Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on February 11, 2011 11:44 AM. The previous post in this blog was The PC police get up even closer in your face. The next post in this blog is What's Twitter got to do with it?. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, February 11, 2011

Someone's planning, Lord, kumbaya

The latest issue of Portland Curbsider is out. This newsletter from the City of Portland usually helps us all figure out which bin to put which type of trash in, but this time around, it's got much bigger ambitions.

Check out the first half of the thing. It's a textbook example of precious planner psychobabble -- page after page of platitudes. "What kind of Portland do we want?" If you could be a twee, what kind of twee would you be?

We hold ourselves accountable, so that the benefits and burdens of our actions are equitably shared across communities...

Achieving equity will be a priority and part of all the strategies and actions in the Portland Plan — from education, housing and economic prosperity to transportation, sustainability and public health. Addressing chronic racial and ethnic disparities requires specific action, such as the development of a racial and ethnic justice and accountability initiative...

A network of safe and attractive sidewalks, bikeways, trails and neighborhood greenways that connect people to nature and neighborhood destinations...

More Portlanders are leading active lifestyles and can easily get to thriving local business hubs, schools, parks and transit on safe sidewalks, trails and streets...

Excuse me, which week was yard debris pickup again?

On page 4, they've got some great news: Having people throw food scraps in with yard debris cuts landfill garbage by 30%! Yeah, and they're going to cut landfill garbage pickups by 50%. Probably jack up the price, too. What fun.

Anyway, to round out the absurdity, on the back of the newsletter is a survey designed to make it appear that Mayor Escalofriante and Sustainable Susan give a darn about your everyday problems, like potholes, poor street lighting, dilapidated parks, and the like. Ha! Ha! Whatever you write on that paper, you know what the City Hall solution will be -- streetcars, nasty infill, drainage ditches bioswales, and bike boulevards.

It’s not possible to immediately fix all problems, but the survey below gives you another way to inform the City’s budget decisions and priorities. In these tough economic times, many Portlanders have trimmed household budgets, and the City is doing the same.
Too, too funny. Go by streetcar! And above all, remember:
To create and enhance a vibrant city, BPS combines the disciplines of planning and sustainability to advance Portland’s diverse and distinct neighborhoods, promote a prosperous and low-carbon economy, and help ensure that people and the natural environment are healthy and integrated into the cityscape.

BPS provides a forum for community engagement and education, and is a catalyst for action. With a city full of partners, BPS develops creative and practical solutions on issues as far ranging as comprehensive, neighborhood and environmental planning, urban design, waste reduction and recycling, energy efficiency and solar technologies.

This innovative, interdisciplinary approach strengthens Portland’s position as an international model of sustainable development practices and commerce.

Comments (35)

Switching a few letters around would change the Curbsider into the Crusader.

And 18% of the people on the cover are white males... I'm surprised it's that high!

Arrg! Why did I read this while I have low blood sugar?!

I think that "Aliki" from Portlandia is my new symbol for the weird eco-planning-bike cult that has taken over the city. His portrait should hang at the entrance to BDS.

Everyone who comes into town will be greeted by a hollow-eyed zombie on the airport MAX: "I can't wait for you to meet Aliki!"

Prof. Bogdanski (said with fond memories of your tax class, circa 1997), I'm curious... I've lurked on your blog for some time, and while I see a tremendous amount of acerbic commentary from you and other commentators about the perceived decline of Portland, what I almost never see is: proactively, how would *you* structure city governance? Do you have any *specific* policy proposals by which we could reverse the apparent decline in civic infrastructure and long-term fiscal stability, apart from simply "vote 'em out?" For example, as you've frequently pointed out, we've got some serious long-term unfunded liabilities--how can we constructively deal with these, taking into account the legal minefield we'll likely have to navigate along the way?

Basically put, if you were mayor or a council member, how would you choose to shape the future of Portland? I'm especially interested in how you would handle significant structural issues such as our aging and ever-more decrepit sewer system; provisioning and oversight of emergency services; public employee wages and benefits (which ties into my question about long-term unfunded liabilities); and of course that perennial issue of job creation within Portland city limits.

I ask this out of genuine interest, and not snark. As the proprietor of one of the most-read blogs in Oregon, you're in a unique position to help shape policy through robust & reasoned debate.



...just because I'm having a Tenswatawa moment...

ARTHUR: I am your king!
WOMAN: Well, I didn't vote for you.
ARTHUR: You don't vote for kings.
WOMAN: Well, 'ow did you become king then?
ARTHUR: The Lady of the Lake,
[angels sing]
her arm clad in the purest shimmering samite, held aloft Excalibur
from the bosom of the water signifying by Divine Providence that I,
Arthur, was to carry Excalibur.
[singing stops]
That is why I am your king!
DENNIS: Listen -- strange women lying in ponds distributing swords
is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power
derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical
aquatic ceremony.
ARTHUR: Be quiet!
DENNIS: Well you can't expect to wield supreme executive power
just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you!
ARTHUR: Shut up!
DENNIS: I mean, if I went around sayin' I was an empereror just
because some moistened bint had lobbed a scimitar at me they'd
put me away!
ARTHUR: Shut up! Will you shut up!
DENNIS: Ah, now we see the violence inherent in the system.
ARTHUR: Shut up!
DENNIS: Oh! Come and see the violence inherent in the system!
HELP! HELP! I'm being repressed!
ARTHUR: Bloody peasant!
DENNIS: Oh, what a give away. Did you here that, did you here that,
eh? That's what I'm on about -- did you see him repressing me,
you saw it didn't you?

Reading that mess of pottage, I'm once again reminded that most government feel-good literature like this can be summed up with a quote from the Alex Winter short film "Entering Texas:" "He's just greasing the pan, dear. It's special grease."


1) Get rid of the commission system

2) Have coucilors elected by geographic districts.

3) Severely curtail urban renewal, in physical scale and what its money can be spent on. Get govt out of the real estate development business.

4) Use money for its intended purpose. No more mission creep. No more demonstration houses built with water bureau money, bioswales for bikes, etc.

5) Admit that the long-term costs of rail service are too high. The Feds pay for intitial construction, but no operation or maintenance going forward. The cost has been to our bus service.

6) Admit that 85% to 90% of our populace drive cars and want a functioning street network for autos.

7) Admit that what makes a city livable are the boring things. Schools, cops, functioning services for as cheap as possible.

8) As far as the the pension system, who knows. That is a bomb whose fuse was lit a long time ago. Start by controling salary and benefits of current employees and probably reducing the overall workforce.

9) Admit that a functioning city needs more than to be a cool "livable" place for 20 year olds, retirees, and unmarried couples.

The stupid bioswales really gave the mosquitoes a hand last summer. I can't wait to see what food garbage in the yard debris does for the rat population.

I can't wait to see what food garbage in the yard debris does for the rat population.

I believe City Hall already has food service.

I think that the frustration comes in, from those of us who are critical but are not just knew jerk, anti-government crackpots, is that there seems to be such an emphasis on keeping Portland a "Keep Portland Weird" kind of place with all kinds of feel good initiatives and rah rah granoly speeches. And this at the expense of practical things like better roads, parks, services. Tri Met has been on a downhill money sucking slide for so long we cannot remember when it was anyones idea of a model transit system. We rarely shop or go to downtown anymore because of the crappy roads, bad parking and various "colorful street people" who make us feel like it is a hazard. How about encouraging business and improving infrastructure as a way of getting people to come and spend and build and maybe other funding issues might get addressed.

And yet Tri-Met was just rated #1 transit system in the entire country!!!

6) Admit that 85% to 90% of our populace drive cars and want a functioning street network for autos.

If the City of Portland keeps repeating that it isn't George, it isn't true.

More and more Portlanders are choosing "active transportation" and "prefer" "alternative" modes of transportation.

(Oh, but that does not include buses, because buses aren't sexy and cool like Streetcars are. But electric cars and hybrids are O.K.)

Mr. Grumpy -

Ahhh, yes, TriMet is rated # 1.....

Which begs the question, rated by whom?

IIRC the rating is from a national group of transit planners.....

Wonder how its funders, the taxpayers of the region, would rate TriMet...?

Oh, wait, the funders, the taxpayers, did just rate TriMet in an election in November 2010....

Again, IIRC, the rating wasn't too good....TriMet's "we absolutely gtta have this extra pot of money" sales job was rejected.

Yeah, right, TriMet is # 1....

I rate TriMet #2

I'm very disappointed in you Jack. You have to be in the right frame of mind to read and understand such beautiful prose. Before reading it, I hopped on my bike and peddled down to my neighborhood medical co-op. With a renewed herbal essence I read the enlightened words from those who work for us. I was so touched I sang Kum bay ya! Now I'm looking for some "key Ingredients" they were talking about!

To "Marc V." by your very questions you have made it very apparent you do not read this blog. It is pointed out daily what the city should not be spending it's time and money on. Go back and read a weeks worth and think about it.

How will all of this sweet talk by city fathers/mothers play out if the IMF has their way with the new plan? Maybe we will all have different priorities at that time. It really will mess with the pensions.

V Mark, I agree with dman's last paragraph responding to you. I hope you can look through the maze of critiques on local government and see the message, it's quite clear.

I've been involved in over 35 years of public meetings here. It always bothered me that the form of the message, the critique, becomes more important to some than the message in the critiques. They don't like it that the remarks aren't sugarcoated or more.

Many times government staff or others opposing one's view and not subscribing to their Mission employ that famous comment/question, "Well, what would you propose then?" , when the other person has spent much time expressing the answer in what they have critiqued. Their critiques are the proposals.

It's like they ask your type of question as they are more superior, knowledgeable by their put-off question. And then if you try to follow up to answer their rhetorical question, they generally don't want it answered.

For example, I have never had a government official (or others) who strongly believe that we need many more hundreds of millions of dollars for bike infrastructure of how they reconcile that with over 95% of all trips in the region are by vehicles. The question is a critique and not in the form they want. But worse, they don't answer it.

Actually Jay, that says that 85% of households have a car.

20% don't drive to work, but they may drive many other places.

dman, I actually read this blog almost every day, and have done so for quite some time. :-) I'm well aware that significant textual energy is expended by blog participants on what the city should *not* be spending its time and money on.

But at day's end, I don't believe deconstruction alone advances the civic ball. It's easy to say what we don't like, but actually coming up with concrete policy proposals that satisfy the (to me) foundational criteria of fiscal responsibility, social equity and sensible infrastructure investment seems to be bloody damn hard. I *know* there have been some excellent discussions in the past about certain issues (e.g., the recent SoWa immigration jail discussion), but for the most part these genuinely useful (to me) policy discussions are vastly outnumbered by deconstructive snark.

Of course, this is a blog, and not a policy workshop, and the daily snark is often what makes reading this blog so much damn fun. But this blog is frequented by a number of people who obviously care deeply about this city, and who have the skills to propose concrete, detailed and fundamentally useful policies that taken together, might help form a genuinely viable platform for a City that Doesn't Suck. For example, I found Snard's response to my query an extremely useful summation of a number of points worthy of more detailed discussion.

Thanks for the considered responses.

When a ship is sinking, the first step is stop the water coming in. When Portland finally rights itself, it can aspire to become the green capital of the world, and a utopia of peace and justice. But in order to do that, it has to first stop wasting its future on nonsense.

We need more and better policing.

We need to take downtown back from the scuzzies and make it a place that people want to frequent again.

We need to end the open-air mental health "system."

We need to rebuild our crumbling parks.

We need better street maintenance.

We need to replace the Sellwood Bridge before somebody gets killed going over it.

We need a better reputation as a place to do business.

We need earthquake preparedness.

There are many needs. But none of them will be attended to with the twisted priorities of City Hall, Earl the Pearl, and the army of misguided planners. We need to stop the insanity before we can make positive change.

Instead we're getting streetcars, a soccer stadium, more unwanted light rail, and a white elephant hotel for our money. The foolishness never stops.

Prof. Bogdanski, many thanks for that concise summation.

You have far more patience than I: I looked thru it to see if the new yard debris pickup schedule had been published (it hadn't) then promptly discarded it.

One interesting factoid comes to mind, however: the bulk of Metro's money comes from solid waste. How do you suppose they'll replace a 30%+ drop in fees?

How gaggy! I read that piece and wondered how many hours of staff time and how much money went into producing the startling news that the city wants equity for all. Yea, me too.

Re. the mailer: I got it and spent a frustrating few minutes filling it out. It didn't really address the things that are real problems for the city or our neighborhood and I wrote a note in the margin remarking on these omissions before mailing it off.

I've worked in printing, advertising and public relations long enough in a past life that I recognize a mailer that probably cost us more than it needed to in flowery prose, color ink and oversized, folded stock.

Re. getting MLS: There's an article in today's Oregonian about the people who posed for the onslaught of Timbers billboards around town. If you travel up Burnside from the bridge to Sandy, you'll see one literally every block - on boards, painted on the sides of buildings. The first time I saw this it looked like expensive overkill for one street. I have no idea if this carpeting is going on elsewhere. It would be nice if other things - community programs, etc. - had the same level of promotion and support.

Regarding the food scrap plan, what isn't clearly stated in the Curbsider is that the City's plan calls for garbage pickup to be reduced from weekly pickup to once per month citywide. For those households that want to retain weekly garbage pickup your cost will double.

No discount for those who already compost and will not benefit from weekly yard debris pick up.
And if you don't have kitchen space counter top or under the sink for the food scrap container, too bad.

And yes, Multnomah County Public Health staff are concerned about increased rodent problems resulting from this plan.

Mark V, I think you know this but I want to make sure. When I stated my comment above, "how do they reconcile" 95% of trips are by vehicle, that critique is really saying that I disagree with the spending priorities and want a more fair distribution to our vehicular infrastructure-like Bojack's, "We need to replace the Sellwood Bridge before....".

I think the snarks here are more constructive than destructive if you know how to read between the lines. Snarks are generally less wordy, and we won't get the long winded, say nothing jargon that Susan Sustainable gave us that instigated this post.

Mark V - Last night I was having dinner with a couple of very old (30 plus years worth) friends. At one point, I was bemoaning how ridiculous the current crop of young adults are and the rejoinder was that we had been ridiculous too.

And the one part of that conversation that was hard to refute was that my generation had once believed it was capable of changing the political landscape for the better. Yes, our protesting (and a few other things) got the US out of Indochina. Yes, we helped move civil rights forward for minorities, women, and gays. And we started to change the electorate until the right wingers came back with a vengeance.

Those friends do not post here but they would agree with the need for fiscal responsibility while holding a civil liberties point of view and don't assume business will police itself point of view. And they would agree that the the current local crop of politicians and planners need to find something else to do with their lives.

The thing is that we all believe the system is too broken and too corrupt to actually be changed at this point. So while we might have ideas, we have no hope that they could ever be implemented.

"And they would agree that the the current local crop of politicians and planners need to find something else to do with their lives."

You reject the actions of the progressive liberal left.

"And we started to change the electorate until the right wingers came back with a vengeance."

You reject the actions of the conservative right.

What do YOU propose?

Of course, this is a blog, and not a policy workshop, and the daily snark is often what makes reading this blog so much damn fun. But this blog is frequented by a number of people who obviously care deeply about this city, and who have the skills to propose concrete, detailed and fundamentally useful policies that taken together, might help form a genuinely viable platform for a City that Doesn't Suck.

I'd have added a comma after the first *that*, above. But, then, I just love commas, dont you?

"Snarks are generally less wordy, and we won't get the long winded, say nothing jargon that Susan Sustainable gave us that instigated this post."

I'm not sure if Mark V's posts are quite so "jargon-filled" or "say-nothing" as SS's, but there IS the "...advances the civic ball" bit (Heimlich, anyone?), among others. No dearth of "mots", bon or otherwise, either.

I think Mark acquits himself quite well in the native tongue of COP prose and can't help but suspect a ringer.

Trust no one....


Home grown?

Mark V, I went back and reread your first comment on this post and you said, "Do you have any 'specific' policy proposal....apart from simply 'vote 'em out'?".

In evaluation, isn't "vote 'em out" a "specific" policy? It seems that is what the Egyptians have done. I think on several levels many feel that same way here in the USA, and especially around here.

And I slightly agree with cc, are you a ringer, similar to the types I alluded to that I've heard for decades in government around here? Evade the critique, the questions, the comments by coming back with the kinds of inquiry you made to Jack.

Home grown?

Hey, man...

Paranoia strikes deep...

Just Red Hook Long Hammer and a BLT with cheddar and avocado.



...ya think?

cc / lw, I wish I was a ringer, wouldn't that be nifty? Then I could pretend to be a concerned citizen seeking a coherent statement of positions from the regular posters on this blog, while snorting donuts and hoppy beers in my secret lair of leftist evil from deep beneath city hall.

Instead, you'll just have to settle for me, a previously rather apathetic citizen who periodically forgets the proper use of commas, who is genuinely interested in seeing if any of you clever, clever people can help him articulate survival strategies for a city that he's come to love quite dearly.

My questions were asked out of respectful interest, nothing more.

Onwards to wherever, and thanks for your time!


Marc V., apologies for maybe appearing haughty. I appreciate your comments. And I hope you can see "specifics" in cynicism.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics