Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.



For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.







Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!






E-mail us here.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on November 11, 2010 3:22 AM. The previous post in this blog was Ron Artest was right. The next post in this blog is The pungent odor of scam. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Archives

Links

Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
TaxVox
Tax.com
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Conglomerate
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
myCorporateResource.com
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Utterly Boring.com
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
HinesSight
Onfocus
Jalpuna
Beerdrinker.org
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
Sansego
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
Mireio
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
{AE}
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Althouse
GirlHacker
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Frytopia
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
StumptownBlogger
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and Drink.com
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion
LoveSalem

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Misterblue
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
Twisty
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
Pinktalk
Mellow-Drama
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Rosenblog
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Blort
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Maukie
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
KGW-TV
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
KOIN
Willamette Week
KATU
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB
Topix.net - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
KPTV
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

Music-Related
The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Seal
Sting
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Thursday, November 11, 2010

A harsh dose of reality

The blue-ribbon, bi-partisan federal commission set up to address the crushing federal deficit is showing around a draft of its recommendations, and they're refreshingly honest. The federal government needs to cut spending, including on Social Security, and raise taxes. We can either feel the pain now or inflict it on our children and grandchildren.

Alas, the chances of the current crop of politicians in charge of the country actually doing what the commission suggests is nil. But don't tell the kids nobody warned you. Go by streetcar!

Comments (33)

There is a precedent for a country completely revamping its taxation and revenue system in a bi-partisan manner.

It happened in New Zealand in the early 1980s, and by all accounts it has worked out very well.

If you Google "New Zealand 2001 tax review," or something like that, you'll find an excellent report on what went on.

The "Overview" and Chapter 1, in particular, are brilliant essays on the pragmatic and philosophical issues involved in developing taxation and revenue systems.

What's interesting is that Australians voted down on a similar plan in the early 90s. Apparently, with Australia being a larger country, it was simply too difficult to develop a consensus. So, the chances of developing any sort of consensus in the U.S. would seem to be impossible.

It's humbling that the U.S. Government recognizes the problem while Portland and the State of Oregon are whistling past the graveyard. Portland can't just print more money and inject it into the money supply (by buying back it's own securities from the banks), and we will (very soon) lose the ability to sell more bonds to fearful public debt investors.

The Feds have the printing presses, but they are fearful. We don't, and (with the exception of Ted Wheeler) our "leaders" act as if we can borrow our way to prosperity.

Somebody needs to do a serious fireside chat with the American public explaining what will happen if we continue along our present path. You would expect that to be the President, but he's probably too chicken to do it. Maybe two years from now he'll man up.

In the meantime, Al Gore could do another movie...

I hope this goes further than Teddy's blue-ribbon panel (what'd they call it the refresh?) on spending.

Problem is that these guys in Congress get used to buying love by spending which is way easier than getting it by passing a law or raising a tax. God forbid the wrath they'll endure for taking back an entitlement.

I guess that's what you get when you have politicians running a country spending other people's money instead of people who actually have to live here and earn a living and pay bills and tazes.

Makes perfect sense. Now that the FICA revenues of the past ten years have been funneled to the top 1% of earners as income tax rate cuts, it's time to man up and take aery the retirement benefits. It's also worth noting that the cstfood commission is proposing a top marginal income tax rate of 23%.

That's "take away" and "cat food commission".

I agree with Peter. No chance our representatives could reach a consensus.

This country is divided, and there seems little hope for progress. Seeking the majority in the house and senate has become the priority for the elected, rather than doing the work at hand. The majority shifts back and forth with each election as voters get frustrated. Then all the work of those before them is reversed in a never ending cyle of nothing accomplished.

We best look for real leadership, the kind we have not seen for a long time.

So this "harsh dose of reality" is going to just blow away like dandelion seeds in the political winds?

I hate to feel so hopeless. I wonder how many years til almost nobody even remembers this deadly serious report. Two?

This "proposal" offers nothing for containing health care costs, the one true threat to the budget. It keeps Bush's massive tax cuts for the wealthy in place, paying for them with cuts to programs that help the middle-class and the poor. It admits that Social Security contributes nothing to the federal deficit, and yet slashes benefits anyway. It's Ronald Reagan's vision for government. Recommended reading:
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2010/11/deficit-commission-serious

when dealing with the budget, politicians should be made to write out whole numbers instead of rounding and shortening so they can get a grasp of how much money they are actually throwing around. For example, instead of writing $10.1 Billion, they should have to write $10,100,000,000.00. Both numbers are exactly the same but the latter has the effect of looking like what it really is--- a lot of freakin' money.

Problem is that these guys in Congress get used to buying love by spending which is way easier than getting it by passing a law or raising a tax.

Which is still easier that repealing or just not passing a law in the first place.

I fear Oregon's annual sessions will open the door to even more must do "something", regardless of how much "something" costs or if its really needed. It's like the kicker. A terrible piece of policy that makes little to no sense. Yet, without it the legislature would have spent every last dime of increased revenue leaving an even bigger hole in the budget when the revenues drop.

There's some scary stuff in there?

Why wait until 2012?

Malpractice reform? This I've got to see...

Oh come on Jack. The proposed solution is transparent class warfare- the very rich win, the working poor get f&cked again. Seriously, kill the EITC to pay for a 15% cut to the highest marginal tax bracket?

I've got a better idea. How about we cut defense spending and foreign aid by, say, 80%, and repair some of our own goddamn roads and bridges instead?

"This 'proposal' offers nothing for containing health care costs, the one true threat to the budget."

Things that make you go, damn.

"How about we cut defense spending and foreign aid by, say, 80%"

Lovely. Now we've freed up $500 billion in a $3.5 trillion budget that's running a $1.4 trillion deficit.

Any plan that does not permanently get the federal government out of the middle-class transfer payment business will fail. The federal government has to stop doing many, many of the things it's currently doing entirely.

Well, well- now that those "conspiracy rumors" about FEMA detention camps is proving to be real, everything is falling into place to continue the gutting of the good ole USA (watch the Jesse Ventura show this Friday).

There are no good solutions because the mega-rich have virtually all the cards and can withstand the pain a whole hell of a lot longer than any of us.

Eventually, the mega rich will be infected with the Midas touch, if not already.

I applaud the commission for taking the assignment seriously.

I think many of the responses here show why nothing will be done. Everyone just goes into a partisan crouch and sees it as a political problem instead of structural problem.

We won't fix anything until the timebomb blows up in our lap.

If you're under 50, get ready for your kids AND your parents to move in. If you're retired, better kiss up to your kids - you'll need them much more than you expect.

I was under the impression that I have been paying for social security every time I have gotten a paycheck since 16 years old.

What happened to my money?

"I was under the impression that I have been paying for social security every time I have gotten a paycheck since 16 years old.

What happened to my money?"

You don't pay for YOUR social security. You pay for the social security of the people collecting it now. When you are collecting it, it will be a new group of working people who are paying for yours.

Social Security is not a savings account or an insurance system; it's an income-transfer system that will work as long as enough people are working to pay for the income-earned compensation of people who no longer are.

I think many of the responses here show why nothing will be done. Everyone just goes into a partisan crouch and sees it as a political problem instead of structural problem.

Categorizing any disagreement with this proposal a "partisan crouch" is a convenient formulation if you happen to agree with a much more regressive tax system. But what if you don't? Shut up? There are some worthwhile ideas here — the home-mortgage tax credit is badly in need of reform, especially at the high end — but the fact is that not even Reagan would have put forth an agenda this bent on serving the interests of the haves over the have-nots. That Jack supports it shows, to my mind, how amazingly far to the right the political discussion in this country has drifted.

Pete, that sounds like a partisan crouch.

Has anyone here noticed that this is not the Commission report? It's the rantings of a couple of crazed old sociopaths. The commission report is due next month.

You don't pay for YOUR social security. You pay for the social security of the people collecting it now.

This is correct as far as it goes, but the rest is important too: For the last thirty years or so (except for the last year or two, when the recession and unemployment sharply reduced the tax receipts), a great deal more has been paid into Social Security in FICA taxes than has been paid out in benefits. This was the result of changes to the system in the Reagan administration, and the projections — except for the current dip — call for the positive cash flow to continue for a few more years. Where did the excess money go? Into the federal government's general funds, to reduce the deficit (and, not incidentally, to facilitate and pay for tax cuts for the very rich). The mechanism for this is for the Social Security Administration to buy bonds and notes issued by the US Treasury.

Sure, some say, but those bonds and notes are just IOU's that the government can disregard. Leaving aside the rather large issues about how, or how easily, the federal government can default on any of its debt obligations, it you accept that view of things — that the IOU's are just a bunch of paper — then in effect there is no Social Security "Fund" — it's just part of the giant federal ball of wax. If that's true, Social Security isn't going to "go broke" or become "insolvent" on its own — it's part of the federal government and no more "broke" than the Defense Department on any given day.

People who talk that way are trying to have it both ways. Either Social Security is a separate fund, and it has assets to meet its benefit obligations far into the future, or it's part of the federal government, with as much claim on general revenues as it needs for that purpose. It's a completely disingenuous analysis whose real intent is to weaken and dismantle the social safety net.

It's weird that people are worried about the deficit now, when 1)we need the government to run a large temporary deficit to increase aggregate demand, and 2)the deficit isn't any kind of problem, as the government is having no trouble borrowing money.

Pete, that sounds like a partisan crouch.

What disagreement with this proposal wouldn't you characterize as a "partisan crouch"? Look, there are some good things in the Bowles/Simpson plan, but it needs to slight a scooch over to the find the middle. The Social Security proposals are simply too heavily tilted toward cutting benefits vs. raising revenue. We also need to look hard at their assumption that the Affordable Care Act (aka, Obamacare) will lead to the savings in Medicare that they anticipate. My own thought is more needs to be done there. But this is a trial balloon and maybe with some tweaking it will work. I do hope so.

If you're worried--and I don't want you to be worried--you could read this page for a different viewpoint:

http://www.newdeal20.org/2010/04/27/the-deficit-nine-myths-we-cant-afford-10162/

Or browse around the "Our Fiscal Security" website from the Economic Policy Institute, starting with their "Deficit 101," here:

http://www.ourfiscalsecurity.org/deficit-101

BTW, I am very much in agreement with Jack's critiques of the city's poor fiscal management and misplaced priorities. The federal government is just a different beast altogether, IMHO.

Well if they cut spending on social security perhaps they should lift the rule that prohibits people getting a social security check from receiving other sources of income..... Did you know the most a disabled person in Oregon can get in SSI benefits is $674.00 and they are not allowed to receive other sources of income but yet they are expected to fully cover all living expenses with only $674.00


Sponsors


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

If You See Kay, Red 2011
Turnbull, Old Bull Red 2010
Cherry Tart, Cherry Pie Pinot Noir 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve Cabernet, Oakville 2012
Benton Lane, Pinot Gris 2012
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Reserva 2008
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2012
Pendulum Red 2011
Vina Real, Plata, Crianza Rioja 2009
Edmunds St. John, Bone/Jolly, Gamay Noir Rose 2013
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 26
Ayna, Tempranillo 2011
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Haley's Block 2010
Apaltagua, Reserva Camenere 2012
Lugana, San Benedetto 2012
Argyle Brut 2007
Wildewood Pinot Gris 2012
Anciano, Tempranillo Reserva 2007
Santa Rita, Reserva Cabernet 2009
Casone, Toscana 2008
Fonseca Porto, Bin No. 27
Louis Jadot, Pouilly-Fuissé 2011
Trader Joe's, Grower's Reserve Pinot Noir 2012
Zenato, Lugana San Benedetto 2012
Vintjs, Cabernet 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White 2012
Rainstorm, Oregon Pinot Gris 2012
Silver Palm, North Coast Cabernet 2011
Andrew Rich, Gewurtztraminer 2008
Rodney Strong, Charlotte's Home Sauvignon Blanc 2012
Canoe Ridge, Pinot Gris, Expedition 2012
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Gamay Noir Rose 2012
Dark Horse, Big Red Blend No. 01A
Elk Cove, Pinot Noir Rose 2012
Fletcher, Shiraz 2010
Picollo, Gavi 2011
Domaine Eugene Carrel, Jongieux 2012
Eyrie, Pinot Blanc 2010
Atticus, Pinot Noir 2010
Walter Scott, Pinot Noir, Holstein 2011
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
Coppola, Sofia Rose 2012
Joel Gott, 851 Cabernet 2010
Pol Roget Reserve Sparkling Wine
Mount Eden Chardonnay, Santa Cruz Mountains 2009
Rombauer Chardonnay, Napa Valley 2011
Beringer, Chardonnay, Napa Reserve 2011
Kim Crawford, Sauvignon Blanc 2011
Schloss Vollrads, Spaetlese Rheingau 2010
Belle Glos, Pinot Noir, Clark & Telephone 2010
WillaKenzie, Pinot Noir, Estate Cuvee 2010
Blackbird Vineyards, Arise, Red 2010
Chauteau de Beaucastel, Chateauneuf-du-Pape 2005
Northstar, Merlot 2008
Feather, Cabernet 2007
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Alexander Valley 2002
Silver Oak, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2002
Trader Joe's, Chardonnay, Grower's Reserve 2012
Silver Palm, Cabernet, North Coast 2010
Shingleback, Cabernet, Davey Estate 2010
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone 2009
Santa Margherita, Pinot Grigio 2011
Alamos, Cabernet 2011
Cousino Macul, Cabernet, Anitguas Reservas 2009
Dreaming Tree Cabernet 2010
1967, Toscana 2009
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009

The Occasional Book

Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 225
At this date last year: 71
Total run in 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269


Clicky Web Analytics