Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on December 5, 2010 9:49 AM. The previous post in this blog was World Cup soccer is corrupt. The next post in this blog is A 13-point pickup in Week 13. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Sunday, December 5, 2010

Tick tick tick

State and local governments keep borrowing money, and people are starting to wake up to what that means. Go by streetcar -- while you can.

Comments (27)

Check kiting on a grand scale. Is Portland too big to fail?

I think states and big cities are starting to see themselves like big banks... "we're too big to fail so bail us out or we'll take you down with us!"

I await the Photoshopped image of the laser laboratory scene from the film Goldfinger where Gert Frobe's character haughtily laughs:

"No, Mr. Municipal Bonds, I expect you to die!"

...And the federal deficit is out of control, and we owe $900 billion to the Chinese, and we send $28 billion a day overseas to import oil. (See T. Friedman column today in NY Times). The current US debt to GDP ratio is reported to be comparable to that of countries like Portugal. Yet the report of the bipartisan commission on the national debt has already been fractured along far left and right polar lines. So few of our elected officials in Washington seem to have the mettle to face, let alone speak to, the depth of these problems. Instead they are, for the most part, bitter and paralyzed, (while our media is fixated,) over whether to let the Bush tax cuts expire for couples with annual income over $250k.
So our states will start to fail one by one, and (unlike for AIG and Morgan Stanley) there may not be enough capital or credit faith in our Federal treasury to do anything meaningful about it. And then, I fear, we'll start to resemble our old nemesis, the dreaded Soviet Union, with extensive social entitlement programs, a bristling, bloated and far too expensive military, and a shrinking economic base that can't support either.
Does anyone really see a workable way out of this mess that doesn't involve a catastrophic meltdown which might make the current recession look like the good old days.

Is debt swamping the name of the game?
and for whose benefit and for what purpose?

or is it something that just happened across the board here?

"You aint seen nothing yet"

Al Jolson, sort of, chanelling through any muni bond analyst.

The whole thing is nothing but illusion anyway.

Our paper money has been without value for quite a long time now.

How long can the power brokers continue to keep the illusion alive?

There is one upside, the rich are richer than anytime in all of human history, so there are winners in all this mess.

The masses may have to perish, but we have seen that before haven't we?

Mario Savio's quote:There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all!

In my opinion, we need to stop taking for granted that somehow the pendulum will swing back to where it was, or that other people will take care of the situation. We the people need to get engaged on matters. We cannot depend on our elected officials to do the right thing here for our public interests.

Example of people engaged:
The Lents people who stopped the stadium and stopped the loss of their URA money for it and loss of park space for it.

The St. Johns community who years ago stopped 75 huge Douglas Firs and Cedars at Pier Park from being cut by our own City under Vera Katz and Park's Commissioner, Charlie Hales - even though the tree's already had red x's on them.

Now,The Clackamas and Milwaukie petition on the light rail matter.

I am sure there are other examples of what can happen when people become engaged. Do not feel powerless to act here.

There'll be a wholesale political housecleaning if/when that happens in Portland/Oregon. When tough decisions need to be made, we won't close down schools, end bus service, double property taxes, or even stop urban renewal spending, we'll renegotiate PERS and police/fire pensions in bankruptcy. They're both our Achilles heel and our panacea. Public employees and the police and fire people have a lot to lose by supporting our spendthrift pols.

the federal deficit is out of control,

This is fundamentally a revenue problem; it can't be cured by cutting spending. Federal tax revenues have declined sharply because of tax rate reductions under George Bush and because of high unemployment since 2007. (The Bush tax cuts if renewed or extended, taken all together, will "cost" an estimated $3 trillion for the next ten years, $700 billion of which represent tax savings for those who have incomes over $250,000.) Looking forward, health care spending will produce massive additional budget deficits if historical trends are not changed.

we owe $900 billion to the Chinese

People seem to believe we need China to buy and hold our debt in order to finance our budget deficits. We don't. China's debt results from our buying Chinese goods in amounts that exceed our sales to China. It's a trade deficit, in other words, the cumulative effect of which is that China holds dollars or dollar debt instruments. China could dispose of these, but that would depress the value of the dollar, making Chinese goods more expensive for us and therefore depressing the Chinese economy.

Our paper money has been without value for quite a long time now.

This is the gold bug's view — that money or currency has value only if it can be exchanged for something with "intrinsic" value. It is no longer conventionally accepted. Our currency — any currency — has value based on the issuing country's capacity to produce and sell goods and services. Once we reach the limits of that capacity, more money in the system only pushes prices up. But until that point, more money is a solution more than it is a problem. Because we print our own currency, we can't go broke. The states, on the other hand, are more like Greece and Portugal. They can't (except for stopgaps like California's "scrip") make their own currency, so they're limited by their capacity to borrow. Once it's tapped out, they're done. This is worth remembering as we watch states spend borrowed money, driving up their interest costs, and lay people off and cut projects, depressing the private sector as their revenues fall. This is a potential death spiral, and not just for the Arizona transplant candidates who have been crossed off the list of the living for budget reasons.

Does anyone really see a workable way out of this mess that doesn't involve a catastrophic meltdown which might make the current recession look like the good old days.

The economic solution is not difficult, just as it is not difficult in Europe. More public sector spending for us, and more deleveraging in Europe through elimination of public sector debt would do the trick. Austerity now is counterproductive. Deficits balloon, but the time to address them is when the respective economies are growing. In Europe, lending banks will get stiffed, but isn't that what they charge interest for?

The problems aren't economic, they're political. You have a so-called bipartisan commission ranting about our federal deficit when the real problems are in the state and local governments and in the private sector, and the real, immediate, and urgent solution involves a bigger deficit. The commission and the government are proposing and implementing programs, like the federal salary freeze, that are counterproductive and whose most redeeming feature is that they are just window-dressing, not big enough to cause real trouble.

If these were just economic problems, there would be reason to be optimistic. But they're political, and thus in the hands of people who have political agendas and ideologies that will make solutions difficult and risk the kind of outcome that Drew fears.

"has value based on the issuing country's capacity to produce and sell goods and services."

The value is based upon other's willingness to accept that currency in exchange for goods.

Switzerland has one of the strongest currecnies in the world along with Australia right now. I don't think I'd call either a manufacturing power-house, just a safer haven.

"This is fundamentally a revenue problem; it can't be cured by cutting spending."

BS - When every upside in revenue gets spent and then some, you're on a hamster wheel. You need to implement some sort of spending controls or any plan is doomed.

I mean Bush had revenues actually increasing then he decided to have govt pick up liability for prescription drugs. Nice intent, but it sure didn't help the deficit since it is one of the larger entitlements not.

Yes, willingness to accept money is the other side of the coin, so to speak. It is influenced by one's expectations about what the money will buy, which is why capacity matters, along with expected inflation.

There is nothing objectionable about controlling spending, except for possible adverse effects on federal revenhe. What I am saying is that if you look at the sources of deficit increase, starting in 2008, revenue decline is the big factor.

A revenue problem?

Is that what the city has?
TriMet?
The State?
California?

No.

It's mission creeping bloated government at every level trying to be too many things to too many people.

Including helping us eat the right portions.

http://www.smallstep.gov/portion_control.html

"What I am saying is that if you look at the sources of deficit increase, starting in 2008, revenue decline is the big factor."

Now we're talking chicken-n-egg. Spending in terms of stimulus money (>$1T of which OR got about $2B and promptly spent it) and entitlement growth (unemp benes, prescription drugs, PERS plans, etc.) are spending.

These programs all have good intentions, but we are getting to the point of picking whose oxen will be gored.

Be careful (not to be abducted on the street and tortured to death incommunicado and ignominiously -- for dissent) not to spread Truth because it might panic the public! Like we used to say when we got the herd corraled and in the midst of loading the cattle truck about to drive them one-way to the slaughter house, "hope nothin' spooks 'em now."

Listen folks: The crash and devestation was pre-planned and is engineered. Repeat: The 'free market' (fiction) 'capitalist system' (fascism) is NOT going to 'bounce back' and is NOT going to save us because the capitalists rigged it NOT to.

It went like this: Get the oil. Worldwise Big Oil men realized, about 1970-75, that planetary oil supply was depleting to zero in about one lifetime from then. (Nothing arguable today about that fact; the point is simply that they had advance warning and a head start to make their maneuvers.) In essence, the motive for them staging Nine-Eleven Op was, and is, to go get control of the last oil reserves. And keep taxpayers docile (with TV news lies and broadcast propaganda) while their taxes fund the military invasions of oil conquest. After the oil is obtained, then the problem looks like this, to them: There is only so much oil left, they control it, and divided by the number of people on Earth the oil per person is less than the amount the US lifestyle grew up by, and runs on. Two possibilities then: Either each person has to reduce use and live with less (than US lifestyle to which they had become accustomed), OR reduce world population ... by about half. Globally powerful Big Oil men decided Option 2 for me and you. So: Get the oil. Them murder half of humankind. Result: powerful Big Oil men stay in power. Me and you stay dead.

And when the Big Plan became public knowledge, (as now), public sheep bleat, "oh, no, we don't believe it; the seers are wearing pointy tinfoil hats; broadcasting LIARS say everything's okay, (as long as Muslims are murdered first), and broadcasting LIARS wouldn't lie to us ... hey, what game is on TV tonight?"

Camden City Council approves massive layoffs, By Matt Katz, Phila.Inquirer Staff Writer, Fri, Dec. 3, 2010

Camden City Council voted unanimously Thursday to begin handing out layoff notices to municipal employees even as union leaders and city officials restarted negotiations in an attempt to save some of the 383 threatened jobs.

After emotional and angry pleas from residents, business owners, firefighters, police officers and government workers, Council voted, 5-0, to eliminate nearly half the Police Department and almost a third of the Fire Department.

"We'll start buying weapons, because I don't see any choice," said Carmello Villegas, 65, owner of Villegas Laundromat in East Camden for three decades. "We're going to have to defend ourselves. We're going to have to defend our families. I really don't know what else to do."

Two of Villegas' sons and one daughter are Camden police officers; another of his children is a firefighter. Family connections in Camden's workforce are not uncommon, and employees told Council that the loss of jobs would put many at risk of homelessness.
[...]
"Jan. 18 will be the worst day in Camden since the 1971 riots," said Karl Walko, president of the Council 10 union representing nonuniformed employees. "It's essentially the end of government as we know it, and for many people in the city, it's the end of hope."

Walko said 40 percent of the police dispatch unit would be dismissed along with 42 percent of the clerical staff in the courts. He said 25 of the city's 40 laborers would be let go, a loss he said could paralyze the city in a snowstorm.

Council President Frank Moran asked for concessions from the police and fire unions while putting the blame on Gov. Christie.

"We didn't put a price tag on public safety," Moran said. "Unfortunately, the governor of the State of New Jersey put [on] that price tag on public safety," Moran said. "Unfortunately, the governor of the State of New Jersey put [on] that price tag."
[...]

Meet the biggest 'get' celebrity attraction who appeared on LIARS Larson's thought-programming in the last two weeks:

For fawning press, Gov. Christie's $400 million blunder gets flushed down the memory hole, by Eric Boehlert, Media Matters for America, December 01, 2010

It's awfully friendly the way reporters look away from a telling example of how Christie actually governs and instead focuses its attention on the YouTube clips Christie's flacks post online showing the governor yelling at people at town hall forums.

Nothing like style over substance, right?

If you live in New Jersey, you might recall that in August the state was shocked to discover it had narrowly missed out on $400 million worth of desperately needed education aid from the federal government because New Jersey's application for the grant was flawed. In other words, a clerical error cost state schools $400 million dollars.
[...]
But if you live outside the New Jersey area, that's probably news to most people. Why? Because as the national press continues its voluntary/obedient role in hyping Republican Christie (apparently any governor now with a 51 percent approval rating is to be hailed as being "popular), the press has flushed the embarrassing $400 million episode down the memory hole.

In fact, in the last week, both New York and Newsweek printed up obligatory Christie's-a-star profiles and both managed to avoid mentioning how the governor's blunder cost the cash-strapped state $400 million in education aid.

What a coincidence.

And oh yeah, guess what else the press, led by New York and Newsweek, flushes down the Christie memory hole?
A) While serving as a U.S. Attorney for New Jersey, Christie often overspent on his travel expenses (i.e. fancy hotels) and left the DOJ holding the tab.
B) The self-styled, small-government conservative earlier this year announced a massive state-run take-over plan that would have the New Jersey government virtually running Atlantic City, in charge of everything from the casinos to the police and garbage pickup.
C) Christie's New Jersey still hasn't paid back the federal government the nearly $300 million it owes after the governor pulled the plug on building a new rail tunnel to New York City.
[...]

This is sort of a lot of words for one small example. A long way from Oregon. Far short of Bush's 5-trillion dollar deficit surge, (after Clinton, before Obama). Suppose that 5 trillion was Treasury Notes at 5 percent per year. (Or make up your own math to do.) My figuring shows $50 billion every 52 weeks, or say a billion a week.

In another accounting, $1,150 Billion gone into Iraq/Afghan 'patriotic terror-prevention war' in the last 350 weeks, (7 years times 50 wks/yr), figures out to be $3 Billion a week. (Most 'war' accountants say $1,150 Billion is low-ball, actual Treasury drain is double that, or more ... who knows? the figures are Top Secret, for 'national security.')

And another 'little' example, a dot that connects, somehow, when we think about it together: Saudi Arabia and other Middle East 'sovereigns' are holding more US debt, (IOU's and Treasury Notes), than China holds.

And the Middle East is NOT manufacturing 'goods' of Wal-Mart in 'trade' for the debt. Rather, taxpayer money went, and goes, out the automobile exhaust -- gigaTons of CO2 -- into the atmosphere and destablizing global climate balance into climate chaos ... but that's another story.

There is so much to think about that one person or group can not do all the thinking -- we all have to think about it.

stimulus money (>$1T . . . .)

I'm glad to have a conversation about cause and effect, but it should be factual. That number isn't. Actual stimulus spending authorized was much less than half of that, with a big part of the authorized stimulus being tax cuts.

Does anyone really see a workable way out of this mess that doesn't involve a catastrophic meltdown which might make the current recession look like the good old days.

No, prepare accordingly.

This is fundamentally a revenue problem; it can't be cured by cutting spending.

We can't tax our way out of this. Fedgov's biggest expenditures in 2010: Social Security 20%; Medicare 13%; Defense 19%; Welfare, unemployment other entitlements 16%; Medicaid 8%

This is unsustainable. Sorry but it is the truth.

"That number isn't."

I'm including things like banks bailouts and GM handouts.

However, you need to implement some sort of spending control. Just to use OR, we've had several opps to save or make a rainy day fund for reference:
2007 - 20% increase in revenue - Gone into general funds
Tobacco settlement - ABout $700M - GOne into general funds
Stimulus - About $1.8B - Gone into general funds.

This is the way pols see life. If you get a dollar, you spend since you may not see it tomorrow - Which is not prudent.

I'm angry tonight, so sorry.

Angry that people are gullible for false and/or misleading information, and that gullibility in the minority few is deadweight enough to sink us all.

Such as on the Social Security & Medicare 'thing.' Those are separate, 'earmarked,' DEDICATED taxes. Those are NOT in the 'General Fund.' Those are NOT 'public money.' Congress has NO discretion in WHAT to spend those revenues on - Congress can NOT take Soc.Sec. withholdings and spend it on a bomb for the Pentagon, or chalkboards for Education, or farm subsidies for Agriculture, or park ranger stations for Interior, NO. Soc.Sec. money goes to Soc.Sec.Admin ONLY. NO discretion. Medicare taxes goes to Medicare ONLY. NO discretion.

Soc.Sec. & Medicare are NOT part of 'The Budget' (of Congressional Appropriations). Fed taxes supplies Congress about 1.0 Trillion to 'play with' this year. 'Defense' (includes freaking Homeland Security), plus interest on The Debt gets about 1.0 Trillion of that, (i.e., ALL of it). The other Dept's (Educ., Agri., Interior, Justice, State, everything gets another 1.0 Trillion, which Congress does NOT have from taxes, so they 'charge it.' That's the deficit. this year.

Also 1.0 Trillion Medicare revenues is collected - that goes to Medicare. ONLY. And it is not enough to pay total claims filed by hospitals, doctors, pharma, and medical-associated insurance claims. Since hospitals, doctors, et al. have inflated their prices so unreasonably freaking much, because, after all, the Gov't always pays the claims. Any 'shortage' of collections against claims is another amount on the 'charge card,' tacked onto the deficit.

Similar with Soc.Sec. About 1.5 Trillion in Soc.Sec. withholdings (7%, say, of employee gross, and then employer matches it, so employer sees employee pay as 107% of the amount employee sees it as), is collected this year. and less than 1.5 Trillion is spent, (and that 'overage' of collections against benefits paid out, is 'played' in funny and fraudulent accounting 'games').

To review: Fed.Taxes 1. Trillion. That's ALL Congress can spend -- 'Budget' this.
1. Trillion Medicare taxes collected. No Congressional discretion to spend it.
1.5 Trillion Soc.Sec. taxes collected. No Congressional discretion to spend it.
Total 3.5 Trillion flows to Wash.DC, and they call that 'lump sum' the 'Budget' BUT IT IS NOT what Congress can Budget.

And people's eyes glaze over, people don't know the difference between a Trillion and a Billion nevermind where it goes, and Congress gets more and more derelict and corrupt and mashes all the money together with the INTENTION of confusing as many people as much as possible. Blurring distinctions, shuffling Budget 'line items,' razz-a-ma-tazz pea under the moving walnut shells.

Okay, okay, Guilty guilty, I 'rounded off' my numbers extremely, but they're not false numbers and the proportionality is about right 1.0 - 1.0 - 1.5 (taxes - medic - soc.sec.). The chart is for only Fed taxes - what Congress can spend however it likes. (So: Medicare & Soc. Sec. NOT shown in chart, as it shouldn't be.) The whole pie shows spending about 1.4 - 1.6 Trillion this year, and 'Defense' is half of the pie, about .75 Trillion, ( = 750 Billion), purportedly, but the Actuals exceeds 1.0 Trillion; for 'Defense and Nat'l Security' things (example: CIA Intel.Community = .1 Trillion not shown in pie).

But Fed Tax Revenues is only about 1 Trillion (1000 Billion -- figure 100,000,000 workers taxed $10,000 each [25% of avg. $40,000 wages] = 1000 ooo,ooo,ooo = 1000 billion). So the pie is 'spending' 1.5 Trillion, the IRS is collecting 1.0 Trillion to put in the pie, the 'shortage' difference is this year's deficit, say .5 Trillion. Remove 'Defense' and there could be a .25 Trillion (250 Billion) 'surplus' - or how about a 25% 'refund' of your Fed Taxes? Take the Big Things out first.

'Defense Nationalism' is over half of what Congress chooses to spend, over half of 1.5 T$. Say, 60%. But if Med.& Soc.Sec. amounts are tacked on -- which Congress has NO spending choice about -- then a combined 'Total Budget' number like 4.0 T$ is 'puffed up' and, against that, the paltry .8 T$ for 'Defense' is a measly 'reasonable' one-fifth or 20%.

Defense Nationalism spending is NOT reasonable. Mainly because it does NOT 'defend' us against anything. There are NO terrorists coming after us; the 'terrorism troops' is a TOTAL FICTIONAL bogeyman to make up an 'enemy' then we need to be 'defended against.'

That's why reporters can not go into the 'battle zone.' Because then they'd see there is NO 'al quaida' there.

The Pentagoners have hired a few mercenaries to shoot at US troops and blow up stuff around the place, think: Blackwater. So our tax money for 'Defense' pays for the 'eneby' and pays for 'defense' against the 'enemy' too -- we buy a Black Army and we buy a Red Army and they 'war game' each other and they are both 'on the same side,' or both their 'breads' are buttered on the same side and US taxpayers is the 'butter'.

All of which has NOTHING to do with Social Security or Medicare numbers.

This phony-baloney 'Commission' to 'reduce' the deficit -- Alan Simpson: croak, already -- says to 'raise the Soc.Sec. retirement age. Bulls**t. Simply remove the withholding cap, which is what?, Jack, at about $100,000 now? Or $120,000? Those of us who do not earn over $100,000(?) mostly don't know that there is NO Soc.Sec. withholding above that amount. Someone 'earning' 1 million bucks a year does NOT pay 7% Soc.Sec. on the 'last' $900,000 of it.

Remove the cap. Make someone earning 1 million bucks pay 7% into Soc.Sec. revenues all the way up their gross 'earnings.'

Remove the cap and {presto!} Social Security becomes solvent. Surplus revenues every year at least until 2070. Even if the retirement age is lowered, back down to 65, or even 62, say, like it is now in civilized (European) countries.

And -- on another matter -- the Feds need revenue to 'reduce the deficit' or, better yet, balance the budget? Do DeFazio's idea: a half-a-percent (0.5% or .005 tax rate) 'sales tax' on Stock Market transactions. Actually, it's a 'buyer tax' -- if you buy $100,000 worth of Stocks, add $500 more as a tax on your purchase. If you sell the Stocks 10 minutes later at the same price you paid for them, you 'lost' 500 bucks in 'the market.'

It is NOT like Congresscritters DON'T know about this stuff. When the Economy crashes or melts down it is because they intended to crash it.
It's not like they CAN'T do these accounting things, it is that they WON'T on PURPOSE!

Blowing Billions on War While American Workers Go Under, by Robert Greenwald and Derrick Crowe, Common Dreams .org, December 5, 2010

When asked by USA Today's pollsters last week, sixty-eight percent of Americans said we worry that the cost of the Afghanistan War hurts our ability to fix problems here in the U.S. This week, we learned just how right we were about that. Friday's terrible jobs report shows that a crushing 9.8 percent of us are unemployed. And, millions of us are about to lose our lifeline because Congress refuses to extend unemployment insurance benefits. We're spending $2 billion per week -- per week! -- in Afghanistan while millions of people face going hungry during the holidays.

Do our elected officials not get it? We're drowning out here, and the administration is throwing money that could put Americans back to work at a failed war on the other side of the planet. In fact, that's where the president was when the jobs report came out this morning -- in Afghanistan, talking about "progress" again.
[...]
What are the 2 million people who are about to lose their unemployment insurance benefits supposed to think when they hear senators yelling about the cost of keeping them from going hungry, while at the same time those senators shove enough money to keep the benefits going into that money pit of a war?

There is NOT any "supposed to think" about it. KNOW this: the senators, representatives, and president ARE KILLING us ON PURPOSE! THEY get the money, with their hand in the war 'money pit.' WE get dead, with our bodies in the 'war.'

Like Jack says, "tick, tick, tick ...."
Life is passing.

While gullible goofballs waste time talking about 'cutting expenses' 5 or 10 million dollars, here or there, "but NEVER cut the military." I call Bulls**t. I say ABOLISH the MILITARY. It's glory days and it's honorable time is past ... and take the airport crotch molesters out with it.

"but NEVER cut the military."

OK, cut the military, heck, cut anything - Sacred cow or not. I didn't think OR had that much military spending.

Military spending has been grwoing about as fast as anything else and it's always been about 50% regardless of party in power, so please cut away.

http://www.truthandpolitics.org/military-relative-size.php

You can continue the diatribe now.

There is no doubt the Pentagon has massive waste, fraud and abuse.

It has to be at least proportionate to their share of the budget.

But they also are subject to the same problem as every other part of government.
A massive dysfunctional government cannot fix itself.

Can anyone provide an example when it has occured?

It doesn't matter what the topic. When it gets this big and out of control there is no legislation possible that provides the kind of reform needed.

When Tenskwatawa gets angry, I scroll even faster than usual. That big fat "X" in the pie chart (in a blog comment) is hilarious, bro.

A massive dysfunctional government cannot fix itself.

I think you can argue that Clinton's tax increases in 1993 helped fix the problem at the time. This was the age of Ross Perot and the giant sucking sound of the federal deficit. Clinton raised taxes (responsibly in my opinion, although I suspect yours will differ), and the timing was perfect. Republicans argued that the increases would result in a major recession, hurting everyone in the process. The opposite occurred, and we had one of the largest expansions in American history. By 1998, the country had surpluses well into the future, and started decreasing the national debt. There were even economists at the time expressing concerns about bringing down the debt too quickly and the macroeconomic impact that might have.

So long as the Republicans care about nothing except making Obama a one term president, so long as the Democrats have no spine and refuse to get a pair, so long as we continue to think that their is a free lunch and so long as the only answers we get to our fiscal problems are either 1) Cut taxes or 2) tax the rich we will continue to wallow in the mess we are in. There is no political courage to speak the truth: we all need to work together and sacrifice. Not just expect the other guy to do it. Incease taxes for all, cut spending across the board and think in terms of dollars not votes.

"A massive dysfunctional government cannot fix itself.
I think you can argue that Clinton's tax increases in 1993 helped fix the problem at the time."

Yeah and I could argue that the contract with America did the same.

But you provide no definition for "helped fix", what else did, or what the "problem" was or what the "fix" was.

Without that it's just empty rhetoric to make those claims.

The tech boom, dot com bubble and false earnings reportings fed the phony economy of the 90s and government grew more out of control than ever as Republicans abandoned their fiscal conservatism.

Like I said before, if you can't apply any remedy to a local or state level how is it ever going to happen on a grand scal nationally? c


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 109
At this date last year: 151
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics