Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 5, 2010 7:38 PM. The previous post in this blog was Have a great weekend. The next post in this blog is Hughes leads Stacey by 831. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Friday, November 5, 2010

For the record

The street sweepers will be coming through our block tomorrow, but they will not need to sweep any leaves from in front of our place. This afternoon we raked, swept, and dumped into the worm compost bin all the fallen leaves, and now you can eat off our street:

We won't be paying the City of Portland leaf tax -- not without an order from the Oregon Supreme Court.

Comments (38)

Go Jack!! I hope many follow your lead.

You tell 'em, Jacko!

All you need now is some Yellow Police Line ribbon to keep the sweeper away. I'll bet someone in your neighborhood has saved some.

Nice. Good public documentation. Not too bad a day for raking leaves either.

Could you send your team over here on Dec 2?

All you need now is to hope that the wind doesn't blow all of your neighbors' leaves down the street tonight so they end up in front of your house.

By the way, what is the actual biomass of leaves once they've been ground up? Tree removal companies use chippers to grind up solid wood into sawdust, so why can't the city come up with a street sweeping equivalent that simply grinds up leaves on the spot?

"... so why can't the city come up with a street sweeping equivalent that simply grinds up leaves on the spot?"

Or compress them like our garbage.

The possibility of a private enterprise gathering the leaves, composting them, and then selling the compost could be made a reality by someone with a little vision. After all, what does the city do with the leaves?? Anyone know? I don't. But I figure they either A) dump them - what a waste of a green, sustainable commodity..., or B) sell them to a major composter who then sells the compost at a profit.

I don't know why this can't be made into a new industry. Maybe the city could pay a private contractor to do the job? Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,ha!!! Sorry, I crack myself up sometimes.

You know what would be funny - Sam telling Randy to pay up. He's saying, I told you I bet I can make Jack pick up his own leaves!

Jack, as much as I disagree with the way the city handled this, I have to take issue with the reaction to the change in policy.

Wealthier neighborhoods have been receiving a free service that other neighborhoods did not enjoy. Others have had to dispose of their own leaves and also deal with cuts in city drop-off locations, I believe.

Also, I've been appalled in years past to see how many in the neighborhoods with leaf pick-up left their sidewalks and streets covered in piles of wet leaves. It's been a mess and a hazard for people and bikes, and gasp...even cars, for years.

I'm sorry that the "City that Works" actually doesn't, but I'm glad that these neighborhoods are going to need to be responsible for leaves like the rest of the city.

The only thing missing in those photos to make them golden is a copy of today's newspaper.

I never asked these clowns to pickup the leaves in front of my house. And I'm not asking them to do so now. Just leave me alone and stop sending me bills for bulls**t. Thanks.

The City has a compost yard on N.E. 33rd it shares with the homeless camp, "Dignity Village". They receive leaves with a nominal fee as well as sell them as compost.

Here is the response I got from the city regarding the leaf pick up tax. It was sent by a someone who goes by the name Leaf Removal:


I am sorry for the delay in replying to you.

Since this is our first year with this program we know we will have some growing pains in our policy and we appreciate your questions about the different aspects of it.

First, this is a fee and not a tax, and we understand how they might be confused. Gas tax and vehicle registrations fund the Bureau of Transportation's maintenance budget. No property or income tax dollars are used for our maintenance budget.

The City's fee for leaf removal services is in compliance with City financial policy (FIN-2.06). Transportation adheres to City policy regarding services that benefit a specific user and whose quantity, quality, and/or number of units as may be specified should be paid for by fees and charges. The fee and program structure take into account the following:

- the degree to which a service provides a general benefit in addition to the private benefit provided to a specific business, property, or individual,

- economic impact of new or expanded fees, especially in comparison with other governments within the metropolitan area,

- the true or comprehensive cost of providing a service, including the cost of fee collection and administration,

- the impact of imposing or increasing fees on economically at-risk populations and on businesses, and

- the overall achievement of City goals.

The fee will cover full costs of services for the leaf removal program.

It has been mandated that the City provide a way for leaf removal customers to opt out of the leaf removal service and fee if they can show that they provided the service themselves. The City has identified alternative leaf removal strategies that could qualify a customer for an exemption to the fee.

For this year's program, if you have no trees or a small enough volume of leaves that you don't need extra yard debris bags for a garbage hauler, we ask that you submit photographs of your frontage showing that you have a very limited volume of street leaves. If you collect and compost your street leaves, we ask that you submit photographs of your composting process on your property.

The concept of the dates that "correspond to your property's scheduled cleanings" means we want the receipts to identify that the work took place on or near the date of the cleaning, not specifically the date the crews came through. The dates on your receipts or other proof of payment must be on or before the date of the City's scheduled cleaning.

The City will send a bill for the City-provided leaf removal service by mail to each customer. The bill will be sent the Monday following the customer's only or final sweep. If the bill is unpaid within 28 days of the original bill date, the City will send a notice of the unpaid bill. Interest will accrue on unpaid bills at the rate of 1 percent.

[I think that "1 percent" is a typo.]

In the letter that Eric posted, Leaf Removal states:

"No property or income tax dollars are used for our maintenance budget."

Where does this department think its funding comes from, the "tooth fairy"?

No way does the $30 fee, even if collected from a majority of the affected property owners even come close to paying for such a service.

Jack- for those who have senior citizen neighbors...give them a hand and help them get away from this $30 added cost. This group is getting hit hard with these nuisance fees with no increase in Social Security again this year.

What buffoons. The costs of administering this program will outstrip the $15 and $30 checks they'll get. Can you imagine how many exemption applications and photos they'll have to process? Then there will be the administrative appeals (and then court, I assume) when people are denied the exemption.

The City has a compost yard on N.E. 33rd it shares with the homeless camp, "Dignity Village". They receive leaves with a nominal fee as well as sell them as compost.

They sell the bums as compost? now that's innovation!

"The costs of administering this program will outstrip the $15 and $30 checks they'll get. Can you imagine how many exemption applications and photos they'll have to process?"

Amen. Bad policy poorly implemented.

Most interesting.

The only residents to be charged are those who demand the service which willbenefit a specific user and whose quantity, quality, and/or number of units as may be specified?

So...If the City DoT consistantly FAILS to sweep the street in front of my house, I can bill them? I have received NO benefit from the city sweepers. To get leaves swept off my street, my neighbors and I have to rake them all down to a location where the sweeper can sweep them.

THEN...I will not, and I strongly recommend that others not, consistantly place leaves from the street in home composters. Leaves which have spent any appreciable time in the street during wet conditions (now, when might that be?) will accumulate petrochemical byproducts and other toxins which build up in the street (carbon and heavy-metals tainted oils, break lining residue, and the like) along with the glass chips, waxed and plasticized paper bits, plastic chunks, and other tidbits which don't biodegrade.
I have no desire to add any of that to the soil I intend to grow foods in.

For the same reason, I'd steer clear of any 'composted product' the City is selling (or giving away) as an afterproduct of street sweeping.

Okay, so we have two very small trees that shed their leaves long before the first leaf sweep in early November. BUT, our neighbor across the street has a HUGE tree and they never rake. On our block, the leaves always end up on the south side of the street due to wind - one can drive by and notice the disparity with all the leaves blown to one side of the street.

So, every year we dutifully rake our NEIGHBOR's leaves that end up on our property even though we have a tiny, tiny amount of our own.

Sure, we can snap photos showing our dismal trees, but if one were to drive by, we would still be hit with the leaf tax thanks to our non-raking neighbors. Meanwhile, their yard has nary a leaf!

And this is just, how?

Where does this department think its funding comes from, the "tooth fairy"?

If you read their letter, you can see clearly where they say they think it comes from.

Allan L: sorry, my bad.

But with the city encouraging people to go by means other than personal vehicles, maintenance funding may be reduced as an unintended consequence of getting residents out of their vehicles.

I still think that this program will cost more than whatever funds they might collect.

Portland: "The City That Works" hard to be more inefficient.

I bet they'll charge you a $100 fee for "wasting their time."

I don't live in a "leaf removal district", yet there are a lot of huge deciduous trees on my street. I was out for a walk this morning, and took not of the huge swaths of leaves in the street here and there. Some are diligent about raking their leaves off of the streets and sidewalks, while others choose to let the leaves decay in place. We all know what a treacherous gooey mess that creates on the sidewalks when it rains. There are no negative consequences for property owners in my neighborhood who ignore their leaf removal duty. I think Portland's leaf tax is unfair, in that it targets those in some neighborhoods, but not in others.

an unintended consequence of getting residents out of their vehicles.

Too true: it's a bit like the two state initiatives: one, to double the vehicle registration fee (which was done a few years ago) on cars like the Prius, that don't use enough fuel to pay their share of the gallonage tax; and the other, coming soon, to track the movements of all vehicles so that the tax can be charged on the basis of miles drive, thus removing the intolerable inequity of fuel efficiency.

Leaf me alone, dammit!

Don't Sweep On Me

I suggest we all rake our leaves into piles that spell out messages to the city. I have enough leaves to make the letters F and U .

'You know what would be funny - Sam telling Randy to pay up. He's saying, I told you I bet I can make Jack pick up his own leaves!' Leonard always has to have the last word/laugh so he'll head over to bojacks house and 'accidently' trip over that long crack running along the driveway and then sue the crap out of him.......


I think I have a solution for the financial troubles at TriMet. Require every resident in the district buy a bus pass. I'm not sure what the opt out would be, but it would probably involve some heavy lifting or perhaps security work.

The City swept my neighborhood (Alameda) North of Fremont on Thurs last week. Unfortunately, I didn't have time to pull a 'Jack' and get my frontage cleared. Like many folks have commented, I have two small trees that don't drop until Dec. I sent a note to the Leafremoval email address and asked for a re-schedule. I received a prompt response indicating the City would consider that next year.

Back to Thursday: when I returned home from work, it didn't look like they had actually cleaned. The city scrapped the leaves, with the plows I suspect. But they didn't follow with with the street sweepers, as they've done every year since I lived in the neighborhood. So all the debris smaller than a leaf, mud, etc was all left at the curb. My wife even asked if anything had happened. I took images and happy to share. I'm wondering if this would be considered 'half' a job and therefore I should only be subject to $7.50 for this weeks compulsory fee. Or if the service now only includes just the initial scrape, and no street sweeping. (???)

My other concern is that someone park at my curb, unbeknownst to me, while i'm at work and during the sweeping day. I wonder how I might get relief should that happen. I'll probably get a reply from the City saying they'll consider that scenario next year.

What a disaster.

At least your yard and street look sharp.

But seriously, I can see at least a dozen leaves at the bottom of the last photo. You want your exculpatory evidence to be unimpeachable.

The property line is just below the water meter.

No leaf removal service in my neighborhood either. I have some big trees, and I am pretty diligent about keeping the sidewalk raked. I also rake the parking strip, and if it looks like leaves are clogging up the storm drain, I will rake them away from the drain. But aside from fallen branches, what falls on the street stays on the street. Why should I lend City Hall a hand when they offer my neighbors and I no help whatsoever in dealing with the real litter problem around here : vehicles illegally stored on the street?

Yeah! That's a good point.

Where do I send the bill for my regular clearance of the corner drain?

As we all know, they don't plough snow on residential streets either. They do send the street-sweeper through a few times a year, but with all the illegally-stored vehicles on my street, a lot of the street doesn't get swept. Really, I don't know why they bother.

Jack, I'd like to see the look on your face when you read Brad Schmidt's 11/12 Oregonlive article on the Leaf fee removal program. You just can't make this stuff up!

It will probably be as easy as the fee they say they do not collect for Storm Water.
I pay it and we do not even have drains, With a 300 foot by 90 foot lot my storm water never gets close to the street.
The one question where they demand a tree count including hieght has me confused. Do taller trees 200 feet from the road create more run off.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Marc Maron - Waiting for the Punch
Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 5
At this date last year: 3
Total run in 2017: 113
In 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics