The Japanese government and Tokyo Electric are finally breaking the news to people that three reactors melted down at Fukushima back in March. There really was no other logical explanation for what happened, but they withheld what they knew for a long time, and the world's mainstream media let them get away with it.
Today's stories also admit that molten radioactive waste has left the reactor vessels and oozed into other parts of the reactor system. There are holes in all three of the reactor vessels. Once the hot lava, known as corium, leaves the vessel, it likely enters the space around the reactor core known as the drywell, and then the suppression chamber, sometimes known as the torus. If the nasty lava eats through those, there's a concrete pad underneath them (the green in this drawing). Then there is the earth, and then there is groundwater. One threat is a possible steam explosion if the corium makes it to the water table.
It's easy to blame Tokyo Electric and the Japanese regulators, but don't forget who built these plants: General Electric, as American as Mom and apple pie. There are dozens of them with the same design still operating in the United States. The federal government is routinely extending their permits beyond their design lives. Wonder how they'd hold up in, oh I don't know, a tornado.
Comments (6)
So currently we can assume the reactor Corium has been contained within the facility? If so then the containment redundancies are working?
The US reactor Vessels or Domes were designed to take a direct hit from a 747, I'm sure they would survive a tornado.
Face it Jack, Fukushima is soon becoming a non-issue. GE and the Japanese didn't foresee the chance that the plant would experience both an earthquake AND a tsunami. Considering where we are today the plants fared well.
We are all very aware that regardless of the facts you will never accept Nuclear Power as a viable power source, which is fine. I guess we can assume you will refuse all radiological, and medical imaging exams based upon technology developed in conjunction with all Nuclear Devices? That would include X-Ray, CT, MRI, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, and PET Scans all offered at your local Clinics, and Hospitals? All of those modalities can expose you to more radiation than what you find to be unacceptable for the workers to be exposed to from the Fukushima Plant.
I stand with you Jack, on this one. Arne Gunderson of Fairewinds has published very clear videos (which I got via your blog).
The radioactive elements are in the open due to exploded containments, and the cooloing water they must be pouring on becomes contaminated and then leaks into the groundwater and/or the Pacific Ocean. The Japanese are exposing hundreds of thousands (or more) to dangerous levels of radiation. there will be consequences...
I support the development of more modern nuclear generating facilities in the U.S. but it's pure whitewash to suggest the "corium has been contained within the facility".
Jack called it like it was, and the mainstream press got snookered.
I don't blame G.E. for this accident any more than I blame Boeing when a terrorist blows up their plane. That said, I understand Jack's frustration that clearly outmoded facilities haven't been retired.
The idea that Fukushima will become a "non-story" is ridiculous at best. Your apologist screed will not go over well here, and you only hurt the future chances of development of nuclear power with your ignorance.
Fukushima is bad. Probably not Chernobyl bad because it didn't blow 4 x 10^18 Bq of radioactive crap into the stratosphere, but the localized damage is immense, and won't be getting any less immense for quite some time. Oh, and that says nothing of the who-knows-how-many Bq of radioactive crap that it did blow into the atmosphere, as well as the gigatons of radioactive water continuing to spill into the ocean.
Please, if you'd like to see any future for nuclear power generation, stop with the denial and whitewash.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (6)
So currently we can assume the reactor Corium has been contained within the facility? If so then the containment redundancies are working?
The US reactor Vessels or Domes were designed to take a direct hit from a 747, I'm sure they would survive a tornado.
Face it Jack, Fukushima is soon becoming a non-issue. GE and the Japanese didn't foresee the chance that the plant would experience both an earthquake AND a tsunami. Considering where we are today the plants fared well.
We are all very aware that regardless of the facts you will never accept Nuclear Power as a viable power source, which is fine. I guess we can assume you will refuse all radiological, and medical imaging exams based upon technology developed in conjunction with all Nuclear Devices? That would include X-Ray, CT, MRI, Nuclear Medicine, Radiation Therapy, and PET Scans all offered at your local Clinics, and Hospitals? All of those modalities can expose you to more radiation than what you find to be unacceptable for the workers to be exposed to from the Fukushima Plant.
Posted by Mark | May 24, 2011 3:22 PM
We don't know how far the corium has gone, because until today Tepco wouldn't even admit there was corium.
Fukushima will never become a non-issue, just as Chernobyl hasn't.
Once a nuke apologist starts up with the medical horsecrap, I just stop reading This is about Mark I boiling water reactors, not CAT scans.
There will be many cancers from Fukushima. You'll just have to deal with that fact.
Oh, and Mark, why don't you add that you are posting from here?
Posted by Jack Bog | May 24, 2011 3:45 PM
I stand with you Jack, on this one. Arne Gunderson of Fairewinds has published very clear videos (which I got via your blog).
The radioactive elements are in the open due to exploded containments, and the cooloing water they must be pouring on becomes contaminated and then leaks into the groundwater and/or the Pacific Ocean. The Japanese are exposing hundreds of thousands (or more) to dangerous levels of radiation. there will be consequences...
Posted by geneb | May 24, 2011 10:06 PM
Wait 'til the birth defects start.
Posted by Jack Bog | May 24, 2011 11:42 PM
Mark,
I support the development of more modern nuclear generating facilities in the U.S. but it's pure whitewash to suggest the "corium has been contained within the facility".
Jack called it like it was, and the mainstream press got snookered.
I don't blame G.E. for this accident any more than I blame Boeing when a terrorist blows up their plane. That said, I understand Jack's frustration that clearly outmoded facilities haven't been retired.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 25, 2011 6:10 AM
The idea that Fukushima will become a "non-story" is ridiculous at best. Your apologist screed will not go over well here, and you only hurt the future chances of development of nuclear power with your ignorance.
Fukushima is bad. Probably not Chernobyl bad because it didn't blow 4 x 10^18 Bq of radioactive crap into the stratosphere, but the localized damage is immense, and won't be getting any less immense for quite some time. Oh, and that says nothing of the who-knows-how-many Bq of radioactive crap that it did blow into the atmosphere, as well as the gigatons of radioactive water continuing to spill into the ocean.
Please, if you'd like to see any future for nuclear power generation, stop with the denial and whitewash.
Posted by MachineShedFred | May 25, 2011 7:28 AM