Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 30, 2010 7:44 AM. The previous post in this blog was Seven more years of recession?. The next post in this blog is Another Euro "green" company gets a PDC handout. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, August 30, 2010

Just what the Portland real estate market needs right now

Fifty-seven more condo units! Who's crazy enough to blow money to build condos in the midst of the worst real estate trough of our lifetimes? You guessed it -- the Portland Development Commission. They've got $11 million into this turkey, including $3 million they coughed up just this past Friday. The deal has been staggering along for nearly four years.

When Fireman Randy asks you in November for money for his new firehouse and trucks, you could suggest that he should have used this money instead.

Comments (23)

This is just wonderful for my friend who has been trying to build a 12 unit condo project, but can't get the financing. PDC has given to Portland unfair business and competition practices.

Associations that represent all kinds of businesses, like the MultiFamily Housing Council of Oregon needs to speak up. Apartment owners have an unfair advantage competing with PDC's "affordable housing" give-aways and the subsequent tax subsidies.

Not too bad, only $200K/unit and they haven't even broken ground. By the time the doors open it'll be 2x-3x that number.

lw - Winkler is another guy that knows how to work the system. Your friend really needs to find some way to humiliate himself with PDC by sticking green/sustainable/renewable or something like that over all the units.

PDC has buckets of money, even if Randy's dropped his attempts to tap into it.

They can't even keep it straight that Killingsworth is a street ... not an avenue.

Just when you think they couldn't design an uglier building they pull it off. Lets start following the creed of Frank Lloyd Wright and insist on "Less is More."

Only three two-bedroom units? Great. So much for encouraging middle-class families to stay in the city. If they wanted to stay in this building, they would have to sleep tenement-style in the single bedrooms.

And how much do you want to bet the few two-bedroom units are bought by DINKS who use one as an office or retirees who save the extra bedroom for their college kid who visits once in a blue moon?

Tom, you are so right: Portland has quickly become a city without buildings to admire. Perhaps it will top the list of Cities That Have Surrendered Their Character to Ugly Buildings.

Remember, for example, how grand the view used to be looking east from the Art Museum on a clear February evening? Vertical space has been expropriated by extraordinarily mundane glass towers driven like murderous spikes into the city's prostrate body whored out by its myopic elected officials and its insatiably greedy cabal of "developers."

The recent condo atrocities along Division, Belmont, and SE 28th, for instance, are breathtaking in their inappropriateness. Most remain unoccupied. Could it be that people do not want to reside in an ugly building?

"Ugly. Uglier. Ugliest." Perhaps, in the Portland fashion of futility, we need a commission to assign recent construction to its proper category. And perhaps Portland can market its penchant for ugliness.

The real sign of the scam was that we were pouring money into condos when the market was red hot. I could see city government having to make a deal to get jobs here because that's a fiercely competitive situation. That's a crater.
But why were we throwing money at a bubble?

I'm sure that lots and lots of people are clamoring to buy some cramped real estate at the corner of Killingsworth and Interstate.

By the way, in ten years time, this project will be held up as proof that light rail lines are "catalysts" for creating density. There will be no word of the heaping public subsidies, or the fact that the building was never financially feasible without them.

Establishing objective criteria for comparative ugliness is hardly a straightforward endeavor: ugly, like beautiful, may indeed be entirely in the eye of the beholder.

If the roof of a condo does not leak and the plumbing functions properly, then the structure might be considered suitable for a home. Nevertheless, there are buildings recently erected in this city that proffer not much more than an aesthetic challenge. Consider, for example, the SunRose Condominiums on the SE corner of Burnside and 28th:

You get the feeling that the PDC is trying to justify its existence.

The last thing Portland needs is more condos.

The only positive is that it will employ folks in the construction industry which has been badly badly hurt by this economy.

Comedy gold, brought to you by the kids who walk to dilapidated schools without the benefit of sidewalks. Volunteers do the landscaping, music and arts cost extra, the PTA buys classroom supplies, and they can't figure out why enrollment is declining.

Oh well, at least The Nines will have gold plated bathroom fixtures for whoever buys them out of bankruptcy.

"But why were we throwing money at a bubble?"

Why are we throwing money at sinkhole with as many condos on the market as there are now?

Best thing is - No Parking if it follows PDC form. So the retail part is screwed besides the tenants.

Want proof - Look at PDCs other field of dreams, NE MLK. All that brand new retail space with beauty supply stores, pizza joints and coffee houses and no parking.

These idiots really need to learn new tricks instead of re-cycling the same threadbare concepts.

Why learn new tricks when re-cycling of old ideas keeps getting you re-elected?

Darrin: Did the Portland voters reelect the PDC?

I've said it here many times before, and I'll say it again. PDC needs to be abolished. The fact that we have a public agency that is in the real estate development business simply defies logic by standards of every other city in the country.

Most cities attain their planning goals through zoning code (and yes, as bad as they are) through urban renewal districts. But to go as far as acquiring some properties (Bridgehead among them)and heavily subsidizing others...and losing money on every transaction? I know I'm preaching to the choir, but there is simply no excuse for this waste. They can package it in whatever they want..."green", "transit-oriented"...whatever. It is and will always be a waste of public money with no benefit...ever.

If Portland voters only understood this maybe they'd get pissed off enough to vote differently next time. Seriously...underfunded schools AND speculative real estate deals? There simply is no excuse for that.

Hey PD - Want to spearhead a ballot initiative to dissolve the PDC and stop the CoP from ever trying anything similar? I'll be your first signer.

Tom and Menefree, yes, visual "ugliness" is subjective in these condo towers, themselves.

But another kind of ugliness is how, in planning and building these towers, the process itself can create measurable ugliness. It was argued by the John Ross designers, like Bob Thompson, that to create a "signature" tower that the recently adopted SoWhat maximum footprint size needed to be increased 25%, plus two other design Standards needed to be ignored that affected the bulkiness, spacing of towers.They claimed that a larger square foot building was needed to pay for the "signature" tower.

The same CoP Planners that helped formulate these three Standards, after years of review, including adoption by the Planning Commission, Design Commission and the City Council, then asked on behalf of the developers and architects to throw out the Standards. Now that is ugly.

And look at what we get as we drive along Terwilliger Blvd., Barbur, Corbett, Front Ave, Macadam, I-5-a wall of buildings with no visual, solar permeability. All contrary to what the thrown-out Standards were attempting to do. Now, this is really UGLY.

Yes it is almost like the wild west - anything goes as long as the special interests make money. Who cares if Mt. Hood is no longer visible in its glory from so many parts of the city now? Who cares if the good planning we used to have doesn't apply anymore? A designer told me he worked on plans years ago for the buildings to be scaled down in height as sited closer to the waterfront? Certainly those good plans didn't "apply" anymore to SoWhat that sticks out as a mistake. I saw the "hole" downtown today and really missed the character of that block that had the Virginia Cafe and Zells.

Yes, where were the greenies, environmentalists, and the good planners when SoWhat's zoning was being increased from 3 to 1 FAR to 12 to 1, then allowing up to 325 ft buildings?

The SoWhat area has been in the statewide and city Greenway zone since it's inception in 1976. Greenway Regulations require heights of buildings to step down in height as they approach the river and to be "similar in scale to their surroundings". In the whole state there was/is not one building that is more than five stories in height in the distance that the Atwater and John Ross buildings are from the river. The nearest building which is over 9 blocks away is the RiverForum building, and it is 5 stories high.

Back in the days when CoP Planners respected the Greenway Zone, they helped insure the stepped down buildings west of Naito Parkway along McCall Riverfront Park in downtown. That is why the PGE World Trade complex has its highest building on the west side of its three block complex; and that building is over 900 ft. from the seawall. Oh, how the Planners of CoP are prostitutes.

Where are the experts, the concerned souls concerning our green agenda? Not one showed up, except neighborhood associations that asked these kinds of questions and were totally ignored.

lw: . . .Where are the experts, the concerned souls concerning our green agenda? Not one showed up, except neighborhood associations that asked these kinds of questions and were totally ignored.

Have also wondered lw, about where all these concerned planning and environmental souls are? I have observed also that in some matters as you said not one showed up.

What about that Coalition for a Livable Future? That seems to be a huge group.
and Sierra, and and ??
They seem to be relatively silent on critical issues? Also, I have noticed that some of these groups are focused on areas outside of Portland, save this or save that and Amazon Rain forests, etc. Not that those places don't need attention, but why the silence on so many issues right here in our community? It does seem like we have in our community "selective environmentalists" not really willing to get too much into the political scene here.

Clinamen, I've asked environmentalist, like Mike Houck who was with the Audubon Society at the earlier hearings/reviews of SoWhat and now Director of his Urban Greenspaces Institute here in Portland why no comments about the density, heights, concrete jungle of SoWhat. Answers have usually been that they want density here, not there, wherever that may be. If you mention that the area is in a wetland, flood zone or on a earthquake fault they shrug. If you discuss the carbon footprint of a 30 story building in comparison to three 10 story buildings maybe built in Kruse Way and how it is less, they don't know. If you discuss the impact of 30 stories on the Greenway Path, the river edge and river, or on Ross Island, they ignore the question. If you discuss the solar and wind impact of the density/height, they don't know what you are talking about. If you mention that transit trips into SoWhat isn't anymore than Kruse Way they just respond that "we are looking at the future".

What it boils down to is that they really haven't measured the environmental impact of their silence; they make assumptions, they are on a mission, they are righteous.

Thank you for the conversation and input on your experience.

I think too that this mission has taken over so that nothing else matters except that they want the density here period. Nothing else to be said or looked at I guess after that decision was made.
Which leads me to ask the question has Portland then essentially been written off as a kind of "sacrifice zone" so only to save areas outside of here?

Doesn't make sense to me to not be pro-active about the places within our city where we actually do live. With the cost of gasoline, and other changes in the way we might need to live, we may not have the same kinds of opportunity to even get out to these "other saved places" as we do today or to "escape" from the city tensions and then we will regret this Metro plan of extreme density. Just continuing to cover up our best fertile land with more housing developments when we may need that land right within our UGB for growing food. Then having to pay extra for food imported from other areas and even coming in from China makes my head spin. Plus they keep expanding the UGB and it is looking like sprawl anyway with step and repeat strip malls, etc. so nothing new there. I have lots of thoughts about all this perhaps for later.

"we are looking at the future"

that's the buzzword today. Of course, they never have to take a stand because then the future becomes now.

Tomorrow never comes.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics