Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 11, 2010 12:45 PM. The previous post in this blog was Having a bad spell. The next post in this blog is You've been sued!. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

No, it isn't worth it

Hard to know what to make of this story. It's an obvious puff piece on Portland city commissioner Amanda Fritz. But WW is trying to spin out a tale that the upcoming vote on Portland's "voter-owned elections" system (which it will no doubt endorse) is somehow a referendum on Fritz, who has had not one but two campaigns paid for by the city's taxpayers.

To us, it's a referendum not only on Fritz, but also on John Branam, Jesse Cornett, Chris Smith, Jim Middaugh, Jeff Bissonnette, Charles Lewis, Erik Sten, and of course Emilie Boyles, who together with Fritz have eaten through around $2 million of tax dollars on mostly throwaway campaigns while schools rot, police precincts close, and streets decay. "Clean money" is also an elaborate incumbent protection system, effectively insuring that no challenger will ever be able to outspend an incumbent (which is the only way to beat one). And it greatly favors union-backed candidates, who can get their hundreds of "seed money" contributions with a single phone call to union local headquarters.

About the only good argument we've heard so far for "voter-owned elections" is that Fireman Randy's against it.

Comments (18)

I'll say this about Amanda--I have written emails to her on two occasions, and both times she has written long, eloquent, well-thought out responses. The first was about something on which we disagreed. I still disagreed after reading her response, but I appreciated her taking the time to draft what was clearly a non-form-letter response. I don't agree with her every time, but I think, attitude wise, she's a breath of fresh air compared to Randy et al.

No doubt a self-serving head fake from Leonard. He knows the unions are in his pocket and vice versa.

I'll say this about Amanda

But the referendum election is not about Amanda. Amanda could have, and should have, been elected to her office without using public money.

I'm sure I'll take some hits regarding my following comment, but I believe it.

Welcome to the world of the progressives, where taxpayer money is wasted on campaigns and vote-by-mail encourages voter fraud like never before.

The dollars come from our water and sewer rates to fund voter-owned elections. We will have the opportunity to chime in as to whether to continue to pay for this in November.

Over the years, I have commented enough on this ridiculous concept that there is nothing else that I can really say except, "Please vote against this ridiculous waste of money. Not every idea needs to be publically funded."

With apologies to Ross Thomas, Portland voters think "publicly funded" means that the money comes from the other guy.

So despite all the griping here, it turns out you're actually cool with letting developers call the shots. You must have loved Citizens United.

OMG Roger, are you so naive as to believe "voter owned elections" makes a hoot of a difference??

First, spending $2 million so ONE person gets elected over two election cycles is the same fiscal irresponsibility but with another name.

Second, the freakin' genius of this idea, Mr. Sten, was completely in the pockets of developers. So, what makes you think the source of the money has any rational relationship to who calls these shots once they are elected?

Third, even supposing that persons elected under this scam do not let the developers call the shots, who says that they are independent of other special interests?

The reason this city is at the edge of a fiscal cliff isn't because of "developers," per se. It is because city leaders do not have a lick of business sense. They fund whatever "good idea" comes along without a second thought to budgets and priorities, whether sponsored by "developers" or by "voter owned election" whack-jobs.

Maybe if these good ideas were flushed down the toilette, the city could earn some additional sewage fees for future capital improvements.

"cool with letting developers call the shots."

Travis nails it pretty good.

Has VOE Amanda ever stood in the way of any developers or planners?

Would like to know more about the organization that has filed with the SOS--Portlanders against Taxpayer Funded Political Campaigns.....what a long winded name but sounds like something to support

One can be a thoughtful, hard-working, self-confident person and still be entirely unsuited (and ineffective) for public service at this level. To make a difference as a City Council member means having some guts and vision and making tireless efforts to serve *all* citizens. Fritz has none of those, really--she's entrenching (like Fish) to make a long-term job of it. And that's exactly what was never intended for public service jobs of this kind. In difficult issues, she punts. She's made her first ally--Saltzman--by basically adopting much of his playbook.

And the soft-core porn-like statements made in the article about Fritz voting "no" repeatedly concerning the soccer stadium is gag inducing. In the end (and all along the way, really), Fritz chose to don a soccer scarf, make a sweet deal with Paulson, and play to the crowd. She knew where her re-election lay.

For example, Fritz wrote another one of those "thoughtful" pieces where she lays out her concerns about the Paulson/MLS deal:

There she is, over a year ago, with a long list of concerns--gender equity, living wage jobs, the actual viability of soccer in PDX, the impact on the city, wise use of prime land, *no* financial risk for the City, no provision of basic services in PDX neighborhoods, and so on. A long list of major concerns that affects hundreds of thousands of people.

Shortly thereafter, she voted yes. Guess how many of the issues she was "concerned" with were addressed? Here's a hint: NONE.

Even though Amanda got the funding, for the most part she tends to go along to get along. Although the article does state some good she has done within the community, she has not been independent enough for my tastes, as I will most likely be drinking degraded water. Our microbrews will not be the same with added toxic chemicals in our water. That is unless we get a Waiver from this LT2 rule.

If I were funded by public dollars I would have gone over Randy and Sam's head and voted NO on that UV 200 million dollar treatment plant and I would have made a special trip to DC to lobby for an exemption for my constituents from that EPA LT2 Rule that will cost our community another billion dollars with debt. I would have pushed for the delay when in July 2009 many citizens and organizations asked for it.

Since she is a nurse, I do not understand how she could vote to move forward on anything that would add toxic chemicals to our drinking water or make decisions that could lead to radon being backed up into our homes.

If she claims no knowledge of this, and that is the case, her staff needs to educate her on the matter, or she simply really doesn't get it. It seems citizens "get" it, why doesn't she?

Sending letters back as a nice gesture doesn't really cut it for me. I expect more from my elected officials.

Two facts, one observation:

1. Fritz was a consistent "No" vote on the soccer deal; final vote on that was 4-1. Her concerns about the living wage were addressed, sort of, though continuation of the city subsidy for PGE Park workers.

TOM is right about her putting a scarf on, but she voted "No" that day.

2. Per WW, VOE has cost $2 million over five years. Taking that out reduces Jack's Long-Term-Debt-O-Meter from $10,657 to $10,652.

What I don't get is the antipathy toward trying to change a system in need of change. I come here often enough to expect discontent. I'm very surprised, though, at the accompanying willingness to preserve the status quo.

Fritz was a consistent "No" vote on the soccer deal; final vote on that was 4-1. Her concerns about the living wage were addressed, sort of, though continuation of the city subsidy for PGE Park workers.

And you know very well that (a)she knew in advance how others were voting, and (b) that a "no" vote that has no effect was being done for political points, not fiscal ones.

TOM is right about her putting a scarf on, but she voted "No" that day.

So if we accept that the "no" vote was made because she thinks the deal was a bad idea for Portland citizens, why did she make repeated public efforts (8-9, at my count) to publicly support Paulson bringing MLS to Portland?

What I don't get is the antipathy toward trying to change a system in need of change. I come here often enough to expect discontent. I'm very surprised, though, at the accompanying willingness to preserve the status quo.

I'm confused for two reasons: first, I've read a large number of comments from readers who want anything *but* the "status quo"; second, what change, exactly, has Fritz wrought in how local government works?

Given that, there seems to be some sharply defined irony in what you're saying. I, for example, would like to see quite a bit of the "status quo" changed in local government. Instead, what I've seen from City Council members (all of them) is a strong desire to look good, to mold policy to their own pet visions, and to put down roots in the office they're inhabiting.

How does Fritz feel about what's happening on West Hayden Island, for example, and how does she plan to vote? I'm going to make a prediction--go with the "status quo", and develop the heck out of it so that coal and cars have a place to be staged for shipping and receiving.

Here's Fritz's "reasoned" opinion on the matter of West Hayden Island, for example:

Consider this for a moment, because it's a typical Fritz behavior now: "further study".

There's a simple answer for what to do with this particular project--that is, if the city has its priorities straight. That answer is: stop developing the remaining undeveloped, unique areas like this one at a time until they're gone.

If nothing else, I'd like to see Fritz apply what she so fervently promised when asking for hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to help her get elected--that she'd be a watchdog for human health.

Does development of several hundred acres of fairly unique land serve local human health, or contribute to its impairment?

Calling Fritz's actions on this issue "reasoned" is like saying a 10-lane CRC bridge is sustainable, but a 12-lane one is not. In the end, developing several hundred acres is developing several hundred acres, and those cars and coal containers aren't going to do a thing for protect, enhance, or improve human health in Portland.

ecohuman:If nothing else, I'd like to see Fritz apply what she so fervently promised when asking for hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars to help her get elected--that she'd be a watchdog for human health.

Amanda, you or your staff must be reading this -
what have you all to say about being a watchdog for human health? Please, if you do not know your actions are degrading our drinking water and toxic chemcials added will affect the health of the community, then get the info. You do know who to get this from and it is not Randy!


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2012
Decoy, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Marqués de Murrieta, Reserva Rioja 2010
Kendall-Jackson, Grand Reserve Cabernet 2009
Seven Hills, Merlot 2013
Los Vascos, Grande Reserve Cabernet 2011
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Forlorn Hope, St. Laurent, Ost-Intrigen 2013
Upper Five, Tempranillo 2010 and 2012
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Topsail, Syrah 2013
Jim Barry, The Lodge Hill Shiraz 2013
Robert Mondavi, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2012
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2014
Boomtown, Cabernet 2013
Boulay, Sauvignon Blanc 2014
Domaine de Durban Muscat 2011
Patricia Green, Estate Pinot Noir 2012
Crios, Cabernet, Mendoza 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Dehesa la Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #15
Selvapiana, Chianti Ruffina 2012
Joseph Carr, Cabernet 2012
Prendo, Pinot Grigio, Vigneti Delle Dolomiti 2014
Joel Gott, Oregon Pinot Gris 2014
Otazu, Red 2010
Chehalem, Pinot Gris, Three Vineyards 2013
Wente, Merlot, Sandstone 2011
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2012
Monmousseau, Vouvray 2014
Duriguttti, Malbec 2013
Ruby, Pinot Noir 2012
Castellare, Chianti 2013
Lugana, San Benedetto 2013
Canoe Ridge, Cabernet, Horse Heaven Hills 2011
Arcangelo, Negroamaro Rosato
Vale do Bomfim, Douro 2012
Portuga, Branco 2013
Taylor Fladgate, Late Bottled Vintage Porto 2009
Pete's Mountain, Pinot Noir, Kristina's Reserve 2010
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Bookwalter, Subplot No. 28, 2012
Coppola, Sofia, Rose 2014
Kirkland, Napa Cabernet 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Napa Meritage 2011
Kramer, Chardonnay Estate 2012
Forlorn Hope, Que Saudade 2013
Ramos, Premium Tinto, Alentejano 2012
Trader Joe's Grand Reserve, Rutherford Cabernet 2012
Bottego Vinaia, Pinot Grigio Trentino 2013
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2011
Pete's Mountain, Elijah's Reserve Cabernet, 2007
Beaulieu, George Latour Cabernet 1998

The Occasional Book

Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 3
At this date last year: 0
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics