Even Reed College has a nucle-head. Really -- everything's fine.
Comments (19)
He's right. Reactor grade uranium is only 3-4% U-235. To get a nuclear explosion you need at least 40% U-235. The explosions they have has so far have been hydrogen gas. Some radiation can come from that but it is small.
none: you are not alone...lots of folks don't know about the nuke reactor at Reed. They keep it pretty quiet.
Of course when the Cascadian subduction zone quake hits...who knows what will happen?
I've known about it for years. The knowledge has often brought me to speculate about elite "green" activism.
Don't think that it is cognitive dissonance so much as it is about an unfounded self-confidence that simply does not admit self examination, rather like NPR.
Those "young turks" at NPR are (were) there for 40 years. Often they passed the baton to their children and the friends of their children. Reminded me of the old Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico.
Both the school and the public broadcasting creature have a whiff of the French branch of the Bourbons.
They're dumping sea-water onto the reactor, which may cool it down (though you may want to talk to some Reedies about that).
I think it's safe to say that they've moved to desperation tactics.
It's interesting that the small-scale systems developed here in Oreygun wouldn't suffer problems related to power outage; they shut down as soon as power goes off. Of course, they're nuclear. So they're illegal in the USA.
We'll just stick with old tech, thanks.
Posted by Max | March 12, 2011 2:57 PM
The threat here is not a nuclear explosion as occurs with an atomic bomb. It's more like a huge "dirty bomb," going off for a long time, contamination of the groundwater, and other ecological consequences that no one has told us about (or perhaps even thought about).
Reed College may, however, have the only nuclear reactor in a government-sanctioned "Nuclear Free Zone" - assuming that designation survived the end of the Cold War.
Even the lefties over at Slate say don't overreact (yet).
To us, this is not political any more. This is going to be a tragedy at least as heavy as Chernobyl. Different in the particulars, but at least as heavy in the bottom line.
Plutonium is named after the god of hell. There's a reason for that.
There is a massive difference between a research reactor, and a nuclear generating station. Orders of magnitude difference in thermal power (250 kWt for a TRIGA-1 research reactor like Reed has, or 1.1 MWt for the TRIGA-2 that Oregon State has; the BWRs that Japan is currently having trouble with are rated at something like 2700 MWt). One runs for months at a time, when the other is only operated for hours depending on the neutron flux necessary for the experiment, etc.
There's enough speculation and fear already, must we create more?
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 29
At this date last year: 66
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
He's right. Reactor grade uranium is only 3-4% U-235. To get a nuclear explosion you need at least 40% U-235. The explosions they have has so far have been hydrogen gas. Some radiation can come from that but it is small.
Posted by Robert | March 14, 2011 1:47 PM
Reed College has an on-campus nuclear reactor. Did NOT know that...
Posted by none | March 14, 2011 2:12 PM
none: you are not alone...lots of folks don't know about the nuke reactor at Reed. They keep it pretty quiet.
Of course when the Cascadian subduction zone quake hits...who knows what will happen?
Posted by portland native | March 14, 2011 2:18 PM
'Tis true, 'tis true! Home to the Renn Fayre doth have its own atomic pyle!
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 14, 2011 2:44 PM
Renn Fayre + On-Campus Nuclear Reactor = __________________
Posted by Brendan | March 14, 2011 2:54 PM
I've known about it for years. The knowledge has often brought me to speculate about elite "green" activism.
Don't think that it is cognitive dissonance so much as it is about an unfounded self-confidence that simply does not admit self examination, rather like NPR.
Those "young turks" at NPR are (were) there for 40 years. Often they passed the baton to their children and the friends of their children. Reminded me of the old Institutional Revolutionary Party in Mexico.
Both the school and the public broadcasting creature have a whiff of the French branch of the Bourbons.
Posted by ll | March 14, 2011 3:21 PM
From Reed's website: "The Reed Research Reactor was established in 1968 and is the only reactor operated primarily by undergraduates."
Scary.
Posted by PD | March 14, 2011 3:48 PM
As I said a couple of days ago:
They're dumping sea-water onto the reactor, which may cool it down (though you may want to talk to some Reedies about that).
I think it's safe to say that they've moved to desperation tactics.
It's interesting that the small-scale systems developed here in Oreygun wouldn't suffer problems related to power outage; they shut down as soon as power goes off. Of course, they're nuclear. So they're illegal in the USA.
We'll just stick with old tech, thanks.
Posted by Max | March 12, 2011 2:57 PM
I assumed the Reed reactor was common knowledge.
Posted by Max | March 14, 2011 3:52 PM
I am working on converting my car to run on a small nuclear reactor. See you around!
Posted by Bob Clark | March 14, 2011 4:15 PM
The threat here is not a nuclear explosion as occurs with an atomic bomb. It's more like a huge "dirty bomb," going off for a long time, contamination of the groundwater, and other ecological consequences that no one has told us about (or perhaps even thought about).
Posted by Jack Bog | March 14, 2011 4:53 PM
Interesting point about the ground water there, Jack.
Isn't the source of Crystal Springs right about there? I do believe it flows into the Willamette and has (or is) undergoing a habitat restoration.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 14, 2011 5:07 PM
"Reed College has an on-campus nuclear reactor. Did NOT know that..."
Yeah! And Virgil Earp is buried just across the river.
Posted by cros | March 14, 2011 5:07 PM
Jack,
Even the lefties over at Slate say don't overreact (yet).
http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_exclusive/20110314/pl_yblog_exclusive/analysis-lets-cool-the-political-meltdown-over-japans-damaged-nuclear-power-plants
Posted by zonedar | March 14, 2011 5:10 PM
Reed isn't the only college in the state with a nuclear reactor. Oregon State University also have a nuclear reactor for research in Corvallis.
Posted by Pragmatic Portlander | March 14, 2011 5:35 PM
Reed College may, however, have the only nuclear reactor in a government-sanctioned "Nuclear Free Zone" - assuming that designation survived the end of the Cold War.
Posted by John Fairplay | March 14, 2011 5:59 PM
Even the lefties over at Slate say don't overreact (yet).
To us, this is not political any more. This is going to be a tragedy at least as heavy as Chernobyl. Different in the particulars, but at least as heavy in the bottom line.
Plutonium is named after the god of hell. There's a reason for that.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 14, 2011 6:09 PM
Reed College has an on-campus nuclear reactor. Did NOT know that...
Yup, learn all about it here.
OSU also has one. As does Washington State University.
Posted by Erik H. | March 14, 2011 8:28 PM
There is a massive difference between a research reactor, and a nuclear generating station. Orders of magnitude difference in thermal power (250 kWt for a TRIGA-1 research reactor like Reed has, or 1.1 MWt for the TRIGA-2 that Oregon State has; the BWRs that Japan is currently having trouble with are rated at something like 2700 MWt). One runs for months at a time, when the other is only operated for hours depending on the neutron flux necessary for the experiment, etc.
There's enough speculation and fear already, must we create more?
Posted by MachineShedFred | March 15, 2011 7:19 AM
There's enough speculation and fear already, must we create more?
Apparently.
Posted by cc | March 15, 2011 8:43 AM