Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 22, 2011 10:43 AM. The previous post in this blog was Uprise -- blood pressure edition. The next post in this blog is Have a great weekend. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, April 22, 2011

Mission impossible

Can anybody find anything of value in this baby? To us it's just more Portland planner psychobabble. And it no doubt cost the taxpayers a fortune. If we need money for teachers, we should lay off some planners -- especially if this shinola is all they have to offer.

Comments (49)

Looks like Sim City. This is socialism at its best. All the jobs, housing, stores, transportation and entertainment will be determined by the City-State.

No Dman it's fascism at it's best. Socialism is where the government orders you around to primarily benefit the political bosses. Fascism is where the government orders you around primarily to benefit the developers.

I don't see much value in it other than giving adults an opportunity to play with crayons.

It's the same kind of planning that goes on in most cities and suburban areas across the nation.

Fat color marker and designation of land-uses...

This is all good and bad at the same time. These plans are overly programmatic in what goes where.

If you want a "free market" development/planning system, be prepared for a 20 story hotel next to your single-family home.

Government is what keeps this from happening, so the comparisons of socialism and fascism are off (these are forms of government control).

What I would give for ws' IP info.

Well, I learned a new word "Charrette". I feel so French.


Why do you want my info?

"Multi modal gateway" is my fave!

ws Houston does quite well. They have not had the problems economically other cities have and planning is minimal.

ws: If you want a "free market" development/planning system, be prepared for a 20 story hotel next to your single-family home.
JK: Why would someone spend good money putting a 20 story building in a single family neighborhood? It would be cheaper to buy up a few of homes & build low rise.

ws: Government is what keeps this from happening,
JK: That is the way is was in the past. That is what the planners still claim. The reality is that the planners put high density wherever THEY want it and all too often in response to the desires of the rich, like the local, on the government teat, developers of the Pearl, SoWhat. Now their favorite sport is destroying neighborhoods by forcing tacky little houses into every vacant side yard.

ws: so the comparisons of socialism and fascism are off (these are forms of government control).
JK: Not when planners cross the line from protecting neighborhoods to FORCING higher density on our neighborhoods and main streets.

City planners are vermin

The group, formerly known as Enablers Anonymous, has had a name change to Boomerang Support. Sounds like the Portland chapter has some new members.


Houston has a littany of planning codes. They have no formal zoning.

Here's their government mandated parking codes for building types:

Bar or Club "10.0 spaces for every 1,000 square feet of GFA and outdoor decks, patio and/or seating areas"

Hey, the drunks need to find a parking space too. Most of the drinking holes in Portland would be illegal under these regulations of 10 spots per gross sf. for comparison.

Parking, of all codes possible, will affect the form and appearance of buildings the most.


These issue do arise from time to time.

While the issue of a hotel wouldn't come around too often, we have all seen these atrocities in Portland.

Skinny, snout-style homes are a lack of proper codes and zoning. Personally, I think Portland should ban these renditions of skinny homes (fascism/socialism according to some posters), especially in blocks that are 5,000 sf.

Saying you do not believe in zoning or codes is saying you do not care if a skinny home goes in a neighborhood like Irvington or Laurelhurst.

I am not a defender of all that is Portland style planning. Far from it.

To say you do not believe in zoning, codes, or planning is to say you believe that a developer can build whatever they want regardless of the context. Yes, objects occur naturally in places for reasons as JK tries to point out, but that is not always the case (and his retort on cue will be that neighborhoods can form home owners' associations and there can be deed restrictions, etc.).

These are all tired arguments for the case against planning.

The bottom line there is good planning and bad planning, with a lot of gray area in the middle, too. Let's avoid the extremes of both ends of the spectrum and arrive in the middle somewhere.

You do realize the main work product of 80% of CoP staff is reports and telling taxpayers to go away?

It must be nice to have a job where you can make up something to study and take as much time as you want to make a report or PowerPoint.

Gotta admit though, the hand-art is a nice diversion from the bloviation in this thing.

The Soviet Union had massive planning bureaus. Both Stalin and Khrushchev implemented enormous top-down big plans throughout Soviet society and look at the damage those two alone did to that country and surrounding ones.

Oh, but today's life planners were probably either still toddlers or not around yet when all of that went down and was being written about by historians. With general education either in collapse or 'corrected' to pursue a social engineering purpose, how would they ever know?

Planning and zoning in and of themselves aren't bad things. They're the trade-off we make when we choose to live in close proximity to thousands of other people and need some more-or-less objective way to mediate between all of the competing interests and desires. If we don't like it, we can always move to more rural, less-regulated areas.

The problem with Portland planning is its gone beyond a minor, bureaucratic function of local government to become an end in and of itself, in particular as a vehicle for promoting social policy. It doesn't help that we have a well-regarded school of planning at PSU; there's now a reputation to maintain and starry-eyed young planning students we need to keep busy.

I personally think we DO need to drive less, consume less, reduce our carbon footprints, plant more trees, etc. But that's for me and others to fight for through the marketplace, the political process, and the land-use regulations. It's not for unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats (many of whom are not from here) to smugly browbeat us with.

If you want a "free market" development/planning system, be prepared for a 20 story hotel next to your single-family home.

Like the multi-story beast going in on the corner of SE 43rd and Division? Sure, they will all be transit riders and no cars will flood out into the neighborhood.

ws I said Houston's planning was minimal. Compared to other cities, especially Portland, it works quite well.

I can only guess that you work for the government since you seem to have read something into my comment that I did not write.

Evergreen Libertarian

Why are you being so toxic?

No, I do not work for the government.

Back on sort-of topic - traffic in this area - a gridlock mess.

Traffic after the streetcar is operational - even more a gridlocked mess.

I made a comment about Houston having minimal planning and you comment by saying they have a litany of codes and then add the parking info.

I'm not the one making a mountain out of a molehill, nor am I being toxic.

BTW last I heard Houston's costs for comparative housing was about 30% less or more than Portland.

Same quality; lower costs means more money stays on the family table and in the local community.

ws derides the "snout houses" on their puny 5,000 sf lots. He sounds exactly like the bigot planning gods of the city "that works". It must be amazing to be so certain of your correct and unassailable views that you can with self-assuredness direct others as to what they can and cannot do with their own property. There's a thin line between deriding the "snout houses" and the "snouts" who live there.

To clarify; my last comment should have said Houston's housing was 30% to 40% less than Portland's.

Given the recent collapse in housing prices I have no idea what the difference is today.

Zoning is about intensity of land use and compatibility of land uses.

Once a zoning regime is in place (in large tract development zoning is normally not necessary because the objectives of zoning can be achieved by attaching covenants to land for the benefit of adjoining properties) you don't need to cover the floor of a warehouse with the zoning map and rejigger every element -- rarely, very rarely the zoning map gets updated by moving a district a few parcels one way or the other, by upgrading or downgrading future uses of plots by a level or two, or rezoning archaic or obsolete uses.

These charettes aren't about land use, they are about trying to stuff a lifestyle down people's throat and have the government decide who the winners and losers are and arrange for insiders to be paid off. The charrettes are a charade -- a parlor game that empowers the pasted smile technocrats to exercise the police power of the state.

After living in and having to get around in Portland for nearly 40 years I have observed the following...

Traffic just gets worse and worse at the same time the city claims there are fewer and fewer drivers due to its award winning alternative transportation programs, so it's hard to believe one single word out of City Hall.

And what I've noticed over the past 15 since Vera Katz declared her "War on Driving", is engineered congestion.

So, yes we need to drive less and less. The city says we are and congratulates itself. At the same time, it appears they are deliberately engineering the gridlock, which wastes petrol fuel and leads to unnecessary emissions.


Codes are a part of a planners' tools. My comments were pertinent to your post. I fail to see why your response is so negative. Does Houston have less planning than Portland? Sure. Is it some Libertarian's utopia? Nope and probably far from it.

Cost of living is an issue in Portland, especially in regards to housing costs.

I disagree that Houston has the same level of "quality" of housing. In regards to historic neighborhoods, architecture, etc., Portland has much higher quality than Houston.

I never said it was a "Libertarian's utopia" and it isn't. As to the quality in Portland being much higher. Are you kidding me? I have seen both and there is no way in hell that the quality in Portland is any better.

ws says No, I do not work for the government.

I completely accept that, as most government employees aren't familiar with the concept of "work".

The "snout-house" line gives him away.

I'm going to guess that he's a retired government employee - or a released "planner" who hopes to latch on more firmly.

After reviewing the Charette documents what became most noticeable was that all the drawings totally disregard the I-5 freeway. They eliminate it!!!

In the Transportation Concepts 1 and 2, where one would think there would be some recognition of I-5, you find nothing, except things like "The Strand". So European. Good bye west coast commerce, or even serving our own city and suburbs. Living only by bike, transit and walking isn't the future that most believe should be our future. But in Portland it may be our future because of Planning that disregards commonsense commerce.

I have never been a planner or a government employee. I am not retired -- in fact I would not even be retirement age if you doubled my current age and added 15 years.

I offered a moderate post, did not defend Portland-style planning and only offered the notion that planning -- as a procedural tool -- is not a bad thing inherently.

All I get in return are false accusations and negativity.

Gee whiz, sorry for commenting.


Apologies if I misinterpreted your comments. Are you a student at PSU?

I got to thinking about Portland's future of "no commerce". It reminds me of visits to Rothenburg, Germany in the Bavarian region. Beautiful town, but it has been preserved as a historical Medieval city. No vehicles are allowed within the city proper, it's all historical. Vehicles are only allowed after midnight to service the tourist shops, restaurants, Christmas ornament shops, and the occasional delivery of new historical torture shackles for the Medieval Dungeon Museum.

I guess that is what Sam's Charettes will help Portland to become-a post uber Medieval city. Commerce, places to stay will be out in the suburbs like around Rothenburg.

First, Portland's historic neighborhoods and architecture are on the chopping block as they get demolished and replaced with shiny silver Lego condo boxes. The latest insult to my close-in SE neighborhood has a big sign in front of it that says "Your new neighborhood".

Second, it has long been a goal of the city to find a way to get rid of the East Bank freeway and develop what they consider wasted waterfront real estate underneath I-5.

Third, Portland isn't a historical Medieval city worth protecting in that sense. And in fact it there is less and less to preserve every year, per my first paragraph.

Everything progressive about Portland is bogus, that is, unless you consider real estate development progressive.

Houston vs Portland

Houston gets better results "naturally in open markets" and their housing is much more affordable.

This is not a critic's report below. Bottom line is we are funding an unnecessary layer of government that we cannot afford.

Considering how Metro helps TriMet pilfer countless millions from essential services for their boondoggles the cost is really in the billions.

"Accelerated infill and the concomitant decline in overall fragmentation do occur naturally in open markets that are not subject to regulatory restrictions.

"We therefore urge caution in concluding that rigorous containment is
a necessary policy tool for accelerating infill and reducing fragmentation."

Look at the side by side figures on page 34 of this central planning report and see we do not need Metro or the UGB. Or the enormous cost.

Portland’s urban growth boundary resulted in its city footprint ratio declining from 1973 - 2005 at an average rate of 1.2 percent per annum.
Houston’s city footprints declined from 1990-2000 at an annual rate of 1.9 percent,

"This is a surprising finding, considering that Houston, which does not have a zoning law let alone a containment policy, has a very open housing
market and housing there is considerably more affordable than in Portland."

In the third quarter of 2009, for example, it required 4.2 median household incomes to purchase a median-priced house in Portland and only
2.9 in Houston (Demographia 2010).

I have understood your comments about planning, good and bad. Some planning is one thing, one would not want a pig farm next to your single family yard or school, a factory noise throughout the evening next to residential.

The problem I see in Portland, is that they have gone too far in every possible way, to redo all in their vision, and be damned with the people's input. Be damned with their livability. Too bad if people lost sunlight for their garden, too bad if a neighborhood lost their view of Mt. Hood, too bad if it is a greenway and there are height restrictions. Too bad if we say an apartment complex can be put in a neighborhood "sans parking" for cars. Too bad if we cut down a grove of huge trees for infill, etc. All for the UGB. Portland is a sacrifice zone? The lock step mantra and push on the agenda is in evidence in every way they can, whether using skewed surveys, horribly controlled meetings, etc.,we all fairly well know the drill here.

I am thinking that some of the planners, especially the ones who were in this city when we actually had good planners, those if there are any left, wouldn't feel too good about the changes in the planning dept. But by now, I imagine they hire certain types who are devotees of "the plan". This has turned into the planning department for whose benefit here?

Smart growth, smart meters, cannot take all this "smartness" as a tool to push plans on the rest of us.

Ben thank you for that link to the Lincoln Institute report.


Your link appears to report what I was saying. Lack of zoning will create higher densities/infill naturally.

Many people are afraid of the D word. High density in downtown would be a good use of density. High density in Hillsdale? Probably not the best idea.

If you're looking to preserve the qualities of your neighborhood, Houston's probably not the best example unless your're in a neighborhood with home owner's associations (but to my knowledge that mostly only applies to suburban homes and not so much for inner-city dwellings).


Regarding planners of today vs ones of yesterday: Are we really hearkening back to the planners of yesterday...the same ones who would level your home for a new freeway to connect suburban growth and give homeowners a pittance of compensation for their loss?

Talk about top-down planning.

I'm personally not a fan of either styles.

If we didn't have zoning, we would have 10 story buildings on lots of streets.
It's simple economics.

I am not referring to the freeway planners. I am referring to the planners that crafted the step down plan in heights to the waterfront.
Planners that saw that each neighborhood had schools and parks. I saw documents where years ago, planners were concerned there would not be enough open space for future population growth, more concerned than they are today as the extreme density has been added without concern for the amenities. Even earlier, we had planners who created Ladd Circle area, a lovely neighborhood. Our neighborhoods in general seemed fine until this new bunch came in, don't think the former good planners would have allowed apartment buildings to be plunked down in a neighborhood without parking for the cars.
We used to have required set backs, not now, anything goes and the whole thing has reversed to where they need an exemption if one wants to build with a set back. And surprise? we used to have adequate solar access standards, but they stood in the way of infill, so some of those were changed. Earlier planners had a downtown that was vital. I stand by my opinion that current planning has changed our city in a very negative direction away from what we once had by good planners.

There is one major typo that appears 48 times. Charade is mis-spelled charrette.

pdxmick There is one major typo that appears 48 times. Charade is mis-spelled charrette.
JK: Best post of the week!!



No one said Houston or any other place had perfect zoning or planning.

The POINT IS our sucks.

Despite the constant battery of proclomations my the central planninng class around here that we do it right the actual outcomes of the implementation do not resemble at all the visioning depicted in the mountain of colorful reports by the 100s of planning bureaucrats we support.

The many exmaples of failed outcomes are thoroughly ignored by the anti-boogeyman (sprawl) zealots and rail transit/TOD fanatics.

And zealots and fanatics are too kind.


Those planners are before my time, so I don't know what you're referencing. They sound concerned with neighborhood livability. That's a good thing.


Glad we are in semi-agreement, believe it or not. I'll leave you this image of Houston just so you know what Portland is not missing, at least:,+Houston,+TX+77027&aq=0&sll=29.722907,-95.376089&sspn=0.00764,0.016512&ie=UTF8&hq=&hnear=4743+Banning+Dr,+Houston,+Texas+77027&ll=29.738641,-95.457963&spn=0.007639,0.016512&t=h&z=17&layer=c&cbll=29.738547,-95.457959&panoid=LGZLTYZmPehi1nCz23VSkA&cbp=12,64.32,,0,-20.18

Yeah, that's a highway billboard in the front lawn of a homeowner.

Dear jimkarlock,
I may disagree with you some of the time, but your comments about city planners are exactly right IMO.
But please, don't insult the vermin...they are relatively harmless by comparison.

Um "ws" that "homeowner" is a business. What kind of business? Why they make signs!
SIGN A RAMA is Houston's full service sign center.
Those are all commercial businesses on that road. Great research and planning.

I think you are full of it.

ws, I think you're one of those people that makes one think you are agreeing with them, but not really. It's an old (which you aren't) planner's/architect's trick from our Architectural Schools: "Yes, that makes sense, I see what you are trying to achieve.....BUT......ya di dah da..."

So the many vinyl signs like the one facing the Starbuck's courtyard on the adjacent building that is 50ft x 30ft at the corner of SW Terwilliger and Taylors Ferry is okay? Portland has more sign ordinances than Houston but there's all kinds of exceptions, looking the other way, and non-enforcement. What's the difference?

The difference between Portland with its many ordinances and other places that have none are the waivers and exceptions... but here they only apply to those with the proper connections.

Gordon, "If we didn't have zoning, we would have 10 story buildings on lots of streets. It's simple economics."

Are you referring to The Pearl or SoWhat?

In Portland its, "We have zoning, we WILL have 32 story buildings",

like in SoWhat, even though a few years back the FAR/height zoning only allowed two story buildings.

Who was the Commissioner in charge that allowed the FAR/height zoning of two story buildings to turn into 32 story buildings???
Who was the Mayor?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics