Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 18, 2011 8:46 AM. The previous post in this blog was WaPo: Wal-Mart's better than nothing. The next post in this blog is Fish on immigation jail: "a small processing center". Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, February 18, 2011

Sustainable Susan's "calamity"

The City of Portland's army of planners -- the smug know-it-alls who parlay vague memories of Tom McCall into one ugly, out-of-place condo bunker after another -- have a stunning defeat on their hands with a state board's rejection of their "River Plan." The bureaucrats are downplaying the latest development, but as one knowledgeable observer pointed out, "It's such an overwhelming rejection of both the city's methodology and its outcomes."

More than a decade of planner busy work has essentially been flushed down the loo. And the business interests who oppose the plan are taking the latest ruling to an appeals court to make sure that the city doesn't get away with papering over its major flaws.

Environmentalists are understandably bummed, but their ire shouldn't be directed at the business folks, who were just protecting their money. It should be directed at the bunglers in city government. With friends like the mayor and the planning cabal, Portland's wildlife, like its beautiful neighborhoods, don't need enemies.

Comments (16)

With hindsight, it's shocking that Amanda "All About Process" Fritz didn't make a peep and joined the 5-0 decision to ram through ℠ the Scam's bogus plan.

I have a hard time seeing how the Willamette from downtown to Kelly Point can be an industrial area and a very healthy ecosystem. Seems to me like you've got to make a choice between the two. And at the same time the City is adopting the River Plan, it's proposing to mow down West Hayden Island to ship coal to China. Seems like conflicting efforts.

Perhaps in hindsight, Sam should not have fired all the real planners and engineers who know more than he does. I say let him try to write the next plan all by himself and see how well he does.

This would make a great question at City Club today when he delivers his state of the city address.

So true. Remember Gil Kelley?

The River Plan isn't much about "environment"--it's a camel by committee that tries to appease everybody and thereby does little for anybody--or the ecology itself.

I also wouldn't necessarily call all supporters on the environment side "environmentalists", either. Many groups have either given up and supported the superrficial, or do environmental work that amounts to little more than issuing press releases.

The cutesy press release you linked to is an interesting aside. Crafted by Roy Kaufman, the opening line "Led by Mayor Sam Adams, the Portland City Council voted 5-0 to adopt the River Plan/North Reach yesterday" is priceless. Trust that this careful wording will be used later to claim ownership and credit, despite there was no "leading" going on at all.

Forgive my profound cynicism, but lately it seems that developers want to invoke the McCall Legacy, such as it is, to mean "anything we want to do."

I can't help thinking if they wanted to store plutonium in Mt. Tabor Reservoir, you would hear something about how Tom McCall is smiling down upon them.

While we're on the subject, don't forget that McCall got smoked in the 1978 gubernatorial primary because he failed to see the GOP's lurch to the right and that he would have had a much better chance running as an independent. So much for infallible vision.

CoP's "army of planners" have other recent "defeats"-like the SoWhat Jail.

CoP tried to squeeze the project through review under only Design Review. But to be fair, there were several planners that felt the review should be under the Conditional Review process with full public notice and being able to review the detention center portion of the project and not just the window sizes. The defeat was really for Leonard and chief of staff Kovatch. Sam just sat on his hands. Well, there went 10 months of futile planning morass-let's start over like the River Plan.

The City Council is now trying to have the Jail Conditional Review only apply to the portion of the building that has detention facilities, not all the supporting offices, parking, other facilities that support the detention facility. It would be like reviewing only 23% of the vacant Wapato Jail having holding cells and the rest of its office's, kitchens, counseling rooms, etc. supporting the holding cells is non-reviewable. There's nothing in Title 33 that assigns proportionality to a land use hearing.

Sounds like the "going to LUBA and beyond door" is being left open by the city for the Jail, just like the River Plan. The River Plan went through the door, then the city's feint to just "clean up a few loose ends" isn't being bought by the industry community. They are now going through the screen door.

If you really want to see make work / busy work "planning" take a look at the Portland Plan exercise.

The "Portland Plan" wont itself produce the state statutorily required update to the "comprehensive plan" but it will somehow "inform" the "creation" of the comp plan.

The Portland Plan has been burning through money in salaries to staff and consultants and is busily looking into schools; health care; nutrition and a whole raft of other things having nothing to do with the City's charter or its obligations under tye State Land Use laws.

But, hey, it keeps the planners employed who were tossed out of BDS when building and land use application fees dried up.

The dirty little secret about the Portland Plan is that like other stuff, it is flowing out of, and downhill from, the Mayor's office.

The City is way behind the state statutory time lines for doing its comp plan, but the Portland Plan silliness goes on and on and on.....

Try asking Eric Engrstrom or Sustainable Sue for the actual dollar numbers expended on this game.

Think about the actual City mandated services like fixed existing roads which those dollars could have bought.


Nonny, it all makes sense once you realize that the planning is the goal in and of itself. Not some result that comes out of the planning: implementation, or action, or arriving at some hard decision. The planning process itself is the point.

We have reached a point where we've praised "Portland planning" so much, that we mistake it for actual accomplishment.

Look at all the happy back-slapping and self-congratulation that came after they adopted the Bike Plan. The achievement is just the act of creating and adopting a plan, not actually doing anything laid out in the plan.

Snards -

Agree taht the planning itself is often the goal. Its an ongoing welfare system for graduates of UO Architecture and PSU Toulan Schools. Useless in so many ways.

However, the planning process is not benign. The "Bike Plan" you point to is a perfect example. Now, in almost every CoP funded capitaal project, costs for bike exclusive improvements, whether bike boulevards, parking racks, striping, and a host of other physical items which are all bike exclusive add significantly to the cost of the project.

And it is only the bike community which gains bike exclusive amenities.

Were you aware that according to state law, peds are trespassing if they use a "bike lane" to walk in where there are no sidewalks? A ped hit by a biker, or a car, while walking in such a lane, is already behind the 8 ball in terms of any claim for injuries because under Oregon's "comparative fault" rules, the act of trespassing makes the ped at fault.

Try walking almost anywhere in either SW or outer SE without walking in a bike lane.

THE bike plan, as just one instance, is both costly in terms of cap[ital expenditure, and discriminates against all pother modes ( see, I can do planner speak) such as ped and car by obtaining bike exclusive physical amenities.

And let me ask again, just how much has Sustainable Sue and her merry minions spent so far on the Portland Plan.

Speaking of LUBA, there is a proposal floating around in Salem to create a loser pays system of appeals.

How does this serve the public and neighborhoods if they cannot appeal faulty or political land use decisions paid for by our general fund taxes?

The example noted fits. We lose either way. We pay for the creation of the Comp Plan and zoning code, then pay BDS to enforce it.

The City expended funds to create the faulty plan such as the Waterfront Plan on our nickle. They will now have to do it over correctly.

If this new proposal goes through, we'd also have to pay anyone challenging them who prevails, so twice, and without any limit.

This would also prevent neighborhoods or legitimate organizations from risking any LUBA appeal so development will prevail without challenge.

Please let your representative know this should not be brought to a vote.

Mark, good points. Adding to Nonny points about Planning meaning more than the act itself, while I agree with Snards point, Portland Planning is like a key to bring many additional, physical consequences.

For example is SoWhat. In the late 80s, early 90s Katz and Co.(Sam) wanted to bring the whole area all the way down to Johns Landing into the ubiquitous "Central City Plan". The neighborhood association was very concerned about what that met. Katz and Co. promised that if brought into the district, it would not mean the density, heights, FAR, etc. of the Central City District. The Greenway Zone that it occupied would be honored and that it's encompassing in CC would respect the neighborhood, the river, the enormous transportation problems of the area.

The president of CTLH, Betsy Lindsey, daughter of Mr. Lindsey of Lindsey/Hart Attorneys (a respected Portland firm)was against it. She saw the writing on the wall like many others. CTLH opposed it, but......

Two years later the Planning Bureau began the long planning process that became SoWhat. FAR went from 2:l to 12:1. Heights went from 35-45 ft.. Heights to 250-325 ft, all these just like Downtown. No step-down of building mass to the river as Greenway requires. And not one vehicle transportation improvement has been made in SoWhat, in disregard to over 220,000 daily trips passing through on I-5, Macadam and other arterial streets and no convenient access to get there, still an island.

Katz and Co. lied. And Planning documents, like this, are used by the Pols and others to make the physical reality like SoWhat happen.

That's true lw, I shouldn't be so cavalier about claiming that plans aren't implemented. Maybe I should just say that the city also considers "planning" to be "doing something".

I consider planning to be "planning to do something later".

The SoWa district also had the power of an urban renewal district behind it. That's the big difference between which plans are implemented and those that just have a lot of pretty planning diagrams drawn and then nothing happens.

mark -

Do you have a bill number - eg. HB 2001 or SB 789 - for the LUBA loser pays attorneys fees provision.

You are correct that such a system needs to be resisted.

HB 2181, I believe.

I'm fine with the River Plan being axed, but wait a minute. You write:

"[B]ut their ire shouldn't be directed at the business folks, who were just protecting their money. It should be directed at the bunglers in city government."

That's an odd comment. I thought that "protecting their money" was otherwise grounds for relentless criticism here. Have standards been relaxed so that the higher goal of bashing city planners can proceed?


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics