Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 7, 2011 6:44 AM. The previous post in this blog was Fingers crossed on Fukushima no. 1. The next post in this blog is An intense aftershock. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Fighting the "kicker"

Governor Retread and Treasurer Ted are pushing the state legislature to set the wheels in motion to get rid of the state income tax "kicker," under which Oregon refunds taxes to taxpayers if tax collections exceed budget estimates. We need to "build up a savings account" in good economic years, they say, to provide a cushion in lean economic years.

The problem with this argument, of course, is that even in lean times, Oregon spends money on unwanted and unneeded junk like a train from Portland to Milwaukie -- and the bureaucrats will borrow money if necessary to pay for the toys. Given that reality, trying to sell a tax increase as building a "savings account" is going nowhere fast. If the "kicker" money is kept by the state, it will surely be spent on baloney, or used to pay credit card debt on previously purchased baloney.

They might be able to get rid of the corporate "kicker," but the individual version isn't going away any time soon. It's in the state constitution, and the votes just aren't there in the electorate to change it.

Comments (19)

So what they are saying is they want to overtax us and keep the change.

Exactly - If this group of clowns had the discipline to actually lock money up in a box and then use it ONLY for emregencies - OK.

However, when the emergency becomes Homer not being able to make a payment without a streetcar line, fageddaboutit.

Beisdes, if you look at the allfunds since M5 (about 20 years), its gone up at a compound rate of 13% or so every biennium - And they still couldn't save a penny. Giving them another honeypot isn't going to change a lack of discipline or priorities.

So what they are saying is they want to overtax us and keep the change.

That isn't anywhere close to being right. Nothing in the kicker determines tax rates. Or even spending rates. It merely forces "dividends" to taxpayers based on the state's economic predictions. That's why it works so perversely.

The kicker has been de facto spending limit that prevented even more massive spending increases during what the David Sarasohns like to now call the "go go 90s when we had too much money".

Strangley that wasn't what the "stakeholders" claimed at the time.

Governor John Kitzhaber
Inaugural Address
January 9, 1995


"Today we stand perilously close to the brink of a chasm, and all our minds and all our energies have been concentrated on avoiding a fall. But with courage and honesty, with cooperation and balance, we can again find ourselves poised on the wings of promise to take flight toward our highest aspirations."

"That's why it works so perversely."

Explain that - They set a two year budget (I should be happy they have enough self-control to do that), then the excess is returned to taxpayers.

I'd assume that budget has plenty of "fudge" factors (they are pols after all), so there should be some headroom to address surprises.

I just don't think giving them extra implies it will be spent any more wisely.

Just to add to Allan's point:

Let's say that you have a business that operates under the same mechanism as Oregon's kicker.

Every 2 years you'd have to forecast how much revenue you expect to take in over the next 2 years.

Then, if your actual revenue exceeded your previous forecast by more than 2%, you'd have to issue rebates to all of your customers, equal to the difference between what you forecast and what you actually took in.

Under that system, rebates would be issued not because the company "overcharged" for its products, but simply because more of those products were sold. Or, perhaps, because a larger number of customers bought more expensive items than expected.

Keep in mind that this is based on revenues, without regard to expenses. So even though your costs may have been higher than expected (along with your revenue), you still "owe" your customers a rebate even if that will result in a net loss for the 2 year period.

Would you agree to operate a business under those conditions?

The arguments about government spending every penny (and more) that it takes in are certainly valid, but they do not make the kicker mechanism any more rational.

Jack is correct that getting rid of it (the personal kicker, anyhow) will be well-nigh impossible, but it's still a bad policy.

That isn't anywhere close to being right. Nothing in the kicker determines tax rates. Or even spending rates. It merely forces "dividends" to taxpayers based on the state's economic predictions.

No, the kicker doesnt determine tax rates. But its the only thing keeping tax rates down because they know they cant keep the extra money. And its not a dividend. Its a refund of my money because they didnt need it.

The whole point of the kicker is we get our money back if they collect more taxes than they budgeted for. In other words, they took more than they needed. Excessive taxation.

"Every 2 years you'd have to forecast how much revenue you expect to take in over the next 2 years."

Private business needs to make long-term projections for capital expenses and employees all the time. Do you think Intel decides to spend a few $B here just based on a good quarter or even good year?

"you still "owe" your customers a rebate even if that will result in a net loss for the 2 year period."

I'd study how companies who issue stock and pay dividends manage to do it. The kicker only happens if the state shows a "profit" (i.e. it took it more than it budgeted to spend two years prior.)

I guess what I am saying is that the gourp of legislators/gov are just horribly under-equipped intellectually or discipline-wise to manage a state that is spending $52B every two years.

"But its the only thing keeping tax rates down because they know they cant keep the extra money."

Qualification - "its the only thing keeping effective tax rates down"

They'll raise taxes as much as they can get away with.

I'll consider kicker reform when the legislature repeals the permanent tax increase under measure 66. Until then, forget about it.

It's so much easier to support something if you recast it as something you like.

Private businesses don't operate under a "kicker"? If a private business takes my money coercively (say, by getting a court judgment against me) and takes more than I owe, you damn well better believe they're obligated to give me back the difference.

The state sets a budget and estimates how much tax money they'll raise to fund it. If they take in more than they expect, they damn well should give back the difference. If they want to "save for a rainy day" (a laughable argument from most governments, and certainly from ours), they can BUDGET for it. If the economy booms (no thanks to them), and they get a windfall in taxes they do not--and should not--get to keep it.

It's so much easier to support something if you recast it as something you like.

Of course, thats why everything is "for the children." And why we have "fees" for anything and everything.

Allan L and David:

REI is an example of a business that gives back to its customers. If REI makes a profit, a rebate is sent to customers each year, depending on how much the customer spent.

USAA Insurance company is another example of a company that does this; my subscriber account is credited every year, and can be cash in my pocket, or credited directly to my premiums.

Another, better example are regular or special dividends paid to investors of companies who manage to make a profit. And those special one time dividends are especially nice when companies exceed their profit forecast. Profit sharing companies may also pay their entire work force bonuses.

Now before some of you say that only the executives benefit in that latter scenario, it will likely come in the form of an income bonus that is taxed as ordinary income, not as a preferential dividend.

In summary, businesses have several ways to reward customers and employees when they are profitable.

As for the kicker? Yes, the state should take a look at reserve funds that are perhaps more visible, but with restrictions on how those funds can be spent in tough times. Keeping all the extra tax revenues is simply wrong.

David Wright's analogy of the kicker to a private business is the wrong analogy. The taxpayers are not the "customers" of the state; we're the "owners". We are in the position of shareholders of a business that is not profitable, and every year we have to (involuntarily)"invest" more in the business to keep it afloat. If the "business" needs less money than was expected, the "owners" should expect to get the excess back.

Having said that, the kicker is a dumb way of accomplishing this result. The money doesn't go to the people who overpaid, and it has no impact on influencing taxpayer behavior (though it does put some breaks on the legislature's spending plans). If we could (1) put in place some other mechanism to control the growth of spending and (2) reduce tax rates in some meaningful way (or create a trustworthy way of creating some kind of rainy-day fund or, better yet, repay existing indebtedness with what would otherwise be kicker proceeds), that would be better than the kicker (in my opinion at least).

My analogy was admittedly less than perfect.

However, those of you injecting the concept of "profit" in relation to the kicker (a la dividends for businesses) are also off the mark. The kicker doesn't apply because the state took in more revenue than it *spent*. It applies because the state took in more revenue than it *expected*, WITHOUT REGARD to how much was actually spent.

Yes, many government expenses can be budgeted and will essentially be fixed for the 2 year period.

But many government expenditures may vary from the budgeted amounts, not through any mismanagement on the part of the government but instead because of variable need.

For example, what if more school kids move into the state over the 2 years than were originally expected? Presumably those extra families would contribute to the higher than expected income tax revenue, but they would also contribute to higher than expected school expenditures. So the state may not be "profiting" from that extra revenue after all.

I'm not here to defend government spending. I'm most certainly NOT a fan of big government. But treating unexpectedly high tax revenues for a 2 year period as "overcharging" the taxpayers, or automatically considering any extra tax revenue as "profit" for the state, is just plain wrong.

"It applies because the state took in more revenue than it *expected*, WITHOUT REGARD to how much was actually spent."

So you're telling our legislators would just start spending and ignore revenue forecasts?

I wish I could buy into the sudden pop growth, but in bad years population will shrink because of the economy.

Besides at all funds growing at 13% per biennium, this is far outpacing popgrowth * inflation.

It boils down to discipline. If the state gets an upside in revenue, suddenly Ted goes on a hiring binge and all the legislators will fund their pet projects. Hec, Ted threw 20% more at education in 2007 and it didn't make one diff in the classroom experience for "the kids". More money won't solve that character flaw.

What the Governor, Treasurer and too many legislators fail to acknowledge is that neither the kicker law, nor any other state law prohibits them from saving for a rainy day right now.

All they have to do is budget to spend less than the revenue forecast tells them they will have to spend, and save the difference. Why they never do that is a political question, not a legal one.

I wouldn't mind the kicker so much if it were used to ameliorate the extreme inequity of Oregon's income tax structure. If there are refunds to be given, start with those taxpayers at the very bottom of the income scale (Oregon's income tax, unlike the federal one, reaches well below the poverty line) and work up, zeroing out the tax bills of the poorest households. In addition to providing some modest relief to those who need it most, such a system would also yield the biggest possible economic stimulus, as these are the people who will spend every penny they get back.


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009

The Occasional Book

Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 115
At this date last year: 21
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics