Those of us watching the meltdown disaster at Fukushima have literally been watching two video feeds for weeks now. One is from an on-site camera (albeit at a pretty unhelpful angle) supplied by the plant operator, Tokyo Electric (a.k.a. Tepco). It is here. The other is a telephoto stream from miles away, supplied by a Japanese television network. It is here.
One thing we've noticed over recent weeks is that there are an awful lot of big steam or smoke events happening at night. Sometimes it's hard to differentiate the emissions coming out of the trashed reactors from fog rolling in off the ocean. Given how scandalously secretive and misleading Tepco has been throughout the disaster, we suspect that they conduct some of their desperate, experimental operations at night, in the hope that the darkness will add a little deniability if needed.
Anyway, early this morning, Japan time (late yesterday morning, our time), a big mess of smoke or steam seemed to come pouring out of reactor 4, the furthest to the right and the furthest away from the Tepco cam. (It's in front of the middle of the three vent towers.) A viewer who recorded the video stream at the time has apparently enhanced the images with colorization, and doctored up that way, the clip shows that something serious was going on at that reactor. Skeptics, feel free to laugh, but for those with open minds, the clip is here.
That green plume seems to be headed south, straight for Tokyo.
Comments (10)
My guess is that the reactor core(s) and/or spent fuel pool(s) are constantly emitting (super)heated water vapor, and that is more visible at night because the ambient air temperature is cooler (the vapor condenses). We understand that TEPCO is almost continually dumping mass quantities of water onto the messes, so that toxic vapor is constantly being carried off by the prevailing winds. Eh?
TEPCO have admitted to a significant loss of water in the spent fuel pool located in the R4 building, which as you probably know was in shutdown for maintenance at the time of the disaster. The fuel from R4, which is relatively 'fresh' or 'hot' was removed from the RPV and placed in the SFP alongside the used fuel already stored there for long term cooling.
Like many other aspects of the crisis, this situation seems to have been largely 'off the radar' in terms of risk and crisis management. With both the fresh 'hot' and depleted 'dirty' fuel assemblies exposed to air in an uncontained environment, in a pool which appears to be leaking, they have some serious problems facing them.
Add the fact that the building itself looks in danger of collapsing, with radiation levels so high the workers cannot approach close enough even to assess the damage, and you get a sobering focal point for just one aspect of the problems at this wrecked nuclear plant.
Those interested in the latest news, and discussion of same, might care to visit ENENEWS at http://enenews.com/
"...they have some serious problems facing them."
Given the breadth of impacts from oceanic to atmospheric contamination we should substitute "we" for "they" & "us"for "them". Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries.
Re: "Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries."
genop,
actually, time is a boundary in that half-life decay at least reduces emissions from many isotopes; otherwise, I couldn't agree more with you.
While attention has been focused on Fukushima, NE's own Ft Calhoun nuke has shown that it, too, should be subject to greater scrutiny, even a video feed. But why stop in NE when NRC records show that tritium has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, including one in NJ, where it has made its way to an aquifer:
"Radioactive tritium has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows."
And,
"At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard. At a fourth site, in New Jersey, tritium has leaked into an aquifer and a discharge canal feeding picturesque Barnegat Bay off the Atlantic Ocean." http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_aging_nukes_part2
"Tritium is potentially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. It can combine with oxygen to form tritiated water molecules, and those can be absorbed through pores in the skin."
Your post's title, "Fuku in Moonlight", gave me an idea. The only way to describe the pain and magnitude of this thing is with poetry, specifically the ancient Japanese form called haiku:
The Nebraska reactor had me concerned when the FAA imposed a no-fly zone in the area. According to the IEAE, it's at level 4.
As somebody has mentioned, an interesting AP report notes that the NRC is merrily reducing standards and extending licenses on aging nukes. Doesn't seem especially responsible.
The no-fly zone over the Nebraska nukes (which are still surrounded on all sides by floodwaters) was apparently more out of a concern that swarming news helicopters would collide than out of any concern for radioactive releases.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (10)
My guess is that the reactor core(s) and/or spent fuel pool(s) are constantly emitting (super)heated water vapor, and that is more visible at night because the ambient air temperature is cooler (the vapor condenses). We understand that TEPCO is almost continually dumping mass quantities of water onto the messes, so that toxic vapor is constantly being carried off by the prevailing winds. Eh?
Posted by Mojo | June 21, 2011 5:51 AM
I am glad I am old.
Posted by portland native | June 21, 2011 7:17 AM
TEPCO have admitted to a significant loss of water in the spent fuel pool located in the R4 building, which as you probably know was in shutdown for maintenance at the time of the disaster. The fuel from R4, which is relatively 'fresh' or 'hot' was removed from the RPV and placed in the SFP alongside the used fuel already stored there for long term cooling.
Like many other aspects of the crisis, this situation seems to have been largely 'off the radar' in terms of risk and crisis management. With both the fresh 'hot' and depleted 'dirty' fuel assemblies exposed to air in an uncontained environment, in a pool which appears to be leaking, they have some serious problems facing them.
Add the fact that the building itself looks in danger of collapsing, with radiation levels so high the workers cannot approach close enough even to assess the damage, and you get a sobering focal point for just one aspect of the problems at this wrecked nuclear plant.
Those interested in the latest news, and discussion of same, might care to visit ENENEWS at http://enenews.com/
Posted by Steven | June 21, 2011 7:38 AM
"...they have some serious problems facing them."
Given the breadth of impacts from oceanic to atmospheric contamination we should substitute "we" for "they" & "us"for "them". Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries.
Posted by genop | June 21, 2011 8:26 AM
Re: "Unfortunately radioactivity knows no boundaries."
genop,
actually, time is a boundary in that half-life decay at least reduces emissions from many isotopes; otherwise, I couldn't agree more with you.
While attention has been focused on Fukushima, NE's own Ft Calhoun nuke has shown that it, too, should be subject to greater scrutiny, even a video feed. But why stop in NE when NRC records show that tritium has leaked from at least 48 of 65 sites, including one in NJ, where it has made its way to an aquifer:
"Radioactive tritium has leaked from three-quarters of U.S. commercial nuclear power sites, often into groundwater from corroded, buried piping, an Associated Press investigation shows."
And,
"At three sites — two in Illinois and one in Minnesota — leaks have contaminated drinking wells of nearby homes, the records show, but not at levels violating the drinking water standard. At a fourth site, in New Jersey, tritium has leaked into an aquifer and a discharge canal feeding picturesque Barnegat Bay off the Atlantic Ocean."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_aging_nukes_part2
Tritium, btw, has a half-life of approximately 12.32yrs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tritium
"Tritium is potentially dangerous if inhaled or ingested. It can combine with oxygen to form tritiated water molecules, and those can be absorbed through pores in the skin."
Posted by Gardiner Menefree | June 21, 2011 9:24 AM
Your post's title, "Fuku in Moonlight", gave me an idea. The only way to describe the pain and magnitude of this thing is with poetry, specifically the ancient Japanese form called haiku:
Fukushima vents
the People breathe its poison
will it ever end
Posted by Bill McDonald | June 21, 2011 10:50 AM
Bill's invented faiku!
Posted by Mojo | June 21, 2011 12:11 PM
The Nebraska reactor had me concerned when the FAA imposed a no-fly zone in the area. According to the IEAE, it's at level 4.
As somebody has mentioned, an interesting AP report notes that the NRC is merrily reducing standards and extending licenses on aging nukes. Doesn't seem especially responsible.
Fortunately, Obama's certain to be all over it.
Posted by Max | June 21, 2011 3:27 PM
You might go to bed one of these moonlit nights, clouded by vapors and steam steathly passing by and wake up to one of these in your neighborhood:
http://www.nuscalepower.com/ot-Scalable-Nuclear-Power-Technology.php
Brought to you by these smiling faces:
http://www.nuscalepower.com/an-Management-Leadership.php
We had a small stay from imminent irresponsibility when their felon financial backer was arrested:
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2011/03/nuscale_power_still_seeking_re.html
I don't think TVA will be so lucky.
Posted by sheila | June 21, 2011 4:03 PM
The no-fly zone over the Nebraska nukes (which are still surrounded on all sides by floodwaters) was apparently more out of a concern that swarming news helicopters would collide than out of any concern for radioactive releases.
Posted by Jack Bog | June 21, 2011 4:32 PM