The 32-year-old mayoral aide who's moving over to the Portland Development Commission is going to be a "deputy director" over there -- one of two (the other hasn't been identified, to our knowledge). But what she will actually be doing is shrouded in the following dense cloud of bureaucratese:
Kimberly Schneider Branam is joining the Leadership Team as Deputy Director for Strategy and Operations. While Kimberly's role will evolve over time, she will be responsible for ensuring that our project and program work implements the Economic Development Strategy and the key actions of the PDC Strategic Plan. One of Kimberly's initial priorities will be the completion and implementation of the Neighborhood Economic Development Action Plan. In addition, Kimberly will be working closely with Lew Bowers, Jennifer Nolfi and our Neighborhood managers on priority projects for the agency.
There ya go. A steal, no doubt, at $135,000 plus benefits.
The mayor is notorious for stuffing his buddies onto the payrolls of city bureaus, who then have no idea what to do with them except pay them. Remember the dude who wrote his goofy term paper and accompanying PowerPoint presentation on the sewer bureau's dime? "Senior policy advisor," my eye. Let's hope this isn't more of the same.
Comments (23)
It's amazing how people say there's no corruption in Oregon. If this isn't a Chicago-style patronage position, I don't know what one would look like.
Just out of curiosity, do you think Sam's a fan of "Absolutely Fabulous", considering that he's running the city like Edina Monsoon's publicity company, or he's more of a Young Ones kinda guy? (I was about ready to make a Bottom joke, but that would be cruel.)
Bubble has better hair! or at least it is groomed, unlike Ms Kimberly's.
If we give Ms. Kimberly a shopping cart to push around the Pearl, will that "spur the local economy" too?
Most former Peace Corps volunteers I know have a great skepticism of American governance and would disdain working for the corporate or government establishment. For Branam and her husband (another returned Peace Corps volunteer), the Peace Corps sounds like it was just another box to be checked off in the climb into the liberal meritocratic elite (Ivy League degree for her, Portland Schools Foundation and running for elected office for him).
Then again, many Peace Corps volunteers work on development projects in benighted economic backwaters, so maybe she's a perfect fit for the PDC.
It is in a word 'disgusting.' After watching the video of Michael Moore's speech in Wisconsin last night, this is particularly disheartening.
Sounds just like when City Hall 'foisted' a new manager on us (when they DIDN'T want or like her) as our Public Affairs Manager (Director?!), bumping up her salary significantly. City Hall staff openly celebrated her departure, and the staff of PDC suffered. She was unqualified to do the job well with NO real background in communication, or understanding of much of the work that we were trying to do in PA. And she shut down our key public information materials, didn't value staff and their skills, and talked down to everyone.
On top of that she was a mean spirited tyrant who seemed to take satisfaction in intimidating folks and managing by instilling fear. And we complained and complained, and had to endure her behavior for about 18 months. Only our collective LOUD and PERSISTENT voices forced management/HR to finally do something and she "resigned." But by then, much of the irrevocable damage had already been done.
This article from the Oregonian lets me know that PDC is the same with its core of being so inhumane and insensitive. It is in so many ways a 'soul less' organization and as challenging as life is for me being self-employed in this down economy, I am HAPPY to no longer be there.
My heart goes out to anyone still there who feels the pain and acknowledges the injustice of the organization. And to all of those who do not speak up, and who have become complicit co-dependents of the psyche their, I would encourage them to consider speaking out and standing strong. As I did when I worked with coworkers to *successfully* bring the union to PDC for the first time in its 50-year history.
PDC is not a healthy organization. Much of its management seems to be co-conspirators of an effort to sustain what in reality isn't actually sustainable. Look at the revolving door of HR directors and of all the committed, caring, loyal and talented employees who have come and gone.
I regret the many years that I gave to that organization. It gave so very little to me during all that time other than $$$.
"Much of its management seems to be co-conspirators of an effort to sustain what in reality isn't actually sustainable."
Exactly. The PDC is now a gigantic cash machine with nothing to spend it on. All they can do is keep proposing mega projects that add office and retail space in a city which has LOST jobs over the last decade. They talk about building out the Rose Quarter while business is hurting in downtown, the Lloyd, the Pearl, you name it. Why? Because they have to justify their own existence and their HUGE budget.
I worked at PDC for 20+ years in the Economic Development Department and in the Public Affairs section of the Executive Department. I saw a lot during those years, and most of it was very discouraging.
Yes, it is only now that I feel the freedom to speak openly. This is a fact: While there, PDC staff only spoke up either anonymously trying to leak information to the media, or vicariously through others posting to blogs or contacting WW or the Oregonian, etc. Rarely did anyone feel safe to speak out effectively within the organization. It was my experience that the work environment was fraught with fear and intimidation. ONLY the union brought about much needed change, but unfortunately I did not remain to experience any of the 'empowerment' of staff.
It is important for staff to have a voice. For injustice and unethical (yes!) practices at the organization to be made known. It is behind me now, and I must move on. But I still care for many colleagues who remain. I know that they are going through difficult times at the organization, and these kinds of announcements only intensify the discouragement and outrage.
Tim, were you there when PDC was brought under City Hall's control a few years ago? I wonder if things are different (better or worse) now than when it was independent. From a public governance perspective (can't say much about personnel issues), it seems like a wash - the PDC is now overseen by elected officials, theoretically giving voters and taxpayers a say over its activities (good), but now it is no longer protected from Sam's "vision" and other political meddling (bad).
I cannot fully answer your question. I left PDC May of 2007, immediately after the union vote was ratified. I worked there from September 1986 until my 'demise.' I was outspoken and worked with others to organize for the union. I was fired, call it a sheer coincidence if you want.
I do know from those who remain that the union has been effective and helped staff have more of a voice and a role in their bargaining contract. And I have heard that many are thankful for the changes that the union has helped to bring. I do not believe that any of these positive changes, as few as they may be, would have happened without the union and the organizing of staff to finally say, 'enough is enough' and 'we want a voice.'
...This is a fact: While there, PDC staff only spoke up either anonymously trying to leak information to the media, or vicariously through others posting to blogs or contacting WW or the Oregonian, etc. Rarely did anyone feel safe to speak out effectively within the organization...
Tim Liszt,
Thank you for your post.
I often wonder why there are not more whistle blowers. From what you wrote, they exist, but if the channels are closed, we the public will not get the message. Know this to be so, as a rally held regarding the Bull Run Water had a reporter from the O. Result = no story.
From personal experience, I know that PDC IS the 800 pound gorilla. My experience was that if mere citizens opposed any PDC project we were systematically intimidated from the top down. And it was genuinely frightening.
It seemed to me that PDC staff were intimidated by their superiors to then intimidate the citizenry who questioned any PDC decision.
Thank you Tim for speaking out.
Are there any more ex PDC staffers out there who want to comment or whistle blow?
This beast should be stopped.
Snards, you don't know how right you are. Economic development is not a bad thing but are they focusing in the right places? And PDC employee morale is REAL DOWN. They are not liking the change of leadership, Kimberly coming in, and the pending budget cuts. it's ugly. You are looking at a bureau or agency about to embark on a huge melt-down. It's going to be messy, people!
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (23)
It's amazing how people say there's no corruption in Oregon. If this isn't a Chicago-style patronage position, I don't know what one would look like.
Posted by John Fairplay | March 8, 2011 8:55 AM
Wow. I think I've seen this before:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VPmfhsazrSU
Just out of curiosity, do you think Sam's a fan of "Absolutely Fabulous", considering that he's running the city like Edina Monsoon's publicity company, or he's more of a Young Ones kinda guy? (I was about ready to make a Bottom joke, but that would be cruel.)
Posted by Texas Triffid Ranch | March 8, 2011 8:57 AM
Wow! The thirtysomething has got a real important job ...
Strategy! Plans! Action! Is this the crap they teach in planning school?
Posted by Garage Wine | March 8, 2011 9:00 AM
They seem to have Scott Adams writing job descriptions. Is he related to Sam?
Posted by Allan L. | March 8, 2011 9:07 AM
$135k. Save the money sweetheart. You've just hit your upper bound at age 32.
Posted by Snards | March 8, 2011 9:07 AM
Wouldn't "Economic Development Czar" be a better title?
Posted by MJ | March 8, 2011 9:18 AM
Bubble has better hair! or at least it is groomed, unlike Ms Kimberly's.
If we give Ms. Kimberly a shopping cart to push around the Pearl, will that "spur the local economy" too?
Posted by portland native | March 8, 2011 9:21 AM
Most former Peace Corps volunteers I know have a great skepticism of American governance and would disdain working for the corporate or government establishment. For Branam and her husband (another returned Peace Corps volunteer), the Peace Corps sounds like it was just another box to be checked off in the climb into the liberal meritocratic elite (Ivy League degree for her, Portland Schools Foundation and running for elected office for him).
Then again, many Peace Corps volunteers work on development projects in benighted economic backwaters, so maybe she's a perfect fit for the PDC.
Posted by Eric | March 8, 2011 9:25 AM
Maybe this explains why the mayor's office keeps coming up with new bureaus... job creation for the right people.
When is somebody going to shine a bright under this pile of rot?
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 8, 2011 9:33 AM
On second thought, I realize this blog shines such a light.
I should've said, is anyone above the local level even noticing or caring about what's going on in unimportant, little backwater Oregon?
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 8, 2011 9:35 AM
It is in a word 'disgusting.' After watching the video of Michael Moore's speech in Wisconsin last night, this is particularly disheartening.
Sounds just like when City Hall 'foisted' a new manager on us (when they DIDN'T want or like her) as our Public Affairs Manager (Director?!), bumping up her salary significantly. City Hall staff openly celebrated her departure, and the staff of PDC suffered. She was unqualified to do the job well with NO real background in communication, or understanding of much of the work that we were trying to do in PA. And she shut down our key public information materials, didn't value staff and their skills, and talked down to everyone.
On top of that she was a mean spirited tyrant who seemed to take satisfaction in intimidating folks and managing by instilling fear. And we complained and complained, and had to endure her behavior for about 18 months. Only our collective LOUD and PERSISTENT voices forced management/HR to finally do something and she "resigned." But by then, much of the irrevocable damage had already been done.
This article from the Oregonian lets me know that PDC is the same with its core of being so inhumane and insensitive. It is in so many ways a 'soul less' organization and as challenging as life is for me being self-employed in this down economy, I am HAPPY to no longer be there.
My heart goes out to anyone still there who feels the pain and acknowledges the injustice of the organization. And to all of those who do not speak up, and who have become complicit co-dependents of the psyche their, I would encourage them to consider speaking out and standing strong. As I did when I worked with coworkers to *successfully* bring the union to PDC for the first time in its 50-year history.
PDC is not a healthy organization. Much of its management seems to be co-conspirators of an effort to sustain what in reality isn't actually sustainable. Look at the revolving door of HR directors and of all the committed, caring, loyal and talented employees who have come and gone.
I regret the many years that I gave to that organization. It gave so very little to me during all that time other than $$$.
Posted by Tim Liszt | March 8, 2011 10:47 AM
Thank you, Tim Liszt, for the insider's view the other insiders don't want us to know about.
Posted by Alice | March 8, 2011 11:04 AM
The mayor is notorious for stuffing his buddies onto the payrolls of city bureaus, who then have no idea what to do with them except pay them.
Or, you could end that sentence after "buddies"...
Posted by cc | March 8, 2011 11:10 AM
"Much of its management seems to be co-conspirators of an effort to sustain what in reality isn't actually sustainable."
Exactly. The PDC is now a gigantic cash machine with nothing to spend it on. All they can do is keep proposing mega projects that add office and retail space in a city which has LOST jobs over the last decade. They talk about building out the Rose Quarter while business is hurting in downtown, the Lloyd, the Pearl, you name it. Why? Because they have to justify their own existence and their HUGE budget.
Posted by Snards | March 8, 2011 11:24 AM
I worked at PDC for 20+ years in the Economic Development Department and in the Public Affairs section of the Executive Department. I saw a lot during those years, and most of it was very discouraging.
Yes, it is only now that I feel the freedom to speak openly. This is a fact: While there, PDC staff only spoke up either anonymously trying to leak information to the media, or vicariously through others posting to blogs or contacting WW or the Oregonian, etc. Rarely did anyone feel safe to speak out effectively within the organization. It was my experience that the work environment was fraught with fear and intimidation. ONLY the union brought about much needed change, but unfortunately I did not remain to experience any of the 'empowerment' of staff.
It is important for staff to have a voice. For injustice and unethical (yes!) practices at the organization to be made known. It is behind me now, and I must move on. But I still care for many colleagues who remain. I know that they are going through difficult times at the organization, and these kinds of announcements only intensify the discouragement and outrage.
Posted by Tim Liszt | March 8, 2011 11:26 AM
Tim, were you there when PDC was brought under City Hall's control a few years ago? I wonder if things are different (better or worse) now than when it was independent. From a public governance perspective (can't say much about personnel issues), it seems like a wash - the PDC is now overseen by elected officials, theoretically giving voters and taxpayers a say over its activities (good), but now it is no longer protected from Sam's "vision" and other political meddling (bad).
Posted by Eric | March 8, 2011 11:57 AM
I cannot fully answer your question. I left PDC May of 2007, immediately after the union vote was ratified. I worked there from September 1986 until my 'demise.' I was outspoken and worked with others to organize for the union. I was fired, call it a sheer coincidence if you want.
I do know from those who remain that the union has been effective and helped staff have more of a voice and a role in their bargaining contract. And I have heard that many are thankful for the changes that the union has helped to bring. I do not believe that any of these positive changes, as few as they may be, would have happened without the union and the organizing of staff to finally say, 'enough is enough' and 'we want a voice.'
That's what I know.
Posted by Tim Liszt | March 8, 2011 12:04 PM
...This is a fact: While there, PDC staff only spoke up either anonymously trying to leak information to the media, or vicariously through others posting to blogs or contacting WW or the Oregonian, etc. Rarely did anyone feel safe to speak out effectively within the organization...
Tim Liszt,
Thank you for your post.
I often wonder why there are not more whistle blowers. From what you wrote, they exist, but if the channels are closed, we the public will not get the message. Know this to be so, as a rally held regarding the Bull Run Water had a reporter from the O. Result = no story.
http://www.thepracticeofleadership.net/2006/12/03/fish-rot-from-the-head-down-as-do-organisations/
Russian proverb that “A fish rots from the head.”
In my opinion, the web of power from the head has fowled and dispersed a sick pallor over our state and city.
We do know who they are, don't we? My angst is why the leaders in our community let this go on?
Posted by clinamen | March 8, 2011 12:26 PM
From personal experience, I know that PDC IS the 800 pound gorilla. My experience was that if mere citizens opposed any PDC project we were systematically intimidated from the top down. And it was genuinely frightening.
It seemed to me that PDC staff were intimidated by their superiors to then intimidate the citizenry who questioned any PDC decision.
Thank you Tim for speaking out.
Are there any more ex PDC staffers out there who want to comment or whistle blow?
This beast should be stopped.
Posted by portland native | March 8, 2011 1:00 PM
The second "Deputy" is none other than Keith Witcosky. That places Patrick, Keith and Kimberly running the agency. Is anyone else worried?
Posted by disgusted | March 8, 2011 3:25 PM
"The mayor is notorious"
He learned that skill from the puppet-master Randy who has plenty of incompetents who need his aegis to keep their jobs.
Posted by Steve | March 8, 2011 5:29 PM
No Worries. Appointment of Keith is a good sign.
Posted by Jerry's Kids | March 8, 2011 10:00 PM
Snards, you don't know how right you are. Economic development is not a bad thing but are they focusing in the right places? And PDC employee morale is REAL DOWN. They are not liking the change of leadership, Kimberly coming in, and the pending budget cuts. it's ugly. You are looking at a bureau or agency about to embark on a huge melt-down. It's going to be messy, people!
Posted by Daisy Chain | March 9, 2011 12:48 AM