We have two words for these people, and they aren't "go green." They make us want to crank everything up and burn more, just to spite them.
Comments (41)
It's an interesting social psychology tactic. As it is, presenting the little bar graph of the last year's history does significantly reduce energy consumption.
However, in previous trials of this particular strategy in other cities, there is a perverse effect... those people who are generally more green will significantly reduce consumption when they can compare with their neighbors.
But those people who don't really care, will regress to the mean... that is to say, if they are lower than their neighbors, then they may increase expenditure as the comparison gives them "cover".
In any case, it's a great idea, particularly if, as I assume, they are doing this as an experiment and testing for significance.
Our household received one of these two page audits. My view is that they are a waste of money. All it did was fuel my arrogance about our low energy consumption.
Now if they had a bounty on turning my neighbors in for burning inside lights in several rooms of the house all night long (the kids must have night terrors); the other neighbors who leave their kitchen window wide open all winter long so they can listen to their lame water feature, while the steam rises from the b-vent on their furnace.......
The HEAT program is having funding cuts and the Energy Trust is wasting money on this.
It's more of the same vigilante type BS that's becoming prevalent in our nanny culture. Just like the tree trimming and cutting issue, where the city says it will not be able to effectively monitor actions, so they will depend on neighborhood surveillance and reporting. It sends goose bumps up the crooked spines of "neighborhood activists."
"ABNER!! Abner look! The neighbor's cutting a tree limb that's at least 3/4 of an inch thick!! We have to report them!! And they left a light on in the bathroom!! ABNER!! ABNER!!"
A bounty for turning your neighbors in? For what exactly? It would really be none of your business, but hey, feel free to come to my door in the middle of the night and ask me to turn off my hall light. We'll see how that goes.
Just want to add, for many it may feel like it is a good thing. As for myself, alarm bells went off, as I was not raised under this kind of control. This must be a part of those smart meters being installed.
JS: love this commercial....just this week went out and bought a 24 pack of incandescent flood lights for the kitchen. Cost was around $1 each. After 8 years the first two went. No to CFL's in this house. Getting on in age and do not want to handle the hazardous waste.
I like how in the article they talk about "competition" when it could just as easily be considered shaming people into action that they aren't compelled to.
"i eagerly await the list of shame which will show who the highest energy users are on my block."
(I think you're kidding, but...)
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding the energy expenditures of two climate-controlled habitats, and fossil fuel consumption from commuting. So bite me.
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding the energy expenditures of two climate-controlled habitats, and fossil fuel consumption from commuting. So bite me.
There's a tax coming - you know it.
Folks like you (and me) will have to file a 20 page "opt-out" request, accompanied by a $150 non-refundable (or sustainable) application fee.
Just you watch.
I need an energy-efficient recipe for torches - I've got a pitchfork.
The letter that was featured in the video didn't seem to provide any kind of context for making a meaningful comparison between households.
For instance, are they taking things like square footage, number of residents, type of heating, etc. into consideration? If they're not I really don't see how these numbers are any indication of how energy efficient you are.
Of course the young couple, with no children, featured in the video use less energy than their neighbors that have large families, especially those who are at home with kids during the day.
This reminds me of the water waster’s article the Oregonian used to print. They had a half page spread of the top 10 residential water users in the city. Maybe if I fire up my ceramic kiln 24/7 I can get my fifteen minutes of fame.
I guess I can be thankful that I own the smallest home on the block, don't have a hot tub like everyone else, and work during the day (unlike several of my neighbors) so my electric usage is lower.
OR...those with the larger homes can be proud of their usage.
Working at a power company, I love talking to people who give me the "my home is exactly like the one next door!" Uh huh...sure it is. (And yes, I sometimes do use Google Earth to verify it.)
We work from home so our electric usage might be higher. However, it is just one part of the energy picture. We don't commute, we walk to do most all of our errands, and we don't fly. So, how big is our energy footprint compared to others? Isn't the whole picture more valuable than just one piece?
Jimkarlock, I don't remember reading where Sammy got hired as the ceo of pge or nw natural. Nice try.
More importantly, why does the utility want to even bother or spend the resources doing this? It's not really their job to discourage people from using their product. Where'd this come from?
I got the personal version with no neighbors. Called and opted out. Told them I would rather thay spend the money on reducing rates. It is interesting to note that I cannot call and get usage history on my rental propery because the account is not in my name, but they have no qualms about violating my tenants privacy. Maybe its for the children. Go by streetcar!
Home is office and lab; lots of extra power consumption due to work tools here. Don't drive to office, except on rare occasions.
In the grand scheme of things, why does comparing me to my neighbor's use even matter?
On the other hand, seeing my usage over the past year is useful; let's me know if things are out of kilter. Same goes for water usage - enables discovery of "leaks" in the sprinkler system feeder line like I had a few years back. It was an expensive summer!
I cannot call and get usage history on my rental propery because the account is not in my name
At least at my power company, we'll give a 12 month high/low/average.
But you're correct, we won't give more detailed info than that. Frankly, I'm a little surprised that this mailing is permitted if it is giving out actual data on another home.
JimmyMac, Mayor Sam does have something to do with this through EnergyTrust. CoP is a strong proponent and taxpayers help fund EnergyTrust. It's time to complain to Sam and EnergyTrust about this invasion. Plus, I think it will be found to be illegal.
Time to design the new uniforms for the Green Police.
Will they be checking on what sort and how many vehicles, garden tools, and appliances people have too?
This is just too invasive.
Fortunately we do not live in Portland and where we do live such inquirIes might be met with the business end of a gun, though not from us.
I love the hydrocarbon sniffing aardvark that cameos at 0:42 in the clip.
--------------------------
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding . . . . . . . So bite me.
Lifer, you seem to be a little sensitive. and a smidge too independent minded for the brave new sustainable Portlandia. A few months of 'volunteering' at the community gardens may encourage you to be a team player. Power for people -- not for profit!
Concord, I'm not sensitive. Just aware and not afraid to be blunt.
I'm pretty sure your response is meant to be ironic. But it does allow an opportunity to address a few issues and make some statements directed at those who would respond as you have done, but with real conviction.
You've comprised an opinion of who I am and what I do - or don't do - based on my simple reaction to monitoring and making public an individual's energy consumption. My reaction to this and the alarming number of ways in which our government is eroding our individual freedom, privacy and independence is as follows:
Mind your own f*cking business.
I am independent. And as a result I've been relatively successful. Dependence inhibits development and leads to entitlement, based not on what you have worked for or contributed to the world, but just because you exist. Great motivation...
But the final suggestion that I do some volunteering really takes the cake. How have you determined what I have or have not done in terms of volunteering, gifting, assisting, instructing, hiring, mentoring, listening, etc., in my five decades of life in Portland? This illustrates exactly what I mean. You have judged me and created a complete image of me based on the simple comment I made above. Just as an energy consumption report would appear to fully illustrate whether an individual property owner is a good guy or a bad guy. Again:
Mind your own f*cking business.
Ironically, most people who volunteer and make a habit of assisting others as much as they can, do so not for recognition, but for the sake of helping make someone's world a little better. The grandstanding that's made these days by so many who conduct their lives in what they consider to be a more enlightened and altruistic fashion is nauseating. While their actions are good, their self-aggrandizement undermines them.
Again Concord, this isn't directed at you (maybe?), but to those who seriously would take the view you express. But as a third-generation Portlander, I can assure you that independence is what made this and other great communities what they are. The social engineering experiment known as "Portlandia" will fail. And we know this is not just a local phenomenon, but one that is being played out across the country. Do a little online investigation of "Smart Growth," and don't be afraid to look into "UN Agenda 21."
Anyway, it's Saturday and I have to get back to work before preparing dinner for my two elderly neighbors. Oops, I guess I must have let that slip accidentally.
PDXLifer, well stated. As you suspect, I think Concord was just being a snark. But that just goes to show how being snarking can even help define an issue. Thanks.
Oops, I forgot to forget. I have to get back to making my salsa for my neighbor who loves it, she just lost her 93 year old husband. Please notify the Volunteer Police for me because I can't hack it.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (41)
It's an interesting social psychology tactic. As it is, presenting the little bar graph of the last year's history does significantly reduce energy consumption.
However, in previous trials of this particular strategy in other cities, there is a perverse effect... those people who are generally more green will significantly reduce consumption when they can compare with their neighbors.
But those people who don't really care, will regress to the mean... that is to say, if they are lower than their neighbors, then they may increase expenditure as the comparison gives them "cover".
In any case, it's a great idea, particularly if, as I assume, they are doing this as an experiment and testing for significance.
Posted by PJB | February 11, 2011 11:03 AM
Our household received one of these two page audits. My view is that they are a waste of money. All it did was fuel my arrogance about our low energy consumption.
Now if they had a bounty on turning my neighbors in for burning inside lights in several rooms of the house all night long (the kids must have night terrors); the other neighbors who leave their kitchen window wide open all winter long so they can listen to their lame water feature, while the steam rises from the b-vent on their furnace.......
The HEAT program is having funding cuts and the Energy Trust is wasting money on this.
Posted by teresa | February 11, 2011 11:07 AM
It's more of the same vigilante type BS that's becoming prevalent in our nanny culture. Just like the tree trimming and cutting issue, where the city says it will not be able to effectively monitor actions, so they will depend on neighborhood surveillance and reporting. It sends goose bumps up the crooked spines of "neighborhood activists."
"ABNER!! Abner look! The neighbor's cutting a tree limb that's at least 3/4 of an inch thick!! We have to report them!! And they left a light on in the bathroom!! ABNER!! ABNER!!"
http://www.thecarconnection.com/image/100179375_gladys-kravitz-nosey-neighbor
Temperance 2011 is next.
Posted by PDXLifer | February 11, 2011 11:15 AM
Ahh, the good ol green police.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxTNZUhesZk
Posted by JS | February 11, 2011 11:21 AM
We have two words for these people, and they aren't "go green."
We have three words for them, starting with "go" and ending with "yourself".
Posted by none | February 11, 2011 11:29 AM
What is next then?
Sending an extra fee if "one" should exceed the norm?
Neighbors "snitching" on each other.
This feels like a scarf put around our necks, first it feels OK like it is a good thing, but then watch out, the tightening of it isn't good at all!!
Posted by clinamen | February 11, 2011 11:37 AM
"Oceania is at war with Eastasia and we've always been at war with Eastasia."
Posted by The Original Bob W | February 11, 2011 11:43 AM
A bounty for turning your neighbors in? For what exactly? It would really be none of your business, but hey, feel free to come to my door in the middle of the night and ask me to turn off my hall light. We'll see how that goes.
Posted by Brian | February 11, 2011 11:44 AM
...first it feels OK like it is a good thing,...
Just want to add, for many it may feel like it is a good thing. As for myself, alarm bells went off, as I was not raised under this kind of control. This must be a part of those smart meters being installed.
Posted by clinamen | February 11, 2011 11:51 AM
Brian --one word sarcasm.
JS: love this commercial....just this week went out and bought a 24 pack of incandescent flood lights for the kitchen. Cost was around $1 each. After 8 years the first two went. No to CFL's in this house. Getting on in age and do not want to handle the hazardous waste.
Posted by teresa | February 11, 2011 11:52 AM
i eagerly await the list of shame which will show who the highest energy users are on my block.
Posted by concordbridge | February 11, 2011 12:25 PM
The World has moved on.
Posted by Roland Deschain | February 11, 2011 12:25 PM
Keep Portland weird through forced conformity!
Posted by Snards | February 11, 2011 12:30 PM
I like how in the article they talk about "competition" when it could just as easily be considered shaming people into action that they aren't compelled to.
Posted by MachineShedFred | February 11, 2011 12:44 PM
"i eagerly await the list of shame which will show who the highest energy users are on my block."
(I think you're kidding, but...)
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding the energy expenditures of two climate-controlled habitats, and fossil fuel consumption from commuting. So bite me.
Posted by PDXLifer | February 11, 2011 12:52 PM
"Now they're going to send you a "report card"
Just wait until they get cranking with the smart meters. Then they can track you day/night.
I got one of these for my gas bill and they were interesting, but had some of the numbers wrong.
Posted by Steve | February 11, 2011 12:58 PM
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding the energy expenditures of two climate-controlled habitats, and fossil fuel consumption from commuting. So bite me.
There's a tax coming - you know it.
Folks like you (and me) will have to file a 20 page "opt-out" request, accompanied by a $150 non-refundable (or sustainable) application fee.
Just you watch.
I need an energy-efficient recipe for torches - I've got a pitchfork.
Posted by cc | February 11, 2011 1:08 PM
The letter that was featured in the video didn't seem to provide any kind of context for making a meaningful comparison between households.
For instance, are they taking things like square footage, number of residents, type of heating, etc. into consideration? If they're not I really don't see how these numbers are any indication of how energy efficient you are.
Of course the young couple, with no children, featured in the video use less energy than their neighbors that have large families, especially those who are at home with kids during the day.
Posted by Pragmatic Portlander | February 11, 2011 1:09 PM
In the old days brown shirts and shiny boots, or red neckerchiefs would've been what's next. Green armbands?
We'll see. AG with a blind eye, too much kool-aid down at City Hall, Congressman funnels earmarks to pay for it, we'll see.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | February 11, 2011 1:20 PM
Afterthough: basement pot farmers are going to stick out like a sore thumb.
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | February 11, 2011 1:23 PM
Afterthough: basement pot farmers are going to stick out like a sore thumb.
Selective enforcement, Grump, selective enforcement.
Posted by cc | February 11, 2011 1:26 PM
Why is any of Sam's business how much energy we use?
Or does he still believe Al Gore's lies about CO2?
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlock | February 11, 2011 1:34 PM
This reminds me of the water waster’s article the Oregonian used to print. They had a half page spread of the top 10 residential water users in the city. Maybe if I fire up my ceramic kiln 24/7 I can get my fifteen minutes of fame.
Posted by John Benton | February 11, 2011 1:58 PM
Jimkarlock, I don't remember reading where Sammy got hired as the ceo of pge or nw natural. Nice try.
Posted by JimmyMac | February 11, 2011 2:00 PM
I guess I can be thankful that I own the smallest home on the block, don't have a hot tub like everyone else, and work during the day (unlike several of my neighbors) so my electric usage is lower.
OR...those with the larger homes can be proud of their usage.
Working at a power company, I love talking to people who give me the "my home is exactly like the one next door!" Uh huh...sure it is. (And yes, I sometimes do use Google Earth to verify it.)
Posted by Erik H. | February 11, 2011 2:53 PM
I love the smell of green backlash in the afternoon.
Posted by Mister Tee | February 11, 2011 3:14 PM
We work from home so our electric usage might be higher. However, it is just one part of the energy picture. We don't commute, we walk to do most all of our errands, and we don't fly. So, how big is our energy footprint compared to others? Isn't the whole picture more valuable than just one piece?
Posted by Donaleen Kohn | February 11, 2011 4:00 PM
Jimkarlock, I don't remember reading where Sammy got hired as the ceo of pge or nw natural. Nice try.
More importantly, why does the utility want to even bother or spend the resources doing this? It's not really their job to discourage people from using their product. Where'd this come from?
Posted by Mr. Grumpy | February 11, 2011 5:17 PM
I got the personal version with no neighbors. Called and opted out. Told them I would rather thay spend the money on reducing rates. It is interesting to note that I cannot call and get usage history on my rental propery because the account is not in my name, but they have no qualms about violating my tenants privacy. Maybe its for the children. Go by streetcar!
Posted by pdxmick | February 11, 2011 5:18 PM
Home is office and lab; lots of extra power consumption due to work tools here. Don't drive to office, except on rare occasions.
In the grand scheme of things, why does comparing me to my neighbor's use even matter?
On the other hand, seeing my usage over the past year is useful; let's me know if things are out of kilter. Same goes for water usage - enables discovery of "leaks" in the sprinkler system feeder line like I had a few years back. It was an expensive summer!
Too many busy bodies.
Posted by Mike (one of the many) | February 11, 2011 6:06 PM
I cannot call and get usage history on my rental propery because the account is not in my name
At least at my power company, we'll give a 12 month high/low/average.
But you're correct, we won't give more detailed info than that. Frankly, I'm a little surprised that this mailing is permitted if it is giving out actual data on another home.
Posted by Erik H. | February 11, 2011 8:33 PM
JimmyMac, Mayor Sam does have something to do with this through EnergyTrust. CoP is a strong proponent and taxpayers help fund EnergyTrust. It's time to complain to Sam and EnergyTrust about this invasion. Plus, I think it will be found to be illegal.
Posted by lw | February 11, 2011 8:52 PM
I met to add that our Portland taxes have gone to EnergyTrust that is participating in this program, besides state tax dollars and fed dollars.
Posted by lw | February 11, 2011 8:55 PM
Time to design the new uniforms for the Green Police.
Will they be checking on what sort and how many vehicles, garden tools, and appliances people have too?
This is just too invasive.
Fortunately we do not live in Portland and where we do live such inquirIes might be met with the business end of a gun, though not from us.
Posted by Portland Native on the road | February 12, 2011 7:42 AM
The Green Police!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wq58zS4_jvM
Posted by Rich | February 12, 2011 9:47 AM
I love the hydrocarbon sniffing aardvark that cameos at 0:42 in the clip.
--------------------------
Probably people who work at home (like me), avoiding . . . . . . . So bite me.
Lifer, you seem to be a little sensitive. and a smidge too independent minded for the brave new sustainable Portlandia. A few months of 'volunteering' at the community gardens may encourage you to be a team player. Power for people -- not for profit!
Posted by concordbridge | February 12, 2011 11:04 AM
Concord, I'm not sensitive. Just aware and not afraid to be blunt.
I'm pretty sure your response is meant to be ironic. But it does allow an opportunity to address a few issues and make some statements directed at those who would respond as you have done, but with real conviction.
You've comprised an opinion of who I am and what I do - or don't do - based on my simple reaction to monitoring and making public an individual's energy consumption. My reaction to this and the alarming number of ways in which our government is eroding our individual freedom, privacy and independence is as follows:
Mind your own f*cking business.
I am independent. And as a result I've been relatively successful. Dependence inhibits development and leads to entitlement, based not on what you have worked for or contributed to the world, but just because you exist. Great motivation...
But the final suggestion that I do some volunteering really takes the cake. How have you determined what I have or have not done in terms of volunteering, gifting, assisting, instructing, hiring, mentoring, listening, etc., in my five decades of life in Portland? This illustrates exactly what I mean. You have judged me and created a complete image of me based on the simple comment I made above. Just as an energy consumption report would appear to fully illustrate whether an individual property owner is a good guy or a bad guy. Again:
Mind your own f*cking business.
Ironically, most people who volunteer and make a habit of assisting others as much as they can, do so not for recognition, but for the sake of helping make someone's world a little better. The grandstanding that's made these days by so many who conduct their lives in what they consider to be a more enlightened and altruistic fashion is nauseating. While their actions are good, their self-aggrandizement undermines them.
Again Concord, this isn't directed at you (maybe?), but to those who seriously would take the view you express. But as a third-generation Portlander, I can assure you that independence is what made this and other great communities what they are. The social engineering experiment known as "Portlandia" will fail. And we know this is not just a local phenomenon, but one that is being played out across the country. Do a little online investigation of "Smart Growth," and don't be afraid to look into "UN Agenda 21."
Anyway, it's Saturday and I have to get back to work before preparing dinner for my two elderly neighbors. Oops, I guess I must have let that slip accidentally.
Posted by PDXLifer | February 12, 2011 12:18 PM
PDXLifer, well stated. As you suspect, I think Concord was just being a snark. But that just goes to show how being snarking can even help define an issue. Thanks.
Posted by lw | February 12, 2011 1:03 PM
Oops, I forgot to forget. I have to get back to making my salsa for my neighbor who loves it, she just lost her 93 year old husband. Please notify the Volunteer Police for me because I can't hack it.
Posted by lw | February 12, 2011 1:10 PM
Terrible idea. I'm gonna be pissed if I get one of these things.
Posted by dg | February 13, 2011 10:23 AM
lw, thanks. I'd love the recipe for your salsa.
Posted by PDXLifer | February 13, 2011 11:36 AM