We lamented a while back that the City of Portland was spending mucho consultant dinero trying to generate a "brand" for its public housing for the poor. Well, who knows how much they spent, but they've come up with a sexy new name for the housing authority. Henceforth it will be called "Housing Forward."
Isn't that special?
UPDATE AND CORRECTION, 2:04 p.m.: City Commissioner Nick Fish responds that the city did not pay for this rebranding, and that the Housing Authority of Portland is not a city bureau. Fascinating, and we regret our error. But that begs a couple of additional questions that we'll have to work on: Just what is the Housing Authority of Portland, and what ever became of the actual housing bureau's "strategic planning" effort?
For those who don't know, the Housing Authority and the city's Bureau of Housing are two different things. The Housing Authority administers mostly federal funds through HUD, through the public housing and Section 8 voucher programs.
The City's bureau... um... does some stuff. I think.
It's strange for a Housing Authority to rebrand itself, because HA's play a large and pretty specific role. This makes them sound like just another local non-profit managing a couple of properties.
As far as I understand, HAP is a govt/non-profit corporation. They own housing and they distribute HUD/other grant money for affordable housing. Go to their WEBsite, they have about $100M annual budget.
20% of which goes to admin, so it's not cheap to run. I'd have a bigger issue with that than the name change.
The Housing Authority does the compliance inspections and tell you your concrete step and handrails are out of compliance with code.
It is under BDS as far as I am aware.
They follow nuisance complaints and insert themselves into places they feel they have a right to oversee. Enforcement is uneven and selective. Seems complaint driven now that budgets have been cut, but there are those special situations for certain people.
I always wanted Nick to respond to my questions about why that authority (formerly) known as HAP, who administer those federal funds plan to pay $400k per unit to rebuild properties such as Hillsdale Terrace, when on the open market multi unit properties can be purchased for far under $100, per unit?
Let's do that math...
$41.5 million (with an additional $5 M kicker from Council) was proposed when existing units could be bought for less than $10 million all in.
Who gets that $30 million difference?
Isn't that always the question?
Seems to me the slush in this fund goes to the administration and perpetuation of the cycle of dependency for those lower income residents, rather than a constructive means to reestablish and insert them into a productive and non dependent status in society.
But then we wouldn't need all that administrative staff. Anyone see a conflict of interest?
Looking at names on that admin and board might provide some of the answers.
And why are they so adamant against these units being called what they are "public housing" properties.
Mark,
Mayor Katz and others for years kept saying we need more affordable housing in Portland, most people might think that yes we need more housing that is affordable which is very different than "public housing" - there seems to be a big push on this kind of housing. I sometimes think that if the city had their way, they would like to take a bulldozer over some neighborhoods and replace them with "public housing" projects one after another with very little space between.
$400k per unit?
Who gets that $30 million difference?
Isn't that always the question?
I'm not clear on what Housing Authority of Portland is. It isn't a corporation, it isn't a city bureau, it isn't (apparently) a partnership -- it may be some sort of multi-governmental agency. As of this afternoon, "Housing Authority of Portland" doesn't show on the secretary of state's website at all, and "Home Forward" shows only as a business name reserved by the Stoel Rives LLP law firm on May 20.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (11)
Hmmm... sounds like "Wagon's Ho!"
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | May 25, 2011 11:12 AM
"Taxpayers Backward"
Posted by cc | May 25, 2011 11:15 AM
Hope Access Potential
Nice byline they use; too bad the rest of the citzens of Portland do not see any of these three concepts in the acts of its leaders.
Posted by teresa | May 25, 2011 11:50 AM
Jack--
The City of Portland did not spend one dime on this rebranding.
Portland Housing Bureau is the City's housing bureau; Home Forward, formerly HAP, is not a City agency or bureau.
Nick Fish
Posted by Nick Fish | May 25, 2011 12:09 PM
Nick is petulant.
For those who don't know, the Housing Authority and the city's Bureau of Housing are two different things. The Housing Authority administers mostly federal funds through HUD, through the public housing and Section 8 voucher programs.
The City's bureau... um... does some stuff. I think.
It's strange for a Housing Authority to rebrand itself, because HA's play a large and pretty specific role. This makes them sound like just another local non-profit managing a couple of properties.
Posted by Snards | May 25, 2011 12:31 PM
Portland Hosing Bureau has a certain ring to it....
Posted by Max | May 25, 2011 1:24 PM
"Just what is the Housing Authority of Portland"
As far as I understand, HAP is a govt/non-profit corporation. They own housing and they distribute HUD/other grant money for affordable housing. Go to their WEBsite, they have about $100M annual budget.
20% of which goes to admin, so it's not cheap to run. I'd have a bigger issue with that than the name change.
Posted by Steve | May 25, 2011 4:18 PM
The Housing Authority does the compliance inspections and tell you your concrete step and handrails are out of compliance with code.
It is under BDS as far as I am aware.
They follow nuisance complaints and insert themselves into places they feel they have a right to oversee. Enforcement is uneven and selective. Seems complaint driven now that budgets have been cut, but there are those special situations for certain people.
Don't know if Comm Saltzman plans any changes.
Posted by mark | May 26, 2011 4:26 PM
I always wanted Nick to respond to my questions about why that authority (formerly) known as HAP, who administer those federal funds plan to pay $400k per unit to rebuild properties such as Hillsdale Terrace, when on the open market multi unit properties can be purchased for far under $100, per unit?
Let's do that math...
$41.5 million (with an additional $5 M kicker from Council) was proposed when existing units could be bought for less than $10 million all in.
Who gets that $30 million difference?
Isn't that always the question?
Seems to me the slush in this fund goes to the administration and perpetuation of the cycle of dependency for those lower income residents, rather than a constructive means to reestablish and insert them into a productive and non dependent status in society.
But then we wouldn't need all that administrative staff. Anyone see a conflict of interest?
Looking at names on that admin and board might provide some of the answers.
And why are they so adamant against these units being called what they are "public housing" properties.
Posted by mark | May 26, 2011 4:36 PM
Mark,
Mayor Katz and others for years kept saying we need more affordable housing in Portland, most people might think that yes we need more housing that is affordable which is very different than "public housing" - there seems to be a big push on this kind of housing. I sometimes think that if the city had their way, they would like to take a bulldozer over some neighborhoods and replace them with "public housing" projects one after another with very little space between.
$400k per unit?
Who gets that $30 million difference?
Isn't that always the question?
Sure would like some answers.
Posted by clinamen | May 26, 2011 8:43 PM
I'm not clear on what Housing Authority of Portland is. It isn't a corporation, it isn't a city bureau, it isn't (apparently) a partnership -- it may be some sort of multi-governmental agency. As of this afternoon, "Housing Authority of Portland" doesn't show on the secretary of state's website at all, and "Home Forward" shows only as a business name reserved by the Stoel Rives LLP law firm on May 20.
Posted by Isaac Laquedem | May 27, 2011 3:56 PM