

We accept advertising through Blogads. If you're interested, click the "Advertise here" link above, or go here to place your ad through Blogads. For assistance, e-mail me here; I'd be glad to help. Reach lots of viewers -- we're up to about 3,800 unique visits a day, and more than 61,000 page views a week (as of November 4). Our rates are dirt cheap for the exposure you'll get! If you'd like to advertise without going through the Blogads system, that's do-able, too. Just e-mail us here for more information.
As a lawyer/blogger, I get
to be a member of:
Quinta das Amoras, Vinho Tinto 2009
Mauro Molino, Barbera d'Alba 2009
Garda Chiaretto Rose
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Vineyard 10 White
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Pinot Gris, Columbia Valley 2009
L'Hortus, Rose de Saignee 2010
Maculan, Pino & Toi 2008
McKinley Springs, Bombing Range Red 2008
Trader Joe's Pinot Gris 2009
Montes Alpha, Cabernet 2007
Gran Sasso, Sangiovese, Terre di Chieti 2009
Garda, Classico Chiaretto Rose
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1999
Picos del Montgo, Tempranillo 2008
Chateau de Montmirail, Vacqueyras 2008
La Granja 360, Syrah 2009
Montgras, Carmenere Reserva 2009
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Cabernet 2008
Kirkland, Pinot Grigio 2010
Trader Joe's Coastal Syrah 2009
Columbia Crest, Horse Heaven Hills Merlot 2008
Trader Joe's Coastal Chardonnay 2009
Vieux Papes Red
Domaine de l'Aujardiere, Chardonnay 2009
Santa Rita, Cabernet, Medalla Real 2007
Penfold's, Koonunga Hill Shiraz Cabernet 2008
Guild, Red, Lot #02 2008
Dievole, Dievolino Sangiovese 2008
Laforet, Burgogne Chardonnay 2009
Columbia Winery, Merlot 2007
Bonterra, Cabernet 2008
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2009
Maquis Lien 2006
Scott Paul, Pinot Noir, Le Paulee 2007
Cameron, Chardonnay
B.R. Cohn, Cabernet, Silver Label 2006
Graffigna, Cabernet 2005
Palo Alto, Reserve Red 2008
Menguante, Garnacha 2008
Lange, Pinot Gris 2009
Felsina Berardenga, Vin Santo 1997
Anne Amie, Pinot Gris 2009
McKinley Springs, Bombing Ramge Red 2007
Vieux Papes Red
Dionysius Chardonnay 2009
Haden Fig, Pinot Noir 2009
Vega Montan, Mencia 2008
Chateau la Vernede, Coteaux du Languedoc 2007
Mount Defiance, Hellfire (White) 2008
Root: 1, Cabernet 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines Pinot Grigio 2009
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 White, 2008
Columbia Crest, Two Vines, Vineyard 10 Rose, 2007
Abacela, Grenache Rose 2009
Avia Cabernet 2004
Lemelson Pinot Noir, Thea's Selection 2007
Chateau de la Roulerie, Rose d'Anjou 2009
Casal Garcia, Vinho Verde Rose
La Ferme Julien, Rose 2008
Cana's Feast, Bricco Red, 2006
Hogue, Genesis Merlot, 2008
Owen Roe, Sharecropper's Cabernet, 2008
Kim Crawford, Unoaked Chardonnay 2008
J. Scott, Pinot Noir 2008
Edmunds St. John, White, Heart of Gold 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2006
Stevenot, Cabernet, Sierra Foothills, "Stanford" 2000
Portuga, Vinho Rose 2009
Taylor Fladgate, First Estate Reserve Porto
Franciscan, Cabernet, Napa 2006
Chaparral de Vega Sindoa, Garnacha 2008
Quinta da Aveleda, Vinho Verde 2008
St. Francis, Chardonnay Sonoma 2008
E. Guigal, Cotes du Rhone Blanc, 2007
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Noir 2008
St. Innocent, Pinot Noir 2006
Jigsaw, Pinot Noir 2007
Chateau Ste. Michelle, Merlot, Indian Wells 2007
Charles Shaw, Chardonnay 2008
Edmunds St. John, Bone-Jolly, Gamay Rosé 2009
Cameron, Willamette Valley Chardonnay
Il Valore, Sangiovese, Giovane, Puglia 2008
Duck Pond, Chardonnay, Wahluke Slope 2007
Kim Crawford, Marlborough Pinot Noir 2008
Domaine du Pesquier, Cotes du Rhone 2005
Cantina Zaccagnini, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo 2006
Domaine Matrot, Chardonnay, Bourgogne 2007
David Hill, Oregon Sparkling Wine, Brut
Chandler Reach, Monte Regalo 2006
Elk Cove, Pinot Gris 2008
Kirkland, Columbia Valley Merlot 2008
D'Aragon, Old Vine Garnacha 2008
Columbia Crest, Walter Clore Private Reserve 2005
Pavin & Riley, Merlot 2006
David Hill, Estate Pinot Noir, Barrel Select 2006
Castle Rock, Paso Robles Cabernet 2006
Magnificent, Cabernet, Steak House 2008
Conundrum 2008
Beaulieu, Cabernet, Rutherford 1998
Saint Cosme, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
La Granja, Tempranillo 360, 2008
Santa Rita, Mendalla Real Cabernet 2006
Columbia Crest, Grand Estates Merlot 2006
Andezon, Cotes-du-Rhone 2007
Collegiata, Montepulciano d'Abruzzo
Troon, Druid's Fluid 2008
La Granja, Tempranillo 2008
Monte Antico, Toscana 2006
Vieux Papes, Blanc de Blancs
Jack London - The House of Pride, and Other Tales of Hawaii
Jack Walker - The Extraordinary Rendition of Vincent Dellamaria
Colum McCann - Let the Great World Spin
Niccolò Machiavelli - The Prince
Harper Lee - To Kill a Mockingbird
Emma McLaughlin & Nicola Kraus - The Nanny Diaries
Brian Selznick - The Invention of Hugo Cabret
Sharon Creech - Walk Two Moons
Keith Richards - Life
F. Sionil Jose - Dusk
Natalie Babbitt - Tuck Everlasting
Justin Halpern - S#*t My Dad Says
Mark Herrmann - The Curmudgeon's Guide to Practicing Law
Barry Glassner - The Gospel of Food
Phil Stanford - The Peyton-Allan Files
Jesse Katz - The Opposite Field
Evelyn Waugh - Brideshead Revisited
J.K. Rowling - Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone
David Sedaris - Holidays on Ice
Donald Miller - A Million Miles in a Thousand Years
Mitch Albom - Have a Little Faith
C.S. Lewis - The Magician's Nephew
F. Scott Fitzgerald - The Great Gatsby
William Shakespeare - A Midsummer Night's Dream
Ivan Doig - Bucking the Sun
Penda Diakité - I Lost My Tooth in Africa
Grace Lin - The Year of the Rat
Oscar Hijuelos - Mr. Ives' Christmas
Madeline L'Engle - A Wrinkle in Time
Steven Hart - The Last Three Miles
David Sedaris - Me Talk Pretty One Day
Karen Armstrong - The Spiral Staircase
Charles Larson - The Portland Murders
Adrian Wojnarowski - The Miracle of St. Anthony
William H. Colby - Long Goodbye
Steven D. Stark - Meet the Beatles
Phil Stanford - Portland Confidential
Rick Moody - Garden State
Jonathan Schwartz - All in Good Time
David Sedaris - Dress Your Family in Corduroy and Denim
Anthony Holden - Big Deal
Robert J. Spitzer - The Spirit of Leadership
James McManus - Positively Fifth Street
Jeff Noon - Vurt
Miles run year to date: 54
At this date last year: 50
Total run in 2011: 113
In 2010: 125
In 2009: 67
In 2008: 28
In 2007: 113
In 2006: 100
In 2005: 149
In 2004: 204
In 2003: 269
Comments (35)
Gee, and checking the City's own portlandmaps.com reveals the site to be in the "HIGH" earthquake hazard area. That sure doesn't seem like a great idea for the proposed use. Isn't this site where ESCO used to be?
Posted by none | May 27, 2010 7:59 AM
Don't we already have perfectly good parks where they can do this kind of thing in the event of a disaster? How about the vacant land at the shuttered up Washington High which is surrounded by a residential core? I agree that the deal smells bad given that this is most certainly a buyer's market and real estate is declining in value by the day. The last thing the cash strapped city needs to do at this point in time is shell out 10 million for a vacant lot.
Posted by Usual Kevin | May 27, 2010 8:09 AM
Why put your eggs all in one basket? If there is a quake and all this equipment is in one place. What happens if you can't get to it. It should be spread out. not just in the city, but just outside in stable areas too. And raising water and sewer rates! Many homeowner can barely keep up now.
Posted by Bladerunner | May 27, 2010 8:10 AM
While this deal does stink of something improper, it is worth saying that this particular lot is sitting right at the last stoplight on Yeon before it turns into a freeway, with quick emergency access to basically anything.
If they were paying market price for it, and the economy wasn't in the toilet, and there was a clear demonstrated need for such a thing... which none of these are true... then maybe this wouldn't be such a bad site for it.
Posted by MachineShedFred | May 27, 2010 8:20 AM
I think that's the old US Steel site that's been sitting empty since the late 1980's.
Great Leader already has the Police Bureau, Streets & Transportation, with Randy Leonard apparently in his pocket the Water/Sewer/Bikes/Scholarship/GeneralCollections Bureau whatever it's turning into, plus I don't know what else. Perhaps the mayor does want his own media outlet, or maybe he just want the O to owe him a big favor. Or maybe it's just another 'investment' like the old Post Office site.
Who knows what he's up to next? I have a feeling all will be revealed to the people in due time. Perhaps there's even some sort of 'Enabling Act' of historical proportions around the corner...
Posted by JC | May 27, 2010 8:23 AM
"...before it turns into a freeway, with quick emergency access to basically anything."
I would expect a freeway to become a parking lot in the event of a major disaster, though. I think Bladerunner's comment is pretty on target.
Posted by PDXLifer | May 27, 2010 8:40 AM
At one time, Costco tried to get clearance to build a mega-store at that site, but was thwarted by neighbors et al.
_ob_
Posted by oregbear | May 27, 2010 8:51 AM
I don't think Sam needs to "buy off" the big O. He seems own their staff as it is.
Posted by David E Gilmore | May 27, 2010 8:52 AM
Portland is one large disaster staging area.
Posted by Tom | May 27, 2010 8:59 AM
As previously noted, highest and best use would be Costco, Wal-Mart. Why does the city need this property at all? With all of the vacant land at the area between PIR and the Expo center this is another boondoggle. These people search out things to waste our money on!!
Posted by pdxjim | May 27, 2010 9:24 AM
It's a pretty good site to watch the Fremont Bridge collapse into a hunk of twisted steel and shattered concrete.
And it would also be a good staging area for shipping out all of us democracy lovers to the FEMA camps.
Posted by Ralph Woods | May 27, 2010 9:28 AM
This is fascinating, someone should give Sam and Randy a call and explain to them how to use LoopNet (a comm listing service for free once you get an acct) and they could find the following in the general area (Address/Asking/Acres/$PerAcre):
12160 NE Riverside $1,450,000.00 5.48 $264,598.54
17800 NE Riverside $1,700,000.00 5.21 $326,295.59
10504 NW St Helens $7,850,000.00 24.74 $317,299.92
6849 NE Columbia $2,575,000.00 11.25 $228,888.89
2167 NE Elrod $1,850,000.00 10.86 $170,349.91
Average = $3,085,000.00 11.508 $261,486.57
Sam's Land $10,000,000 10.6 $943,396.23
The O is making blogs look more belivable every day by comparison. OF COURSE IT IS A PAYOFF!!!
BTW - I have to admit, this is a relative bargain compared to the Central PO deal.
Posted by Steve | May 27, 2010 9:44 AM
Forgot - How do they pay for this largesse?
If you still read the O and believe it, front page of Metro:
Water (12% after last year's 18% increase) and Sewer (another 6.35% after umpteen years of raises) have increased. They will find a back door to siphone money out of PWB while the Auditor looks the other way.
No wonder Gary whatsisname quit, he must have a little shred of conscience or foretaste of the potential illegallity of all this crap.
All with a 5-0 vote of City COuncil. And Portland has done nothing more than study LT2. God forbid if they actually do something.
Posted by Steve | May 27, 2010 9:49 AM
In the case of emergency where the bridges are out of commission: I would hazzard a guess that most of the people on Portland's emergency and street crews do not live in NW, and would have just as hard a time getting to the staging site.
Anyway, whatever is behind this, the bottom line is that this is an absolutely ridiculous expenditure at this time. A Big One only happens once in many hundreds of years, so odds are quite good it won't happen in the next three or four years. We can probably wait until better economic times return.
These guys just don't understand money. Straight up. We could do with at least one token businessperson on the council.
Posted by Snards | May 27, 2010 9:59 AM
Steve,
Water turned into 15% increase....they snuck in a 3% increase on the "base charge".
Posted by insider | May 27, 2010 10:08 AM
Sorry, I just noticed:
12160 NE Riverside $1,450,000.00 / 5.48 / $264,598.54
Should be:
12160 NW St Helens $1,450,000.00 / 5.48 / $264,598.54
Doesn't change that CoP is paying $946K/acre while the average asking is $261K/acre
Posted by Steve | May 27, 2010 10:08 AM
Why not just use Forest Park? We own it and it is already a staging area and only 12 blocks away.
But let's get serious. Who, what, where are the studies, commissions, stakeholders that decided we needed a "staging area"? What brought this on? After Sam's glorious decision are we now to get one of his famous power point, easel-grease-pencil- board, mike-in-hand, lecturing TownHall Meetings????
Posted by lw | May 27, 2010 10:14 AM
Not only is the average asking price $261K per acre, very few sites (if any) are selling these days. This means that the asking prices are too high. I would wager a cash offer on one of these parcels from the city would net a lower actual selling price.
If they were clever they could negotiate a friendly Eminent Domain proceeding so the land owner could avoid capital gains taxes. This would drop the acceptable price even further.
Posted by John | May 27, 2010 10:15 AM
I'm doing a little shopping:
http://www.amazon.com/Ames-1837600-Best-Manure-Fork/dp/B000DILSKU/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&s=home-garden&qid=1274980621&sr=8-3
http://www.amazon.com/Bond-1005-Classic-Bamboo-Torch/dp/B000HHSDOQ/ref=sr_1_39?ie=UTF8&s=garden&qid=1274980673&sr=1-39
Posted by John | May 27, 2010 10:18 AM
If the intent was to acquire the property for some genuine city services oriented purpose, I'm sure there's no shortage of clever and sneaky ways the city could get hold of it. This blog alone is largely about fast ones City Hall is constantly pulling.
I agree with the other posters... like the Central PO, they're paying top dollar for some other reason, yet to be revealed.
Posted by JC | May 27, 2010 10:40 AM
Great research on land sales. I think the an equally good counterpoint here is that Adams is taking a very rare, unsually large, and well located industrial parcel off the market while it could be used to attract a sizable employer to the City. No, I'm not thinking Costco here, I'm talking about manufacturing.
Think about it...if City Hall was at all serious about job creation they'd partner with the owners of that site and bundle it in an incentive package to attract a large employer. Instead, Adams and Leonard are being grabby with our money and reducing the inventory of industrial land at the same time.
These Bozos don't have a clue...and you can bet that since the Oregonian owns it, this will be one of the least publicized land grabs of all time. And we all though it was sketchy that the Oregonian didn't report about Bob Caldwell's DUI? They surely won't make a peep when they're trying to unload this asset at a tremendous gain on the backs of ratepayers.
Posted by PD | May 27, 2010 10:41 AM
I don't get where this conversation is going. Shouldn't the question be "why do we need a staging area for any future catastrophic disaster?" and not questioning the value of the Oregonian property? Which is very legitimate after you answer the first question.
How is this staging area to be used? What size might it be if needs are ascertained? Are there any existing city owned property that might suffice?' Who's analyzed which bridges, freeways will have failure for a 6.3, 6.9 or 7.5 quake, which would make the O property a worthless staging area in a quake? Gosh, are we just going to roll over for the stupidity of SamRand?
Posted by lw | May 27, 2010 12:24 PM
Taxpayer money used by elected officials to curry favor with the Oregonian? Isn't that voter-owned elections?
Posted by Allan L. | May 27, 2010 12:41 PM
PD,
Unfortunately, these Bozos do have one clue - how to be the city that works us over. This time it is so apparent and in our face.
They have no conscience when attempting to sneak $10 million from a very basic need of the people - water.
Creating more debt when PWB is already in debt. They do not care as if on a joyride with the money, and for us higher and higher rates.
What happens when people can no longer afford the “water general fund”?
What happens when a city is on the verge of bankruptcy?
They may not want that news to get out. Better to raid our water.
Posted by clinamen | May 27, 2010 12:59 PM
Two words for what they are going to use that land for:
Re-Education Camps
You will be re-educated to enjoy the wisdom of our great leaders Sam and Randy and their handpuppets: Nick, Amanda, and Dan.
I'll see you at the barricades.
Posted by Mike D | May 27, 2010 1:22 PM
Think of how much Ignorant Sam and the City Council would have paid a crony 'consultant' for the information provided by Steve (this time) and other guests and the Proprietor of this site. But dealing with facts is foreign to them. Pathetic. Glad I already have my pitchfork.
Posted by Morbius | May 27, 2010 2:46 PM
LW,
If a municipality wants to buy some land for a specific purpose, they would normally outline the purpose, define the specific qualities they're looking for, then narrow it down to three or four parcels and determine which one offers the greatest utility at the best price.
Otherwise, it looks like the Mayor is treating the public treasury like his own piggy bank to reward supporters and (potentially) exclude enemies.
Nevermind the fact we can't take anything the Mayor says at face value.
Posted by Mister Tee | May 27, 2010 3:43 PM
If you suspend reality and say ok, we take the bait, we need emergency staging areas and we need 'em yesterday ... LW and Mister Tee are making excellent points. Where have these specifics been addressed in public documents supporting the proposed land purchase? With $10m to drop on some land there's a whole lot of unemployed and underemployed real estate folks who'd want to get in on the bidding process.
Posted by got logic? | May 27, 2010 5:21 PM
PD, are you suggesting that we build a manufacturing concern, which will pump money INTO the local economy, as opposed to retail sales which pumps money OUT of the region? Whatever are you thinking?!
Posted by Old Zeb | May 27, 2010 7:01 PM
Government in general has degenerated into buying off this group and that group with other peoples' money.
This will end only when government cannot extract enough money out of the taxpayers to feed the greedy.
Posted by Britt Storkson | May 28, 2010 6:46 AM
There's blood in them thar turnips!
Posted by NW Portlander | May 28, 2010 9:28 AM
Dignity Village II?
Posted by Abe | May 28, 2010 12:17 PM
Irony - they use the water fund to purchase land and then again to subsidize shanty's for the people who can no longer pay their water bills.
Those that still can pay will pay and pay, some swamped with debt.
Portland may however have the distinction of being noted as an eco Shantytown. Perhaps win an award at the annual AIA event.
Posted by clinamen | May 28, 2010 2:04 PM
If Randy has anything to do with this deal, then yes, they haven't the slightest clue what the value of land is. They get themselves so committed to a project or property that they leave themselves no negotiating room (same could be said for PDC).
I would hope at minimum an appraisal should be conducted. In the current climate where nobody is buying land, it would be hard to argue a single reason for paying above appraised value.
Posted by PDX Pessimist | May 28, 2010 3:55 PM
Britt Storkson - This will end only when government cannot extract enough money out of the taxpayers to feed the greedy.
What happens then?
Posted by clinamen | May 30, 2010 8:57 AM