Detail, east Portland photo, courtesy Miles Hochstein / Portland Ground.

For old times' sake
The bojack bumper sticker -- only $1.50!

To order, click here.

Excellent tunes -- free! And on your browser right now. Just click on Radio Bojack!

E-mail us here.


This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on August 16, 2010 3:32 PM. The previous post in this blog was Federal taxes haven't changed in 60 years. The next post in this blog is This project is a flop -- literally. Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.



Law and Taxation
How Appealing
TaxProf Blog
Mauled Again
Tax Appellate Blog
A Taxing Matter
Josh Marquis
Native America, Discovered and Conquered
The Yin Blog
Ernie the Attorney
Above the Law
The Volokh Conspiracy
Going Concern
Bag and Baggage
Wealth Strategies Journal
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation
World of Work
The Faculty Lounge
Lowering the Bar
OrCon Law

Hap'nin' Guys
Tony Pierce
Parkway Rest Stop
Along the Gradyent
Dwight Jaynes
Bob Borden
Dingleberry Gazette
The Red Electric
Iced Borscht
Jeremy Blachman
Dean's Rhetorical Flourish
Straight White Guy
As Time Goes By
Dave Wagner
Jeff Selis
Alas, a Blog
Scott Hendison
The View Through the Windshield
Appliance Blog
The Bleat

Hap'nin' Gals
My Whim is Law
Lelo in Nopo
Attorney at Large
Linda Kruschke
The Non-Consumer Advocate
10 Steps to Finding Your Happy Place
A Pig of Success
Attorney at Large
Margaret and Helen
Kimberlee Jaynes
Cornelia Seigneur
And Sew It Goes
Mile 73
Rainy Day Thoughts
That Black Girl
Posie Gets Cozy
Cat Eyes
Rhi in Pink
Ragwaters, Bitters, and Blue Ruin
Rose City Journal
Type Like the Wind

Portland and Oregon
Isaac Laquedem
Rantings of a [Censored] Bus Driver
Jeff Mapes
Vintage Portland
The Portlander
South Waterfront
Amanda Fritz
O City Hall Reporters
Guilty Carnivore
Old Town by Larry Norton
The Alaunt
Bend Blogs
Lost Oregon
Cafe Unknown
Tin Zeroes
David's Oregon Picayune
Mark Nelsen's Weather Blog
Travel Oregon Blog
Portland Daily Photo
Portland Building Ads
Portland Food and
Dave Knows Portland
Idaho's Portugal
Alameda Old House History
MLK in Motion

Retired from Blogging
Various Observations...
The Daily E-Mail
Saving James
Portland Freelancer
Furious Nads (b!X)
Izzle Pfaff
The Grich
Kevin Allman
AboutItAll - Oregon
Lost in the Details
Worldwide Pablo
Tales from the Stump
Whitman Boys
Two Pennies
This Stony Planet
1221 SW 4th
I am a Fish
Here Today
What If...?
Superinky Fixations
The Rural Bus Route
Another Blogger
Mikeyman's Computer Treehouse
Portland Housing Blog

Wonderfully Wacky
Dave Barry
Borowitz Report
Stuff White People Like
Worst of the Web

Valuable Time-Wasters
My Gallery of Jacks
Litterbox, On the Prowl
Litterbox, Bag of Bones
Litterbox, Scratch
Ride That Donkey
Singin' Horses
Rally Monkey
Simon Swears
Strong Bad's E-mail

Oregon News
The Oregonian
Portland Tribune
Willamette Week
The Sentinel
Southeast Examiner
Northwest Examiner
Sellwood Bee
Mid-County Memo
Vancouver Voice
Eugene Register-Guard
OPB - Portland
Salem Statesman-Journal
Oregon Capitol News
Portland Business Journal
Daily Journal of Commerce
Oregon Business
Portland Info Net
McMinnville News Register
Lake Oswego Review
The Daily Astorian
Bend Bulletin
Corvallis Gazette-Times
Roseburg News-Review
Medford Mail-Tribune
Ashland Daily Tidings
Newport News-Times
Albany Democrat-Herald
The Eugene Weekly
Portland IndyMedia
The Columbian

The Beatles
Bruce Springsteen
Joni Mitchell
Ella Fitzgerald
Steve Earle
Joe Ely
Stevie Wonder
Lou Rawls

E-mail, Feeds, 'n' Stuff

Monday, August 16, 2010

A jail by any other name is still a "detention facility"

The people who are expressing concern about the proposed new federal immigration detention tank in Portland's troubled SoWhat District are feeling the heat from City Hall and the developer cabal. We caught a nasty comment on this blog from someone working at GBD Architects, which was drawing up the plans for the facility without any scrutiny before the words "detention" and "cell" appeared on this blog and the firestorm began. The plans are still ongoing, but there's a lot more political friction being generated now, and the GBD folks apparently don't like working in sunshine.

The neighborhood association's land use committee is meeting tonight in the shadow of the infernal OHSU aerial tram [rim shot] to talk about the proposed facility. They've reportedly been catching flak from at least one prominent City Council staffer for daring to call the proposed facility a "jail." "It is not a jail!" we all keep being told.

But of course, it is.

Here are some dictionary definitions of "jail":

From Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary: "A building for the confinement of persons held in lawful custody."

From the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language: "A place for the confinement of persons in lawful detention, especially persons awaiting trial under local jurisdiction."

From Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary: "A place of confinement for persons held in lawful custody; specifically: such a place under the jurisdiction of a local government (as a county) for the confinement of persons awaiting trial or those convicted of minor crimes — compare prison."

It's clear that the to-be-remodeled building on Macadam can correctly be called a "jail," even though it's going to be run by the federal, rather than a local, government. It's a place where arrested people will be held awaiting their proceedings before a judge. Indeed, there's no better term for it than "jail."

At the very least, the proposed new facility can properly be said to include a "jail." And of course, it's that part of the proposed remodel that is driving its neighbors nuts. The City Hall types and architects can call it whatever they want, but the issue here, plain and simple, is the location of a jail.

From a legal standpoint, the more important point seems to be that the proposed facility will be a "detention facility" within the meaning of the city's planning and zoning code, which defines that term as follows:

33.920.520 Detention Facilities

A. Characteristics. Detention Facilities includes facilities for the judicially required detention or incarceration of people. Inmates and detainees are under 24 hour supervision by peace officers, except when on an approved leave.

B. Accessory Uses. Accessory uses include offices, recreational and health facilities, therapy facilities, maintenance facilities, and hobby and manufacturing activities.

C. Examples. Examples include prisons, jails, probation centers, and juvenile detention homes.

D. Exceptions. Programs that provide care and training or treatment for psychiatric, alcohol, or drug problems, where patients are residents of the program, but where patients are not supervised by peace officers are classified as Group Living. Programs that provide transitional living experience for former offenders, such as halfway houses, where residents are not supervised by peace officers, are also classified as Group Living.

"Detention facilities" aren't allowed, even in commercial zones such as the one on which the proposed facility sits, without "conditional use review," which we're told is a more thorough (and slower) process than the mere "design review" that the promoters of the project are pushing for. (Apparently, the property is owned by the Lindquist Development interests and under lease to the federal immigration authorities.)

Not that the facility couldn't pass muster in a "conditional use" application. It might. But among the criteria for approval is the sticky question of transportation, which is a real sore point in the entire SoWhat District. The proponents have to show that --

The transportation system is capable of supporting the proposed use in addition to the existing uses in the area. Evaluation factors include street capacity, level of service, or other performance measures; access to arterials; connectivity; transit availability; on-street parking impacts; access restrictions; neighborhood impacts; impacts on pedestrian, bicycle, and transit circulation; and safety for all modes...
That will be an interesting bone of contention in this case.

Meanwhile, the big question -- how many inmates the facility would hold -- is becoming slightly less mysterious. We're told by reliable sources that the capacity is to be 100 detainees -- with a projected "average" of 10 to 15 of them present at any given time.

Comments (30)

City Council also tells us that the cell towers going up in front of peoples homes are "Utility Replacement Structures" because cell towers aren't allowed without zoning review.
I hope the "guests" at the "facility" enjoy Portland's vibrant South Waterfront. I guess this is what it takes to get people to stay there.

Nothing says rising home and condo prices like "walking distance from Federal jail facility" in the MLS listing....

If you are in a "facility" and cannot leave at the time of your choosing, that sumbitch is a JAIL.

Sounds like Beth got a little edgy when faced with the truth. Thanks Jack, for keeping us posted with this information.

I'm over the exchange with Beth. But the GBD person, trash-talking under a pseudonym? Bad. Real bad.

Absolutely...I should have included "crow".

Awe and I was hoping for a Portland edition of Monopoly.

Jack, your post is right on. There are other factors that CoP's Kara Fioravanti (chief planner for the project) and GBD haven't considered. They have determined that this project is only an addition onto a existing office building for a bank's processing center, thus not requiring a Conditional Use Review, only a Design Review. This is really a stretch.

First, there is the Change of Use factor. Usually when there is a COU, especially to this magnitude of adding more square footage than existing and changing use from office and receiving center for bank documents to a Detention Center (Jail), then a CUR is required.

Secondly, if CoP and GBD wants to classify the offices necessary for the Fed Detention Center as similar or same as present office uses, there is still the factor that those "offices" are subsidiary to the main function of the
proposed use-a Fed Detention Center for hearings. The FDC is dependent on the Jail. Wrong interpretation.

Then, if CoP wants to classify all/parts of facility as "Community Services-Short Term Housing" under Title 33.285, then Table 285-1 and Table 130-1 requires under the CX zoning, a Conditional Use Review.

There is also the necessary reviews for this area for Greenway and Open Space.

Plus, we have the old standby "Design Review" Type III requirement still remaining that GBD is claiming anyone can ONLY talk about the window placement, colors of materials, number of bike racks, etc.; and not the larger issues allowed by the Conditional Use Review:

"Purpose-A necessary due to potential individual or cumulative impacts they may have on surround area or neighborhood."

That quote is really the substance that you have highlighted. This is another good case of Sam's Transparency-huh?

I'm wondering if CoP is trying to minimize all the processes/reviews they have put in the zoning code, that they are so entrenched in having many of us follow to the "T", for an outcome they have predetermined. That wouldn't be fair, would it?

In defense of those insisting on the distinction, the folks being detained would not be facing criminal charges but rather civil deportation proceedings. I think the relevant distinction is not state-federal but criminal-civil (though admittedly, many immigrants facing deportation came to ICE's attention because they were involved with criminal activity). I would find someone being detained for being in the US illegally much less threatening than someone convicted of a crime (especially a violent one).

Still, I think there's nothing wrong with calling the proposed facility a "jail."

You know back in the day (er 70s, the CoP was trying to let developer weasels bypass zoning to put a motel in a residential section of NW PDX. The city got sued by the neighborhood association and it put a stop to it. The question is can anyone afford to pony up court fees here?

What? No stockades? Maybe those could go in the poodle park....

LucsAdvo, the NW motel incident is also like the GooseHollow incident a few years ago. The City and developers tried sneak a carwash facility into a new building on SW Jefferson, a transit-oriented street. What could be more anti transit-oriented than a carwash? But CoP "forgot" the codes. The GooseHollow NA had to pull out the legal challenges to stop it.

Here's the rub. Unless things have changed since I was in the planning business the Feds are exempt from local land use regulations. We had case in the late 70's where the Postal Service relocated out of the Parkrose business district and told the County they weren't subject to local land use regualtions.

A discussion of Federal and State exemption can be found here:

Counsel for illegals who (a) occupy (b) appear (c) are held (d) spend time in this proposed (i) jail (ii) detention center (iii) holding place ...... might get charges thrown out because their client is/was being held in a place not approved to be a legal detention facility.

Because according to GBD Architects, that's not what they're designing and building.

The fix is in. Thus people here illegally and brought in will be eligible to be set free just as they're being processed to be locked up. Or something like that.

Synonyms: bastille, black hole, brig, bullpen, can*, cell, clink, cooler, detention camp, dungeon, house of correction, inside*, jailhouse, joint*, lockup, pen, penal institution, penitentiary, pound, prison, rack, reformatory, slammer, solitary*, stir*, stockade, up the river.

* = informal/non-formal usage


Not to mention the defacto public process exception in Portland: Mayor Adams is the Law if he gets two commissioners to agree.

lw asked, "What could be more anti transit-oriented than a carwash?".

How about a BIG BOX strip mall where $100 million tax dollars paid for all of the infrastrucutre for what was intended to be a ped/bike/transit oriented mini-city at Cascade Station-IKEA-BEST BUY.

Or Beaverton's tallest building a 7 story parking garage at the no longer transit oriented Round.

Or the MAX Green Line that Metro now says can't spur any transit oriented stuff because it is the wrong place.

etc etc etc

You got it wrong, Jack. In the euro-spirit of Neo-Stumptown-babble, it's a gaol -- and the double-bonus is that a lot of those MLS2PDX nuts will think it's part of the Paulson soccer complex. A Win!-Win!-Win!

Mayor Adams is the Law if he gets two commissioners to agree.

The majority of a legislative body elected by the people voting to pursue a course of action: The height of tyranny indeed!

Anon, you're right. The King of England and England's legislative body were called out for tyranny indeed by our founding Fathers.

the Feds are exempt from local land use regulations

The feds don't own the building.

the folks being detained would not be facing criminal charges but rather civil deportation proceedings. I think the relevant distinction is not state-federal but criminal-civil

No such distinctions appear in the city code. If it's "judicially required detention," it's a "detention facility," no matter whether it's "civil" or "criminal."

anon & lw:

You have defined the root cause of the problem: vesting both legislative and executive power in the Portland City Council created Absolute Power. Even more so when the City Attorney/City Auditor are just rubber stamps.

There are several possible solutions to this structural deficit, they include:

Electing Commissioners by district

2) Empowering a City Manager with executive authority

3) Revising the City Charter (a la "VOE") to create "Voter Owned" legal fund that citizens may access to challenger their elected official's unlawful ordinances in the Courts.

4) Replace our do nothing D.A. with somebody who will investigate local corruption and violation of City Charter and the O.R.S.

Mister Tee, I could be wrong, but I think Anon was jesting, tongue in cheek. But I wasn't. I was just throwing it back. I agree with your suggestions except for 3). We don't need another "department" managing a Voter Owned Legal Fund. How do you keep that from getting politicalized?

Sadly, I believe that Anon was quite sincere. Also don't forget that we lack an effective judicial branch of municipal government: there is no balance of power, there is only a Strong Mayor and his minions.

As for Voted Owned legal expenses, if we can provide $145,000 in campaign funds to any citizen that garners $5,000 in donations; why not give $l45,000 to any citizen who meets the same criteria (1,000 sigs with $5- donations) to defend our ordinances and charter? We just need three commissioners to approve it, and it's the LAW!!!

Jennifer , I second the motion !
Voter Owned Legal $$ can level the playing field. Of course we would not need this if we had a DA.

I was indeed being cheeky with my tyranny comment. I found Mister Tee's comments hyperbolic, though I'm not a huge fan of the city commission system of government.

To lw,

Unlike colonial Americans, Portlanders have universal suffrage. You can object to various decisions made by the elected leaders of the City, but unlike King George and Parliament circa 1770, they were indeed elected by a majority of adult citizens who chose to vote.

Hey Anon - Let me know when I can elect the morons that run the Port of Portland and other plum appointed positions that cost me $$. Home rule is not universal in Oregon yet.

Cheeky Anon, there's not much difference between King George's era and Portland's political scene. When you have only 30% of the registered voters-not the entire citizenship, voting on a few issues or electable positions, representative government is lacking.

Then when you add LucsAdvo's point about all the appointed Commissions, etc. like PoP and PDC, and the Boards and Committees, we are further diluted.

On top of that, how many times do we get to vote on substantive, costly issues like urban renewal, water and sewer projects, transportation, bridges, light rail and trolleys, sport facilities?

All this sort of explains why there is citizen participation apathy, but much ire.


You're still missing the most fundamental point: There is universal suffrage in Portland, and something like 3% of men were eligible to vote in George III's time (colonists not among them). Only 30% of Portlanders may choose to exercise their right to vote in local matters, but that's hardly tyranny--it's laziness.

Your analogy was hyperbolic and inapt.


As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:

In Vino Veritas

Lange, Pinot Gris 2015
Kiona, Lemberger 2014
Willamette Valley, Pinot Gris 2015
Aix, Rosé de Provence 2016
Marchigüe, Cabernet 2013
Inazío Irruzola, Getariako Txakolina Rosé 2015
Maso Canali, Pinot Grigio 2015
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Kirkland, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2016
Cantele, Salice Salentino Reserva 2013
Whispering Angel, Côtes de Provence Rosé 2013
Avissi, Prosecco
Cleto Charli, Lambrusco di Sorbara Secco, Vecchia Modena
Pique Poul, Rosé 2016
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly Rosé 2016
Stoller, Pinot Noir Rosé 2016
Chehalem, Inox Chardonnay 2015
The Four Graces, Pinot Gris 2015
Gascón, Colosal Red 2013
Cardwell Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
L'Ecole No. 41, Merlot 2013
Della Terra, Anonymus
Willamette Valley, Dijon Clone Chardonnay 2013
Wraith, Cabernet, Eidolon Estate 2012
Januik, Red 2015
Tomassi, Valpolicella, Rafaél, 2014
Sharecropper's Pinot Noir 2013
Helix, Pomatia Red Blend 2013
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
Campo Viejo, Rioja Reserva 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2013
Locations, Spanish Red Wine
Locations, Argentinian Red Wine
La Antigua Clásico, Rioja 2011
Shatter, Grenache, Maury 2012
Argyle, Vintage Brut 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16 Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2014
Benton Hill, Pinot Gris 2015
Primarius, Pinot Gris 2015
Januik, Merlot 2013
Napa Cellars, Cabernet 2013
J. Bookwalter, Protagonist 2012
LAN, Rioja Edicion Limitada 2011
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2009
Denada Cellars, Cabernet, Maipo Valley 2014
Marchigüe, Cabernet, Colchagua Valley 2013
Oberon, Cabernet 2014
Hedges, Red Mountain 2012
Balboa, Rose of Grenache 2015
Ontañón, Rioja Reserva 2015
Three Horse Ranch, Pinot Gris 2014
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
Nelms Road, Merlot 2013
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris 2014
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2012
Conn Creek, Cabernet, Napa 2013
Villa Maria, Sauvignon Blanc 2015
G3, Cabernet 2013
Chateau Smith, Cabernet, Washington State 2014
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #16
Willamette Valley, Rose of Pinot Noir, Whole Clusters 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Ca' del Baio Barbaresco Valgrande 2012
Goodfellow, Reserve Pinot Gris, Clover 2014
Lugana, San Benedetto 2014
Wente, Cabernet, Charles Wetmore 2011
La Espera, Cabernet 2011
King Estate, Pinot Gris 2015
Adelsheim, Pinot Gris 2015
Trader Joe's, Pinot Gris, Willamette Valley 2015
La Vite Lucente, Toscana Red 2013
St. Francis, Cabernet, Sonoma 2013
Kendall-Jackson, Pinot Noir, California 2013
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Napa Valley 2013
Erath, Pinot Noir, Estate Selection 2012
Abbot's Table, Columbia Valley 2014
Intrinsic, Cabernet 2014
Oyster Bay, Pinot Noir 2010
Occhipinti, SP68 Bianco 2014
Layer Cake, Shiraz 2013
Desert Wind, Ruah 2011
WillaKenzie, Pinot Gris 2014
Abacela, Fiesta Tempranillo 2013
Des Amis, Rose 2014
Dunham, Trautina 2012
RoxyAnn, Claret 2012
Del Ri, Claret 2012
Stoppa, Emilia, Red 2004
Primarius, Pinot Noir 2013
Domaines Bunan, Bandol Rose 2015
Albero, Bobal Rose 2015
Deer Creek, Pinot Gris 2015
Beaulieu, Rutherford Cabernet 2013
Archery Summit, Vireton Pinot Gris 2014
King Estate, Pinot Gris, Backbone 2014
Oberon, Napa Cabernet 2013
Apaltagua, Envero Carmenere Gran Reserva 2013
Chateau des Arnauds, Cuvee des Capucins 2012
Nine Hats, Red 2013
Benziger, Cabernet, Sonoma 2012
Roxy Ann, Claret 2012
Januik, Merlot 2012
Conundrum, White 2013
St. Francis, Sonoma Cabernet 2012

The Occasional Book

Phil Stanford - Rose City Vice
Kenneth R. Feinberg - What is Life Worth?
Kent Haruf - Our Souls at Night
Peter Carey - True History of the Kelly Gang
Suzanne Collins - The Hunger Games
Amy Stewart - Girl Waits With Gun
Philip Roth - The Plot Against America
Norm Macdonald - Based on a True Story
Christopher Buckley - Boomsday
Ryan Holiday - The Obstacle is the Way
Ruth Sepetys - Between Shades of Gray
Richard Adams - Watership Down
Claire Vaye Watkins - Gold Fame Citrus
Markus Zusak - I am the Messenger
Anthony Doerr - All the Light We Cannot See
James Joyce - Dubliners
Cheryl Strayed - Torch
William Golding - Lord of the Flies
Saul Bellow - Mister Sammler's Planet
Phil Stanford - White House Call Girl
John Kaplan & Jon R. Waltz - The Trial of Jack Ruby
Kent Haruf - Eventide
David Halberstam - Summer of '49
Norman Mailer - The Naked and the Dead
Maria Dermoȗt - The Ten Thousand Things
William Faulkner - As I Lay Dying
Markus Zusak - The Book Thief
Christopher Buckley - Thank You for Smoking
William Shakespeare - Othello
Joseph Conrad - Heart of Darkness
Bill Bryson - A Short History of Nearly Everything
Cheryl Strayed - Tiny Beautiful Things
Sara Varon - Bake Sale
Stephen King - 11/22/63
Paul Goldstein - Errors and Omissions
Mark Twain - A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
Steve Martin - Born Standing Up: A Comic's Life
Beverly Cleary - A Girl from Yamhill, a Memoir
Kent Haruf - Plainsong
Hope Larson - A Wrinkle in Time, the Graphic Novel
Rudyard Kipling - Kim
Peter Ames Carlin - Bruce
Fran Cannon Slayton - When the Whistle Blows
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt

Road Work

Miles run year to date: 113
At this date last year: 155
Total run in 2016: 155
In 2015: 271
In 2014: 401
In 2013: 257
In 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269

Clicky Web Analytics