One in five Portland bike commuters hits asphalt during year
Some harder than others, but all picking up some road rash nonetheless.
Among the biggest hazards: streetcar tracks and wet leaves. You superior people on two wheels know whom to blame for those. The same Earl the Pearl and Mayor Creepy for whom you religiously vote. Die by streetcar!
Comments (19)
Not so hard to avoid the streets with tracks. And if the rest of you would just fork over your leaf removal "fee", all would be fine.
hey all you superior people (bloggers included) who lump all bikers in with developers, streetcar groupies, and Sam Adams... go die (by streetcar of course).... just kidding, I mean let's try and keep it civil and all........if you read bikeportland you'd see that a good many bicyclists are critical of all that....
Large seams in the road left after work, dogs chasing you, doors being opened on you as you approach,left turn drivers who didn't see you, right hook drivers who thought they were faster/farther ahead thanb they were,debris in roadways, joggers running against traffic in the bike lane who force you out onto traffic,
the list goes on and one.
Yet,cyclists still keep riding. Ever wonder what the attraction is?
I know.
Two years ago I was right-hooked by a driver that was not paying attention (I swore the driver was on a cell phone). I was more worried about the truck coming up behind me than the car next to me and, wham, I flew over the car into the road and somehow walked away from it with deep bruises and a busted up bike. What little riding I have since done on roads has been fraught with paranoia. I wish I could be like those arrogant pukes I see carrying on without a care in the world, trusting that we drivers have their back. I want to tell them that not everyone is as careful as, well, most of us. Judging from that article, some of them will see the pavement just as I did. And I hope it works out just as well for them. For now, it’s closed courses or mountain biking for me.
Flat residential streets on a grid are still fun, if they're wide enough to keep you away from doors on both sides. But arterials? Trucks? Buses? That's a whole different ballgame. One near-death experience at the Rose Quarter Transit Center was enough for me.
I have to wonder if some of the aggro cyclists have never had a driver's license, hence have no idea what we're talking about when we refer to "the rules of the road". Combine that with too many hours spent playing Grand Theft Auto and you would have a good recipe for the persecution complex we see, as well as the pride in riding wildly and unpredictably.
Maybe what is needed is an evidence-based safety program. Perhaps many simply do not know how much being visible, being where you are expected to be and being predictable contribute to safety.
Those numbers seem a little low, actually. And I really wonder at the numbers of children injured in accidents. The making and marketing of cars is safety obsessed. Vehicles are tested and rated on safety. We have seatbelts, airbags, bumpers and rollbars. We have laws demanding children ride in special seats until they are at least 8. And yet parents drag kids behind them inside cloth and aluminum tubed boxes, with a plastic hat to keep them safe.
How is that actually legal?
I love the headline: "Bicycling in Portland is good for you -- except when you crash, study says." It is similar to "Robbing Banks in Portland is Good For Your Income -- Until You Get Arrested, Study Says."
So the odds are that a cyclist will skin a knee once every 5 years. Wah. Bikes are dangerous! See!? Live in fear of a skinned knee... we're Americans afterall...
These days any fool can own a car. Frequently they do so uninsured. Oregon has amongst the highest uninsured rates in the country.
Any fool can ride a bicycle on city streets. They carry no insurance.
As a recent graduate from the Motorcycle Basic Rider Training, I can say that the very same rules apply to bikes as they do bicycles. You simply must be more aware because friction, the elements, obstacles, and traffic put you at greater risk.
After taking that course I am much more aware of motorcycles on the road as a cager because I know how much more advanced planning/scanning they must do just to drive. In addition, a biker knows that they have a serious job to do when simply riding in a straight line on any road. I don't believe that the same thinking goes on with most bicyclists and that creates a false sense of security and more frequent accidents.
Here's how you fix it:
Cagers must be more aware of there surroundings. It must be more difficult to own a car and enforcement of insurance laws should be very strict at least while the law exists. Fail to carry insurance and injure someone? Serve jail time.
Bicyclists must adhere to the rules of the road. This includes yielding to traffic if you are unable to match traffic speed. Be careful on corners, particularly where you cannot plan your turns or cannot maintain speed. These are the rules followed by cars and motorcycles. Don't like slipping on tracks in Portland? Join the motorcyclists who always complain about the hazards of on-street tracks. They are a safety hazard. That bright green paint Sam Adams likes to put down - that stuff is so slippery just walking on it when it's wet is hazardous. Textured paint or NO paint people!
Walt, did they teach you it is ok to split lanes? I bet not.
I'd be for allowing motorcycles to do it as, unlike bicycles, they almost always can accelerate faster than the cars so they don't slow anyone down at lights.
How about some more traffic enforcement on bicycles please.
I was inches from being run over by bike on the Pearl sidewalk at 5 yest eve , just as I predicted the diversion of the bike lane off of Lovejoy is going to drive the west bound bikes onto the sidewalk. This guy was wearing a burley bike jacket , so we know it was a serious bi8ke rider , and he like many will flaunt the stupid re-routing of Lovejoy bike traffic and hit us walkers on the sidewalk. As I said I will sue COP for this Design Error if I am hit , and yest it was only a few inches.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (19)
Not so hard to avoid the streets with tracks. And if the rest of you would just fork over your leaf removal "fee", all would be fine.
Posted by Allan L. | November 14, 2010 6:39 PM
It's interesting that Congress' biggest bike advocate is also a heavy promoter of cyclist-deadly streetcar tracks.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 14, 2010 7:20 PM
Is there an implication here that bi-cycles are unstable and dangerous? Is being un-safe considered sustainable?
Bunch of damn fool dare devils!
Posted by Abe | November 14, 2010 7:24 PM
hey all you superior people (bloggers included) who lump all bikers in with developers, streetcar groupies, and Sam Adams... go die (by streetcar of course).... just kidding, I mean let's try and keep it civil and all........if you read bikeportland you'd see that a good many bicyclists are critical of all that....
Posted by john peterson | November 14, 2010 8:03 PM
Large seams in the road left after work, dogs chasing you, doors being opened on you as you approach,left turn drivers who didn't see you, right hook drivers who thought they were faster/farther ahead thanb they were,debris in roadways, joggers running against traffic in the bike lane who force you out onto traffic,
the list goes on and one.
Yet,cyclists still keep riding. Ever wonder what the attraction is?
I know.
Posted by Grumpy ol' Joe | November 14, 2010 8:58 PM
if you read bikeportland
It would be better if you read it and checked back in with us "cagers."
Posted by Jack Bog | November 14, 2010 9:04 PM
I kind of like how Abe hyphenated "unsafe" and "bicycle". Strunk & White redux!
Posted by PJB | November 14, 2010 9:20 PM
Two years ago I was right-hooked by a driver that was not paying attention (I swore the driver was on a cell phone). I was more worried about the truck coming up behind me than the car next to me and, wham, I flew over the car into the road and somehow walked away from it with deep bruises and a busted up bike. What little riding I have since done on roads has been fraught with paranoia. I wish I could be like those arrogant pukes I see carrying on without a care in the world, trusting that we drivers have their back. I want to tell them that not everyone is as careful as, well, most of us. Judging from that article, some of them will see the pavement just as I did. And I hope it works out just as well for them. For now, it’s closed courses or mountain biking for me.
Posted by Mark Mason | November 14, 2010 9:45 PM
Flat residential streets on a grid are still fun, if they're wide enough to keep you away from doors on both sides. But arterials? Trucks? Buses? That's a whole different ballgame. One near-death experience at the Rose Quarter Transit Center was enough for me.
Posted by Jack Bog | November 14, 2010 10:25 PM
I have to wonder if some of the aggro cyclists have never had a driver's license, hence have no idea what we're talking about when we refer to "the rules of the road". Combine that with too many hours spent playing Grand Theft Auto and you would have a good recipe for the persecution complex we see, as well as the pride in riding wildly and unpredictably.
Maybe what is needed is an evidence-based safety program. Perhaps many simply do not know how much being visible, being where you are expected to be and being predictable contribute to safety.
Posted by dyspeptic | November 14, 2010 11:50 PM
What worked for me on the prairie years ago was a bounty on coyotes. No reason why it wouldn't work here on...
Posted by Larry | November 15, 2010 12:11 AM
Does anyone know where to find data on the death rate of bike riding per passenger-mile? (per capita is easy to find.)
(I know one European chart implies it as about TEN times a deadly as cars, but I have not seen any solid data.)
Thanks
JK
Posted by jimkarlockj | November 15, 2010 3:28 AM
Those numbers seem a little low, actually. And I really wonder at the numbers of children injured in accidents. The making and marketing of cars is safety obsessed. Vehicles are tested and rated on safety. We have seatbelts, airbags, bumpers and rollbars. We have laws demanding children ride in special seats until they are at least 8. And yet parents drag kids behind them inside cloth and aluminum tubed boxes, with a plastic hat to keep them safe.
How is that actually legal?
Posted by portlanddad | November 15, 2010 6:57 AM
I love the headline: "Bicycling in Portland is good for you -- except when you crash, study says." It is similar to "Robbing Banks in Portland is Good For Your Income -- Until You Get Arrested, Study Says."
Posted by pchuck | November 15, 2010 8:16 AM
So the odds are that a cyclist will skin a knee once every 5 years. Wah. Bikes are dangerous! See!? Live in fear of a skinned knee... we're Americans afterall...
Posted by pdxmark | November 15, 2010 9:14 AM
These days any fool can own a car. Frequently they do so uninsured. Oregon has amongst the highest uninsured rates in the country.
Any fool can ride a bicycle on city streets. They carry no insurance.
As a recent graduate from the Motorcycle Basic Rider Training, I can say that the very same rules apply to bikes as they do bicycles. You simply must be more aware because friction, the elements, obstacles, and traffic put you at greater risk.
After taking that course I am much more aware of motorcycles on the road as a cager because I know how much more advanced planning/scanning they must do just to drive. In addition, a biker knows that they have a serious job to do when simply riding in a straight line on any road. I don't believe that the same thinking goes on with most bicyclists and that creates a false sense of security and more frequent accidents.
Here's how you fix it:
Cagers must be more aware of there surroundings. It must be more difficult to own a car and enforcement of insurance laws should be very strict at least while the law exists. Fail to carry insurance and injure someone? Serve jail time.
Bicyclists must adhere to the rules of the road. This includes yielding to traffic if you are unable to match traffic speed. Be careful on corners, particularly where you cannot plan your turns or cannot maintain speed. These are the rules followed by cars and motorcycles. Don't like slipping on tracks in Portland? Join the motorcyclists who always complain about the hazards of on-street tracks. They are a safety hazard. That bright green paint Sam Adams likes to put down - that stuff is so slippery just walking on it when it's wet is hazardous. Textured paint or NO paint people!
Posted by WalterEWilliams | November 15, 2010 10:09 AM
Walt, did they teach you it is ok to split lanes? I bet not.
I'd be for allowing motorcycles to do it as, unlike bicycles, they almost always can accelerate faster than the cars so they don't slow anyone down at lights.
How about some more traffic enforcement on bicycles please.
Posted by John | November 15, 2010 3:04 PM
I was inches from being run over by bike on the Pearl sidewalk at 5 yest eve , just as I predicted the diversion of the bike lane off of Lovejoy is going to drive the west bound bikes onto the sidewalk. This guy was wearing a burley bike jacket , so we know it was a serious bi8ke rider , and he like many will flaunt the stupid re-routing of Lovejoy bike traffic and hit us walkers on the sidewalk. As I said I will sue COP for this Design Error if I am hit , and yest it was only a few inches.
Posted by billb | November 15, 2010 3:38 PM
One in five Portland bike commuters hits asphalt during year
yeah, well the asphalt probably deserved it.
Posted by pmalach | November 15, 2010 5:15 PM