

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (45)
"Makes me nervous
The sooner this gets off the front pages around the country, the better:"
===
I just read the complete complaint...
(see here: http://www.justice.gov/usao/or/Indictments/11262010_Complaint.pdf )
I guess I would not want it off the front pages of major newspapers around the country anytime soon.
The more visibility, the better. I kinda would want to be ignorant, but it really is not bliss. Not regarding this Global War. We are not safe in NYC or DC, nor in Stump-town.
Posted by Harry | November 28, 2010 9:02 AM
This "global war" was an angry teenager in Corvallis sending out e-mails and getting nowhere until the FBI hooked him up with his fantasy. For all intents and purposes, they busted him five months ago, long before he got anywhere near delivering the FBI's bomb to Pioneer Courthouse Square. But don't let that stop you all from being afraid, very afraid. Drive east 300 miles and I bet you could find white folks that harbor the same fantasies.
Posted by pmalach | November 28, 2010 9:13 AM
Shouldn't that read "bomb plot created, then foiled using teen near Portland, Ore.?"
Posted by George Anonymuncule Seldes | November 28, 2010 9:19 AM
"FBI helps nurture, coach, and develop a jihadist and his plan, then 'thwarts' its own co-creation."
Or, what George said.
Posted by the other white meat | November 28, 2010 9:22 AM
"Drive east 300 miles and I bet you could find white folks that harbor the same fantasies."
You can just stay in town here and deal with a mayor that seems to think outreach programs will just make this all go away - If your choice is fantasy.
I guess we need a "real" threat before you think we should do something.
Do wehave to turn into a martial state? No, but I think if our 24/7 job is chiseling money to build trolleys or over-priced real estate all over town instead of dealing with real problems, then I think this is symptomatic of bigger issues
Posted by Steve | November 28, 2010 9:23 AM
At least we agree this wasn't a "real" threat. Glad the little psychopath is in jail, because he certainly had the will. But we should not lose sight of the fact that he displayed neither the ability to do this on his own or the ability to find help.
Posted by pmalach | November 28, 2010 9:28 AM
What Islamists find objectionable about Portland is the residents are mostly Progressive and Accepting.
Posted by Abe | November 28, 2010 9:35 AM
What's an "Islamist"? is that like a "Catholicist"?
Posted by the other white meat | November 28, 2010 9:39 AM
"we should not lose sight of the fact that he displayed neither the ability to do this on his own or the ability to find help."
So what do you want to do about those with the ability who are not a hormone-driven teenager and ave help?
I understand this was a screwed-up kid, but we can't even keep neighborhoods safe from gangs which are probably the same skill level.
Posted by Steve | November 28, 2010 9:40 AM
Boom!
What happened?
Posted by Ben | November 28, 2010 9:48 AM
P: I think you are right in assuming he had no ability to get this done without help, but wrong in assuming he did not have the ability to find help. Lucky for many he found the FBI first, rather than the help he was looking for.
I'm not afraid at all, but I am not naive. Just as there are rapists and robbers, there are muslim extremists and other radicals who want to hurt us. They exist here is Portland in numbers just as they do in other areas of the country. So, moving 300 miles away won't really help.
If there is something here not to lose sight of it is the fact that our feebs should get big creds for recognizing this guy as being more dangerous than most like him they run into. They let it go far enough to build a strong case for terrorism, rather than a weak case for conspiracy, so we don't see him out to hurt others anytime soon.
Posted by Gibby | November 28, 2010 9:50 AM
"I'm not afraid at all, but I am not naive."
What Gibby said...
"So, moving 300 miles away won't really help."
That's right... Global... 300 miles from anywhere is still where crowds gather. Even in sleepy little Stump-town. Or sleepier and littler Corvallis. Or even someplace called Bly, where ever that is.
And more awareness is better, especially when the next one gets help before the feds get wind of the plan.
Posted by Harry | November 28, 2010 10:01 AM
If laws and police work do not work, then the next step is to...create illegal scenarios and encourage people to follow them and break the law?
Huh?
Why aren't we spending equal amounts of sweat and effort *discouraging* people from pursuing these acts instead of *encouraging* them? Can you imagine if you practiced such a philosophy with your own family, your wives and husbands and children?
Posted by the other white meat | November 28, 2010 10:06 AM
"Why aren't we spending equal amounts of sweat and effort *discouraging* people from pursuing these acts instead of *encouraging* them?"
You know, flaunting your ignorance of the broad range of efforts against international terrorism on a blog is fine, but I hope you're not in any kind of decision-making position.
Posted by John Fairplay | November 28, 2010 10:15 AM
You know, flaunting your ignorance of the broad range of efforts against international terrorism on a blog is fine, but I hope you're not in any kind of decision-making position.
That's the point, John; I'm saying that we're *all* in a decision-making position. You're just more readily willing to give over much of that decision-making authority without questioning it than I am.
Posted by the other white meat | November 28, 2010 10:25 AM
I guess being 300 miles away excuses me from any terrorist concerns. Being over 3000 miles from 9/11 totally releases me from even knowing about it. Great deduction.
A terrorist's ability to "find help" is not a factor of time. In studying the history of terrorist attacks they are overwhelmingly a product of much time, many resources examined, some discarded, and sometimes help coming from very unsuspected sources.
Mohamub with his strong desire to cause mayhem would have likely succeeded in some fashion to do so, even without FBI intervention.
Sammy has so many outreach committees, commissions and task forces that soon there won't be enough commissioners, citizens and city staff to fill the potholes.
Posted by lw | November 28, 2010 10:33 AM
Sorry, no PC entrapment tears from me for a guy who apparently professed no ambiguity about potentially murdering hundreds of innocent families. The guy sounds like a garden variety sociopath disguised as a religious zealot. We can speculate about him being young and led astray, and that may be true, but it doesn't excuse or allow us to ignore the murderous intent. The FBI might have nurtured and aggrandized his jihadist fantasies, but that can be figured out in the judicial process, and if there's a conviction, during sentencing.
Posted by Drew G. | November 28, 2010 10:36 AM
Regardless whether this guy was competent enough to pull this off, we should not be surprised that terrorist would try something here. Our brilliant PC city officials have opted out of the FBI's terrorism task force.
Wouldn't it make sense for terrorist to strike where local law enforcement has declined to help with the task force?
Posted by Anthony | November 28, 2010 10:37 AM
Yes, yes. Of course, the FBI set this up for their own benefit.
Last night there were three shooting incidents in my part of Portland. The PPB was behind those.
Why do we keep falling for these government tricks? We are a sick culture that is really doing this to itself.
The mayor and the president are leading us to a new light, a brighter way.
Yes, yes. This human caused near disaster was characteristic of agency over reach and cultural hubris.
Posted by Larry | November 28, 2010 10:45 AM
I wonder if Sam knew about the plot all along. I imagine he would be fussing and fuming behind closed doors once he realized he was powerless do anything about how the Feds might use this in the media.
Posted by SKA | November 28, 2010 11:04 AM
It's great to see the conservative spin cycle going quickly into centrifuge mode. Of course Portland was the target because, years ago, Tom Potter resisted the concept of putting an FBI agent in charge of the Portland police and taking our civilian management out of the loop. Especially clever was the kid getting his parents to move here from Mogadishu in the nineties when he was -- what? -- maybe eight years old? And brilliant of his terrorist controllers, who must have made this choice of venue, to bring in the undercover FBI to help.
Posted by Allan L. | November 28, 2010 11:15 AM
Hey it's Thanksgiving weekend in Portland....something's gotta happen in the new Detroit.
Posted by kimberly | November 28, 2010 11:18 AM
"FBI helps nurture, coach, and develop a jihadist and his plan, then 'thwarts' its own co-creation."
Or, what George said."
This morning's O article, indicates that friends thought he could easily have been talked out of the deed-or into it, it seems.
Does this kind of thing give us any real information about how we can guage terrorist threats?
I am not a frequent flyer, but some of my most recent plane trips have been to, or included stops in, Chicago where Orange alerts were broadcast throughout the terminal. I overheard passenger conversations about "fear tactics".
Is the purpose to make us callous? The FBI is hard for me to understand. I remember the Old Jimmy Stewart movie "G-Men" and how, in the 1940s the focus of the agency moved away from the Mob to internal threats. Maybe it needs to step back and do some objective analysis.
Posted by Cynthia | November 28, 2010 11:23 AM
Truly frightening. Glad the FBI found him first, as the tragedy in OKC showed us, these loons don't need much advanced technical know how or capital to cause mayhem. Heck, even the shoe bomber would have brought down a plane if he'd managed to light the fuse. We live in dangerous times, thankfully this lunatic was found out sooner than later.
Posted by NEPguy | November 28, 2010 11:33 AM
"Tom Potter resisted the concept of putting an FBI agent in charge of the Portland police and taking our civilian management out of the loop."
The big reason Potter didn't go along with JTTF was because he couldn't get a security clearance, maybe due to Potter's "extra-curricular" activities. So just saying it'd take local mgmt out of is not entirely accurate.
Of course, with Sam's baggage, he'd probably be one of the least likely to get clearance either.
I mean do you really think having the FBI vs. Sam working with police is much of a choice?
Posted by Steve | November 28, 2010 11:47 AM
wow! the Mighty Wurlitzer is really cranked
up now...as if it's a coordinated effort to
get the be-Jesus scared out of the Citizen
Rubes so they'll be united in One Voice as
they beg the Uber Rightwing Nutties to come
to the rescue and save us..yet again..from
a vaguely defined "enemy out there" who is
hellbent on being "evildoers" and doing bad
things to US(a)...(ho hum, yawn, wink wink)
Posted by coffee-drinkier | November 28, 2010 11:53 AM
Of course, with Sam's baggage, he'd probably be one of the least likely to get clearance either. I mean do you really think having the FBI vs. Sam working with police is much of a choice?
Are you serious? Security clearance Is probably the most arbitrary and disconnected process in our federal government. But the FBI is never accountable to a local government in the JTTF, irrespective of security clearances. I don't like our disgraceful mayor and I don't consider him a capable administrator of our Police Department. But I'm dumbfounded at the number of supposedly conservative or libertarian types who would turn our local law enforcement over to the federal government. That's idiotic.
Posted by Allan L. | November 28, 2010 12:30 PM
"I'm dumbfounded at the number of supposedly conservative or libertarian types who would turn our local law enforcement over to the federal government. That's idiotic."
OK, I'll go slowly. IF we had someone local who ran the police that could get a security clearance, then we'd still have Portland overseeing them. I think Potter's issue keeping him from getting clearance was his penchant for the ladies(which he didn't bother to conceal much) which could put him in a difficult spot.
If you tell me you're more comfortable with a Randy or Sam just because they are local instead of the FBI, I'd have to disagree.
Posted by Steve | November 28, 2010 12:40 PM
Allan L. writes "...I'm dumbfounded at the number of supposedly conservative or libertarian types who would turn our local law enforcement over to the federal government. That's idiotic."
If you really believe that Libertarians want to turn local law enforcement over to the feds you might want to try brushing up on the philosophy.
Posted by Bluecollar Libertarian | November 28, 2010 1:02 PM
BL could you maybe just comment on what I wrote, if you're so inclined, without revising it first?
Posted by Allan L. | November 28, 2010 1:40 PM
I'm not sure what some idiot setting the mosque in Corvallis on fire accomplishes.
http://www.gazettetimes.com/news/local/article_c124f59a-fb25-11df-8f83-001cc4c03286.html?mode=story
Posted by Nonny Mouse | November 28, 2010 2:59 PM
I wish there was this much passion about the Woodburn bank bombing and those terrorists who killed members of law enforcement. Remember them?
oh my mistake, they must be the good treasonous terrorists. . .
Posted by Ms. Contrarian | November 28, 2010 4:05 PM
"I'm not sure what some idiot setting the mosque in Corvallis on fire accomplishes"
Dividing the community, causing hate, fear, anger, and outrage. The idiot responsible likely tried to accomplish all this and more when he/she lit the match. Just as evil as the terrorist.
Posted by Gibby | November 28, 2010 4:07 PM
Allan I thought I quoted you correctly. Where did I go wrong?
Posted by Bluecollar Libertarian | November 28, 2010 4:43 PM
Allan L, I agree with Bluecollar, the remark he made is apropos to your comment.
How do you determine who is what-Libertarian or Conservative? Can you market this ability?
Posted by lw | November 28, 2010 6:08 PM
Allan L - more importantly, where do you see the "conservatives and libertarians" pushing for more federal law enforcement? I'm not sure why a person's political slant really matters if all they are asking is for SOME law enforcement that will prevent terrorists, local or foreign?
Or doesn't that sit well with your "liberal" point of view?
Posted by Mike (the other one) | November 28, 2010 6:52 PM
Its not like the Feds come in and take over the entire PPB. The way I understand it, the city would have a handful of officers assigned to the JTTF to assist the Feds with investigations. They dont "turn our local law enforcement over to the federal government."
Posted by Jon | November 28, 2010 7:53 PM
Bluecollar, here's what I said (though I'm not sure anyone really wants to read it again): " . . . a number of supposedly conservative or libertarian types . . . " I thought I was pointing out that enhanced reliance on federal government agencies was not entirely compatible with a libertarian or even viewpoint, so I thought I was identifying an inconsistency on the part of some advocates of the JTTF.
Posted by Allan L. | November 28, 2010 8:29 PM
Nice cover up, Allan L.. Look at your sentence again, you included "conservative" with "libertarian". You were being encompassing. You don't give an explanation on your thinking of including "conservative".
And both labels don't dismiss the need for government.
Posted by lw | November 28, 2010 9:22 PM
"The guy sounds like ..." what the FBI made him sound like. Or, what?, you have another source of info? you know the guy personally?
"... the FBI found him first, as the tragedy in OKC showed ..."
You mean when the FBI immediately put out an APB BOLO (all points bulletin, be on look out) for a 'stocky businessman wearing a turban with a Mediterranean complexion who flew out of OKC airport later that day' and they chased some red herring thru Chicago to London, brought him back, and said, 'oops, nevermind' (after some sleepy OK sheriff had stopped a jalopy car with no license plate ... or was it a broken taillight? ... and picked up T.McVeigh unwittingly?) BTW, McVeigh turned out to be one of those white Christian militia acolytes (like listeners to Limbaugh and LIARS) who the FBI never can seem to 'find' camped and fear-crazed in OK, KS, TX, and about 400 miles ENE of PDX in Idaho.
"... wish there was this much passion about the Woodburn bank bombing and those terrorists who killed members of law enforcement. Remember them?"
Actually there is some 'passionate remembering.' Turns out that the local hatetalk radio nutjob (LIARS) might have provoked bomber Turnidge, going by statements FBI agent Chamberlin testified Turnidge said (as basis for his anti-government hate and action) which statements were verbatim quotes from LIARS -- and only LIARS -- broadcasts ... saturating the airwaves over Woodburn and vicinity exactly in the weeks (Oct - Nov about Obama's pending election) leading upt to the Dec.2008 bombing. Seems there is some court-administered investigation of those broadcasts to determine if they were like this: about Byron Williams.
Another informed observer about the PDX put-up:
The FBI successfully thwarts its own Terrorist plot, By Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com, Sunday, Nov 28, 2010
What scares me are the many voices here who believe and bully! bully! this sort of fairy tale poppycockup and then publicly admit they believe it!
Really. Get a clue. About the FBI, not from it.
Posted by Tenskwatawa | November 28, 2010 11:30 PM
"What scares me are the many voices here who believe and bully! bully! this sort of fairy tale poppycockup and then publicly admit they believe it!"
And you believe in Randy and Sam to prevent something like this?
Posted by Steve | November 29, 2010 6:44 AM
Wasn't there a movie a couple of years ago where the robo cops chased you down for the
crimes you would committ in the future?
And why is there not increased security for such potential targets as the mosques or even
people whom could be at risk by the other nut cases out there?
Posted by Portland Native...traveling the USA | November 29, 2010 7:08 AM
Portland Native...traveling the USA, are you keeping count of negative comments about Portland and Oregon as you travel? What's the consensus, is it beyond weird?
Posted by lw | November 29, 2010 10:32 AM
We can all look to the UN for "inspiration." (EXCLUSIVE: U.N. Elects Iran to Commission on Women's Rights)
Or we can look to these brave Iranians for inspiration.
The institutional champions of individual liberty are rotting from the inside out as the key positions, at home and abroad, get filled by folks loyal to tyrants and various flavors of megalomaniacs.
Would it be "hate" to advocate the all Islamic-affiliated organizations be denied recognition as incorporated entities within Oregon? The IRS rules regarding designation of a "charity" for tax purposes looks pretty clear to me. (http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopicj85.pdf) (I assume these particular rules here are stale, but are a good starting point for encapsulating the issues involved.)
This would be in line with my desire to be able to ignore them.
Posted by pdxnag | November 29, 2010 11:19 AM
Tenskwatawa! Are you in contact with rw? She is sorely needed at our new blog, named after her suggestion years back, http://bluethumb.info . For bojackers, you might find the BlueOregon search engine useful. Everything, all those things they never thought they would have to own up to easily searched!
Posted by Dil Mirch | December 10, 2010 8:14 PM