The U.S. nuclear authorities say it's worse in Japan than the Japanese are letting on. At some point, they may have to abandon the Fukushima plant and let it unleash whatever hell it wants. Apparently one spent fuel pool has no water left in it -- and there's no containment around it, either. That means the whole site may soon have to be evacuated.
Comments (30)
Sounds like the "Chernobyl option," wherein they just drop a ton of concrete and boron on the plant from above, is more likely today than it was a few days ago.
If helicopters can't fly over a radioactive plume to dump water, who're they going to get to drop concrete and boron? Japan isn't the USSR. Suicide volunteers? No jokes, this is serious.
On a positive note, the AP is reporting that the effort to restore electricity to the plant is nearing completion. They are hoping that once the power lines leading to the plant are repaired they'll be able to bring the cooling systems back online.
Exposure!
Not only is the radiation being exposed, but the naked truth of how dangerous and unsafe these plants are, is now being exposed as well.
Are people still willing to gamble that despite dangers, despite not having an adequate solution for the dangerous wastes, that somehow all will be OK?
The picture doesn't look good with corporations at the wheel where profits trump human considerations.
Who thinks this way?
We no longer can allow decision makers taking a gamble with the health of all living things on our planet.
Not only did many of the helicopter pilots who borated water on the Chernobyl reactor die from radiation exposure, they later discovered that hardly any of the water actually made it into the reactor. The radiation eventually stopped on its own as the molten core material combined with sand that acted as a biological shield around and formed glass. I don't believe that these reactors have sand around them.
Jim Karlock - Man of Science - calling me out for my cheap scare tactics:
Bill McDonald: There's a reason Chernobyl is still basically an abandoned city. If the same number of people had died there because of coal, at least we could go back.
JK: Pardon me, 400 times as many people die from coal EVERY YEAR as died from Chernobly. And quit comparing a primitive reactors WITHOUT CONTAINMENT to our newer safer designs. It’s a cheap scare tactic.
Jim,
How are your containment vessels and these newer safer designs working for you now? Would you care to revise your B.S. statement?
Thanks.
This whole situation reminds me of the old, old joke, about the cat on the roof. There is no cat, and grandma has died.
The political folks here in OR keep blathering about how there is no danger...I wonder when they will tell us that the cat has died...
It is not going to end well for any of us.
How many children will be asking some hard questions to their parents and grandma and grandpa about their role in participating or not participating to intervene?
Mr. Grumpy,
Here's the Internet version:
Chernobyl or Chornobyl (Ukrainian: Чорнобиль, pronounced [tʃɔrˈnɔbɪlʲ]) is an abandoned city in northern Ukraine, in Kiev Oblast, near the border with Belarus. The city used to be the administrative center of the Chernobyl Raion since 1932.
The city was evacuated in 1986 due to the Chernobyl disaster at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, located 14.5 kilometers (9 miles) north-northwest. The power plant was within Chernobyl Raion (District), but the city was not the residence of the power plant workers. When the power plant was under construction, Prypiat, a city larger and closer to the power plant, had been built as home for the power plant workers."
BTW, check out some of the haunting photos from the abandoned areas around Chernobyl. Profound.
I would think restoration of electric power to the plant would require, as would bringing the plant back into operation, people on site. From now on, that's going to be, at best, very risky and difficult. I understand they are looking for older volunteers.
Bill McDonald: Jim,
How are your containment vessels and these newer safer designs working for you now? Would you care to revise your B.S. statement? JK: What B.S. statement?
* Did the containment vessels fail yet?
* Did any members of the public get exposed yet (beyond the amounts you get from living in Denver)?
BTW:
* Do many times more people die every year from coal than from nuclear?
* Is there any energy source without deaths associated with it?
* How do those deaths balance against the deaths adverted by using energy? (Hint living in a cave heated by wood fires, hunting & foot transport is very deadly - smoke, crawlies, insects, carnivores)
BTW, how many have died so far in this incident:
a. From the quake
b. From the Tsunami.
c. From the power plants?
Be sure to read Jack’s link to the NYT in a previous article. As they say : some people will do anything to save the earth. Except study science.
BTW, what energy sources do you recommend we rely on (with death rates please)?
Still, Pripyat, being the larger and closer, is the place usually mentioned in articles and documentaries. And there are some creepy documentaries out there about Pripyat, both in English and Russian. Spooky.
BTW, I’m not saying a bigger disaster is impossible, I’m just saying that YOU don’t know and are widely speculating a worst case.
Since the population has been moved out of the area, even a repeat of Chernobyl would not hurt a lot of people. That NYT article said even Chernobyl would not have hurt very many people had the Russians stopped people from consuming local milk - the problem was not direct radiation exposure.
The problem here is that this nuclear disaster is happening in a country that is absolutely crippled by the earthquake. Drinking milk? Hell, there are thousands who will soon be scrounging for water.
A man goes to the top of a 20 story building and claims he can jump off, no parachute or any supporting system and survive. He going to demonstrate this to the world.
His friends entreat him to give it up but the world is watching. On every floor, people are watching out of the window. He runs to the edge and jumps off.
Down on the 10th floor, the horrified people see him zoom by, and as he does he is heard to say:
Bill, I support your aim to get JK to eat his words, and he should, (just learn how to say, "my bad, I was wrong, I'll try to listen more before I speak next time"), but Bill, expecting him to start to care for community and integrate with people is not going to start happening just for being shown how offensive he is Big Time. The same as Larson and Limbaugh and O'Reilly and Beck and Palin and Gingrich and Bush!t4brains, et al., are never never going to learn to be decent healthful humans just by having to eat their words and hear they harm living people most of the time with their antisocial hates.
JK you can ignore, Bill, since he's not selfishly profiteering in the public's airwaves and limited broadcast spectrum.
The deceivers saying JK's same 'don't-worry-don't-worry' nonsense, 'vote for nuke electricity' who ARE broadcasting in the public's airwaves (as Jack is talking about) and failing their responsibility for the privilege: those rightwing retrogressive rut-brains we shouldn't ignore.
If JK asking to learn about recommended energy generation is the teachable moment, and/or if this whole nuclear catastrophy in Japan is a teachable moment for youngsters, then the best answer to teach is: Homemade electricity. Make your own, at your house or on your street. Don't rent any residence that doesn't provide making its own electricity. If windmills and solar panels and other generating equipment do not make extravagant amounts of electricity where you live, then reduce the amount you use accordingly.
The isolated greedy 'celebrity' ugly Americans today might think to study what happened to the leading greedy 'celebrity' royal French in 1792 when the peasants got enough sick and tired of the inhumanity of those who wrongly governing did injustices and deprived the general well-fare and abhored domestic tranquility.
I am soooo eager for our soldiers to come home and call out the rightwing supremacists (both Republicans and Democrats), especially the overpaid know-nothing on-air broadcasters, and say, "All right, where are the LIARS saying the words that mass murder is necessary to get to guzzle more petroleum, and where are the LIARS who sent us there saying for everyone to hate and fear fellow humans? Come out come out, stand up, whoever had the antisocial shut-brain shaking terrified inside."
Tenskwatawa: Bill, I support your aim to get JK to eat his words, and he should, JK: Whatever way this turns out, you are clearly assuming the worst possible case. I’m not saying it can’t go terribly wrong, just that we haven’t seen the evidence yet. (And, yes I DO ignore everything coming from the Union of Concerned Scientists and other green propaganda corporations.)
Tenskwatawa: Bill, expecting him to start to care for community and integrate with people is not going to start happening just for being shown how offensive he is Big Time. JK: Are you saying I care less about people than you? You are one that wants electricity price to skyrocket, breaking low income people. See next item.
Tenskwatawa: the best answer to teach is: Homemade electricity. Make your own, at your house or on your street. . . . If windmills and solar panels and other generating equipment do not make extravagant amounts of electricity where you live, then reduce the amount you use accordingly. JK: Do your realize that you are asking people to spend ten times more for electricity? Just to satisfy your green/political/religious agenda.
You are actually suggesting energy so expensive that low income people will have to choose between heat and food. How are low income people going to pay for your scheme? Or are you going to let them freeze in the dark? And you said I don’t care!
Tenskwatawa: The isolated greedy 'celebrity' ugly Americans today might think to study what happened to the leading greedy 'celebrity' royal French in 1792 when the peasants got enough sick and tired of the inhumanity of those who wrongly governing did injustices and deprived the general well-fare and abhored domestic tranquility. JK: There it is - the veiled death threat from the peace loving progressive.
Tenskwatawa: "All right, where are the LIARS saying the words that mass murder is necessary to get to guzzle more petroleum, JK: We need to use domestic oil and dump imports. All we have to do is get the greenies to quit blocking oil exploration and quit blocking coal to oil plants. Are you willing to do your part and advocate for more domestic oil production?
Tenskwatawa: Come out come out, stand up, whoever had the antisocial shut-brain shaking terrified inside." JK: There it is again - another threat from the peace loving progressive.
Here are some credible sources of information from a friend:
iaea.org/press/ (Be sure to check out their radiation dose chart)
.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Second_fire_reported_at_unit_4_1603111.html
jaif.or.jp/english/
BTW, Tenskwatawa, do you have a real name?
BTW2, have you ever taken a hard science class beyond high school?
Starbuck:
JK:
"I DO ignore everything coming from the Union of Concerned Scientists"
JK
"BTW2, have you ever taken a hard science class beyond high school?"
Too funny for words. JK: You don't have a clue how much that tells us about you. Sad.
The solar panels that you'd like to install at your house, so that you can be "green" and create your own juice? It is cost-effective (somewhat) to do this because the panels were manufactured using nuclear power at a factory in China.
Also: you can thank your Prius for driving you around all nice and eco-green-like, because it was engineered and it's parts built using nuclear power from Japan.
That nice flat-panel display that you're browsing this blog on? Manufactured with nuclear power from China, Japan, or South Korea.
A snippet from a talk and now I am to disregard what?
Read the exchange below the video.
The fact is (Karl Popper) that scientific determinism has been falsified, and that goes for both the proponents and opponents. No creditable projections in the matter can be any more than probabilities, the fuzziness of which increases with the projection in time.
Reminds me of Schrodinger's Cat, except in the macro world.
There are far too many assumptions and surmises concerning weather data previous to even crude instrumentation and recording of the applicable parameters. Guessing by tree ring is as likely to support one side or the other, and throwing one's PhD's weight around doesn't do a thing for me. I worked around many, many PhD's and witnessed the hottest arguments ever as a peer to peer discussion of state of the art situations to put heavy stock in one side or the other, especially when the winning side was always the group leader.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (30)
Sounds like the "Chernobyl option," wherein they just drop a ton of concrete and boron on the plant from above, is more likely today than it was a few days ago.
Posted by Dave J. | March 16, 2011 3:29 PM
This can't end well. It's been apparent for several days that it is beyond any ability to control what is happening.
Posted by Allan L. | March 16, 2011 3:39 PM
If helicopters can't fly over a radioactive plume to dump water, who're they going to get to drop concrete and boron? Japan isn't the USSR. Suicide volunteers? No jokes, this is serious.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 16, 2011 3:41 PM
On a positive note, the AP is reporting that the effort to restore electricity to the plant is nearing completion. They are hoping that once the power lines leading to the plant are repaired they'll be able to bring the cooling systems back online.
Posted by Pragmatic Portlander | March 16, 2011 3:45 PM
Mr Grumpy - Ever hear of the kamikase? I am sure the emperor could persuade a few to follow in their footsteps.
Posted by LucsAdvo | March 16, 2011 3:49 PM
Exposure!
Not only is the radiation being exposed, but the naked truth of how dangerous and unsafe these plants are, is now being exposed as well.
Are people still willing to gamble that despite dangers, despite not having an adequate solution for the dangerous wastes, that somehow all will be OK?
The picture doesn't look good with corporations at the wheel where profits trump human considerations.
Who thinks this way?
We no longer can allow decision makers taking a gamble with the health of all living things on our planet.
Posted by clinamen | March 16, 2011 4:32 PM
Not only did many of the helicopter pilots who borated water on the Chernobyl reactor die from radiation exposure, they later discovered that hardly any of the water actually made it into the reactor. The radiation eventually stopped on its own as the molten core material combined with sand that acted as a biological shield around and formed glass. I don't believe that these reactors have sand around them.
Posted by mm | March 16, 2011 4:38 PM
Jim Karlock - Man of Science - calling me out for my cheap scare tactics:
Bill McDonald: There's a reason Chernobyl is still basically an abandoned city. If the same number of people had died there because of coal, at least we could go back.
JK: Pardon me, 400 times as many people die from coal EVERY YEAR as died from Chernobly. And quit comparing a primitive reactors WITHOUT CONTAINMENT to our newer safer designs. It’s a cheap scare tactic.
Jim,
How are your containment vessels and these newer safer designs working for you now? Would you care to revise your B.S. statement?
Thanks.
Posted by Bill McDonald | March 16, 2011 4:42 PM
Bill McDonald:
Unless I'm mistaken, there isn't a city of Chernobyl. I think you meant Pripyat (Припять).
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 16, 2011 4:53 PM
This whole situation reminds me of the old, old joke, about the cat on the roof. There is no cat, and grandma has died.
The political folks here in OR keep blathering about how there is no danger...I wonder when they will tell us that the cat has died...
It is not going to end well for any of us.
Posted by portland native | March 16, 2011 5:07 PM
How many children will be asking some hard questions to their parents and grandma and grandpa about their role in participating or not participating to intervene?
Posted by watching for our children | March 16, 2011 5:24 PM
Native Americans were said to have made decisions by thinking out to the seventh generation. Then the white man came along and trashed all that.
Posted by starbuck | March 16, 2011 5:30 PM
Mr. Grumpy,
Here's the Internet version:
Chernobyl or Chornobyl (Ukrainian: Чорнобиль, pronounced [tʃɔrˈnɔbɪlʲ]) is an abandoned city in northern Ukraine, in Kiev Oblast, near the border with Belarus. The city used to be the administrative center of the Chernobyl Raion since 1932.
The city was evacuated in 1986 due to the Chernobyl disaster at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, located 14.5 kilometers (9 miles) north-northwest. The power plant was within Chernobyl Raion (District), but the city was not the residence of the power plant workers. When the power plant was under construction, Prypiat, a city larger and closer to the power plant, had been built as home for the power plant workers."
BTW, check out some of the haunting photos from the abandoned areas around Chernobyl. Profound.
Posted by Bill McDonald | March 16, 2011 5:48 PM
I would think restoration of electric power to the plant would require, as would bringing the plant back into operation, people on site. From now on, that's going to be, at best, very risky and difficult. I understand they are looking for older volunteers.
Posted by Allan L. | March 16, 2011 5:52 PM
If I'm living near the Aliso Viejo plant (think San Clemente), my water front property can't look too great now.
Posted by Steve | March 16, 2011 6:45 PM
Bill McDonald: Jim,
How are your containment vessels and these newer safer designs working for you now? Would you care to revise your B.S. statement?
JK: What B.S. statement?
* Did the containment vessels fail yet?
* Did any members of the public get exposed yet (beyond the amounts you get from living in Denver)?
BTW:
* Do many times more people die every year from coal than from nuclear?
* Is there any energy source without deaths associated with it?
* How do those deaths balance against the deaths adverted by using energy? (Hint living in a cave heated by wood fires, hunting & foot transport is very deadly - smoke, crawlies, insects, carnivores)
BTW, how many have died so far in this incident:
a. From the quake
b. From the Tsunami.
c. From the power plants?
Be sure to read Jack’s link to the NYT in a previous article. As they say : some people will do anything to save the earth. Except study science.
BTW, what energy sources do you recommend we rely on (with death rates please)?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 16, 2011 6:48 PM
I stand corrected! Ain't the internet grand?
Still, Pripyat, being the larger and closer, is the place usually mentioned in articles and documentaries. And there are some creepy documentaries out there about Pripyat, both in English and Russian. Spooky.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | March 16, 2011 6:49 PM
BTW, I’m not saying a bigger disaster is impossible, I’m just saying that YOU don’t know and are widely speculating a worst case.
Since the population has been moved out of the area, even a repeat of Chernobyl would not hurt a lot of people. That NYT article said even Chernobyl would not have hurt very many people had the Russians stopped people from consuming local milk - the problem was not direct radiation exposure.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 16, 2011 7:02 PM
The problem here is that this nuclear disaster is happening in a country that is absolutely crippled by the earthquake. Drinking milk? Hell, there are thousands who will soon be scrounging for water.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 16, 2011 8:14 PM
Actually, I have been promised that a shipment from Tokyo scheduled for Friday WILL ship on time.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 16, 2011 9:00 PM
That won't be true a week from now. It is hitting the fan, my friend.
Posted by Jack Bog | March 16, 2011 9:17 PM
A story for our times:
A man goes to the top of a 20 story building and claims he can jump off, no parachute or any supporting system and survive. He going to demonstrate this to the world.
His friends entreat him to give it up but the world is watching. On every floor, people are watching out of the window. He runs to the edge and jumps off.
Down on the 10th floor, the horrified people see him zoom by, and as he does he is heard to say:
"So far, so good".
Posted by Starbuck | March 16, 2011 9:26 PM
Bill, I support your aim to get JK to eat his words, and he should, (just learn how to say, "my bad, I was wrong, I'll try to listen more before I speak next time"), but Bill, expecting him to start to care for community and integrate with people is not going to start happening just for being shown how offensive he is Big Time. The same as Larson and Limbaugh and O'Reilly and Beck and Palin and Gingrich and Bush!t4brains, et al., are never never going to learn to be decent healthful humans just by having to eat their words and hear they harm living people most of the time with their antisocial hates.
For instance: Limbaugh Laughs In The Face Of Human Suffering, Media Matters .ORG, March 16, 2011.
JK you can ignore, Bill, since he's not selfishly profiteering in the public's airwaves and limited broadcast spectrum.
The deceivers saying JK's same 'don't-worry-don't-worry' nonsense, 'vote for nuke electricity' who ARE broadcasting in the public's airwaves (as Jack is talking about) and failing their responsibility for the privilege: those rightwing retrogressive rut-brains we shouldn't ignore.
If JK asking to learn about recommended energy generation is the teachable moment, and/or if this whole nuclear catastrophy in Japan is a teachable moment for youngsters, then the best answer to teach is: Homemade electricity. Make your own, at your house or on your street. Don't rent any residence that doesn't provide making its own electricity. If windmills and solar panels and other generating equipment do not make extravagant amounts of electricity where you live, then reduce the amount you use accordingly.
The isolated greedy 'celebrity' ugly Americans today might think to study what happened to the leading greedy 'celebrity' royal French in 1792 when the peasants got enough sick and tired of the inhumanity of those who wrongly governing did injustices and deprived the general well-fare and abhored domestic tranquility.
I am soooo eager for our soldiers to come home and call out the rightwing supremacists (both Republicans and Democrats), especially the overpaid know-nothing on-air broadcasters, and say, "All right, where are the LIARS saying the words that mass murder is necessary to get to guzzle more petroleum, and where are the LIARS who sent us there saying for everyone to hate and fear fellow humans? Come out come out, stand up, whoever had the antisocial shut-brain shaking terrified inside."
Posted by Tenskwatawa | March 16, 2011 10:34 PM
Tenskwatawa: Bill, I support your aim to get JK to eat his words, and he should,
JK: Whatever way this turns out, you are clearly assuming the worst possible case. I’m not saying it can’t go terribly wrong, just that we haven’t seen the evidence yet. (And, yes I DO ignore everything coming from the Union of Concerned Scientists and other green propaganda corporations.)
Tenskwatawa: Bill, expecting him to start to care for community and integrate with people is not going to start happening just for being shown how offensive he is Big Time.
JK: Are you saying I care less about people than you? You are one that wants electricity price to skyrocket, breaking low income people. See next item.
Tenskwatawa: the best answer to teach is: Homemade electricity. Make your own, at your house or on your street. . . . If windmills and solar panels and other generating equipment do not make extravagant amounts of electricity where you live, then reduce the amount you use accordingly.
JK: Do your realize that you are asking people to spend ten times more for electricity? Just to satisfy your green/political/religious agenda.
You are actually suggesting energy so expensive that low income people will have to choose between heat and food. How are low income people going to pay for your scheme? Or are you going to let them freeze in the dark? And you said I don’t care!
Tenskwatawa: The isolated greedy 'celebrity' ugly Americans today might think to study what happened to the leading greedy 'celebrity' royal French in 1792 when the peasants got enough sick and tired of the inhumanity of those who wrongly governing did injustices and deprived the general well-fare and abhored domestic tranquility.
JK: There it is - the veiled death threat from the peace loving progressive.
Tenskwatawa: "All right, where are the LIARS saying the words that mass murder is necessary to get to guzzle more petroleum,
JK: We need to use domestic oil and dump imports. All we have to do is get the greenies to quit blocking oil exploration and quit blocking coal to oil plants. Are you willing to do your part and advocate for more domestic oil production?
Tenskwatawa: Come out come out, stand up, whoever had the antisocial shut-brain shaking terrified inside."
JK: There it is again - another threat from the peace loving progressive.
Here are some credible sources of information from a friend:
iaea.org/press/ (Be sure to check out their radiation dose chart)
.world-nuclear-news.org/RS_Second_fire_reported_at_unit_4_1603111.html
jaif.or.jp/english/
BTW, Tenskwatawa, do you have a real name?
BTW2, have you ever taken a hard science class beyond high school?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 17, 2011 1:09 AM
JK:
"I DO ignore everything coming from the Union of Concerned Scientists"
JK
"BTW2, have you ever taken a hard science class beyond high school?"
Too funny for words.
Posted by Starbuck | March 17, 2011 6:52 AM
Starbuck:
JK:
"I DO ignore everything coming from the Union of Concerned Scientists"
JK
"BTW2, have you ever taken a hard science class beyond high school?"
Too funny for words.
JK: You don't have a clue how much that tells us about you. Sad.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 17, 2011 12:31 PM
Here is a video by a real scientist, with a real PhD degreee. I guarantee you will learn something profound.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=8BQpciw8suk
thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | March 17, 2011 1:01 PM
A note about "creating your own electricity":
The solar panels that you'd like to install at your house, so that you can be "green" and create your own juice? It is cost-effective (somewhat) to do this because the panels were manufactured using nuclear power at a factory in China.
Also: you can thank your Prius for driving you around all nice and eco-green-like, because it was engineered and it's parts built using nuclear power from Japan.
That nice flat-panel display that you're browsing this blog on? Manufactured with nuclear power from China, Japan, or South Korea.
Just a bit of global perspective for you.
Posted by MachineShedFred | March 17, 2011 1:32 PM
A snippet from a talk and now I am to disregard what?
Read the exchange below the video.
The fact is (Karl Popper) that scientific determinism has been falsified, and that goes for both the proponents and opponents. No creditable projections in the matter can be any more than probabilities, the fuzziness of which increases with the projection in time.
Reminds me of Schrodinger's Cat, except in the macro world.
There are far too many assumptions and surmises concerning weather data previous to even crude instrumentation and recording of the applicable parameters. Guessing by tree ring is as likely to support one side or the other, and throwing one's PhD's weight around doesn't do a thing for me. I worked around many, many PhD's and witnessed the hottest arguments ever as a peer to peer discussion of state of the art situations to put heavy stock in one side or the other, especially when the winning side was always the group leader.
Posted by Starbuck | March 17, 2011 3:11 PM
Tenskwatawa:I am soooo eager for our soldiers to come home and call out the rightwing supremacists (both Republicans and Democrats), ....
Question:What shape will these soldiers be in when they get back? How many will have post traumatic stress disorder?
Posted by clinamen | March 17, 2011 3:13 PM