementioned awesomeness and the green legacy projects. They even included the Iron Work company that is going to delay the toy train on the seedy side of the polluted river. I think Vera's lapdog needs to immediately hire an army of wordsmiths to catch these errors. Apparently, the text/twitter staff are preoccupied with condensing communications into a limited format.
Posted by Z | July 21, 2011 10:39 AM
So...how many of these jobs aren't CoP Chief Director of Twitter positions?
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | July 21, 2011 10:45 AM
I started to dig into their methodology but why bother. Basically, they're taking credit for everything that moves, so that any job growth since the depth of the recession is a result of their "economic development."
I would be most interested to understand how they define "retaining" jobs and what the city has to do with that.
Anyway, their employment data for Mult. Co. is cherry picked, comparing July 2009 to May 2011 to find a +5,500 job difference. If you compare May 2009 to May 2011, you find a 2,500 job LOSS.
From the peak in 2007, the county is down 34,000 jobs.
Posted by Snards | July 21, 2011 11:00 AM
Great job, Mr. Mayor! So the 26,463 full-time private sector jobs lost since you have been working in city hall between 1997 and 2009 might be gone forever, making Multnomah County "one of the poorest performing counties in the West," but you have added 1900 Tweeters on the public dime. You are seriously touting the success of your downtown retail development when there is a 40% vacancy rate downtown?
Go back to Newport, Mayor Creepy. Or a community college.
(see http://oregonbusinessreport.com/2010/12/portland-area-near-last-for-jobs-among-199-others/)
Posted by Luis | July 21, 2011 11:06 AM
(Commissioner Nick Fish spoke about the decision two-and-a-half years ago to create a Bureau of Housing separate from the PDC, and “unleash the power of two separate organizations—to have PDC focus relentlessly on jobs, and job creation, and the local economy.”)
Great- let's create another layer of government. And letting PDC not have to deal with unimportant stuff like affordable housing, allows them to focus relentlessly on getting publicly-funded no-bid jobs for their construction mafia buddies.
Posted by Ralph Woods | July 21, 2011 11:14 AM
I'm really tired of the easy, unchallenged, access that the city's PR people have with the local media.
Posted by David E Gilmore | July 21, 2011 11:17 AM
Hey, now, they've created a lot of PR flak jobs if nothing else.... they just cannot do math.. even though it may seem like 1000 plus new PR flaks.
Posted by LucsAdvo | July 21, 2011 11:19 AM
Ha Ha. Good one, Jack. This brochure is funnier than reading the comics. I wonder how many of the "new" jobs went to creative class types to dream up new ways to spin the same old BS? The claims of actual job creation would be laughable if the reality wasn't so depressing.
Posted by Cass | July 21, 2011 11:26 AM
I don't buy anything uncle Sam Adams claims or says.
Posted by matthew vantress | July 21, 2011 11:27 AM
Amanda Fritz, "We can't afford NOT to build Milwaukie Light Rail".
TriMet uses tax dollars to pay staff to lie.
http://trimet.org/pdfs/publications/review_debunking_portland.pdf
TriMet,"Light rail and streetcar investment has been matched with more than $8 billion in adjacent new development".
"Development and Transit
Light rail does not by itself promise redevelopment and prosperity – but it does provide access and access is a valuable commodity. That value translates into more density, less parking and new mixes of commercial and residential development. With access that is clean, quiet and less auto dependent, the character of the surrounding development can be more pedestrian oriented. The prosperity of the Central City and Pearl District is the product of a regional land use and transportation policy that makes reinvestment attractive. There is a synergy between urban renewal investments, streetcar construction and new development and redevelopment. Parking revenue and self-imposed local improvement taxes helped to support the streetcar program. Studies for the Portland Development Commission show that Portland’s livability has attracted a creative generation of workers. New talent and an environment that supports emerging business and industry contributes to the local and international economy, provides cultural benefits to the community and brings national and international visibility. These advantages allow Portland compete with regions like San Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles and New York. Regardless of profession or life-style preferences, everyone benefits from a well-developed and integrated transit system."
Posted by Ben | July 21, 2011 11:36 AM
Perhaps with all of that transit development the COP is counting all of the gang-bangers, drug dealers, pimps and prostitutes in their employment count. Those are creative, aren't they?
Posted by umpire | July 21, 2011 12:20 PM
Of course they're touting jobs created, nothing about net job gain (because that, like unicorns, doesn't exist). On the upside, they didn't bang too loudly on the ever mysterious "jobs saved" drum.
Posted by Kent Mulder | July 21, 2011 12:38 PM
This is amazing. There's been $3.6 Billion in development spurred by our rail transit in just the last 5 years?
How did the lie of "leveraged" investment go from $4.4 Billion in August 2006 to $8 billion today.
The answer is bigger lies follow smaller ones.
http://www.iedconline.org/downloads/smart_growth.pdf
"These case studies range from the use of transit-oriented development in Portland Oregon, where light rail has sparked $3 billion in new development
The Portland Streetcar, which opened in 2001, has been credited with leveraging $1.4 billion in investment around the transit loop."
Posted by Ben | July 21, 2011 12:48 PM
According to NBER's dating Committee the recession ended June, 2009 based on an assessment of "the payroll and household measures of total employment, and aggregate hours of work in the total economy" among other economic measures. Good to know it was smart mayors and smart bureaucrats responsible for the job growth -- I hadn't know they brough us back from the brink. Stupid me, I've been looking at consumption expenditures and private investment as the principal job growth (tepid as it might be) drivers. I'll learn someday.
Posted by Newleaf | July 21, 2011 12:58 PM
"We previously had 13 target industries—which was not focused—and now we have the focused four, which has become five,” added Commissioner Amanda Fritz."
The focused four, which has become five. Probably that went up to six, but was revised down to three between the point that statement was taken and transferred to the web.
UPDATE: since I started typing this, it was been retroactively revised up to 8.
Posted by Dave J. | July 21, 2011 1:09 PM
"We created 1,900 jobs in Portland"
Yeah, they're all on Sam's staff and the PR flacks.
Posted by Steve | July 21, 2011 1:18 PM
A more useful and informative statistic would be to know the number of jobs lost as result of stupid local policy compared to the number of jobs created by stupid local policy. Of course, that number is probably impossible for "experts" to be able to enumerate.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | July 21, 2011 2:19 PM
It's hard to determine how they're calculating these job figures as the report seems to count the reduction in the number of unemployment claimants as "increased jobs" (translation: people ran out of benefits and gave up looking for work). On page 4 they then mention the business license "activity" as indicative of the number of new businesses that opened up shop but don't appear to parse out renewed licenses from new ones.
Many of the jobs "created" appear to be attributable to Vestas, SoloPower and ReVolt, all which have received millions of dollars of tax breaks and subsidies to site facilities in Portland. A big chunk is also temporary construction work for the streetcars and MAX money pits.
Page 8 is pretty funny, Portland has a strong athletic industry because it's home to powerhouses like Nike and Columbia Sportswear. Except Columbia packed up and moved out to Washington County 10 years ago when the city wouldn't let it build any evil car parking for it's planned new headquarters location in inner NE. And Nike is in unincorporated Washington County.
Posted by Ryan | July 21, 2011 10:50 PM
Unbelievable that transit oriented development has created so many jobs when Interstate Lightrail proves the opposite.
The few coffee shops along the route layed off baristas, but the prostitutes increased so I can see the net gain. Or maybe Sam has a way of counting the drug dealers as employed. That certainly has increased. And if not that, maybe he is now including the drive-by shooters as employed.
Posted by lw | July 22, 2011 7:36 AM
How about looking at NET jobs created. If your policies and fees result in losing 3 jobs to create 1 job you did not "create" jobs in my book.
Posted by John | July 22, 2011 8:02 AM