One of several disturbing trends we've noticed about Portland city government is its ever-increasing commercialization. Sure, the mega-million-dollar "public-private partnership" ripoffs are the most galling, but now the sellouts are seeping into routine operations. It's gotten so that City Hall can hardly get through a day without hawking some commercial outfit's wares, usually in the name of "green," "multi-modal transportation," "for the children," or some other foggy notion.
A few weeks ago we had Mayor Creepy hawking Visa cards. Now here's the latest -- Sustainable Susan & Co. drooling over a magazine about the latest hipness, "urban farming." From the city's web page:
Chock full of ideas and stories, Urban Farm is a great resource for beginning or established urban farmers. Read about successful fruit gleaners, the philosophies of ecopsychotherapy and lawn reformists. Get tips on foraging, raising livestock, wine making, setting up a healthy yard-sharing partnership, creating low maintenance water systems and container gardens.
As best we can tell, Urban Farm is published by a for-profit outfit based in Los Angeles. If the City of Portland's going to tout commercial products, it ought to get paid for the service. It can use the revenue to pay for the many children we have in City Hall grinding out Tweet after worthless Tweet, trying in vain to put lipstick on a pig.
I really don't know if I'm going to make it in this town. I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
A third?
The last time I checked, the "creative class" is about 20-25% of Portland's population.
The problem is that they vote quite often. It's those who live in East and un-gentrified North Portland who don't vote and allow the "creative class" to vote their form of a utopia, whereby only they have any power or say in the world, and everyone else is just there to serve them. And anything that requires industrialization..."out of sight, out of mind". Just like the coal fired power plant that provides half of Portland's power...it's 160 miles away, so who cares?
The ironic part is, Portland policy (and land use practices) run almost opposite to this kind of feel-goodness. For example, Saltzman praised the community gardens program years ago, promised to expand it--then promptly shut down two of the most popular ones and let developers build on them. Now, as he and others talk of improving it, their current promises equal a net zero gain in the program.
But Adams and other council members occasionally promote boutique press opportunities--like a "garden" at City Hall. That project epitomizes what City Council is *really* willing to commit to.
Jack: the many children we have in City Hall grinding out Tweet after worthless Tweet, trying in vain to put lipstick on a pig. JK: I would sure love to see an expose of this operation. I wonder how much Portland media they dominate.
ecohuman:The ironic part is, Portland policy (and land use practices) run almost opposite to this kind of feel-goodness. For example, Saltzman praised the community gardens program years ago, promised to expand it--then promptly shut down two of the most popular ones and let developers build on them. . .
Fits so perfectly with what I have written about here in the past:
Curtain Open
Curtain Closed
Curtain Open: What is PR and marketed to us and to others around the country about how “sustainable” and what good planning we have here, etc.
Curtain Closed: The behind the scenes that do the opposite and are not in the public interest.
Snards: . . I really don't know if I'm going to make it in this town. I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
I am afraid you are not alone in that thought.
City of Roses represented a city of beauty and livability. What happened to ours?
We have seen our livability being incrementally taken away from us and to benefit whom? Of course, they had to change the name to the City That Works to do it. How has the horrendous infill, traffic congestion and the list is longer worked for us?
It is sad to have this happen. I believe that what has happened has been planned for years “under the Curtain Open” theme and then 'behind the Curtain Closed" is what has been working against us.
I have often wondered how much of our money may have been used to sales pitch our area? I believe it may helped to have the new people who will support the agenda be lured in here and that assists those who benefit at our expense and of course helps the insiders to stay in.
I am sad about this. I do not like the feeling that I may have to leave in order to get away from really what I consider an ugly scene here.
I recognize that there is no perfect place to land and that no matter where one goes, if one is aware, there will be something to contend. However, I also feel that we have been way way overloaded here with things absolutely not right.
I am conflicted as I do not feel like I should have to be driven out by the frustration as week after week announcements here of yet another dysfunctional council decision and other county, metro, etc. neighborhood level aspects makes me have to wonder about continuing on in this town.
I find I want to live in a community of people who care enough to not let this happen. I do not want to live in this kind of negative community as though I am living in a controlled arena while the Curtain Open promotes how wonderful we have citizen input! An unhealthy pallor permeates our city. We have less safety, less services, now we are getting constant announcements of needing more citizens volunteering and in some cases putting citizens in danger, but they don’t care. We are paying more and more and getting less and less.
I do know that for myself it has been good to be able to communicate after years of frustration about this on Jacks blog.
Thank you to Jack for this avenue for I know I am not alone with this dysfunctional whatever is going on here in our city.
Thank you to you Snards and your comments that resonate. Thank you to Bill McDonald for bringing in the financial aspects of Goldman Sachs, bonds and so forth, I especially liked your comments on BP and calling out our government as though they are bellhops. Thanks to Ben, who is as passionate and persistent about stopping the $$ going on the Milwaukie light rail and I am about stopping the $$ on unnecessary PWB projects. Thanks to so many of you, if I mentioned all, the column would become too long. You know who you are that care and have shared in here.
Charamba, Douro 2008
Horse Heaven Hills, Cabernet 2010
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills Pinot Grigio 2011
Avignonesi, Montepulciano 2004
Lorelle, Willamette Valley Pinot Noir 2011
Villa Antinori, Toscana 2007
Mercedes Eguren, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Lorelle, Columbia Valley Cabernet 2011
Purple Moon, Merlot 2011
Purple Moon, Chardonnnay 2011
Abacela, Vintner's Blend No. 12
Opula Red Blend 2010
Liberte, Pinot Noir 2010
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Indian Wells Red Blend 2010
Woodbridge, Chardonnay 2011
King Estate, Pinot Noir 2011
Famille Perrin, Cotes du Rhone Villages 2010
Columbia Crest, Les Chevaux Red 2010
14 Hands, Hot to Trot White Blend
Familia Bianchi, Malbec 2009
Terrapin Cellars, Pinot Gris 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2009
Campo Viejo, Rioja, Termpranillo 2010
Ravenswood, Cabernet Sauvignon 2009
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2010
Waterbrook, Reserve Merlot 2009
Lorelle, Horse Heaven Hills, Pinot Grigio 2011
Tarantas, Rose
Chateau Lajarre, Bordeaux 2009
La Vielle Ferme, Rose 2011
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio 2011
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir 2009
Lello, Douro Tinto 2009
Quinson Fils, Cotes de Provence Rose 2011
Anindor, Pinot Gris 2010
Buenas Ondas, Syrah Rose 2010
Les Fiefs d'Anglars, Malbec 2009
14 Hands, Pinot Gris 2011
Conundrum 2012
Condes de Albarei, Albariño 2011
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2007
Penelope Sanchez, Garnacha Syrah 2010
Canoe Ridge, Merlot 2007
Atalaya do Mar, Godello 2010
Vega Montan, Mencia
Benvolio, Pinot Grigio
Nobilo Icon, Pinot Noir, Marlborough 2009
Portuga, Rose 2011
Revelation, Chardonnay, Pays d'Oc 2010
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 2005
Monte Alto, Tinto Reserva 2005
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Cabernet, Indian Wells 2009
Espiral, Vinho Rose
Vin-Koru, Pinot Gris 2011
14 Hands, Hot to Trot Red 2009
Rodney Strong, Cabernet, Sonoma 2009
Abacela, Vintner's Blend #11
Portuga, White 2010
La Bourgeoisie, Red 2009
Januik, Red 2009
Three Rivers, River's Red 2008
Kirkland, Alexander Valley Merlot 2008
Muga, Rioja Rose 2010
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
The Occasional Book
Neil Young - Waging Heavy Peace
Mark Bego - Aretha Franklin, the Queen of Soul (2012 ed.)
Jenny Lawson - Let's Pretend This Never Happened
J.D. Salinger - Franny and Zooey
Charles Dickens - A Christmas Carol
Timothy Egan - The Big Burn
Deborah Eisenberg - Transactions in a Foreign Currency
Kurt Vonnegut Jr. - Slaughterhouse Five
Kathryn Lance - Pandora's Genes
Cheryl Strayed - Wild
Fyodor Dostoyevsky - The Brothers Karamazov
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Road Work
Miles run year to date: 21
At this date last year: 52
Total run in 2012: 129
In 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (14)
Get tips on foraging ...
Isn't that how the bums get cigarette butts?
Posted by Garage Wine | June 25, 2010 8:43 AM
The motto of the Lawn Reformists "Don't mow, let it grow."
Posted by Tom | June 25, 2010 8:49 AM
Still waiting for the first flyer on how they're considering raising water/sewer rates.
That kind of BS they pull under cover of night and don't tell anyone about. Otherwise, the bloviation on non-essentials continues.
Posted by Steve | June 25, 2010 9:12 AM
"the philosophies of ecopsychotherapy"
I really don't know if I'm going to make it in this town. I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
Posted by Snards | June 25, 2010 9:39 AM
I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
A third?
The last time I checked, the "creative class" is about 20-25% of Portland's population.
The problem is that they vote quite often. It's those who live in East and un-gentrified North Portland who don't vote and allow the "creative class" to vote their form of a utopia, whereby only they have any power or say in the world, and everyone else is just there to serve them. And anything that requires industrialization..."out of sight, out of mind". Just like the coal fired power plant that provides half of Portland's power...it's 160 miles away, so who cares?
Posted by Erik H. | June 25, 2010 9:42 AM
CoP Mayor, Council & Bureaus need *Eeek-O-Therapy*
No Self Control
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jj314PWnLaI
Posted by Mojo | June 25, 2010 9:46 AM
ecopsychotherapy Is the bullsh**ology word that caught my eye. Sex poodle Al Gores internet has some interpretations but basically it means:
"Go for a walk in the park."
Posted by dman | June 25, 2010 10:00 AM
The ironic part is, Portland policy (and land use practices) run almost opposite to this kind of feel-goodness. For example, Saltzman praised the community gardens program years ago, promised to expand it--then promptly shut down two of the most popular ones and let developers build on them. Now, as he and others talk of improving it, their current promises equal a net zero gain in the program.
But Adams and other council members occasionally promote boutique press opportunities--like a "garden" at City Hall. That project epitomizes what City Council is *really* willing to commit to.
Posted by ecohuman | June 25, 2010 10:45 AM
The last time I checked, the "creative class" is about 20-25% of Portland's population.
Actually, by Richard Florida's own definition and admission, almost 85% of Portland residents are part of the creative class.
Seriously. One Florida example: Welders.
Posted by ecohuman | June 25, 2010 10:46 AM
Jack: the many children we have in City Hall grinding out Tweet after worthless Tweet, trying in vain to put lipstick on a pig.
JK: I would sure love to see an expose of this operation. I wonder how much Portland media they dominate.
Thanks
JK
Posted by jim karlock | June 25, 2010 11:41 AM
ecohuman:The ironic part is, Portland policy (and land use practices) run almost opposite to this kind of feel-goodness. For example, Saltzman praised the community gardens program years ago, promised to expand it--then promptly shut down two of the most popular ones and let developers build on them. . .
Fits so perfectly with what I have written about here in the past:
Curtain Open
Curtain Closed
Curtain Open: What is PR and marketed to us and to others around the country about how “sustainable” and what good planning we have here, etc.
Curtain Closed: The behind the scenes that do the opposite and are not in the public interest.
Posted by clinamen | June 25, 2010 12:07 PM
Go by pigsty!
(...and while you're at it, put on some lipstick!)
Posted by godfry | June 25, 2010 7:50 PM
Snards: . . I really don't know if I'm going to make it in this town. I feel contempt for about a third of the people who live here. And they're the most vocal and seem to control everything.
I am afraid you are not alone in that thought.
City of Roses represented a city of beauty and livability. What happened to ours?
We have seen our livability being incrementally taken away from us and to benefit whom? Of course, they had to change the name to the City That Works to do it. How has the horrendous infill, traffic congestion and the list is longer worked for us?
It is sad to have this happen. I believe that what has happened has been planned for years “under the Curtain Open” theme and then 'behind the Curtain Closed" is what has been working against us.
I have often wondered how much of our money may have been used to sales pitch our area? I believe it may helped to have the new people who will support the agenda be lured in here and that assists those who benefit at our expense and of course helps the insiders to stay in.
I am sad about this. I do not like the feeling that I may have to leave in order to get away from really what I consider an ugly scene here.
I recognize that there is no perfect place to land and that no matter where one goes, if one is aware, there will be something to contend. However, I also feel that we have been way way overloaded here with things absolutely not right.
I am conflicted as I do not feel like I should have to be driven out by the frustration as week after week announcements here of yet another dysfunctional council decision and other county, metro, etc. neighborhood level aspects makes me have to wonder about continuing on in this town.
I find I want to live in a community of people who care enough to not let this happen. I do not want to live in this kind of negative community as though I am living in a controlled arena while the Curtain Open promotes how wonderful we have citizen input! An unhealthy pallor permeates our city. We have less safety, less services, now we are getting constant announcements of needing more citizens volunteering and in some cases putting citizens in danger, but they don’t care. We are paying more and more and getting less and less.
I do know that for myself it has been good to be able to communicate after years of frustration about this on Jacks blog.
Thank you to Jack for this avenue for I know I am not alone with this dysfunctional whatever is going on here in our city.
Thank you to you Snards and your comments that resonate. Thank you to Bill McDonald for bringing in the financial aspects of Goldman Sachs, bonds and so forth, I especially liked your comments on BP and calling out our government as though they are bellhops. Thanks to Ben, who is as passionate and persistent about stopping the $$ going on the Milwaukie light rail and I am about stopping the $$ on unnecessary PWB projects. Thanks to so many of you, if I mentioned all, the column would become too long. You know who you are that care and have shared in here.
Posted by clinamen | June 25, 2010 9:09 PM
This is the background pic they use on Urban Farm. I'm not sure what they are growing or how you would eat it.
http://www.urbanfarmonline.com/images/global/background.jpg
Posted by dman | June 25, 2010 10:58 PM