Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 12, 2011 9:38 AM. The previous post in this blog was The "Hobo Bellagio". The next post in this blog is Whole lotta chancellin' goin' on. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

Is it lunacy to think it?

Nobody really knows for sure what triggers an earthquake. But it's interesting to speculate about. Do you think the recent "super moon" has anything to do with the current outbreak of mayhem in Japan? Or the re-awakening of seismic activity in the Caribbean?

Comments (29)

Come on Jack, everyone knows it is due to global warming. Our planet is heating up, and from physics we know that things expand when they get warmer. The expansion cracks are bound to happen.

/snark off

Seriously, there are mighty gravitational forces at work. Who knows?

Hardly, although neither source offered references. So the jury's out so to speak. Out to lunch actually!

If the gravitational forces of the moon affect the tides on Earth, why not have have some influence on earthquake activity?

Scientists have narrowed it down to 3 possibilities:

Planet X, Comet Elenin, or Kirstie Alley's fall on "Dancing with the Stars."

If science class was right, I thought it had something to do with the big pot of boiling magma beneath our feet. Oh, and something called tectonic plate movement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthquake

No tinfoil hat required.

It would be easy enough for an armchair researcher to look for a correlation by comparing other "supermoon" occurances with outbreaks of earthquakes or volcanic activity. Both events tend to get noticed and recorded.

I like the tulip banner...very cheery! Thanks

You don't think Kirstie Alley's partner isn't scared? She may be on "Dancing with the Stars" but he's on "Survivor."

It might have been caused by the mystery planet that nobody can see but certain people know is there and wreaking havoc! Either that or the forerunner for the end of the planet with 2012 and it'll go to pieces now-- over time.

Armchair science suggests a connection. The moon's gravity is known to pull on land as well as water. Tectonic stress and pressure are known to build until something triggers their sudden release. Think camel's back, and a straw.

Yeah, non-linearity.

Think of a nanotech component on an elephant's back. Or maybe the extra energy floating around the FermiLabs experiments with nutrinos. One extra tug by the moon at just the right picosecond and...poof!

We are talking events here Allan, not an event. Scientific Determinism has been falsified, so all we are left with is trends guided by statistics.

A a sole cause, clearly not. But as a precipitating event, possibly.

It stands to reason if the moon can have a pronounced effect on the earth's oceans, covering 70 percent of the surface, it can also impact the crust, directly and through the rolling motion of tides. There are data that show a correclation between moonquakes and the earth's position relative to the moon.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/05/0523_050523_moonquake_2.html

Because the earth is so much smaller than the moon the the effect of the moon's gravitational pull on tectonic plate shifts would be much more difficult to discern -- it would probably take somewhere between dozens and hundreds of these 18-year cycles carefully tracked with modern technology to see if the impact is measurable and predictable.

If you've ever put a large basin of water down on a surface, you've witness the effect of the volume of water going back and forth fairly regularly until the energy dissipates and the water comes to rest. This is the primary cause of tides in large bodies of water. Since the earth rotates, the regular motion of the tides continue.

http://bowie.gsfc.nasa.gov/ggfc/tides/intro.html

The gravitational pull of the moon is relatively small, varying the relative difference between the high and low tides at monthly intervals, but not being primarily responsible for the tides themselves. The planet is also very plastic. While gravitational pull from the moon could possibly be a factor in a dynamic terrestrial occurrence, I would guess the sun would play a much greater roll given the degree of it's gravitational force on earth. But you don't hear too many people questioning whether the sun is responsible for geophysical events.

Jim Berkland successfully predicted specific earthquake activity during last month's supermoon. Another supermoon is happening this month, with new predictions from Jim et al: http://www.syzygyjob.com//index.php?option=com_smf&Itemid=35&board=2.0

"Because the earth is so much smaller than the moon..."

Really?

http://www.sciencenetlinks.com/interactives/messenger/psc/PlanetSize.html

I have a pretty good track record of predicting the non-occcurrence of earthquakes, with rare but notable exceptions.

"Common Sense tells us" and "It stands to reason", seemingly self apparent truisms, but mostly far, far from the mark. More like leading down the garden path.

Realistic assessment: it's the fun of plate tectonics and mantle plumes. The Pacific is gradually shrinking as the Atlantic expands, and this is all a precursor to Australia slamming into Vietnam within the next, oh, 40 million years.

Fun assessment: it's the Daleks, trying to soften us up before invasion. ALWAYS blame the Daleks.

Hey, Bill, let's do a play called "Hello, Daleks!"

Its all George W. Bush's fault.

Can we change the name of San Andreas to that?

A dyslexic slip there Lawrence.

Been there myself, Newleaf. But sometimes it can lead to funny punchlines.

Earthquakes happen somewhere soon after my dog and parakeet go bonkers without clue, barking and sveeting raucously.

Therefor my dog and parakeet cause earthquakes.

(Sometimes I can't tell whether the thread question is given seriously enough to hear out a serious answer.)

http://bit.ly/hF1Prf

A serious answer involves lots of thought. It is well known that earthquakes occur when the moment of geologic strain exceeds the weakest link of resistance where the wrench applies. Nobody knows in advance calculation when/where that is. Who might predict earthquakes should get rich; not necessarily who explains them.

In (2000-yr) old astrology books it says Jupiter-Saturn configurations portend earthquakes, sometimes when being at right angles (90 degrees) apart, and most often when being in exact alignment on one side or on opposite sides of the Sun; (as analog clock hands on 12 o'clock or on 12:30). Such alignment persists (alternating, every 10 years) for several (Earth) months and as the Earth during its year orbit 'crosses the line' of alignment, passing in one month between the Sun and Jupiter-Saturn, or exactly six months (half-orbit) later, then there are earthquakes ... maybe and usually. So the historic record could show half-spike and high-spike clustered quakes at 10-yr and 20-yr cycles ... if there was an historic record to see. Richter's scale reference has been in use since 1935, and worldwide instantaneous communication has existed since 1900 or so, let's say -- and 100 yrs is not much recorded history. (Later astrology books written after Uranus was discovered in 1781, say Uranus causes earthquakes most in combination with the Jupiter-Saturn patterns.) Today, for about the last 9 months and the next 6 months, Uranus and Jupiter are aligned together on the opposite side of the Sun from Saturn, all in a row. And the Earth 'races' across that line Sept.2010, April 2011, and Oct.2011.

Now another 'chunk' of thought. When earthquakes occur, modern instruments can measure the seismic waves cause a 'wiggle' in the iron-ball core of the Earth. It seems reasonable that it works in reverse, too, so that if it were possible to 'wiggle' the planet's core then it would cause earthquake(s).
Now another 'chunk' of thought. Circular flowing electricity causes a magnetic field simultaneously, and vice versa, a revolving magnetic field causes (simultaneously) electricity to flow if a conductor (wire) for it is available inside the magnetic field. (In what follows next, remember not to blur the distinction between electro-magnetic phenomena and gravity -- these are separate 'forms' of energy.) The core of the Earth rotates (but at a different speed) as the Earth (surface) rotates. Somehow the conductive iron core circles electricity around, (perhaps from charged particles in the atmosphere, streaming from the Sun, entering the ground, soil), and the core's circular flowing electricity causes the magnetic field around the Earth ... orthogonal to the plane of rotation, with a N pole and a S pole. (If the Earth did not rotate it still would have its gravity, and only that it rotates electricity is why it has a magnetic field.)

If you have an electric motor, or 'dynamo', which works by circulating an electric current within a ('permanent') magnetic field, and you insert your motor inside a much much stronger magnetic field, then you can 'seize up' the electric motor -- 'freeze' it trying to spin -- and even 'chatter' the armature shaft in its bearings.

Now ... however, the iron-ball core of the Earth does not rotate on an 'axle' with 'bearings'. Instead it 'floats' (but also rotates) in a somewhat viscous 'liquid', maybe molten 'rock' ... I say "somewhat" and "maybe" since nobody knows exactly what substances comprise the center-of-the-Earth core environment.

See here: bit.ly/hF1Prf

Encyclopedia of geomagnetism and paleomagnetism (linked by googling "seismic waves displace core"), which includes these statements:

... the inner core's importance to our understanding of Earth's structure far exceeds both its relative size and our knowledge of its properties.

Decadal changes in Earth's magnetic field, linked to torsional oscillations (q.v.) of the fluid outer core, can produce corresponding oscillations of the inner core through electromagnetic coupling.

and,
The inner core with radius of about 1215 km resides concentrically within the much larger fluid outer core, which has a low viscosity (e.g. Poirier, 1998). Patterns of convection within the fluid core associated with the geodynamo are presumed to undergo temporal variations because the Earth's magnetic field is changing on timescales ranging over several orders of magnitude. It is therefore reasonable to speculate (Gubbins, 1981; Anderson, 1983) that the inner core might have a rotation rate somewhat different from that of the rest of the solid Earth, which is dominated by the daily rotation. If such relative rotation could be detected, it would provide information on the energy of convection patterns that maintain the geomagnetic field.

The study of inner core motion relative to the mantle and crust is difficult, because of the remoteness of the inner core (more than 5150 km from the Earth's surface where the nearest observations can be made) and its small size (about 0.7% of the Earth's volume). Also there are intrinsic difficulties in telling whether a spherical object is rotating, unless a marker on or within the object can be identified and tracked if it moves.

So Science Simon says, "we don't know how to do it but we know it does it." The iron-ball core is circulating an electric current it gets from somewhere and consequently and simultaneously there is a magnetic field around the Earth.

Now another 'chunk' of thought. The USGovt has built and is operating a High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) in Alaska. Which consists of an array of SuperPowered antennas which emit and inject charged particles into the ionosphere ... or something like that. 'They' are kinda looking at what makes the Northern Lights (aurora borealis) and how to make more (or less) of it. Also, some of the 'research' is investigating the possibility (or 'potentiality' in electrical terms?) of 'zapping' intercontinental ballistic missiles with Reagan's Star Wars Ray Gun.

You should understand that 'charged particles' emission into the atmosphere is similar to but different than radiowave transmissions of Extreme Low Frequency (ELF) or Ultra High Frequency (UHF). The ELF spectrum experiments are transmitted through the crust and oceans of the Earth, (not so much the atmosphere), are primarily aimed to detect submarines at sea anywhere around the world, (although 'they' missed that Chinese sub that came up 30 miles off Los Angeles at rush hour a few months ago and, in plain sight of a CBS traffic helicopter video camera, launched a missile back across the Pacific that landed in China simply to show the wherewithal), (USG ELF's) have been going on about 20 years, and coincide with never-before-in-history-seen herds of whales or porpoises or dolphins 'beaching' themselves in an effort to get out of the water.

HAARP operations are newer, going on for only a few years now, say 2 or 3, and coinciding with flocks of birds falling dead in the middle of Nowhere, Arkansas, also Ireland, also Australia, also Africa, also Mexico, also fish masses floated belly-up, also small-mammal colonies, also starfish, and who knows what-all swarms mysteriously dying. 'Death ray' indeed.

Google 1 word, "HAARP" and you can get to this:

presscore.ca/2011/?p=1624

and see this:

Now it also seems that HAARP operations coincide with never-before-seen-in-history such clusters of earthquakes as we see these days, the last couple of years. A more conclusive statement could be made of the (a, any) relationship between HAARP operations and earthquake incidents if the (scientific) public could know the times and energy levels of HAARP operations ... since, after all, our public tax dollars built the antenna array and pays the electric bill.

I've been wondering and figuring about messing with the charged particles in the atmosphere being connected to 'wiggling' the core of the Earth. I can't say that I've figured it out, exactly ... but I sure would like to have more better data points to connect.

The internet writings (I've read) of some conspiracy hunters claim that an earthquake-causing 'machine' could be aimed at a specific location, latitude longitude depth intensity, and (so) the USG is triggering an 'armegeddon gun' at 'enemies'. In some notional fashion, I wouldn't put it past 'them' but in what I know about geology physics I am really sure (99.99% confidence factor) that there is no way in the world to aim an earthquake with pinpoint accuracy. Others say, "well 'they' could if 'they' planted hydrogen bombs in pinpoint cracks along the tectonic plate fault lines at the bottom of the ocean ...," and at which point I stop(ped) reading ... such fantasmogoria. Get some science, people.

[Anecdote alert: About talking in terms of 'chunks' of thought. At MIT was a research operation called the A.I. Lab, for Artificial Intelligence, which was supposed to be developing computer programs that could install 'thinking' (intelligence) in a computer. So the lead researcher was interviewed after a few years of research 'grants' on the job, and was asked how the work was going and what had he learned so far in order to make Artificial Intelligence. And he said, (it's a punchline -- I about busted a gut laughing for days and days, even now I smile recalling it but, please you must understand, he was both absolutely serious and truly scientifically accurate), he said, "first you have to 'chunk' the data."] [Probably in Business Management School they say 'break the project into interim goals of achievable concrete steps' ... but in the realm of thinking, creativity and inventiveness, nothing is 'concrete' solid and there is no such thing as a 'concrete step' ... unless maybe you can 'chunk' the data someway somehow. Sounds like some technical term in the Big Bang Theory.]

Oh wait wait. I forgot a 'chunk'.

See this:

http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/51606052-78/plume-data-rock-seismic.html.csp

It's a picture of the hot lava caldera under Yellowstone Park. Instead of mapping it with sonic (seismic) wave reflection, the underground rock is mapped by electrical conductivity measurement.

Here's another (related?) question, seriously:

What's 'is? Giant ocean whirlpools puzzle scientists, Anton Yevseyev, Pravda.Ru, 12.04.2011

US scientists discovered two giant whirlpools in the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Guyana and Suriname. It became a sensational discovery because this part of the ocean has been studied thoroughly, and no one expected anything like that to appear in the area. More importantly, no one can understand where the whirlpools came from and what surprises they may bring to people. ... Why do those whirlpools exist for such a long time? This is partially the effect of Earth's magnetic field. In addition, marine water contains many charged ions, Na and Cl for example. To crown it all, water molecules are dipoles that are charged both positively and negatively.

Any dipole starts spinning when moving in the magnetic field. ...

???


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Chloe, Pinot Grigio, Valdadige 2013
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir 2013
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio, Friuli 2013
St. Francis, Red Splash 2011
Rodney Strong, Canernet, Alexander Valley 2011
Erath, Pinot Blanc 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Porto 2007
Portuga, Rose 2013
Domaine Digioia-Royer, Chambolle-Musigny, Vielles Vignes Les Premieres 2008
Locations, F Red Blend
El Perro Verde, Rueda 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red 2
If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend

The Occasional Book

Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 372
At this date last year: 234
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics